Comparison of Clinical and Anatomical Outcomes between Delaminated Rotator Cuff Tear and Single Layer Rotator Cuff Tear

Delamination of rotator cuff tears impairs healing after repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical outcomes and retear rates after rotator cuff repair (RCR) between delaminated and non-delaminated tears.

METHODS

This systematic review was conducted according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines using the PubMed, Cochrane Library, the Web of Science and Embase databases. Only articles on arthroscopic RCR with clinical outcome scores and data on the number of rotator cuff retears and complete healing were included. This study's relevant data were extracted and statistically analyzed. The methodological index for nonrandomized studies was used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies. After conducting a heterogeneity test and sensitivity analysis to determine whether the samples were heterogeneous, the study also detected publication bias. A sub-group test was used to evaluate the influences of the imaging follow-up period on retear rates.

RESULTS

Ten eligible articles were identified with 2,061 patients (925 in the delaminated group and 1,136 in the non-delaminated group). The meta-analysis demonstrated that delamination was significantly associated with higher retear rates (P = 0.026; odds ratio = 1.873, 95% confidence interval 1.079-3.252; I2 = 51.6%) with an imaging follow-up period of > 1 year and lower rates of complete healing (P = 0.036; odds ratio = 0.659, 95% confidence interval 0.446-0.973; I2 = 9.0%) in patients after rotator cuff repair. However, no significant differences were observed between the two groups based on American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Constant score, visual analog scale score, external rotation, internal rotation, or forward elevation.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis found that delamination was significantly associated with higher retear rates with imaging follow-up period of > 1 year, and lower rates of complete healing. In addition, the preoperative and postoperative clinical scores and shoulder joint range of motion were similar between patients with delaminated and non-delaminated tears.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Surgical Treatment Outcomes for Everted Bursal Flap of Delaminated Supraspinatus Tear

Background:

Although everted bursal flaps of delaminated tears have been reported, few studies have reported radiologic images, arthroscopic findings, and clinical results after repair.

Purpose:

To compare the repair outcomes of everted delaminated tears with those of classic delaminated supraspinatus tears.

Study Design:

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

Among 153 patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair for a delaminated supraspinatus tear, everted bursal flap tears were observed in 24 patients upon arthroscopy (group A). Another 24 patients with classic delaminated supraspinatus tears, matched for age and sex, were selected for group B. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasonography were performed preoperatively and postoperatively. Patients were evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS) for pain as well as functional scores (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES] score, Constant score, and University of California Los Angeles shoulder score). Scores were compared preoperatively and at final follow-up (mean follow-up, 32 months).

Results:

Patients in both groups A and B reported improved VAS and functional scores at the final follow-up. In group A, preoperative VAS scores were higher and functional scores were poorer than in group B. Subacromial effusions with tendon swelling on preoperative MRI were more common in group A. During follow-up ultrasonography, group A patients exhibited persistent subacromial effusion. However, VAS scores at final follow-up were significantly better in group A (0.4 ± 0.7) than in group B (1.6 ± 1.4) (P < .001), and ASES scores at final follow-up were better in group A (84.3 ± 4.3) than in group B (77.0 ± 10.2) (P = .005).

Conclusion:

Everted bursal flap delaminated tears were associated with higher VAS scores and poorer functional scores preoperatively. Although subacromial effusions were experienced by group A during the early postoperative period, clinical outcomes at final follow-up were significantly better for everted delaminated tears compared with classic delaminated tears.

Ultrasound Findings Aid Decisions to Repair Partial Articular Supraspinatus Tendon Avulsion

OBJECTIVES

Ultrasound (US) is useful for diagnosing full-thickness rotator cuff tears and high-grade partial-thickness bursal-side tears. However, anisotropy artifacts make it difficult to identify partial articular supraspinatus tendon avulsion (PASTA) by US. This study was performed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of US for PASTA and to uncover sensitive findings that could aid decisions to repair.

METHODS

Patients who underwent preoperative US examinations and supraspinatus tendon confirmation by arthroscopic examinations were enrolled. We analyzed 52 PASTA cases involving greater than 50% thickness of the tendon and 52 age- and sex-matched cases with an intact supraspinatus. Two orthopedic surgeons blinded to the diagnosis interpreted US videos of the supraspinatus tendon. Six findings (echo defect, tendon delamination, echo change, tendon thickness, tendon fiber pattern, and cartilage interface sign) were assessed. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for each US finding.

RESULTS

The cases consisted of 46 men and 58 women. The US diagnosis of PASTA showed sensitivity of 64.7%, specificity of 94.1%, and accuracy of 79.4%. The echo change in the short axis showed the highest sensitivity. Thinning and delamination showed the highest specificity of 100%. In contrast to previous reports, the sensitivity of the cartilage interface sign was low in both long-axis images (17.6%) and short-axis images (29.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative diagnostic US to aid decisions regarding PASTA repair showed high specificity (94.1%) and moderate accuracy (79.4%). However, the sensitivity was only 64.7% and was affected by the examiner's experience with US.