Unsedated Outpatient Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy in Stroke Patients: Is It Feasible and Safe?

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is an established practice for long-term nutrition in dysphagia-suffering stroke patients. This study sought to determine the feasibility and safety of outpatient, unsedated PEG implementation in stroke patients. This retrospective cohort study involved stroke victims who underwent unsedated outpatient PEG insertion from 2014 to 2017 at our Surgical Endoscopy Unit. Patients were given pharyngeal anesthesia with lidocaine 10% spray, while the PEG tube was placed under local anesthesia. The incidence of intraprocedural and postprocedural complications and 30-day mortality rate were recorded. Data from 127 cases were analyzed. The procedures were performed with minor, transient complications, which resolved after rescue maneuvers. No intraprocedural and postprocedural major complications or death were observed. During the 30-day follow-up, the most important complication involved a single case of accidental PEG removal that was successfully resolved surgically. Unsedated PEG insertion appears to be a feasible, well-tolerated, and safe option for stroke-related dysphagia.

Effects of high-resolution esophageal manometry on oxygen saturation and hemodynamic function

The effect of high-resolution esophageal manometry (HRM) on oxygen saturation (SaO2) and hemodynamic function has not been previously evaluated. This was a prospective study of consecutive patients referred for HRM. Demographic and clinical data were collected on all patients. The study variables included SaO2, heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP). SaO2 and HR were measured at baseline, during intubation, during and 5 min after HRM. BP was measured at baseline, during and after HRM. 158 (56% women) patients with a mean age of 56 (SD 15) years were included. Thirty-five (22%) were obese and 55 (35%) were overweight. Eighteen (12%) patients had a history of respiratory disease and 27 (17%) were smokers. Intubation was difficult in 22%. Exploration tolerance was poor in 17% or very poor in 6%. The average duration of the test was 9.9 (SD 2.8) minutes. Sixty-four (47%) and 59 (37%) patients had SaO2 below 95% during intubation and during HRM, respectively. Three patients had SaO2 ≤90%. Sixty-nine (44%) patients had tachycardia during intubation and 8 (5%) during HRM. The appearance of desaturation (SaO2 <95%) during intubation was associated with a lower basal SaO2; desaturation during HRM and 5 minutes after HRM was associated with a higher age, a higher BMI and a lower basal SaO2. HRM decreases SaO2 and increases heart rate primarily during the insertion of the probe, as part of the standard stress response and therefore HMR can be considered a safe procedure. However, in older and overweight patients, respiratory parameters should be monitored.

Transnasal PEG tube placement in patients with head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND

Head and neck cancer (H&NCa) patients have an increased risk of malnutrition and dysphagia because of their malignancy and the adverse events of therapy. Most of these patients require gastrostomies. Four percent to 7% of H&NCa patients are unable to undergo per oral percutaneous gastrostomies. Transnasal endoscopy is an option for gastrostomy placement in selected patients.

OBJECTIVE

Clinical, epidemiologic characteristics and outcomes of transnasal PEG (t-PEG) placement.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis.

SETTING

Tertiary care hospital, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.

PATIENTS

All patients who underwent t-PEG placement.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Epidemiology, adverse events, and outcomes of t-PEG placement.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients underwent t-PEG placement from January 2010 to May 2013. All patients had H&NCa and 56.3% had metastasis. Indications for the transnasal approach were airway compromise, malignant oropharyngeal obstruction, and trismus, among others. All procedures were successful using a 20F gastrostomy tube, push technique, anesthesiologist-guided propofol sedation, and/or nasotracheal intubation. Of all patients, 68.8% were white and 68.8% were men. Mean age was 54 years, and mean body mass index was 20.87. Two patients had a total of 2 adverse events: poor wound healing and wound site infection. Of all patients, 18.75% had leukopenia, 6.25% neutropenia, and 50% lymphopenia. Mean white blood cell count, absolute neutrophil count, and absolute lymphocyte count were 8.6 × 10(9)/L, 6.57 × 10(9)/L, and .93 × 10(9)/L, respectively. Eleven patients were alive, 2 were lost to follow-up, and 3 had died at the time of review.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective analysis, small cohort, patient selection bias.

CONCLUSION

t-PEG placement is a viable and safe option for H&NCa patients when the standard endoscopic approach is not feasible.