Outcome and Metastatic Behavior of Canine Sinonasal Osteosarcoma (2005-2015)

Relative tumor volume has prognostic relevance in canine sinonasal tumors treated with radiation therapy: A retrospective study

Tumor volume is controversially discussed as a prognostic factor in dogs treated with radiation therapy for sinonasal tumors. Dogs’ body sizes vary widely and relative rather than absolute tumor volume might provide better prognostic information. Our hypothesis was that relative rather than absolute tumor volume (gross tumor volume, GTV) influences time to progression (TTP) and that a larger tumor volume is correlated with a higher tumor stage. We retrospectively investigated possible correlations of initial GTV to weight, body surface area (BSA), nasal cavity size and the tumor stage in 49 dogs with sinonasal tumors. Here, also presumed sinonasal tumors, esthesioneuroblastomas and histologically benign tumors were included. The possible impact of absolute and relative GTV on response and outcome were assessed according to imaging findings in 34 dogs with available follow-up computed tomographies (CTs) after definitive-intent radiation therapy with either a regular (10x4.2 Gy) or a simultaneously- integrated boost protocol (SIB; GTV boosted to 10x4.83 Gy). In contrast to absolute GTV (p<0.001), the relative GTVs were not correlated with dogs’ body sizes. Absolute GTV, GTV relative to weight and BSA were not associated with TTP based on CT imaging. However, GTV relative to nasal cavity showed a prognostic influence with a hazard ratio of 10.97 (95%CI:1.25–96.06). When looking at GTV relative to nasal cavity, stage 3 and 4 tumors were significantly larger than stage 1 and 2 tumors (p = 0.005). Our results suggest that GTV relative to nasal cavity could be prognostic for TTP and a larger tumor volume relative to nasal cavity is correlated with a higher tumor stage.

Outcome of external beam radiotherapy for treatment of noncutaneous tumors of the head in horses: 32 cases (1999-2015)

Background

The long‐term outcomes of external beam radiotherapy for treatment of noncutaneous tumors of the head in horses is unknown.

Objective

To report the long‐term outcomes for treatment of noncutaneous tumors of the head of horses, and report short and long‐term clinical adverse effects.

Animals

Thirty‐two horses treated in 2 referral hospitals.

Methods

In this retrospective study, medical records of horses receiving radiation therapy for noncutaneous tumors between 1999 and 2015 were reviewed. Signalment, tumor type, treatment protocol, tumor control duration, and survival were recorded. Kaplan‐Meier survival curves were generated for overall survival (OS), by tumor type and location, and compared using Log‐rank tests, and treatment protocol adherence.

Results

Follow‐up ranged from 2 to 145 months (median 14 months). Of 32 horses, 16 (50%) were alive at the time of reporting, with complete tumor response occurring in 12 (38%). Horses with tumors of the maxilla/nasal cavity had significantly shorter median OS compared to horses with tumors in other locations (21 months vs 145 months) (P = .06). Adverse effects resulting from the tumor or the therapy occurred in 20/32 (63%). The occurrence of major adverse effects and delays in treatment protocol were not significantly associated with median survival estimates.

Conclusions and Clinical Importance

External beam radiotherapy can be used to treat a variety of noncutaneous tumors of the head of horses. Adverse effects related to radiotherapy or the tumor are common.