Hepatocellular carcinoma with biliary and neuroendocrine differentiation: A case report

Combined Neuroendocrine Carcinoma and Hepatocellular Carcinoma of the Liver: Systematic Literature Review Suggests Implementing Biological Characterization to Optimize Therapeutic Strategy

BACKGROUND

Mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine tumors (MINEN) of the liver are exceptionally rare, with limited data available regarding their clinical behavior, pathogenesis, and optimal management. The coexistence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) within the liver presents diagnostic and therapeutic challenges.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted on PubMed, identifying cases of primary mixed HCC and NEC in the liver. The search adhered to PRISMA guidelines, and relevant studies were critically analyzed. A total of 45 documented cases were reviewed, focusing on patient demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment strategies, and outcomes.

RESULTS

Most patients (90%) were male, with a median age of 66.5 years. Hepatitis B or C infection was present in 74% of cases, and liver cirrhosis was reported in 38%. The combined type was the most frequently observed histological pattern (65%). Treatment modalities varied, including transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), surgery, and systemic therapies. The median overall survival was 10 months, highlighting the aggressive nature of these tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the rarity and poor prognosis of hepatic MINEN tumors, multidisciplinary management is essential. Advanced molecular profiling may offer insights into tumor biology and potential therapeutic targets. Future research should explore novel systemic therapies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, to improve patient outcomes.

Mixed hepatocellular carcinoma and high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasm with ambiguous histopathological features: a case report

Well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor (NET) and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) are distinct entities with different biological behavior. However, difficult cases showing equivocal morphology have been reported in some organs. Herein, we report a case of primary hepatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN) with ambiguous histopathological features admixed with conventional hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A 70-year-old man with untreated chronic hepatitis B underwent left medial sectionectomy because of two incidental liver masses. On pathological examination, one of the resected tumors had intermingling NEN and HCC components. The NEN component consisted of relatively uniform tumor cells proliferating in trabecular, cord-like, or solid patterns with peripheral nuclear palisading. The tumor cells were immunopositive for synaptophysin, chromogranin A, cluster of differentiation 56 (CD56), and focally hepatocyte paraffin 1. p53 showed wild-type expression. The Ki-67 labeling index was 27% at the hot spot. Eleven months after the surgery, he died of a cerebral hemorrhage without evidence of recurrent liver cancer. The intermediate degree of differentiation and the modest proliferative activity can challenge the distinction between NEC and NET G3. While the coexisting HCC indicates NEC rather than NET in a pathogenetic viewpoint, such ambiguous tumor may not be as aggressive as typical NECs.

Pediatric combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CC) with neuroendocrine features: distinguishing genetic alterations detected by chromosomal microarray

BACKGROUND

Liver tumors exhibiting hepatocellular, cholangiocarcinoma, and neuroendocrine features are extremely rare, with only five cases reported in the literature.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present an unusual case of a combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CC) with neuroendocrine features in a pediatric patient. A 16-year-old presented with abdominal pain and a 21.0 cm mass in the right hepatic lobe with extension into the left lobe. Histology showed a poorly differentiated tumor with a solid, tubuloglandular, and microcystic architecture. Immunohistochemistry results were negative for hepatic markers, positive for markers of biliary differentiation, and positive for neuroendocrine differentiation. The neoplasm was reviewed at several institutions with differing diagnoses. Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) chromosomal microarray (CMA) showed large deletions within chromosomes 6q and 13q in both the hepatocellular-like areas and the cholangiocarcinoma-like areas, with additional large deletions in the cholangiocarcinoma-like areas, supporting origin from hepatocellular carcinoma. The final diagnosis was a cHCC-CC with neuroendocrine features.

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnosis of cHCC-CCs relies predominately on histomorphology, as per the 2018 International Consensus Group on the nomenclature of cHCC-CC. These findings in this case support that the pathological classification of these lesions be based on molecular data, which could better direct treatment. Further classification of cHCC-CCs and determination of their clinicopathological relevance will require more interobserver consistency and continued molecular profiling of these lesions.

Three-in-one incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocellular carcinoma, and neuroendocrine carcinoma: A case report

BACKGROUND

Primary hepatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) is rare, and a combination with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is extremely rare. To date, only four combination cases have been reported. The present paper describes the fifth patient.

CASE SUMMARY

A 32-year-old Chinese man with chronic hepatitis B was hospitalized for persistent upper abdominal pain. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) examination revealed a liver mass. The tumor was located in the 7th and 8th segments of the liver, and CT and magnetic resonance imaging findings were consistent with the diagnosis of HCC. Laboratory examinations revealed the following: Alanine aminotransferase, 243 U/L; aspartate aminotransferase, 167 U/L; alpha-fetoprotein, 4519 μg/L. Laparoscopic right lobe hepatectomy was performed on the liver mass. Postoperative pathology showed low differentiation HCC plus medium and low differentiation CCA combined with NEC. One month after the surgery, the patient suffered from epigastric pain again. Liver metastasis was detected by CT, and tumor transcatheter arterial chemoembolization was performed. Unfortunately, the liver tumor was progressively increased and enlarged, and after 1 mo, the patient died of liver failure.

CONCLUSION

This is a rare case, wherein the tumor is highly aggressive, grows rapidly, and metastasizes in a short period. Imaging and laboratory tests can easily misdiagnose or miss such cases; thus, the final diagnosis relies on pathology.