PREOPERATIVE PULMONARY FUNCTION AS A PREDICTOR OF RESPIRATORY COMPLICATIONS AND MORTALITY IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING LUNG CANCER RESECTION

Recommendations from the Italian intersociety consensus on Perioperative Anesthesia Care in Thoracic surgery (PACTS) part 1: preadmission and preoperative care

INTRODUCTION

Anesthetic care in patients undergoing thoracic surgery presents specific challenges that necessitate standardized, multidisciplionary, and continuously updated guidelines for perioperative care.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary expert group, the Perioperative Anesthesia in Thoracic Surgery (PACTS) group, comprising 24 members from 19 Italian centers, was established to develop recommendations for anesthesia practice in patients undergoing thoracic surgery (specifically lung resection for cancer). The project focused on preoperative patient assessment and preparation, intraoperative management (surgical and anesthesiologic care), and postoperative care and discharge. A series of clinical questions was developed, and PubMed and Embase literature searches were performed to inform discussions around these areas, leading to the development of 69 recommendations. The quality of evidence and strength of recommendations were graded using the United States Preventative Services Task Force criteria.

RESULTS

Recommendations for preoperative care focus on risk assessment, patient preparation (prehabilitation), and the choice of procedure (open thoracotomy vs. video-assisted thoracic surgery).

CONCLUSIONS

These recommendations should help pulmonologists to improve preoperative management in thoracic surgery patients. Further refinement of the recommendations can be anticipated as the literature continues to evolve.

Airway bacterial colonization in patients with non-small cell lung cancer and the alterations during the perioperative period

BACKGROUND

To observe the alterations in airway bacterial colonization during the perioperative period in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and evaluate their clinical implications.

METHODS

Patients with resectable primary NSCLC were enrolled from October 2011 to April 2012. Airway secretions were harvested for microbiological study after admission, immediately after surgery, and before endotracheal extubation. Spontaneous sputum was collected when patients presented with signs of postoperative pneumonia (POP). Detailed data on the isolated pathogens were carefully recorded. Risk factors for airway colonization and POP were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 78 consecutive patients were enrolled. Fourteen patients (17.9%) had airway colonization at admission, including four cases of fungi and ten cases of Gram-negative bacilli (GNB). Five patients (6.4%) had colonized pathogens at the end of surgery, including three cases of GNB and two cases of Gram-positive cocci. Nine (11.5%) patients had positive culture of airway secretions collected before extubation, including seven cases of GNB and two cases of fungi. Eighteen patients (23.1%) had POP, of whom one suffered from bronchopleural fistula and one died of POP. Pathogens of POP were confirmed in 11 patients, including nine cases of GNB and two cases of fungi. Three patients had the same pathogens as preoperative colonization. The proportion of more antibiotic-resistant strains increased gradually. Advanced age [odds ratio (OR), 2.263; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.030-4.970] and smoking (OR, 2.163; 95% CI, 1.059-4.429) were risk factors for airway colonization. Decreased diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (OR, 5.838; 95% CI, 1.318-25.854), prolonged operation time (OR, 6.366; 95% CI, 1.349-30.033), and preoperative airway colonization (OR, 9.448; 95% CI, 2.206-40.465) were risk factors of POP.

CONCLUSIONS

Airway colonized pathogens altered and more antibiotic-resistant GNB emerged during the perioperative period. These pathogens played an important role in the presence of POP.

Effectiveness of non-cardiac preoperative testing in non-cardiac elective surgery: a systematic review

Elective surgery is usually preceded by preoperative diagnostics to minimize risk. The results are assumed to elicit preventive measures or even cancellation of surgery. Moreover, physicians perform preoperative tests as a baseline to detect subsequent changes. This systematic review aims to explore whether preoperative testing leads to changes in management or reduces perioperative mortality or morbidity in unselected patients undergoing elective, non-cardiac surgery. We systematically searched all relevant databases from January 2001 to February 2011 for studies investigating the relationship between preoperative diagnostics and perioperative outcome. Our methodology was based on the manual of the Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Health Technology Assessment, the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) handbook, and the PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews. One hundred and one of the 25 281 publications retrieved met our inclusion criteria. Three test grid studies used a randomized controlled design and 98 studies used an observational design. The test grid studies show that in cataract surgery and ambulatory surgery, there are no significant differences between patients with indicated preoperative testing and no testing regarding perioperative outcome. The observational studies do not provide valid evidence that preoperative testing is beneficial in healthy adults undergoing non-cardiac surgery. There is no evidence derived from high-quality studies that supports routine preoperative testing in healthy adults undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Testing according to pathological findings in a patient's medical history or physical examination seems justified, although the evidence is scarce. High-quality studies, especially large randomized controlled trials, are needed to explore the effectiveness of indicated preoperative testing.