Racial disparities in immune-related adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors and association with survival based on clinical and biochemical responses

Immune checkpoint inhibitors associated thyroiditis: mechanisms and clinical outcomes

Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized cancer treatment improving prognosis in many cancers. However, ICI often trigger immune-related adverse events (irAEs) that can affect various organ systems, leading to significant clinical challenges. The most frequent irAEs are those affecting the endocrine glands, reported in approximately 10% of treated patients. Thyroid dysfunction is the most common endocrine irAEs, mainly associated with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapies. Transient asymptomatic thyrotoxicosis is the most common form of clinical presentation, often followed by hypothyroidism. Interestingly, several studies have demonstrated that irAEs correlate with the response to cancer therapy and with improved overall survival (OS). The mechanisms underlying thyroid irAEs are not fully elucidated but complex interactions between genetic predisposition to thyroid autoimmunity, distinct immune mechanisms and thyroid cell intrinsic mechanisms are thought to drive thyroiditis associated with ICI therapy. Purpose In this review we discuss the latest data on clinical features of thyroid irAEs, proposed mechanisms and their association with improved survival.

The impact of immune-related adverse events on survival outcomes in a racially diverse population, with a focus on non-Hispanic Black patients

INTRODUCTION

The development of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) has been associated with improved survival outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, this association's extent across race and ethnicity remains uncertain. We evaluated the association between the development of irAEs and treatment outcomes across racially diverse groups treated at a safety net hospital.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed to identify patients with advanced NSCLC treated between 2015 and 2020. The incidence of irAEs across racial subgroups was compared using logistic regression analysis. Cox regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association between the development of irAEs and treatment outcomes.

RESULTS

We identified 138 NSCLC patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), of whom 50% identified as non-Hispanic Black (NHB). Incidence of irAEs was 28%, with no significant difference between NHB and other racial groups. However, females [OR 2.3, 95% CI, (1.1-4.8)] and patients with Medicaid or MassHealth insurance had a higher incidence of irAEs [OR 2.7 (1.2-5.7)]. Additionally, patients with irAEs had a lower risk of disease progression (multivariable HR 0.46, 95% CI, 0.23-0.92) compared to those without irAEs. The association between irAEs and improved progression free survival (PFS) in NHB patients was similar to the other racial group [median PFS 246 vs 181 days; HR 0.87 (0.58-1.29)].

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated a similar incidence of irAEs in NHB patients with NSCLC as compared to other racial groups. Patients who developed irAEs experienced significantly improved survival outcomes. This association remained independent of race and ethnicity, underscoring the importance of providing unbiased treatment recommendations.

Comparative efficacy and safety of first‑line PD‑1/PD‑L1 inhibitors in immunotherapy for non‑small cell lung cancer: A network meta‑analysis

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common type of lung cancer. The emergence of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors offers new therapeutic options for patients with advanced NSCLC, but a comprehensive evaluation of their efficacy and safety is still lacking. In the present study randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from January 2005 to May 2023 were identified through searches of PubMed, the Cochrane Library and Embase. Analysis focused on 10 PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for stages III and IV NSCLC in studies evaluating overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), the objective response rate, the disease control rate (DCR) and the incidence of severe treatment-related and immune-related adverse events. A total of 37 RCTs involving 31,779 patients were included in the analysis. Compared with chemotherapy, tislelizumab, pembrolizumab and nivolumab all significantly improved OS, with tislelizumab showing the highest probability of being the best treatment for improving OS and DCR. While cemiplimab and tislelizumab had the highest probabilities of improved PFS, no significant differences were observed across all PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Combination therapies, such as nivolumab or cemiplimab with chemotherapy, increased OS and PFS but also increased the incidence of severe treatment-related adverse events. In particular, cemiplimab and pembrolizumab were associated with a greater risk of severe immune-related adverse events. In conclusion, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, especially tislelizumab, pembrolizumab and nivolumab, were effective first-line treatments for NSCLC, providing survival benefits. However, the combination of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with chemotherapy increased the risk of severe adverse events. Further research is needed to optimize treatment strategies.

Pharmacoequity measurement framework: A tool to reduce health disparities

Pharmacoequity is a health system and policy goal of ensuring equitable access to high-quality medications for all individuals, regardless of factors such as race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, or resource availability to reduce health disparities. Although measurement frameworks have been widely used in health equity contexts, a focused framework for pharmacoequity remains a critical gap. In this article, we introduce a novel pharmacoequity measurement framework anchored in the patient medication-use journey. The framework includes the following domains: (1) access to health care services, (2) prescription generation, (3) primary medication nonadherence, (4) secondary medication nonadherence, and (5) medication monitoring. For each domain, we provide examples of outcome measures and potential data sources that can be used for evaluation. We also outline an implementation workflow of the pharmacoequity measurement framework that population health stakeholders can use across various settings (eg, health systems, health plans). The framework provides a structured approach to identify existing gaps in the path toward achieving pharmacoequity and lay the foundation for targeted interventions. Additionally, it enables ongoing monitoring of progress toward achieving pharmacoequity while identifying interventions that are effective, scalable, and sustainable.

Pharmacoequity measurement framework: A tool to reduce health disparities

Pharmacoequity is a health system and policy goal of ensuring equitable access to high-quality medications for all individuals, regardless of factors such as race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, or resource availability to reduce health disparities. Although measurement frameworks have been widely used in health equity contexts, a focused framework for pharmacoequity remains a critical gap. In this article, we introduce a novel pharmacoequity measurement framework anchored in the patient medication-use journey. The framework includes the following domains: (1) access to health care services, (2) prescription generation, (3) primary medication nonadherence, (4) secondary medication nonadherence, and (5) medication monitoring. For each domain, we provide examples of outcome measures and potential data sources that can be used for evaluation. We also outline an implementation workflow of the pharmacoequity measurement framework that population health stakeholders can use across various settings (eg, health systems, health plans). The framework provides a structured approach to identify existing gaps in the path toward achieving pharmacoequity and lay the foundation for targeted interventions. Additionally, it enables ongoing monitoring of progress toward achieving pharmacoequity while identifying interventions that are effective, scalable, and sustainable.

Effectiveness and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in Black patients versus White patients in a US national health system: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Black patients were severely under-represented in the clinical trials that led to the approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for all cancers. The aim of this study was to characterise the effectiveness and safety of ICIs in Black patients.

METHODS

We did a retrospective cohort study of patients in the US Veterans Health Administration (VHA) system's Corporate Data Warehouse containing electronic medical records for all patients who self-identified as non-Hispanic Black or African American (referred to as Black) or non-Hispanic White (referred to as White) and received PD-1, PD-L1, CTLA-4, or LAG-3 inhibitors between Jan 1, 2010, and Dec 31, 2023. Effectiveness outcomes were overall survival, time to treatment discontinuation, and time to next treatment. The safety outcome was the frequency of immune-related adverse events; assessed among a random sample of 1000 Black patients and 1000 White patients, 892 pairs were matched on the basis of baseline characteristics using 1:1 exact matching without replacement. After manual chart review, patients who did not receive ICI therapy or who had inadequate follow-up were excluded. The adjusted effect of race on each effectiveness outcome was assessed in the whole ICI-treated cohort with propensity-weighted Cox regression with robust standard errors. Immune-related adverse events outcomes were analysed in the random matched sample with multivariable Cox regression, adjusting for baseline characteristics.

FINDINGS

We identified 26 398 patients, of whom 4943 (18·7%) patients were Black, 21 455 (81·3%) were White, 895 (3·4%) were female, 25 503 (96·6%) were male, 11 859 (45%) had non-small-cell lung cancer, and 26 045 (98·7%) received PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors. As of data cutoff (Aug 28, 2024), median follow-up was 40·3 months (95% CI 38·3-42·3) for Black patients and 43·9 months (43·0-45·1) for White patients. Compared with White patients, Black patients had longer time to treatment discontinuation (2-year unadjusted rates 10·7% [95% CI 9·8-11·7] for Black patients vs 8·6% [8·2-9·0] for White patients; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·91, 95% CI 0·87-0·95, p<0·0001), similar time to next treatment (23·5% [22·3-24·8] for Black patients vs 25·6% [25·0-26·2] for White patients; 1·00, 0·95-1·05, p=0·96), and slightly improved overall survival (36·5% [35·2-38·1] for Black patients vs 36·5% [35·8-37·1]; 0·95, 0·90-0·99, p=0·036). 1710 patients (n=862 Black and n=848 White) were analysed for safety outcomes. Compared with White patients, Black patients had a reduced risk of all-grade immune-related adverse events (unadjusted 2-year rate 33·1% [95% CI 28·9-37·1] vs 44·1% [95% CI 39·1-48·7]; adjusted HR 0·75, 95% CI 0·62-0·90, p=0·0026), immune-related adverse events requiring treatment with systemic steroids (0·61, 0·46-0·81, p=0·00051), and immune-related adverse events resulting in permanent ICI discontinuation (0·58, 0·44-0·78, p=0·00024). In exploratory analyses of irAE subtypes, a significant risk reduction in Black patients was found for colitis (0·46, 0·27-0·76, p=0·0026) and hyperthyroidism or hypothyroidism (0·63, 0·44-0·90, p=0·011), and no significant differences were found for any other immune-related adverse event subtypes analysed. Similar results were found in analyses using a steroid-based definition of immune-related adverse events among the entire ICI-treated cohort.

INTERPRETATION

Compared with White patients, Black patients had similar ICI effectiveness and lower toxicities among those treated in the national VHA system, potentially reflecting an important difference in the therapeutic ratio (ratio of benefit to harm) of ICIs. Our findings of decreased toxicity among Black patients require further investigation to assess their generalisability.

FUNDING

Million Veteran Program, Office of Research and Development, Veterans Health Administration and the LUNGevity foundation.

A DPC Database Study on the Safety of Atezolizumab/Bevacizumab/Carboplatin/Paclitaxel in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in Japanese Patients

INTRODUCTION

Atezolizumab, bevacizumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel (ABCP) combination therapy is a standard of care for advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSQ-NSCLC); however, the lack of safety data limits its clinical application in Japan.

METHODS

This study compared the safety of ABCP with that of bevacizumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel (BCP) combination for the treatment of advanced NSQ-NSCLC in Japanese patients by evaluating the clinical background and incidence of adverse events (AEs) based on data extracted from the Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) database. Incidence rates and restricted mean survival times (RMSTs) for up to 1 year were analyzed for 19 clinically important AEs. Covariates were adjusted using the inverse probability weighting method.

RESULTS

A search conducted using the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision codes identified 350,987 patients, of whom 202 were included in the ABCP cohort and 232 in the BCP cohort. Among the 19 AEs, the incidence of skin disorder and febrile neutropenia (FN) was significantly higher in the ABCP cohort versus the BCP cohort. The adjusted incidence rate ratios were 2.65 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.43-4.91] for skin disorder and 1.70 (95% CI 1.01-2.85) for FN. The adjusted RMST differences were - 64.2 days (95% CI - 93.0 to - 35.4 days) and - 46.0 days (95% CI - 73.5 to - 18.5 days) for skin disorder and FN, respectively. These results were comparable to those of other pivotal clinical trials.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this DPC database study highlight the safety of ABCP in Japanese clinical practice, and this methodology may facilitate more efficient research in real-world settings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

UMIN Clinical Trials Registry ID UMIN000041507.

The real-world insights on the use, safety, and outcome of immune-checkpoint inhibitors in underrepresented populations with lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The data on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) use in lung cancer individuals generally underrepresented in clinical trials are limited. We aimed to examine the ICI access, safety, and outcome in these populations using real-world data.

METHODS

Patients with lung cancer newly started on ICIs from 2018 to 2021 were included. Patient factors (age, sex, race, insurance, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, histories of autoimmune disease (AD), infection within 3 months before treatment, and brain metastasis) were collected and grouped. Associations of each patient factor with the time-to-treatment initiation (TTI) of ICIs and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were examined via cumulative incidence analyses and Chi-squared tests, respectively. Log-rank tests and Cox models were used to assess association of patient factors with overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Of 125 patients (median age:70 years (50-88), 68 (54.4 %) males), 9 (7.2 %) had Medicaid/uninsured, 44 (35.2 %) had ECOG ≥ 2, 101 (80.8 %) had CCI ≥ 3, 16 (12.8 %) had ADs, 14 (11.2 %) had infections, and 26 (20.8 %) had brain metastases. In newly diagnosed stage IV patients (N = 62), no difference in TTI was found by patient factors. Fifty irAEs occurred within 12 months and no differences in irAEs occurrence by patient factors. In advanced-stage group (N = 123), OS did not differ by patient factors, except for race (p = 0.045). Whites showed an inferior OS than non-Whites in multivariable regression. (Hazards ratio = 2.82 [1.01-7.87], p = 0.047).

CONCLUSIONS

Previously poorly represented subgroups were shown to have no significant delays in ICI use, general tolerance, and comparable outcomes. This adds practical evidence to ICI use in clinically and/or socio-demographically marginalized populations.

Comparative efficacy of combined CTLA-4 and PD-1 blockade vs. PD-1 monotherapy in metastatic melanoma: a real-world study

BACKGROUND

In light of the substantial toxicity associated with combined CTLA-4 and PD-1 blockade (ipilimumab and nivolumab), we assessed its efficacy and safety against anti-PD-1 monotherapy (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) in patients with metastatic melanoma under real-world conditions.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective observational study involving 962 patients with stage IV metastatic melanoma who initiated adjuvant treatment between January 2017 and December 2021 across outpatient clinics in the United States. We adjusted for variables such as age, sex, ECOG performance status, comorbidity index, social deprivation index, metastatic sites, BRAF mutation status, and year of treatment. Outcomes included overall survival (OS) and post-treatment hospitalizations, analyzed using propensity score adjustment and inverse probability of treatment weighted Kaplan-Meier estimators.

RESULTS

After adjusting for all variables, no significant difference in OS was observed between treatment protocols in the overall cohort (P = 0.417). In patients with multi-organ metastasis (involvement of more than two organ systems), combined CTLA-4 and PD-1 blockade was associated with improved OS (P = 0.033). Conversely, monotherapy yielded significantly better OS in patients with oligo-organ metastasis (involvement of two or fewer organ systems; P = 0.008). Patients with oligo-organ metastasis also experienced higher hospitalization rates due to immune-related adverse events when treated with combination therapy (31.2% vs. 8.5%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our real-world data indicate that combined CTLA-4 and PD-1 blockade is most beneficial for patients with multi-organ metastasis, while those with oligo-organ metastasis fare better with PD-1 monotherapy. The underlying reasons for these observations-whether they are due to differences in the characteristics of multi- and oligo-metastatic melanomas or the risk-benefit profile of the therapies-remain to be elucidated. These findings underscore the need for a nuanced approach to treatment regimens for stage IV melanoma patients.

Unequal racial distribution of immunotherapy for late-stage non-small cell lung cancer

Immunotherapy has increased survival for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), especially for those diagnosed with late-stage disease. However, it is not known if its use is equally distributed across races. We assessed immunotherapy use in 21 098 pathologically confirmed stage IV NSCLC patients according to race in the Surveillance Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare linked dataset. Multivariable models were conducted to evaluate the independent association of receipt of immunotherapy with race and overall survival according to race. Black patients had statistically significantly lower odds of receiving immunotherapy (adjusted odds ratio = 0.60, 95% confidence interval = 0.44 to 0.80); receipt of immunotherapy was lower in Asian and Hispanic patients but not statistically significant. When immunotherapy was received, survival was similar across races. Immunotherapy for NSCLC is not used equally among races, underscoring the racial disparities that exist in access to the newest cancer treatment. Efforts should be directed toward expanding access to novel, efficacious treatments for advanced stage lung cancer.

Characterization and Prognostic Significance of Cutaneous Immune-Related Adverse Events in Indian Patients on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy

INTRODUCTION

Cutaneous immune-related adverse-events (cIRAEs), commonly seen in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are reported to be associated with better patient survival; however, they have seldom been studied in Indian population. Recent reports suggest racial differences in IRAEs and also in survival outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

To study the various cIRAEs in Indian patients on ICI therapy and to analyze the association between cIRAEs and patient survival outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 86 cancer patients receiving immunotherapies in a tertiary care hospital in India and studied incidence, nature and grades of cutaneous immune-related adverse events and the association of cIRAEs with the patient survival outcomes.

RESULTS

Eighty-six patients were included, of whom 16 patients (18.6%) developed cIRAEs, with pruritus (12.8%) and maculopapular eruption (8.1%) being the most common. Kaplan-Meier plot with log-rank test showed that patients developing any type of cIRAE had longer progression-free survival than those without (P = 0.023) and a better objective-response-rate (50% versus 18.5%, P = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

Most common cIRAEs in our study were pruritus and maculopapular rash. The incidence of cIRAEs was lower in our Indian cohort compared to that reported in Caucasian cohorts. Development of cutaneous immune-related adverse event in cancer patients on ICI was associated with a longer progression-free-survival and a better objective-response-rate. Thus, cIRAEs may serve as a surrogate marker for better patient outcomes.

Association between immune checkpoint inhibitors and myocardial infarction in Asians: A population-based self-controlled case series

BACKGROUND

While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are associated with elevated cardiovascular risks, evidence of any association between ICIs and myocardial infarction (MI) was scarce, especially in Asians.

METHODS

Using prospectively collected population-based data, this self-controlled case series included patients prescribed an ICI between 1/1/2014 and 31/12/2020 in Hong Kong who had MI within January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2021. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for MI during and after ICI exposure were estimated, compared to the year before ICI initiation.

RESULTS

Of 3684 identified ICI users, 24 had MI during the study period. MI incidence increased significantly in the first 90 days of exposure (IRR 3.59 [95% confidence interval: 1.31-9.83], p = 0.013), but not days 91-180 (p = 0.148) or ≥181 (p = 0.591) of exposure, nor postexposure (p = 0.923). Sensitivity analyses excluding patients with MI-related death and incorporating extended exposure periods produced consistent results separately.

CONCLUSIONS

ICIs were associated with increased MI incidence in Asian Chinese patients during the first 90 days of use, but not later.

Cardiovascular Outcomes and Hospitalizations in Asian Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Population-based Study

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have known associations with cardiotoxicity. However, a representative quantification of the adverse cardiovascular events and cardiovascular attendances amongst Asian users of ICI has been lacking. This retrospective cohort study identified all ICI users in Hong Kong, China, between 2013 and 2021. All patients were followed up until the end of 2021 for the primary outcome of major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE; a composite of cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, heart failure, and stroke). Patients with prior diagnosis of any component of MACE were excluded from all MACE analyses. In total, 4324 patients were analyzed (2905 (67.2%) males; median age 63.5 years old (interquartile range 55.4-70.7 years old); median follow-up 1.0 year (interquartile range 0.4-2.3 years)), of whom 153 were excluded from MACE analyses due to prior events. MACE occurred in 116 (2.8%) with an incidence rate (IR) of 1.7 [95% confidence interval: 1.4, 2.0] events per 100 patient-years; IR was higher within the first year of follow-up (2.9 [2.3, 3.5] events per 100 patient-years). Cardiovascular hospitalization(s) occurred in 188 (4.4%) with 254 episodes (0.5% of all episodes) and 1555 days of hospitalization (1.3% of all hospitalized days), for whom the IR of cardiovascular hospitalization was 5.6 [4.6, 6.9] episodes per 100 person-years with 52.9 [39.8, 70.3] days' stay per 100 person-years. Amongst Asian users of ICI, MACE was uncommon, and a small proportion of hospitalizations were cardiovascular in nature. Most MACE and cardiovascular hospitalizations occurred during the first year after initiating ICI.

Flausino L, Iyer G, Balkrishnan R. Effectiveness of immunological agents in non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) continues to claim millions of lives worldwide. Although its poor prognosis is largely attributed to the lack of adequate and precise detection technologies, cancer cells' suppression of the immune system adds on to the difficulty of identifying abnormal NSCLC tumors in their early stages. Therefore, cancer immunotherapy, which activates the immune system and helps it fight tumors, has recently become the most sought-after technique, especially in the advanced stages of NSCLC, where surgery or chemotherapy may or may not bring about the desired survival benefits in patients.

METHODS

This review focuses on the various immunotherapeutic interventions and their efficacy in advanced NSCLC clinical trials. Monoclonal antibodies like anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents and anti-CTLA-4 antibodies, cancer vaccines, oncolytic viruses and adoptive T cell therapy have been discussed in brief. Furthermore, the effects of gender, age, and race on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and suggest plausible future approaches in the realm of immuno-oncology.

RESULTS

Immunotherapy is used alone or in combination either with other immunological agents or with chemotherapy. However, the efficacy of these strategies depends extensively on various demographic variables, as some patients respond perfectly well to immunotherapy, while others do not benefit at all or experience disease progression. By targeting a "hallmark" of cancer (immune evasion), immunotherapy has transformed NSCLC management, though several barriers prevent its complete effectiveness.

CONCLUSIONS

All these immunological strategies should be interpreted in the current setting of synergistic treatment, in which these agents can be combined with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and, or surgery following patient and tumor characteristics to proportionate the best-individualized treatment and achieve superior results. To better pursue this goal, further investigations on cost-effectiveness and sex-gender, race, and age differences in immunotherapy are needed.

Novel Imaging Biomarkers to Assess Oncologic Treatment-Related Changes

Cancer therapeutics cause various treatment-related changes that may impact patient follow-up and disease monitoring. Although atypical responses such as pseudoprogression may be misinterpreted as treatment nonresponse, other changes, such as hyperprogressive disease seen with immunotherapy, must be recognized early for timely management. Radiation necrosis in the brain is a known response to radiotherapy and must be distinguished from local tumor recurrence. Radiotherapy can also cause adverse effects such as pneumonitis and local tissue toxicity. Systemic therapies, like chemotherapy and targeted therapies, are known to cause long-term cardiovascular effects. Thus, there is a need for robust biomarkers to identify, distinguish, and predict cancer treatment-related changes. Radiomics, which refers to the high-throughput extraction of subvisual features from radiologic images, has been widely explored for disease classification, risk stratification, and treatment-response prediction. Lately, there has been much interest in investigating the role of radiomics to assess oncologic treatment-related changes. We review the utility and various applications of radiomics in identifying and distinguishing atypical responses to treatments, as well as in predicting adverse effects. Although artificial intelligence tools show promise, several challenges-including multi-institutional clinical validation, deployment in health care settings, and artificial-intelligence bias-must be addressed for seamless clinical translation of these tools.

Association between pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and immune-related adverse events due to immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment of advanced or recurrent non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). They cause immune‐related adverse events (irAEs), but the underlying mechanisms and predictors remain to be fully elucidated. In this retrospective study, we investigated the association between pretreatment neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the occurrence of irAEs.

Methods

The study involved 115 patients with NSCLC who started ICI‐only treatment in our hospital between January 2016 and April 2020.

Results

Forty‐five patients (39.1%) had irAEs, and pretreatment NLR was significantly lower in the irAEs group than in the non‐irAEs group (2.8 vs. 4.1; p = 0.036). The cutoff value of the NLR was 2.86 (area under curve, 0.62; sensitivity, 0.56; specificity, 0.71), and the incidence rate of irAEs was significantly higher in the NLR < 2.86 group than in the NLR ≥2.86 group (p = 0.004; odds ratio [OR]: 3.12; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.43–6.84). The multivariate analysis showed that the NLR was significantly associated with the occurrence of irAEs (p = 0.016; OR: 2.69; 95% CI: 1.21–6.01).

Conclusions

Low pretreatment NLR may be a predictive factor for the occurrence of irAEs. By focusing on the potential risk of irAEs in patients with a low pretreatment NLR, irAEs can be appropriately managed from an early period.

Metabolic disease and adverse events from immune checkpoint inhibitors

OBJECTIVE

Obese and overweight body mass index (BMI) categories have been associated with increased immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in patients with cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs); however, the impact of being overweight in conjunction with related metabolic syndrome-associated factors on irAEs have not been investigated. We aimed to evaluate the impact of overweight and obese BMI according to metabolic disease burden on the development of irAEs.

DESIGN AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective observational study of patients receiving ICIs at a cancer center. Our main study outcome was development of ≥grade 2 (moderate) irAEs. Our main predictor was weight/metabolic disease risk category: (1) normal weight (BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m²)/low metabolic risk (<2 metabolic diseases [diabetes, dyslipidemia, hypertension]), (2) normal weight/high metabolic risk (≥2 metabolic diseases), (3) overweight (BMI ≥25 kg/m²)/low metabolic risk, and (4) overweight/high metabolic risk.

RESULTS

Of 411 patients in our cohort, 374 were eligible for analysis. Overall, 111 (30%) patients developed ≥grade 2 irAEs. In Cox analysis, overweight/low metabolic risk was significantly associated with ≥grade 2 irAEs (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.0, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.2-3.4) when compared to normal weight/low metabolic risk, while overweight/high metabolic risk (HR: 1.3, 95% CI: 0.7-2.2) and normal weight/high metabolic risk (HR: 1.5, 95% CI: 0.7-3.0) were not.

CONCLUSIONS

Overweight patients with fewer metabolic comorbidities were at increased risk for irAEs. This study provides an important insight that BMI should be evaluated in the context of associated metabolic comorbidities in assessing risk of irAE development and ICI immune response.

Immune-Based Cancer Treatment: Addressing Disparities in Access and Outcomes

Avoidable differences in the care and outcomes of patients with cancer (i.e., cancer care disparities) emerge or worsen with discoveries of new, more effective approaches to cancer diagnosis and treatment. The rapidly expanding use of immunotherapy for many different cancers across the spectrum from late to early stages has, predictably, been followed by emerging evidence of disparities in access to these highly effective but expensive treatments. The danger that these new treatments will further widen preexisting cancer care and outcome disparities requires urgent corrective intervention. Using a multilevel etiologic framework that categorizes the targets of intervention at the individual, provider, health care system, and social policy levels, we discuss options for a comprehensive approach to prevent and, where necessary, eliminate disparities in access to the clinical trials that are defining the optimal use of immunotherapy for cancer, as well as its safe use in routine care among appropriately diverse populations. We make the case that, contrary to the traditional focus on the individual level in descriptive reports of health care disparities, there is sequentially greater leverage at the provider, health care system, and social policy levels to overcome the challenge of cancer care and outcomes disparities, including access to immunotherapy. We also cite examples of effective government-sponsored and policy-level interventions, such as the National Cancer Institute Minority-Underserved Community Oncology Research Program and the Affordable Care Act, that have expanded clinical trial access and access to high-quality cancer care in general.