High Cut-off Membranes in Acute Kidney Injury and Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy

The Efficacy and Safety of Continuous Veno-Venous Hemodiafiltration With High Cutoff Membrane Versus High Flux Membrane in Septic Acute Kidney Injury: A Randomized Controlled Study

BACKGROUND

The application of high cutoff (HCO) membranes for continuous renal replacement therapy remains unclear in septic acute kidney injury (S-AKI) patients.

METHODS

S-AKI patients who received continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) were randomly assigned to the experimental group (HCO membrane) and the control group (high flux membrane, HF membrane). Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) in serum and waste fluid were measured at 0, 2, 12, and 24 h after CVVHDF initiation and the 28-day mortality.

RESULTS

Eleven patients were randomized to the HCO group, and 9 patients in the HF group, with a mean age of 54.9 ± 3.2 years and 6 patients (30%) being female. After 24 h of treatment with CVVHDF, there were significant reductions in serum IL-6 and TNF-α concentrations in the HCO group (p = 0.001, 0.015) and HF group (p = 0.004, 0.031). The serum IL-6 reduction rate of the HCO group was significantly higher than that of the HF group (79.21% vs. 42.69%, p = 0.025), while serum TNF-α reduction rates were comparable between the 2 groups. There were no significant changes in serum albumin after 24 h using either HCO membrane (28.7 ± 1.7 g/L vs. 32.7 ± 1.6 g/L, p = 0.138) or HF membrane (29.6 ± 1.1 g/L vs. 32.6 ± 1.3 g/L, p = 0.055). The two groups had similar 24-h filter clotting rates and 28-day mortality.

CONCLUSION

While CVVHDF with the HCO membrane and HF membrane both achieved significant reductions in serum cytokine levels, the HCO membrane was associated with a greater reduction rate in IL-6 but not in TNF-α. No difference was observed in serum albumin, mortality, or filter clotting.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registry number: ChiCTR2000039725.

Dialysis modalities for the management of pediatric acute kidney injury

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is an increasingly frequent complication among hospitalized children. It is associated with high morbidity and mortality, especially in neonates and children requiring dialysis. The different renal replacement therapy (RRT) options for AKI have expanded from peritoneal dialysis (PD) and intermittent hemodialysis (HD) to continuous RRT (CRRT) and hybrid modalities. Recent advances in the provision of RRT in children allow a higher standard of care for increasingly ill and young patients. In the absence of evidence indicating better survival with any dialysis method, the most appropriate dialysis choice for children with AKI is based on the patient's characteristics, on dialytic modality performance, and on the institutional resources and local practice. In this review, the available dialysis modalities for pediatric AKI will be discussed, focusing on indications, advantages, and limitations of each of them.

How Does Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy Affect Septic Acute Kidney Injury?

Sepsis is the leading cause of acute kidney injury (AKI) in the intensive care unit. As the most common treatment of septic AKI, it is believed that continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) can not only maintain the water balance and excrete the metabolic products but also regulate the inflammation and promote kidney recovery. CRRT can remove the inflammatory cytokines to regulate the metabolic adaption in kidney and restore the kidney recovery to protect the kidney in septic AKI. Second, CRRT can provide extra energy supply in septic AKI to improve the kidney energy balance in septic AKI. Third, the anticoagulant used in CRRT also regulates the inflammation in septic AKI. CRRT is not only a treatment to deal with the water balance and metabolic products, but also a method to regulate the inflammation in septic AKI.