Critical Appraisal of Guidelines for Antithrombotic Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation Post-Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Appraisal of guidelines for managing contrast medium in patients with metformin: consensuses, controversies, and gaps

OBJECTIVES

The current guidelines contain substantial inconsistency regarding the use of metformin concomitantly with contrast media. The objective of this study is to appraise the guidelines and summarize the agreements and differences among recommendations.

METHODS

Our search focused on English language guidelines published between 2018 and 2021. Guidelines for the management of contrast media in patients with continuous metformin were included. Guidelines were assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument.

RESULTS

Six guidelines out of 1134 fulfilled the inclusion criteria with an AGREE II score of 79.2% (IQR 72.7 to 85.1%). There was good overall quality of the guidelines, with six considered "strongly recommended." CPGs scored poorly in "Clarity of Presentation" and "Applicability," with scores of 75.9% and 76.4%, respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficients were excellent in each domain. There are some guidelines (33.3%) that recommend discontinuation of metformin in patients with an eGFR of < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2, while some guidelines (16.7%) suggest the threshold of renal function should be eGFR < 40 mL/min/1.73 m2.

CONCLUSIONS

Most guidelines recommend withdrawing metformin before using contrast agents in diabetic patients with severely impaired kidney function but disagree on the renal function thresholds. Furthermore, the gaps regarding discontinuing metformin with moderate renal impairment (30 mL/min/1.73 m2 < eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) must be considered in future studies.

KEY POINTS

• Guidelines involving metformin and contrast agents are reliable and optimal. • Most guidelines advocate discontinuing metformin before using contrast agents in diabetic patients with advanced renal failure, but there are controversial suggestions regarding kidney function thresholds. • The gaps regarding the time of discontinuation of the metformin with moderate renal impairment (30 mL/min/1.73 m2 < eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) must be considered in the extensive RCT studies.

A Systematic Critical Appraisal of Clinical Practice Guidelines in Heart Failure Using the AGREE II Tool

Multiple clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for heart failure management have been published to provide the best practices regarding the use of foundational therapies to reduce morbidity and mortality in this patient population. However, a critical appraisal of these heart failure guidelines has not been performed. This systematic review aimed to assess the methodological quality of current CPGs in the management of patients with heart failure. A comprehensive search of EMBASE and PubMed was conducted to identify CPGs published between January 1, 2021 and September 8, 2022. Any CPGs published in the last 2 years addressing the management of heart failure were eligible for inclusion. The methodological quality of the CPGs was assessed using the AGREE II (Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluate II) instrument. The initial search yielded 3,269 citations, of which, 6 CPGs were included. A total of 2 CPGs were each published by the cardiology associations in North America and Asia and 1 each in Europe and South America. The overall median score for the AGREE II domains were 100% for scope and purpose, 71% for stakeholder involvement, 71% for the rigor of development, 100% for clarity of presentation, 43% for applicability, 100% for editorial independence, and 64% for overall assessment. CPG developers would benefit from the use of a standardized approach to the development of CPGs and use the contents of the AGREE II tool to improve the methodological rigor, reporting, and applicability of CPGs.

Clinical practice guidelines and expert consensus statements on rehabilitation for patients with COVID-19: protocol for a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

COVID-19 is a highly infectious disease, characterised by respiratory, physical and psychological dysfunctions. Rehabilitation could effectively alleviate the symptoms and promote recovery of the physical and mental health of patients with COVID-19. Recently, rehabilitation medical institutions have issued clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and expert consensus statements involving recommendations for rehabilitation assessments and rehabilitation therapies for COVID-19. This systematic review aims to assess the methodological quality and reporting quality of the guidance documents, evaluate the heterogeneity of the recommendations and summarise the recommendations with respect to rehabilitation assessments and rehabilitation therapies for COVID-19 to provide a quick reference for front-line clinicians, therapists and patients as well as reasonable suggestions for future guidelines.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database (VIP), Wanfang Database and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and websites of governments or organisations (eg, National Guideline Clearinghouse, Guidelines International Network, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network and WHO) will be searched for eligible CPGs and expert consensus statements from inception to August 2022. CPGs and expert consensus statements published in Chinese or English and presenting recommendations for modern functional rehabilitation techniques and/or traditional Chinese medicine rehabilitation techniques for COVID-19 will be included. Reviews, interpretations, old versions of CPGs and expert consensus statements and those for the management of other diseases during the pandemic will be excluded. Two reviewers will independently review each article, extract data, appraise the methodological quality following the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II tool and assess the reporting quality with the Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Healthcare statement. The Measurement Scale of Rate of Agreement will be used to evaluate the heterogeneity of the recommendations in different CPGs and expert consensus statements. Agreement between reviewers will be calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient. We will also summarise the recommendations for rehabilitation in patients with COVID-19. The results will be narratively described and presented as tables or figures.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval is not needed for this systematic review because information from published documents will be used. The findings will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and reported in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020190761.