1
|
Lee GH, Seol YM, Choi YJ, Kim H. Prognostic factors of brain metastasis and subsequent survival in breast cancer patients: An 11-year, single-center, retrospective study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2025; 104:e41827. [PMID: 40101072 PMCID: PMC11922408 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000041827] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2024] [Accepted: 02/21/2025] [Indexed: 03/20/2025] Open
Abstract
Female breast cancer is among the most prevalent cancers globally, often metastasizing to the brain. Despite advancements in treatment, brain metastasis incidence is rising, with a poor prognosis. Moreover, limited data exist on how breast cancer subtypes and patient characteristics impact survival. This study aimed to investigate prognostic factors affecting breast cancer patients with brain metastasis. We retrospectively reviewed 131 breast cancer patients with brain metastasis diagnosed at a single institution between 2010 and 2020. Demographic, clinical, pathological, and radiographic variables were analyzed. The median interval between breast cancer diagnosis and brain metastasis was 27 months. Patients diagnosed with a higher stage of breast cancer (median survival: stage 1: 97.2 months, stage 2: 44.4 months, stage 3: 38.1 months, stage 4: 13.0 months, P < .001) and those with ER-negative tumors (median survival: negative 25.3 months, positive 37.5 months, P = .034) had a shorter time between initial diagnosis and brain metastasis. Median survival after brain metastasis was 8.0 months. Multivariate analysis showed that triple-negative breast cancer was correlated to a high risk of death after brain metastasis (hazard ratio = 2.320, P < .001). Higher histological grade, low-performance status, extensive brain metastases, and leptomeningeal seeding was associated with shorter survival. Systemic chemotherapy after brain metastasis was the only treatment that improved survival (hazard ratio = 0.332, P < .001). The study suggests potential benefits of aggressive treatment, especially in nontriple-negative breast cancer subtypes, limited brain metastases, and good overall health. Further research with larger patient populations is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gha-Hyun Lee
- Department of Neurology, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine and Medical Research Institute, Pusan, Republic of Korea
| | - Young Mi Seol
- Division of Hemato-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine and Medical Research Institute, Pusan, Republic of Korea
| | - Young Jin Choi
- Division of Hemato-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine and Medical Research Institute, Pusan, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyojeong Kim
- Division of Hemato-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maryknoll Hospital, Pusan, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zoghbi M, Moussa MJ, Dagher J, Haroun E, Qdaisat A, Singer ED, Karam YE, Yeung SCJ, Chaftari P. Brain Metastasis in the Emergency Department: Epidemiology, Presentation, Investigations, and Management. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2583. [PMID: 39061222 PMCID: PMC11274762 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16142583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2024] [Revised: 07/14/2024] [Accepted: 07/17/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Brain metastases (BMs) are the most prevalent type of cerebral tumor, significantly affecting survival. In adults, lung cancer, breast cancer, and melanoma are the primary cancers associated with BMs. Symptoms often result from brain compression, and patients may present to the emergency department (ED) with life-threatening conditions. The goal of treatment of BMs is to maximize survival and quality of life by choosing the least toxic therapy. Surgical resection followed by cavity radiation or definitive stereotactic radiosurgery remains the standard approach, depending on the patient's condition. Conversely, whole brain radiation therapy is becoming more limited to cases with multiple inoperable BMs and is less frequently used for postoperative control. BMs often signal advanced systemic disease, and patients usually present to the ED with poorly controlled symptoms, justifying hospitalization. Over half of patients with BMs in the ED are admitted, making effective ED-based management a challenge. This article reviews the epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and current treatment options of patients with BMs. Additionally, it provides an overview of ED management and highlights the challenges faced in this setting. An improved understanding of the reasons for potentially avoidable hospitalizations in cancer patients with BMs is needed and could help emergency physicians distinguish patients who can be safely discharged from those who require observation or hospitalization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marianne Zoghbi
- Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
| | - Mohammad Jad Moussa
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jim Dagher
- Faculty of Medicine, Saint Joseph University of Beirut, Beirut 1100, Lebanon
| | - Elio Haroun
- Faculty of Medicine, Saint Joseph University of Beirut, Beirut 1100, Lebanon
| | - Aiham Qdaisat
- Department of Emergency Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Emad D. Singer
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Yara E. Karam
- Department of Behavioral Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Sai-Ching J. Yeung
- Department of Emergency Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Patrick Chaftari
- Department of Emergency Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Karthik J, Sehrawat A, Kapoor M, Sundriyal D. Navigating breast cancer brain metastasis: Risk factors, prognostic indicators, and treatment perspectives. World J Clin Oncol 2024; 15:594-598. [PMID: 38835846 PMCID: PMC11145961 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v15.i5.594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2024] [Revised: 01/24/2024] [Accepted: 04/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/21/2024] Open
Abstract
In this editorial, we comment on the article by Chen et al. We specifically focus on the risk factors, prognostic factors, and management of brain metastasis (BM) in breast cancer (BC). BC is the second most common cancer to have BM after lung cancer. Independent risk factors for BM in BC are: HER-2 positive BC, triple-negative BC, and germline BRCA mutation. Other factors associated with BM are lung metastasis, age less than 40 years, and African and American ancestry. Even though risk factors associated with BM in BC are elucidated, there is a lack of data on predictive models for BM in BC. Few studies have been made to formulate predictive models or nomograms to address this issue, where age, grade of tumor, HER-2 receptor status, and number of metastatic sites (1 vs > 1) were predictive of BM in metastatic BC. However, none have been used in clinical practice. National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends screening of BM in advanced BC only when the patient is symptomatic or suspicious of central nervous system symptoms; routine screening for BM in BC is not recommended in the guidelines. BM decreases the quality of life and will have a significant psychological impact. Further studies are required for designing validated nomograms or predictive models for BM in BC; these models can be used in the future to develop treatment approaches to prevent BM, which improves the quality of life and overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jayalingappa Karthik
- Department of Medical Oncology Haematology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Rishikesh, Rishikesh 249203, Uttarakhand, India
| | - Amit Sehrawat
- Department of Medical Oncology Haematology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Rishikesh, Rishikesh 249203, Uttarakhand, India
| | - Mayank Kapoor
- Department of Medical Oncology Haematology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Rishikesh, Rishikesh 249203, Uttarakhand, India
| | - Deepak Sundriyal
- Department of Medical Oncology Haematology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Rishikesh, Rishikesh 249203, Uttarakhand, India
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gonsalves D, Ciérvide R, Couñago F. Bridging the gap: Predicting brain metastasis in breast cancer. World J Clin Oncol 2024; 15:356-359. [PMID: 38455134 PMCID: PMC10915941 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v15.i2.356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Revised: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Chen et al explored clinicopathological features and prognostic factors, revealing advanced tumor stage, lung metastases, HER-2 overexpression, and triple-negative status as key contributors. Recent research connects astrocytes' role in brain metastasis with signaling pathways and the impact of Trastuzumab on HER-2 tumor survival. Factors such as positive HER2 status, lack of estrogen receptor expression, and liver metastasis are identified as additional risk factors. The routine use of magnetic resonance imaging, insights into gene mutations associated with metastasis, and the role of radiotherapy, including prophylaxis possibilities, is controversial in clinical practice. Understanding these risk factors in a multidisciplinary collaboration is precise for local treatments and targeted therapies, particularly for HER2+ tumors, impacting directly on longer survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela Gonsalves
- Department of Radiation Oncology, GenesisCare Madrid, Madrid 28043, Spain
- Facultad de Medicina Salud y Deporte, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid 28670, Spain
| | - Raquel Ciérvide
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HM Hospitales, Madrid 28050, Spain
| | - Felipe Couñago
- Department of Radiation Oncology, GenesisCare Madrid, Madrid 28043, Spain
- Facultad de Medicina Salud y Deporte, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid 28670, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yakar M, Etiz D. Prognostic factors of breast cancer brain metastasis. World J Clin Oncol 2024; 15:5-8. [PMID: 38292663 PMCID: PMC10823945 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v15.i1.5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Revised: 12/03/2023] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
In this editorial we comment on the article by Chen et al published in the recent issue of the World Journal of Clinical Oncology. Brain metastasis is one of the most serious complications of breast cancer and causes high morbidity and mortality. Brain metastases may involve the brain parenchyma and/or leptomeninges. Symptomatic brain metastases develop in 10%-16% of newly recognized cases each year, and this rate increases to 30% in autopsy series. Depending on the size of the metastatic foci, it may be accompanied by extensive vasogenic edema or may occur as small tumor foci. Since brain metastases are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, early diagnosis can have significant effects on survival and quality of life. The risk of developing brain metastases emerges progressively due to various patient and tumor characteristics. Patient variability may be particularly important in the susceptibility and distribution of brain metastases because malignant blood must cross the brain barrier and move within the brain parenchyma. Some characteristics of the tumor, such as gene expression, may increase the risk of brain metastasis. Clinical growth, tumor stage, tumor grade, growth receptor positivity, HER2 positivity, molecular subtype (such as triple negative status, luminal/nonluminal feature) increase the risk of developing breast cancer metastasis. Factors related to survival due to breast cancer brain metastasis include both tumor/patient characteristics and treatment characteristics, such as patient age, lung metastasis, surgery for brain metastasis, and HER2 positivity. If cases with a high risk of developing brain metastasis can be identified with the help of clinical procedures and artificial intelligence, survival and quality of life can be increased with early diagnosis and treatment. At the same time, it is important to predict the formation of this group in order to develop new treatment methods in cases with low survival expectancy with brain metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melek Yakar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osmangazi University, Eskişehir 26040, Turkey
| | - Durmuş Etiz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eskisehir Osmangazi University Faculty of Medicine, Eskişehir 26040, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|