Treatment of Large and Massive Rotator Cuff Tears: Does Infraspinatus Muscle Tear Affect Repair Integrity?

A combined anterior and posterior cuff transfer: a novel technique for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears

INTRODUCTION

Irreparable rotator cuff tears (IRCTs) are large tears that can't be surgically repaired due to poor tissue quality, degeneration, or severe tendon retraction. These tears often involve multiple tendons and lead to fatty infiltration, humeral head migration, and tendon retraction. Patients with IRCTs typically present with pseudoparalysis, muscle atrophy, or anterosuperior escape. While various surgical options exist, outcomes are often inconsistent. This case series presents a novel technique for managing massive IRCTs, showing excellent, consistent results and offering a promising advancement for treating these challenging cases.

METHODOLOGY

Our case series involved 20 patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears, presenting clinically with pseudoparalysis and radiographically with signs of fatty infiltration, anterosuperior escape, and tendon retraction. The outcomes of interest included the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORI), Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), and range of motion arc (forward flexion and abduction), measured both preoperatively and postoperatively.

RESULTS

The mean age of our patient cohort was 53.6 years, with a mean follow-up time of 40 months. The mean preoperative WORI score was 155.3, which improved to 54.2 postoperatively, showing an improvement of 101 points from the baseline. The mean preoperative OSS was 34.4, improving to 10.5 postoperatively, with a gain of 23.8 points. The mean preoperative range of motion for forward flexion was 67.0°, which improved to 164° postoperatively, resulting in a mean gain of 97°. The mean preoperative abduction was 57°, which improved to 166° postoperatively, with a mean gain of 109°. All these findings were statistically significant (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In our surgical technique, all patients demonstrated clinically and statistically significant improvements in both range of motion and patient-reported outcomes. This makes our approach a novel, robust, and reliable technique for managing massive irreparable tears, particularly in young adult patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Case Series, Level IV.

All-Arthroscopic Supraspinatus and Infraspinatus Muscle Advancement Leads to High Healing Rate and Excellent Outcomes in Patients With Massive, Retracted Rotator Cuff Tears, Even in Patients With Pseudoparalysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of an all-arthroscopic rotator cuff repair technique involving muscle advancement and double-layer lasso loop (DLLL) repair for massive, retracted posterosuperior cuff tears.

METHODS

This was a retrospective case series of patients with massive, retracted posterosuperior cuff tears who underwent the all-arthroscopic muscle advancement technique from March 2017 to September 2021, with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Key steps included suprascapular nerve release, advancement of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscles, and DLLL repair. Preoperative and postoperative visual analog scale score for pain, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) shoulder score, Constant score, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder score, active range of motion, and strength were compared. Preoperative and postoperative structural radiologic characteristics were analyzed.

RESULTS

We evaluated 43 shoulders in 38 patients with a mean follow-up period of 18.8 months (range, 12-55 months). Of the 43 shoulders, 4 showed repair failure (9.3% retear rate). Visual analog scale, ASES, Constant, and UCLA scores significantly improved (P < .001) in patients who showed healing on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (n = 39). ASES, Constant, and UCLA scores were significantly better in the healed group, with 100% exceeding the minimal clinically important difference for the ASES score and UCLA score and 84.2%, for Constant score. A lower proportion of patients in the retear group achieved the minimal clinically important difference. Active range of motion in all planes significantly improved for patients who had healed repairs (P < .001). Relative abduction strength, supraspinatus strength, and infraspinatus strength were at least 90% of those on the contralateral side. The recovery rate of pseudoparalysis (7 patients) was 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

All-arthroscopic muscle advancement, coupled with DLLL repair, leads to a high healing rate with excellent clinical outcomes and recovery of strength to at least 90%, even in patients with pseudoparalysis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective case series.

The impact of supraspinatus tear on subscapularis muscle atrophy and fatty infiltration

BACKGROUND

Aimed to report the prevalence and predisposing factors affecting subscapularis muscle atrophy and fatty infiltration (MAFI) in patients without a subscapularis tear, and to analyze the effect of this condition on surgical outcomes.

METHODS

Between 2020 and 2022, 153 patients (mean age 58.1 ± 10.2 years; 84 men and 69 women) who underwent repair of posterosuperior cuff tears, with no subscapularis tears identified during arthroscopy were retrospectively analyzed. Baseline characteristics, preoperative and follow-up (6 months) magnetic resonance imaging findings, arthroscopic findings, and clinical outcomes (>1 year) were recorded.

RESULTS

The prevalence of subscapularis MAFI (Goutallier grade 1 or 2) was 73.9% (113/153), of which the prevalence of Goutallier grade 2 was 23.5% (36/153). From multivariable logistic regression analysis, female sex (odds ratio [OR], 5.6; 95% CI, 1.7-18.6; P=0.005), older age (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.0-1.1; P=0.052), advanced supraspinatus MAFI by Goutallier grade (OR, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.5-6.9; P=0.004), and synovitis (OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.1-7.9; P=0.030) were identified as independent predisposing factors for subscapularis MAFI. However, patients with preoperative subscapularis MAFI exhibited similar final range of motion, pain and function, and belly press strength compared to those without preoperative subscapularis MAFI.

CONCLUSIONS

Subscapularis MAFI is frequently observed conditions even in the absence of subscapularis tears, and this condition could be affected by supraspinatus MAFI, female sex, older age, and synovitis. However, because subscapularis MAFI does not affect the surgical outcome, surgeons need not be concerned about this condition when repairing posterosuperior rotator cuff tear. Level of evidence: IV.

Combination of Superior and Posterior Capsular Release Versus Superior Capsular Release Alone in Arthroscopic Repair of Large-to-Massive Rotator Cuff Tears

Background

Superior capsular release has been used to reduce tendon tension, especially in arthroscopic repair of large-to-massive rotator cuff tears. Some clinicians have used a more extensive release of capsules in arthroscopic cuff repair for adequate reduction of torn tendons to footprints.

Purpose

To explore the effects of additional posterior capsular release for superior capsular release in arthroscopic repair of large-to-massive rotator cuff tears.

Study Design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

We compared 26 shoulders that underwent superior and posterior capsular release (group S&P) with 26 shoulders that underwent superior capsular release alone (group S) in arthroscopic repair of large-to-massive rotator cuff tears between January 23, 2013 and December 2, 2015. The visual analog scale for pain, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Constant score, and range of motion (ROM) and muscle power were checked preoperatively and at 2 years postoperatively. Follow-up ultrasound was checked at 2 years postoperatively.

Results

In both groups, the overall mean functional outcomes improved from preoperatively to postoperatively. Patients in group S&P showed more pre- to postoperative improvement than patients in group S with regard to internal rotation ROM (mean difference, 30.0° vs 20.6°; P < .001) and internal rotation power (3.4 vs 1.8 kgf; P = .001). Patients in group S had a higher retear rate on the follow-up ultrasound than patients in group S&P, but this difference did not reach statistical significance (23.1% vs 11.5%, respectively; P = .465).

Conclusion

In the current study, patients who underwent superior and posterior capsular release in arthroscopic repair of large-to-massive rotator cuff tears had greater postoperative improvement in internal rotation ROM and power compared with patients who underwent superior capsular release alone.

Different types of rotator cuff tear morphology do not affect post-repair clinical outcomes in large to massive tears

OBJECTIVES

The primary aim of this current study is to evaluate the effects of rotator cuff tear morphology on clinical outcomes in large to massive tears, using a modified version of the existing classification system, with specific focus on tear symmetry and use of margin convergence.

METHODS

Patients who underwent arthroscopic repair of large to massive, full thickness rotator cuff tears were retrospectively analysed. The tear pattern was classified at the time of surgery as Type IA, Type IB, Type IIA, and Type IIB according to tear symmetry and direction of maximum tear diameter, with Type I being symmetrical and Type II being asymmetrical. Type IA (U-shaped) had greater mediolateral (ML) than anteroposterior (AP) diameter while Type IB (crescent shaped) had greater AP than ML diameter. Type IIA tears have an anterior extension towards the rotator interval while IIB tears have a posterior extension into the infraspinatus, similar to AP L-shaped tears established in the literature. Type I tears were typically repaired from medial to lateral while Type II tears were repaired diagonally. All types were repaired using double row technique, with the addition of margin convergence for Types IA and IIB, which had larger tears in the medial and lateral directions. Primary outcome measures were Oxford Shoulder Score, Constant Shoulder Score, University of California at Los Angeles Shoulder Score followed-up at 6, 12, and 24-months as well as retear rates at latest follow-up.

RESULTS

In total, 109 patients were included in the study with a mean age of 65.5 ​± ​9.4. The prevalence of each tear morphologies from Type IA to IIB was 22.0 ​%, 34.9 ​%, 27.5 ​%, and 15.6 ​%, respectively. All four groups showed statistically significant improvement from pre-operative scores in all 3 outcome measures at 24 months (p ​< ​0.001 for all). No significant difference in primary outcome measures or retear rates was detected between all 4 groups.

CONCLUSION

This study found that different types of cuff tear morphology, despite affecting surgical repair technique, does not influence clinical outcomes post-arthroscopic rotator cuff repair at mid-term follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective Cohort study, Level III.

Clinical outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty and rotator cuff repair in patients with massive rotator cuff tears without osteoarthritis: comparison using propensity score matching

BACKGROUND

The optimal management for massive rotator cuff tears (MRCTs) without osteoarthritis (OA) remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) vs. rotator cuff repair (RCR) in patients with MRCTs without OA.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective data analysis of 68 patients treated for MRCTs via RSA and 215 patients treated for MRCTs via arthroscopic RCR between January 2014 and April 2019. Through propensity score matching, patients were matched for sex, age, tear size, and global fatty degeneration index. Thirty-nine patients in each group were included, and all patients had completed minimal 2-year follow-up. Postoperative radiologic evaluations of healing failure were performed. The visual analog scale score for pain, range of motion, and functional outcome measures including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, QuickDASH (short version of Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire) score, Simple Shoulder Test score, and Constant score were assessed and compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

Healing failure was observed in 10 patients in the RCR group (32.3%). No statistically significant differences in preoperative range of motion and functional scores were found between the RCR and RSA groups. Both groups showed significant pain relief and functional improvement at final follow-up. Patients in the RCR group showed significantly greater forward elevation (156.4° ± 23.8° vs. 139.7° ± 22.4°, P < .001) and internal rotation (thoracic vertebra, T8.2 ± 1.2 vs. T9.7 ± 2.6, P = .001). The average American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was 88.3 ± 12.2 in the RCR group and 81.8 ± 16.1 in the RSA group (P = .045). The QuickDASH score was significantly higher in the RCR group (P = .019). A significantly higher Simple Shoulder Test score (9.7 ± 2.8 vs. 8.1 ± 3.0, P = .01) and a significantly higher Constant score (67.2 ± 6.5 vs. 63.2 ± 7.1, P = .011) were seen in the RCR group.

CONCLUSION

Both RSA and RCR are effective and reliable treatment options for MRCTs without OA. However, the RCR group showed better shoulder function improvement than the RSA group. Considering the possible implications of RSA, RCR should be referred to as a first-line treatment option for patients with MRCTs without OA with proper indications.

The scissors sign: a provocative test for detecting the leading-edge tear of subscapularis tendon: a diagnostic study

BACKGROUND

Several physical examination tests and signs have been described to aid in the diagnosis of subscapularis (SSC) tear, but have limitations and variable sensitivity. This study aimed to introduce a novel test for detecting a leading-edge tear of the subscapularis (LETS), the most important tendinous portion of SSC.

METHODS

A total of 233 patients who underwent arthroscopic repair for anterior and superior cuff tears between January 2018 to September 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The provocative test we have coined as the "scissors sign" and the other related clinical tests (i.e., belly press, belly off, Napoleon, lift off, internal rotation lag, bear hug tests) were performed preoperatively. Whether the patient has a LETS or the complete tear of the SSC (CTS) was confirmed by arthroscopic findings. Sensitivity, specificity, and areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were calculated for each test.

RESULTS

In patients who had LETS with or without supraspinatus tear, the scissors sign showed the highest sensitivity (91.4%) with a specificity of 81.6%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 80.2%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 92.1%. In patients with isolated LETS, the scissors sign also showed the highest sensitivity (90.3%) with a specificity of 81.6%, PPV of 57.1%, and NPV of 96.8%. The scissors sign for the complete tear of the subscapularis (CTS) with or without supraspinatus tear and the isolated CTS had a sensitivity of 73.1 and 75%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The scissors sign is a novel provocative test that can be helpful in the diagnosis of subscapularis tears, especially LETS, with its high sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy. In combination with other tests, the scissors sign will be a good screening tool.

Preoperative rotator cuff tendon integrity, tear size, and muscle atrophy and fatty infiltration are associated with structural outcomes of arthroscopic revision rotator cuff repair

PURPOSE

A few studies have focused on factors predisposing to retear after arthroscopic revision rotator cuff repair (ARRCR). This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate (1) the structural and clinical outcomes of ARRCR and (2) pre- and intraoperative factors affecting the integrity of the rotator cuff (RC) tendon by focusing on preoperative RC tendon integrity, tear size, muscle hypotrophy and fatty infiltration.

METHODS

Patients who underwent ARRCR between 2006 and 2016 were reviewed. Preoperative variables included demographic data, RC tendon integrity, tear size, and muscle hypotrophy and fatty infiltration on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Intraoperative variables included repair technique and completeness of repair. The visual analog scale for pain (PVAS), functional VAS (FVAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, and shoulder range of motion (ROM) were assessed. Postoperative tendon integrity was evaluated using over 6-month follow-up MRI. Patients were classified into groups A (healed) and B (retear), and their variables were compared.

RESULTS

Overall 65 patients with a mean follow-up of 49.5 ± 30.2 (range, 24.0-148.9) months were analyzed. Fifty-six of 65 (86.2%) patients underwent MRI at 9.1 ± 9.7 (range, 4.4-40.2) months after ARRCR, and 20 of 56 (35.7%) patients (group B) exhibited retear. Group A (36/56, 64.3%) showed higher functional scores and ROMs than group B at the final follow-up, with significant differences in the FVAS scores (Group A versus B: FVAS, 7.6 ± 1.8 versus 6.4 ± 1.9, p = 0.036). Intraoperative variables, including preoperative tendon integrity (p = 0.021), tear size (p = 0.007), supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscle hypotrophy and fatty infiltration (p < 0.001 and p = 0.046), and completeness of repair (p = 0.030), differed significantly between the groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that preoperative supraspinatus muscle hypotrophy and fatty infiltration were independent predisposing factors for retear after ARRCR [odds ratio = 7.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-55.8, p = 0.048].

CONCLUSION

The retear was found in 20/56 patients (35.7%) after ARRCR for less than massive rotator cuff tears in this limited study population. Preoperative tendon integrity, tear size, supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscle hypotrophy and fatty infiltration, and completeness of repair was revealed to be associated with tendon integrity following ARRCR. Among them, preoperative supraspinatus muscle atrophy and fatty infiltration were the independent factors for retear after ARRCR, although generalization is limited.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Suture Slippage After Arthroscopic Cuff Repair: Medial Displacement of Suture Knots on Follow-up Ultrasonography

Background:

Compared with the single-row technique, the double-row rotator cuff repair technique is known to have a higher load to failure and a lower frequency of gap formation, leading to a lower retear rate. There are some patients with poor clinical outcomes or poor muscle strength without radiologic retear.

Purpose/Hypothesis:

To assess the postoperative position of suture knots via serial ultrasonography in patients who had undergone arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with the suture-bridge technique. Our hypothesis was that the suture would pull out of the lateral anchor (suture slippage), changing the positions of the medial suture knots during healing.

Study Design:

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

This study included 53 patients (55 shoulders) who underwent arthroscopic suture-bridge repair and were evaluated for a minimum of 24 months. On serial ultrasonography, a straight line was drawn between the top of the greater tuberosity and the medial cortex of the anchor hole. The distances between the knots of the medial rows and the perpendicular line through the center of the anchor hole were measured in longitudinal plane images of the supraspinatus. Follow-up ultrasonography was performed at 2, 3, and 6 months postoperatively as well as at the final visit. The visual analog scale, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, the Constant score, and the University of California, Los Angeles shoulder score were recorded preoperatively and on the final follow-up.

Results:

Of the 55 shoulders, 6 developed retears at repaired sites. The mean follow-up duration was 37.5 months (range, 24-65 months). Slippage distance increased significantly over time (P < .001). The slippage at the final visit did not differ between patients with retear and no retear (13.4 mm for retear group; 10.6 mm for no retear group [P = .096]).

Conclusion:

Suture knots of the medial row migrated medially via a suture pullout from the lateral row anchor of suture-bridge technique. Suture slippage distance did not differ significantly between retear and no retear groups.