Cost benefit analysis of the use of tranexamic acid in primary lower limb arthroplasty: A retrospective cohort study

Determining the Effect of Intraoperative TXA on Postoperative Blood Loss in ACDF

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study using prospectively collected data.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effectiveness of intraoperative tranexamic acid (TXA) in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) on postoperative blood loss.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

TXA has been proven to be a safe and effective agent in reducing blood loss after cervical surgery; however, its efficacy when used intraoperatively for ACDF surgeries had yet to be researched. Currently, there are few studies examining the effects of intraoperative TXA in cervical spinal fusion, and none specifically examining TXA use in ACDF.

METHODS

A tertiary medical center's prospectively collected spine registry was queried between 1/1/18 and 12/1/21 for all patients who underwent elective ACDF surgery and received a drain postoperatively. Patients were separated into 2 groups; those who had received intraoperative TXA and those who did not. Baseline demographic and operative variables were collected from the registry. The primary outcome was postoperative blood loss over a 24-hour period. Secondary outcomes included total drain output, intraoperative estimated blood loss, operative duration, drain duration, changes in preoperative to postoperative hemoglobin and hematocrit levels, and rate of transfusions, complications, revisions, and reoperations. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Two hundred eighty-six patients were included. One hundred ninety patients underwent ACDF and did not receive intraoperative TXA, whereas 96 patients underwent ACDF and did receive TXA. There were no differences in any demographic or baseline variables. Multivariate analysis showed intraoperative TXA was associated with shorter drain duration (β=-5.74, 95% CI: -10.9 to -0.53, P =0.031) and reduction in 24-hour drain output (β=-12.2, 95% CI: -19.4 to -4.89, P =0.001) and total drain output (β=-14.0, 95% CI: -22.9 to -5.05, P =0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

TXA use during ACDF procedures leads to a decrease in perioperative blood loss and faster drain removal. TXA is an effective and safe agent for reducing perioperative blood loss in ACDF surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Intravenous tranexamic acid and thromboembolic events in hip fracture surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Osteoporotic hip fractures are a major health problem in developed countries. Surgical management is the mainstay of treatment for these injuries, and historically presents an increased risk of thromboembolism, blood loss and blood transfusion. Despite the demonstrated safety of tranexamic acid (TXA) in elective hip arthroplasty, there is uncertainty regarding the risk of thromboembolism with the administration of TXA during hip fracture surgery. This study aims to address the following questions regarding patients undergoing traumatic hip fracture surgery: 1. Does intravenous TXA increase the risk of thromboembolic events? 2. Does intravenous TXA reduce peri-operative blood loss? 3. Does intravenous TXA increase the risk of non-thromboembolic complications or post-operative mortality?

METHODS

A literature search of Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials and CINAHL was conducted, assessing results from database inception until the 11th May, 2021. We included randomised controlled trials that investigated perioperative administration of intravenous TXA in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery, compared to a control cohort. We excluded articles published in a language other than English, evaluated elective hip arthroplasty, or did not report thromboembolic events. Included trials were analysed using RevMan v5.3.

RESULTS

Sixteen articles encompassing 1491 patients met inclusion criteria. The risk difference of thromboembolic events in the TXA group was 0.02 (95%C.I. -0.01-0.04; p=0.17). TXA reduced post-operative transfusion rates by 42% (range: 28-54%, p<0.0001). The mean haemoglobin was higher in the TXA group on post-operative day one (0.77g/dL, p<0.0001), day two (0.56g/dL, p<0.0001) and day three (0.42g/dL, p<0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference in non-thromboembolic complications or post-operative mortality across the two cohorts.

DISCUSSION

There is no conclusive evidence from the current published literature that peri-operative intravenous TXA administration increases the risk of thromboembolic events after hip fracture surgery. This meta-analysis reinforces that TXA is effective in reducing post-operative transfusions and haemoglobin decline after hip fracture surgery. This study found that TXA did not increase non-thromboembolic complications or post-operative mortality. Further large-scale studies evaluating thromboembolic complications as a primary outcome are required to definitively establish the safety of TXA in hip fracture surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I; meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Tranexamic Acid in Foot and Ankle Surgery: A Topical Review and Value Analysis

Tranexamic acid (TXA) has become a commonly used perioperative intervention in total joint arthroplasty, shoulder and knee arthroscopy, and spinal procedures in order to minimize blood loss, hematoma formation, hemarthrosis, and wound healing complications. There is a potential role for TXA use in foot and ankle procedures, with limited studies suggesting a potential benefit in minimizing postoperative wound complications and blood loss without an increased risk of thromboembolic events. In light of the profound clinical and financial impact of TXA use in other orthopaedic subspecialties and the early successes in foot and ankle surgery, we aim to provide more information about TXA and its use in foot and ankle surgery. Therefore, the purpose of this review is to perform a comprehensive literature review on the topic of TXA use in foot and ankle procedures in order to describe the pertinent available literature on the use of TXA in orthopaedic surgery and its implications specifically in foot and ankle surgery. It is our aim to identify potential benefits and shortcomings in the available evidence on TXA use for foot and ankle surgery in hopes to (1) best inform foot and ankle surgeons where beneficial and safe and (2) inspire further research on this topic as it relates to clinical management for foot and ankle patients.Levels of Evidence: Level IV.

Using tranexamic acid for an additional 24 hours postoperatively in hip and knee arthroplasty saves money: a cost analysis from the TRAC-24 randomized control trial

Aims

Tranexamic acid (TXA) is now commonly used in major surgical operations including orthopaedics. The TRAC-24 randomized control trial (RCT) aimed to assess if an additional 24 hours of TXA postoperatively in primary total hip (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) reduced blood loss. Contrary to other orthopaedic studies to date, this trial included high-risk patients. This paper presents the results of a cost analysis undertaken alongside this RCT.

Methods

TRAC-24 was a prospective RCT on patients undergoing TKA and THA. Three groups were included: Group 1 received 1 g intravenous (IV) TXA perioperatively and an additional 24-hour postoperative oral regime, Group 2 received only the perioperative dose, and Group 3 did not receive TXA. Cost analysis was performed out to day 90.

Results

Group 1 was associated with the lowest mean total costs, followed by Group 2 and then Group 3. The differences between Groups 1 and 3 (-£797.77 (95% confidence interval -1,478.22 to -117.32) were statistically significant. Extended oral dosing reduced costs for patients undergoing THA but not TKA. The reduced costs in Groups 1 and 2 resulted from reduced length of stay, readmission rates, emergency department attendances, and blood transfusions.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated significant cost savings when using TXA in primary THA or TKA. Extended oral dosing reduced costs further in THA but not TKA.

Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(7):536–542.

Cost-Benefit Analysis of Using A Single Dose of Tranexamic Acid in Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis Patients Undergoing Long-Segment Spinal Fusion Surgery: A Retrospective Study

Background

Degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) patients undergoing posterior long-segment spinal fusion surgery often require perioperative blood transfusions, and previous studies have reported that increased complications and additional costs accompany these transfusions. One method for decreasing transfusions is the administration of tranexamic acid (TXA). We sought to evaluate the costs and benefits of preoperative administration of 1 g of intravenous TXA, without maintenance, in DLS patients undergoing long-segment spinal fusion surgery.

Material/Methods

Patients who received TXA (TXA group) were compared with patients who did not receive TXA (NTXA group) with regard to blood loss, units of packed red blood cells (PRBC) transfused, hemostasis costs, and perioperative complications. The benefits and costs were estimated through analysis of the spending on NTXA and TXA patients, and were compared. The difference between the cost per patient in the 2 groups was designated as the net cost-benefit. Then, both groups were substratified into non-osteotomy and osteotomy subgroups for further analysis.

Results

Of the 173 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 54 TXA patients had significantly reduced perioperative blood loss and total hemostasis costs compared with NTXA patients (n=119). In the group without osteotomy (n=72), TXA (n=13) reduced perioperative blood loss but did not significantly decrease PRBC units and hemostasis costs. However, in patients undergoing osteotomy (n=101), a remarkable net cost savings of ¥648.77 per patient was shown in the TXA group (n=41) (P<0.001). This was because patients undergoing osteotomy in the TXA group received fewer PRBC units (3.7 vs 5.7, P=0.001).

Conclusions

A single dose of TXA significantly decreased perioperative blood loss and total hemostasis costs for DLS patients undergoing osteotomy. Furthermore, TXA led to no additional net costs in patients without osteotomy.

Effectiveness of different doses and routes of administration of tranexamic acid for total hip replacement

PURPOSE

The aim of the study is to show the therapeutic efficacy, safety, and cost-benefit of using tranexamic acid (TXA), as well as the superiority of the route of administration and amount of dose in primary cementless total hip replacement (THR).

METHODS

In this prospective, randomized, double-blind study, we divided 200 patients into five groups of 40 patients each. The placebo group did not receive TXA. Three groups received 2 g TXA each (intravenous, topical, and combined intravenous + topical), while the fifth, combined + group, received 4 g TXA. Total blood loss was calculated, number of transfusions and thromboembolic vascular incidents were monitored, and a cost-benefit analysis of the use of TXA was performed.

RESULTS

Regardless of the route of administration, TXA statistically significantly reduced total blood loss (p = 0.000) and the need for transfusion (p = 0.000) compared with placebo. Total blood loss and the need for allogenic blood transfusion were statistically significantly reduced in the combined + group compared with placebo, and also compared with all other groups. Post-operative thromboembolic vascular incidents were not reported. The cost-benefit of using TXA in THR is associated with reduction of transfusion costs.

CONCLUSIONS

None of the TXA administration routes are superior to others, but multiple doses could statistically significantly reduce blood loss and transfusion requirements, which should be the subject of future researches.

Clinical and instrumental evaluation of two different regimens of tranexamic acid in total hip arthroplasty: a single-centre, prospective, randomized study with 80 patients

PURPOSE

The use of tranexamic acid (TXA) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) can significantly reduce blood losses with many clinical and economical advantages. However, no consensus has been reached regarding the optimal regimen for TXA administration. The aim of this study is to analyse and compare the haemostatic effect of two different intravenous (IV) regimens of TXA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We planned a single-centre, prospective, randomized study including 80 patients who underwent primary unilateral minimally invasive THA because of a hip osteoarthritic degeneration. We divided patients into two groups: the G10 group received two IV doses of 10 mg/kg of TXA, and the G20 group received two doses of 20 mg/kg.

RESULTS

No significant differences in mean minimum levels of Hb and HcT stratified by days after surgery were uncovered between the two groups despite the use of two different dosages of TXA. Also the mean blood volume loss was statistically similar between two groups. No differences were also observed regarding the occurrence of adverse effects.

CONCLUSIONS

In two IV bolus regimens of TXA administration, the use of a dose of 10 or 20 mg/kg provides statistically similar results in blood loss sparing. Therefore, the use of two 10 mg/kg doses could be considered more advisable in order to reduce the potential thromboembolic risks related to this drug.

Day of Surgery Affects Length of Stay and Charges in Primary Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Length of hospital stay (LOS) is a large driver of cost after primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Strategies to decrease LOS may help reduce the economic burden of TJA. This study's aim was to investigate the effect of day of the week of surgery on mean LOS and total charges following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA).

METHODS

An administrative clinical database at a large US health care system was reviewed for all primary THA and TKA admissions performed between 2010 and 2012 (n = 15,237). Of these, 14,800 cases met our inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Furthermore, the cohort was divided into early (Monday/Tuesday) and late week (Thursday/Friday) surgeries, excluding Wednesday surgeries (n = 2835). Univariate and multiple regression analyses examined the effect of each variable on LOS.

RESULTS

Mean LOS for THA and TKA on Monday was 3.54 and 3.35 days and increased to 4.12 and 3.66 days on Friday (P < .0001), respectively. Late vs early week admissions had 0.358 (95% confidence interval: 0.29-0.425, P < .001) additional hospital days. Increased age (0.003 days per unit increase in age, P = .02) and severity of illness score (0.781 days per level increase, P < .001) were associated with increased LOS. Late week surgery had a greater effect on LOS for TKA than for THA. TKAs were associated with higher charges for late week surgery vs early week surgery (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Late week TJA cases, older age, and increasing severity of illness score were associated with increased LOS. Furthermore, late week TKA was associated with increased total charges.