Does the Time of Postoperative Bisphosphonate Administration Affect the Bone Union in Osteoporotic Intertrochanteric Fracture of Femur?

Does early administration of denosumab delay bone healing after intertrochanteric femoral fractures?

INTRODUCTION

Hip fractures are commonly associated with osteoporosis and pose a risk for secondary fractures. Although the administration of anti-osteoporotic drugs is recommended after fractures to mitigate this risk, the potential effect of strong anti-resorptive drugs (e.g., denosumab) on fracture healing processes have not been extensively studied. This prospective study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of early denosumab administration after femoral intertrochanteric fracture surgery and to compare its effect on fracture healing to that of bisphosphonate-treated patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent surgery for intertrochanteric femoral fragility fractures between November 2018 and November 2020 were prospectively examined. Patients were randomized into two groups (denosumab [DSM] and ibandronate [IBN] groups) using a simple randomization procedure. Physical findings, plain radiographs, and computed tomography (CT) were used to evaluate fracture healing at 3 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Physical findings showed no significant differences between the two groups in pain on loading, tenderness at fracture site, or walking ability. There were inter-rater differences in radiological fracture healing rate: plain radiographs, 57.5%-81.8% in the DSM group and 51.5%-90.9% in the IBN group; CT, 51.5%-72.7% in the DSM group and 45.4%-81.8% in the IBN group. Although there were variations, there were no significant differences in the fracture healing rate between groups on plain radiographs or CT among all three raters.

CONCLUSIONS

Early administration of denosumab after intertrochanteric femoral fracture surgery did not delay radiological or clinical fracture healing times when compared with ibandronate administration.

The Healing and therapeutic effects of perioperative bisphosphonate use in patients with fragility fractures: meta-analysis of 19 clinical trials

OBJECTIVES

Previous evidence suggests that bisphosphonates (BPs) may lower the risk of recurrent fractures and enhance functional recovery in patients with fractures. However, there has been controversy regarding the optimal timing of treatment initiation for patients with fragility fractures. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the available evidence on the use of BPs during the perioperative period and compared it to both non-perioperative periods and non-usage.

METHODS

Electronic searches were performed using PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library published before February 2023, without any language restrictions. The primary outcomes included fracture healing rate, healing time, and new fractures. We also examined a wide range of secondary outcomes. Random effects meta-analysis was used.

RESULTS

A total of 19 clinical trials involving 2543 patients were included in this meta-analysis. When comparing patients with non-perioperative BPs use in 4-6 weeks and approximately 10-12 weeks post-surgically, the overall risk ratios (RRs) of perioperative BPs use for healing rate were 1.06 (95% CI: 0.81, 1.38, p=0.69) and 1.02 (95% CI: 0.94, 1.11, p=0.65), respectively, suggesting no difference in healing rate between perioperative and non-perioperative BP initiation. For healing time, the overall mean difference between perioperative and non-perioperative periods was -0.19 week (95% CI: -1.03, 0.64, p=0.65) at approximately 10-12 weeks, indicating no significant impact of perioperative BP initiation on healing time. In terms of new fractures, the overall RR with BP use was 0.35 (95% CI: 0.17-0.73, p=0.005), when compared to patients without BPs use. This suggests a protective impact of BP use against new fractures compared to patients without BP use. Perioperative BP use was associated with a markedly higher likelihood of having adverse experiences, including fever (RR: 23.78, 95% CI: 8.29, 68.21, p< 0.001), arthralgia (RR: 10.20, 95% CI: 2.41, 43.16, p=0.002), and myalgia (RR: 9.42, 95% CI: 2.54, 34.87, p< 0.001), compared with non-BPs use.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with BP during the perioperative period does not affect the healing process and has positive effects on therapy for patients with fragility fractures. These compelling findings underscore the potential efficacy of BP use during the perioperative period as a viable treatment option for patients with fragility fractures.

Osteoporosis Diagnosis, Management, and Referral Practice After Fragility Fractures

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this manuscript is to review the current diagnosis, management, and referral practices of patients with osteoporosis after a fragility fracture from the orthopedic surgeon's perspective.

RECENT FINDINGS

Effective treatments are available for osteoporosis that significantly decrease the risk of additional fractures. Despite recommendations for improved post-fragility fracture osteoporosis management, the rate of diagnosis and treatment is still unacceptably low. Patients sustaining a low-energy fracture should be evaluated for osteoporosis with discussion of beginning pharmacological treatment. Antiresorptive and anabolic agents are available treatment options. Fracture Liaison Services can help to coordinate the care of these patients and improve the rate of diagnosis and initiation of therapy. Dartmouth-Hitchcock is working to improve the bone health for our patients utilizing a multidisciplinary team-based approach. This process is intended to lead to increased recognition of osteoporosis within our institution and close the capture gap between hospital discharge and initiation of osteoporosis pharmacotherapy.

The effect of osteoporosis and its treatment on fracture healing a systematic review of animal and clinical studies

Introduction

Osteoporosis is characterised by low bone mass and micro-architectural deterioration of bone structure. Its treatment is directed at the processes of bone formation or resorption, that are of utmost importance in fracture healing. We provide a comprehensive review of the literature aiming to summarize and clarify the effects of osteoporosis and its treatment on fracture healing.

Material and methods

A literature search was conducted in PubMed and Embase (OVID version). In vivo animal and human studies on long bone fractures were included. A total of 93 articles were included for this review; 23 studies on the effect of osteoporosis (18 animal and 5 clinical studies) and 70 studies on the effect of osteoporosis treatment (41 animal, 26 clinical studies and 3 meta-analyses) on fracture healing.

Results

In animal fracture models osteoporosis was associated with decreased callus formation and bone growth, bone mineral density, biomechanical strength and delayed cellular and differentiation processes during fracture healing. Two large databases identified osteoporosis as a risk factor for non-union whereas three other studies did not. One of those three studies however found a prolonged healing time in patients with osteoporosis. Anti-osteoporosis medication showed inconsistent effects on fracture healing in both non-osteoporotic and osteoporotic animal models. Only the parathyroid hormone and anti-resorption medication were related to improved fracture healing and delayed remodelling respectively. Clinical studies performed in predominantly hip and distal radius fracture patients showed no effect of bisphosphonates on fracture healing. Parathyroid hormone reduced time to union in several clinical trials performed in mainly hip fracture patients, but this did not result in decreased delayed or non-union rates.

Conclusion

Evidence that substantiates the negative influence of osteoporosis on fracture healing is predominantly from animal studies and to a lesser extent from clinical studies, since convincing clinical evidence lacks. Bisphosphonates and parathyroid hormone may be used during fracture healing, since no clear negative effect has been shown. Parathyroid hormone might even decrease time to fracture union, without decreasing union rate.

•

Osteoporosis negatively influences fracture healing in animal models.

•

There is no convincing evidence for a similar effect in humans.

•

In animals, bisphosphonates delay bone remodelling

•

In animals, parathyroid hormone improves fracture healing

•

In humans, anti-osteoporotic drugs do not interfere with fracture healing.

Effect of Preoperative Bisphosphonate Treatment on Fracture Healing after Internal Fixation Treatment of Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures

Purpose

There are concerns that administration of bisphosphonate (BP) can substantially suppress bone turnover, potentially interfering with fracture healing. We investigated the effects of preoperative BP administration before internal fixation of intertrochanteric femoral fractures using fracture healing and clinical outcomes.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively analyzed data from 130 patients who underwent internal fixation for osteoporotic intertrochanteric femoral fractures between March 2012 and July 2016. Patients previously treated with BPs for at least 3 months (BP group; n=29) were compared with the remaining patients (BP-naïve group; n=101). Radiographs were used to assess and compare fracture healing 3 months and 1 year postsurgery. The primary clinical outcome measure assessed was change in Koval score.

Results

Fracture union at 3 months after surgery was verified in 72.4% of patients (21/29) in the BP group and 90.1% of patients (91/101) in the BP-naïve group (P=0.027). Fracture union at 1 year postsurgery (BP group, 93.1% [27/29] vs. BP-naïve group, 97.0% [98/101], P=0.310) and change in Koval score (1.1 vs. 1.0, P=0.694) were not significantly different between the groups. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that a history of BP administration was associated with an increased risk of delayed union at 3 months postsurgery (P=0.014).

Conclusion

Preoperative administration of BP was associated with a decreased fracture healing rate 3 months after internal fixation, compared with BP-naïve patients. Therefore, patients previously treated with a BP should be carefully allowed to wean off walking aids and transition to full weight-bearing in the early postoperative period.