The value of pre-operative diagnostic procedures for cervical involvement in uterine corpus carcinoma

Predictive value of T2-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for assessing cervical invasion in patients with endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To obtain the diagnostic accuracy of T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) in the preoperative assessment of cervical invasion in patients with endometrial cancer (EC).

METHODS

Databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Clinical Trials were searched for relevant articles published from January 2000 to August 2020. Pooled estimation data were obtained by statistical analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 24 articles were included. For assessing cervical invasion of EC, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC) for T2WI were 0.70 (0.61-0.77), 0.92 (0.89-0.94), 8.7 (6.5-11.6), 0.33 (0.25-0.43), 26 (17-41), and 0.92 (0.89-0.94), respectively. For DCE-MRI, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR, and AUC were 0.75 (0.60-0.85), 0.95 (0.89-0.98), 14.7 (6.6-32.9), 0.27 (0.16-0.44), 55 (18-165), and 0.92 (0.89-0.94), respectively; for T2WI combined with DCE-MRI, they were 0.58 (0.41-0.73), 0.98 (0.95-0.99), 28.1 (12.8-62.1), 0.43 (0.30-0.63), 65 (29-146), and 0.94 (0.91-0.96), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

DCE-MRI demonstrated higher diagnostic performance than T2WI in the prediction of cervical invasion in patients with EC. T2WI combined with DCE-MRI improved the pooled specificity, PLR, DOR, and AUC compared to T2WI alone or DCE-MRI alone.

Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI for Detecting Cervical Invasion in Patients with Endometrial Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis

Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the preoperative assessment of cervical invasion and to analyse the influence of different imaging protocols in patients with endometrial carcinoma.

Methods: An extensive search of articles about MRI for assessing cervical invasion in patients with endometrial carcinoma was performed on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Clinical Trials from January 2000 to July 2020. Two reviewers independently evaluated the methodological quality of each study by using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2). Diagnostic accuracy results and additional useful information were extracted. The pooled estimation data was obtained by statistical analysis.

Results: A total of 42 eligible studies were included in the meta-analysis. Significant evidence of heterogeneity was found for detecting cervical invasion (I² = 74.1%, P = 0.00 for sensitivity and I² = 56.2%, P = 0.00 for specificity). The pooled sensitivity and specificity of MRI were 0.58 and 0.95 respectively. The use of higher field strength (3.0 T) demonstrated higher pooled sensitivity (0.74). Using diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) alone presented higher pooled sensitivity (0.86) than using other sequences. The studies that used dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) alone showed higher sensitivity (0.80) and specificity (0.96) than those that used T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) alone.

Conclusions: MRI shows high specificity for detecting cervical infiltration in endometrial carcinoma. Using DWI or a 3.0-T device may improve the pooled sensitivity. DCE-MRI demonstrates higher pooled sensitivity and specificity than T2WI.

Uterine cervical malignancy: diagnostic accuracy of MRI with histopathologic correlation

Objective:

Cervical cancer is the third most common malignancy in women worldwide. Accurate staging of the disease is crucial in planning the optimal treatment strategy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the assessment of extension and staging of cervical malignancy in correlation with histopathologic examination.

Materials and Methods:

Thirty females with untreated pathologically proven uterine cervical carcinoma were included in this prospective study. The patients were 40 - 65 years of age and their average age was 45 years. All patients were subjected to routine clinical staging workup and underwent MRI for preoperative staging. Preoperative MRI findings were reviewed and compared with the final pathological staging that is the Gold Standard of reference.

Results:

Histopathologic examination established that of the 30 tumors, 22 (73.3%) were squamous cell carcinoma. According to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging criteria, 2/30 patients (6.6%) were stage IB, 12/30 (40.3%) were IIA, 8/30 were IIB (26.6%), and 8/30 (26.6%) were IVA. MRI had a sensitivity of 100% and specificity 85.7% in the detection of parametrial infiltration, and a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 90% in the detection of vaginal infiltration. It was sensitive (100%) and specific (100%) in detecting tumor extension to the stroma, urinary bladder, and rectum. Pathological examination demonstrated stage IB cervical carcinoma in 2/30 patients (6.6%), stage IIA disease in 10/30 patients (33.3%), stage IIB in 6/30 patients (20%), and stage IV disease in 8/30 patients (26.6%). MRI features demonstrated stage IB in 2/30 patients (6.6%), stage IIA disease in 12/30 patients (40%), stage IIB in 8/30 patients (26.6%), and stage IV disease in 8/30 patients (26.6%). MRI staging of cervical carcinoma was in concordance with histopathologic staging in stages IB and IVA and over-staging in IIA and IIB stages.

Conclusion:

MRI is an optimal non-invasive modality for preoperative staging of uterine cervical malignancy, and crucial in subsequent more accurate treatment planning.

Prediction of cervical involvement in endometrial cancer by hysteroscopy

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the ability of hysteroscopy to preoperatively predict cervical involvement in endometrial cancer.

METHODS

The records of 110 surgically staged consecutive endometrial cancer patients treated at our institution from 1997 to 2003 were retrospectively analyzed. Data on demographics, preoperative staging procedures, surgical pathology reports, and adjuvant treatments were retrieved.

RESULTS

Fourteen (12.7%) patients had cervical involvement (stage II) according to the surgical pathology report, of whom nine (8.1%) had stage IIA and five (4.6%) had stage IIB. Clinical evaluation by speculoscopy and palpation had failed to reveal any indication of cervical involvement. Preoperative diagnostic hysteroscopy procedures were included. None of the hysteroscopy procedures revealed any suspicious lesion in the cervical canal.

CONCLUSION

Hysteroscopy and clinical examination fail to adequately predict cervical involvement in endometrial carcinoma. Fractional D&C appears to be the best method until a more effective alternative becomes available.