Clinical and Radiological Results of Hook Plate Fixation in Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocations and Distal Clavicle Fractures

Predictive value of implant removal time and acromion-hook angle on subacromial osteolysis following hook plate fixation for acromioclavicular dislocation

BACKGROUND

Subacromial osteolysis is a common complication following hook plate fixation for acromioclavicular (AC) dislocation. Many factors can affect the occurrence and progression of subacromial osteolysis. The objective of this study was to investigate the predictive value of the implant removal time and acromion-hook angle for subacromial osteolysis following hook plate fixation for AC dislocation.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of 66 patients who underwent hook plate fixation for AC dislocations. The presence and severity of subacromial osteolysis were assessed at the time of implant removal. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify the characteristics associated with subacromial osteolysis. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to evaluate the predictive performance of the implant removal time and acromion-hook angle.

RESULTS

Of the 66 patients, 48 had subacromial osteolysis. Univariate analysis revealed that the implant removal time and acromion-hook angle were associated with subacromial osteolysis. Multivariate analysis revealed that the acromion-hook angle was the only factor independently associated with subacromial osteolysis. In the receiver operating characteristic analysis, the optimal cut-off values of implant removal time were 5.5 months for predicting the occurrence of osteolysis and 11.9 months for predicting the severity of osteolysis. The acromial-hook angle cut-off values were 10° for predicting the occurrence of osteolysis and 16° for predicting the severity of osteolysis.

CONCLUSION

The implant removal time and acromion-hook angle were significant risk factors for subacromial osteolysis following hook plate fixation. We recommend removing the implant within 5.5 months to minimize osteolysis risk and no more than 11.9 months to prevent severe osteolysis. Maintaining the acromion-hook angle at 10° or less is advised, whereas an angle of 16° or more may indicate a greater risk of severe osteolysis.

Subacromial osteolysis following hook plate fixation for acromioclavicular dislocation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Clavicular hook plates are extensively used in the treatment of acromioclavicular dislocation. Subacromial osteolysis is a typical complication following hook plate fixation. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the incidence of subacromial osteolysis and analyzed the associated characteristics of subacromial osteolysis to guide surgeons.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were comprehensively searched for relevant literature. We screened the literature based on the eligibility criteria, extracted relevant data, and assessed the quality of the included studies. Pooled odds ratios or mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by a fixed-effects or random-effects model. Heterogeneity was evaluated by the chi-squared test and I2 statistics. A meta-regression analysis was performed to explore the potential source of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Thirty-two studies met the inclusion criteria. The total pooled incidence of subacromial osteolysis was 29% and the only covariate that could influence the incidence of subacromial osteolysis was the radiological measurement method (P = .017). Patients in the hook plate fixation with coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction group had lower odds of subacromial osteolysis (odds ratio, 2.54, 95% CI 1.54-4.18; P < .001). There were no significant differences in the Constant-Murley scores at the final follow-up between patients with and without subacromial osteolysis (standardized mean difference, -0.17; 95% CI, -0.50 to 0.15; P = .294).

CONCLUSIONS

Subacromial osteolysis has a relatively high and variable incidence, and the primary factor influencing the reported incidence is the radiological assessment method. The current analysis suggests coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction as an effective surgical approach for decreasing the incidence of subacromial osteolysis. The presence or absence of subacromial osteolysis did not significantly impact the functional outcomes observed during the final follow-up period.

The Results of Hook Plate Fixation in Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation and Distal Clavicle Fractures

Background

Acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation and distal clavicle fractures are common shoulder injuries. Different methods of fixation are used to treat such injuries, each has its advantages and disadvantages. In this study, we tested fixation using the hook plate. We think that it is technically simple, reliable and more effective in certain surgical situations. However, it is not gaining adequate popularity due to the potential complications of the plate placement including subacromial osteolysis, impingement, rotator cuff injury and others. A second surgery for plate removal is classically indicated to cope with such complications.

Objective

The aim of this study included evaluating the clinical and radiological healing after hook plate fixation in ACJ dislocation and distal clavicle fractures and assessing the incidence and clinical significance of subacromial osteolysis.

Methods

It is a prospective observational study with a total of 96 cases including 64 ACJ dislocations and 32 distal clavicle fractures. Constant-Murley score was used for clinical evaluation. The patients were evaluated regularly with a minimum follow up of 12 months after plate removal.

Results

At the end of the study we found that the results of the hook plate fixation for both groups were good clinically and radiologically. The clinical result score was found to be initially higher among the patients of the ACJ dislocation mainly due to the earlier plate removal in these patients. However, the final score was found to be comparable in both groups. The incidence of the subacromial osteolysis was found to be higher among the patients with clavicle fractures as the plate was retained for a longer time. However we found that subacromial osteolysis did not imply any increased rate of symptoms over the patients who did not show this complication on the X-ray.

Conclusion

Based on these observations, we recommend the hook plate fixation to be added to the armamentarium of the orthopaedic surgeon treating such injuries as it is simple to implement, durable and capable of dealing with difficult situations. The main disadvantage of this method is the need for a second surgery for plate removal.

Suture Button Could Result in More Functional Outcomes Improvement and Pain Relief Than Hook Plate Technique for Treating Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation: A Systematic Review of Comparative Studies

PURPOSE

To systematically review the current evidence to compare the differences in outcomes of the suture button (SB) versus hook plate (HP) fixations for treating acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation (ACD).

METHODS

Two independent reviewers performed the literature search based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A literature search of the Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases was performed and Level I-IV evidence studies comparing the SB and HP procedures for acute ACD were included. Studies that met the following exclusion criteria were excluded: (1) letters, comments, case reports, reviews, animal studies, cadaveric studies, biomechanical studies, and study protocols; (2) incomplete data; and (3) repeated studies and data. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to evaluate the quality of nonrandomized studies. Constant score, visual analog scale (VAS) score, operation time, coracoclavicular distance (CCD), and complications were recorded and the mean differences of VAS and Constant were compared with preset minimal clinically important difference.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies with 363 patients treated with SB procedures and 432 patients with the HP procedure were included. In terms of patient-reported outcomes, 5 of the 13 included studies reported significantly greater Constant score in SB group and most (4/5) used arthroscopic SB technique. Statistically significant differences in favor of SB were found in 3 of the 7 included studies in terms of VAS score whereas none of them reached the minimal clinically important difference. In terms of recurrent instability, no statistically significant difference was noted. All studies showed that the SB technique resulted in lower estimated blood loss. No difference was detected in CCD and complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the current body of evidence, it is suggested that employment of the SB technique may confer advantageous outcomes when compared to the HP technique in acute ACD patients. These potential benefits may include higher Constant scores, lower pain levels, and no discernible increases in operation time, CCD, or complication rates.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, systematic review of Level II-IV studies.

Effect of cigarette smoking on the maintenance of reduction after treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation with hook plate fixation

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine the association between smoking and clinical outcomes of hook plate fixation for acute acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries.

METHODS

This study retrospectively investigated 82 patients who underwent hook plate fixation for acute AC joint dislocation between March 2014 to June 2022. The patients were grouped by smoking status, with 49 in group N (nonsmokers) and 33 in group S (smokers). Functional scores and active range of motion were compared among the groups at the 1-year follow-up. Coracoclavicular distance (CCD) was measured, and difference with the uninjured side was compared at initial injury and 6 months after implant removal.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed between the two groups in demographic factors such as age and sex, as well as parameters related to initial injury status, which included time from injury to surgery, the preoperative CCD difference value, and the Rockwood classification. However, the postoperative CCD difference was significantly higher in group S (3.1±2.6 mm) compared to group N (1.7±2.4 mm). Multivariate regression analysis indicated that smoking and the preoperative CCD difference independently contributed to an increase in the postoperative CCD difference. Despite the radiographic differences, the postoperative clinical outcome scores and active range of motion measurements were comparable between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Smoking had a detrimental impact on ligament healing after hook plate fixation for acute AC joint dislocations. This finding emphasizes the importance of smoking cessation to optimize reduction maintenance after AC joint injury. Level of evidence: III.

Suture button placed beneath plate fixation for complex distal clavicle fractures and acromioclavicular joint injuries: a technical note

Patients with complex distal clavicle and acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries are at risk of loss of reduction, especially when plates are removed postoperatively. The purpose is to review the authors' preferred technique for treatment of distal clavicle and AC joint injuries utilizing combined suture button and plate fixation, aiming to optimize biomechanical strength of fixation and limit loss of reduction after implant removal. Pre-contoured locking plates or hook plates were utilized atop suture buttons to maintain reduction and optimize biomechanical strength. At final follow-up over one year after plate removal and suture button retention in thirteen patients, reduction was maintained to coracoclavicular interval 1.5 ± 1.4 mm less than contralaterally. DASH scores at final follow-up averaged 5.7 ± 2.5 (range: 3.3 - 11.7). Placing suture button fixation prior to and beneath plate fixation in complex AC joint injuries and distal clavicle fractures allows for maintained fixation and prevents loss of reduction after plate removal.

Long-term Clinical Outcomes After TightRope Versus Hook Plate Fixation for Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation

Background

There is limited information regarding the long-term efficacy of techniques for surgical fixation after acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation.

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy of hook plate (HP) and TightRope (TR) fixation for acute AC joint dislocations by comparing the long-term clinical and radiological patient outcomes.

Study Design

Cohort study, Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

This study retrospectively analyzed data from 61 patients with acute AC joint dislocation between July 2011 and November 2015. The patients were grouped according to surgical procedure: HP (n = 36) and TR (n = 25). Clinical outcomes at final follow-up were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain; the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgery score; the Korean Shoulder Score; and the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder score. Side-to-side coracoclavicular (CC) distance on radiographs, postoperative complications, and the rate of subacromial erosion in the HP group were also assessed between procedures.

Results

The mean follow-up period was 7.0 ± 1.0 years, and there were no significant differences in pain or outcome scores between the HP and TR groups (all P > .05). Forward flexion was better in the TR group (172.6° ± 5.6°) versus the HP group (166.0° ± 10.8°; P = .002). The percentages of patients with a difference in the side-to-side CC distance of <5 mm were 83.3% and 72.0% in the HP and TR groups, respectively (P = .288). Complications were found in 2 patients in the HP group and 1 in the TR group (P ≥ .999). Subacromial erosion was observed in 41.7% of patients after HP fixation, with no difference in VAS pain scores at the final follow-up in patients with versus without subacromial erosion (P = .719).

Conclusion

When comparing HP with TR fixation for the treatment of acute AC joint dislocations, there were no significant differences in functional outcome scores, final CC distance, or complications. Slightly better forward flexion was seen after TR fixation. Subacromial erosion occurred in 40% of patients after HP fixation, but this did not affect long-term VAS pain scores. Both surgical techniques are effective treatment options for AC joint dislocation.

Comparing the Efficacy of Anatomical Locked Plate Fixation with Coracoclavicular Ligament Augmentation to Hook Plate Fixation in Treating Distal Clavicle Fractures

OBJECTIVE

Hook plate fixation is the traditional method for treating distal clavicle fractures. However, in recent years, locked plate applications have emerged as a promising treatment method. This study aimed to compare the short- and mid-term clinical efficacy of anatomical locked plate fixation with coracoclavicular ligament augmentation using anchor nails to that of hook plate fixation in treating distal clavicle fractures.

METHODS

This was a retrospective single-center cohort study investigating patients with distal clavicle fractures treated between January 2016 and February 2019 in Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University. Fifty-nine eligible patients who underwent either anatomical locked plate fixation with coracoclavicular ligament augmentation using anchor nails (LPF&CLA group; 20 patients) or clavicle hook plate fixation (CHPF group; 39 patients) were included. The visual analog scale (VAS) and Constant-Murley shoulder scores were used to assess shoulder function. In addition, the coracoclavicular distance between the affected and unaffected shoulders (ΔCC distance) was measured to assess the reduction. Patients were followed up at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively. The comparisons between the two groups were made using Student's t-test, chi-square test, or Fisher's exact test, if appropriate.

RESULTS

Preoperative VAS scores were similar in both groups. At 3- and 6-month follow-up, the VAS score was significantly higher in the CHPF group than in the LPF&CLA group. In contrast, the Constant-Murley shoulder score was significantly lower in the CHPF group than in the LPF&CLA group. When the hook plates were removed, there was no statistical difference in both VAS (0.2 ± 0.4 in LPF&CLA group vs. 0.5 ± 0.5 in CHPF group, p = 0.05) and Constant-Murley shoulder (96.1 ± 3.1 in LPF&CLA group vs. 93.8 ± 5.2 in CHPF group, p = 0.08) scores at the last follow-up. Postoperatively, the ΔCC distance was 2.37 ± 1.93 mm in the LPF&CLA group and -1.56 ± 1.34 mm in the CHPF group. One year after surgery, ΔCC distance increased to 3.96 ± 1.17 mm in the LPF&CLA group and to -0.89 ± 1.39 mm in the CHPF group.

CONCLUSION

For distal clavicle fractures in which the coracoclavicular ligament is disrupted, anatomical locked plate fixation with coracoclavicular ligament augmentation achieved better functional recovery and less pain than hook plate fixation at the 6-month follow-up. However, the hook plate provided better reduction throughout the follow-up period and shoulder pain could be relieved using removal surgery. Therefore, locked plates with coracoclavicular ligament augmentation favors post-surgery pain relief while harvesting similar functional outcomes to hook plate fixation.

The correlation between acromial osteolysis and acromion types in the treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocation with hook plate

This study aimed to radiologically evaluate the effect of hook plates used in the treatment of acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocations on the development of subacromial osteolysis (SAO) according to acromion types. A total of 43 patients with mean age of 38.5 (19-77) years who were diagnosed with AC dislocation and applied neutral clavicular hook plate between 2013 and 2020 were retrospectively evaluated. Acromion types were determined by measuring acromion slope angle on lateral shoulder radiography and 3-dimensional (D)-CT of the patients. Presence of SAO was classified according to the severity of erosion in the subacromial region (grade I: minimal osteolysis, grade II: subacromial erosion <2 mm, grade III: subacromial erosion >2 mm, grade IV: cut-through of the acromion) on postoperative 3D - CT and correlation with acromion types was analyzed. Incidence of SAO was significantly higher among type 1 acromion compared to type 2 and type 3 acromion (P = .003). While osteolysis was observed in 21 patients, no osteolysis was observed in 22 patients. Osteolysis occurred in all patients with type 1 acromion, 7 patients with type 2 acromion, and 5 patients with type 3 acromion. Since the hook tip in the sagittal plane passes posterior to the center of the acromion and the concavity of the subacromial surface is inadequate in the type 1 acromion, we believe that the increased pressure applied by the hook tip on the subacromial cartilage increases the risk of SAO. We predict that the use of hook plates with an angle of 15-20 degrees, similar to the patient's AC angle, rather than neutral hook plate, will reduce the risk of osteolysis in patients with type 1 acromion.

Relation between diameter of a lateral screw and pull-out strength in distal clavicle fracture in plates with different geometry: A cadaveric biomechanical study

Plate fixation has recently gained popularity among the various surgical methods used to treat Neer type II distal clavicle fractures. The use of a low-profile distal clavicle locking plate is logically considered a better option when there is no significant difference in the fixation strength between insertions of 3.5- and 2.7-mm diameter screws. Therefore, the purpose of this biomechanical study was to investigate any differences in fixation strength among varying sizes of screws that are used to treat distal clavicle fractures. The study was performed with 20 paired shoulder girdles from 10 fresh frozen cadavers. To create a type IIA fracture of Neer classification, osteotomy was performed perpendicularly to the longitudinal axis of the clavicle at the medial end point of the conoid ligament. Two custom-made fixtures designed to be attached to both upper and lower sides of the Instron were fabricated for the evaluation. The mean maximum pull-out strength for fixation using 3.5-mm diameter screws was 241.9 ± 67.8 N, whereas the mean pull-out strength in fixation with 2.7-mm diameter screws was 228.1 ± 63.0 N. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Distal fragment fixation with distal clavicle locking plates using two 2.7-mm diameter screws showed comparable biomechanical pull-out strength at the time-zero setting to fixations with a hook plate using two 3.5-mm diameter screws. Therefore, the fixation of the distal fragment with a low-profile plate and 2.7-mm screws may be preferred as an alternative option if the distal fragment of the fractured clavicle is not extremely small.

Complications and Frequency of Surgical Treatment with AO-Type Hook Plate in Shoulder Trauma: A Retrospective Study

We investigated the complications and frequency of hook plate fixation in patients with shoulder trauma. We reviewed 216 cases of hook plate fixation use at our hospital between January 2010 and May 2020. Finally, we included 76 cases of acute distal clavicle fracture (DCF) and 84 cases of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation (ACD). We investigated all complications after hook plate use, bony union in the DCF group, and reduction loss in the ACD group. We defined painful shoulder stiffness (PSS) as aggravating resting pain with stiff shoulder, and pain on shoulder elevation (PSE) as continued shoulder pain on elevation without PSS before plate removal. PSS was managed with intra-articular steroid injections or manipulation with or without arthroscopic capsular release (ACR). PSS occurred in 36 and 33 cases of DCF and ACD, respectively. PSE occurred in 17 of 76 fractures and 13 of 84 dislocations. However, no iatrogenic rotator cuff injury was verified by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with PSS or PSE. Subacromial erosion in patients with hook plate fixation should be considered a sequela and not a complication because it is unavoidable in surgery with an AO-type hook plate. The most common complication was PSS, followed by PSE.

Effect of subacromial erosion shape on rotator cuff and clinical outcomes after hook plate fixation in type 5 acromioclavicular joint dislocations: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Surgical fixation using hook plates is widely used in the treatment of acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence and shape of subacromial erosions after removal of the hook plate in type 5 AC joint dislocations. Further, we evaluated the effect of the shape of the subacromial erosion on the rotator cuff.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 30 patients who underwent hook plate fixation for type 5 AC joint dislocations at our hospital between December 2010 and December 2018. Patients with a follow-up of at least 1 year were included. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the final follow-up Constant-Murley, Korean Shoulder, and visual analog scores. To ensure that the appropriate reduction was well maintained, the coracoclavicular distances of the injured and contralateral sides were evaluated at the last follow-up. Computed tomography was performed to investigate the presence and shape of the subacromial erosion after hook plate removal at 4 months after surgery. Ultrasonography was performed to investigate the presence of rotator cuff lesions at the last follow-up. Clinical and radiological outcomes were compared between groups divided according to the presence and types of subacromial erosions.

Results

Subacromial erosion was observed in 60% of patients (18/30): 13, 2, and 3 simple groove, cave, and marginal protrusion types, respectively. Four patients showed reduction loss at the final follow-up. There were no significant differences in clinical and radiological outcomes between the groups with and without subacromial erosion. Moreover, there were no significant differences between groups according to the types of subacromial erosion. There were no rotator cuff lesions, such as partial tears, in the injured shoulders.

Conclusions

Hook plate fixation may induce subacromial erosions. However, the subacromial erosions caused by the hook plate did not affect the clinical outcomes of type 5 AC joint dislocations. Moreover, regardless of its shape, the subacromial erosion did not affect the clinical outcomes nor cause rotator cuff lesions after plate removal.