Results of radial head resection after Mason type 3 or 4 fracture of the elbow

[Radial Head Replacement: Management of Elbow and Forearm Instability after Comminuted Radial Head Fractures Associated with Elbow Dislocation]

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

This manuscript aims to identify an indication algorithm for the surgical treatment of radial head fractures associated with elbow dislocation. The study compares the mid-term functional outcomes of patients with multifragment radial head fracture treated by resection with the outcomes of patients treated with radial head replacement.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The cohort of 34 patients who sustained a radial head fracture at the mean age of 42.5 years (age range 20-81 years) was broken down into two groups by type of surgery. The EXT group consists of 20 patients with the radial head fracture treated by radial head resection. The END group includes 14 patients treated with the radial head replacement. In all patients, the radial head fracture was associated with elbow dislocation (type IV fracture according to the Mason-Johnston classification). The modified Kocher's surgical approach was used in all patients of both the groups. In the EXT group, resection of the fragmented radial head was performed. In the END group, the ExploR® Modular Radial Head System (Zimmer, Biomet, USA) was used, consisting of a CoCr (cobalt chromium) alloy head and a titanium stem. The pain and the range of motion of the elbow and forearm were evaluated after the completion of the outpatient rehabilitation (the mean follow-up period was 2.4 years). Simultaneously, the elbow joint stability was assessed. Radiographs were taken to detect heterotopic ossifications, proximalization of the radius, and any signs of prosthesis loosening. The frequency of reoperations was followed-up. The MEPS (Mayo Elbow Performance Score) was calculated.

RESULTS

In the EXT group, the mean elbow flexion was 117.5° and the mean pronation/supination was 166.9°. In 50% of patients, the MEPS obtained was greater than 90 points, which means an excellent functional outcome. In 1 patient (5%), recurrent elbow dislocation occurred which was the reason for revision surgery (elbow transfixation with the Kirschner wires and medial collateral ligament suture). Revision surgery was also performed in 2 patients (10%) in whom not all the radial head fragments were removed. Moreover, also observed was elbow joint instability (2 patients) and temporary radial nerve paralysis (1 patient). In 1 case discrete proximalization of the radius developed. The patients in the END group showed the mean elbow flexion of 112° and the mean pronation/supination of 135°. The MEPS obtained from 69% of patients was greater than 90 points, which means an excellent outcome. The pain under load was reported by 3 patients (21%). In 5 patients (35%), the X-rays showed radiolucent zone around the stem of the prosthesis. Neither revision surgery, nor prosthesis removal has been performed yet in any patient. No instability, neurological complications or infections have been reported. In both EXT and END group heterotopic ossifications have developed in 4 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Radial head replacement compared to the radial head resection in the management of multifragment fractures associated with elbow dislocations increase the elbow and forearm stability. The group of patients with an implanted radial head prosthesis shows a higher percentage of patients achieving excellent functional outcome than the group of patients with radial head resection.

KEY WORDS

radial head, elbow, fracture, dislocation, resection, prosthesis.

Impact of radiocapitellar interposition arthroplasty on ulnohumeral joint biomechanics

BACKGROUND

Radial head excision (RHE) has been shown to increase contact pressures within the ulnohumeral joint. Radiocapitellar interposition arthroplasty (RCIA) with the use of a soft tissue graft is an alternative for the treatment of isolated radiocapitellar arthritis or with failure of radial head replacement. We investigated contact pressures and contact area within the ulnohumeral joint after RHE compared to RCIA with dermal autograft.

METHODS

Six fresh-frozen cadaver elbows were tested on a custom dynamic elbow frame. A pressure sensor was inserted into the intact elbow joint, and mean contact pressure, peak contact pressure, contact area, and force within the ulnohumeral joint were recorded at 0°, 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120° of flexion as a valgus load was applied to the elbow. The radial head was then excised and specimens were retested. Finally, a dermal graft matched to the size of the resected radial head was inserted in the radiocapitellar space and the specimens were tested a third time.

RESULTS

At 90° of flexion, contact pressure within the ulnohumeral joint was significantly lower with RCIA compared with RHE (110.8 kPa vs 216.8 kPa; P = .013). The mean peak contact pressure was also significantly lower with RCIA compared with RHE at 90° (279.4 vs 626.7 kPa; P = .025). No statistically significant differences were seen in mean contact area or force between the 3 testing conditions at any flexion position.

CONCLUSION

RCIA with a dermal graft reduced contact pressures within the ulnohumeral joint compared to RHE at 90° of flexion without a significant change in contact area or contact force.

Clinical and radiological outcome of Mason-Johnston types III and IV radial head fractures treated by an on-table reconstruction

Background

Only few methods treating comminuted radial head fractures have been established providing sufficient joint reconstruction, restoring radial length and enabling early joint mobilization. When an anatomical reconstruction using open reduction and internal fixation is not possible, radial head resection or primary arthroplasty is often conducted. An “Ex situ/on-table” reconstruction is widely disregarded but can be an option. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the functional and radiological outcome of comminuted radial head fractures treated with an “on-table” reconstruction and internal fixation using a low profile plate.

Methods

Fourteen patients who sustained a radial head fracture (9 Mason-Johnston type III and 5 Mason-Johnston type IV) and were treated with an “on-table” reconstruction between 2010 and 2020 were evaluated retrospectively. The patients mean age was 41.3 years (range 21–69). The clinical evaluation included active range of motion, grip strength, pain level and elbow stability. The functional outcome was assessed using the Disability of Arm, Shoulder and the Hand (DASH) score, Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI), Broberg and Morrey score. The radiological examination included a.p. and lateral views of the injured elbow to evaluate nonunions, loss of reduction, joint alignment, avascular radial head necrosis, heterotopic ossifications and posttraumatic osteoarthritis.

Results

The inclusion rate was 74% with a mean follow-up of 50 months (range 16–128). The mean elbow flexion of the injured side was 126° (range110–145°) with an average extension loss of 8° (range 0–40°). Pronation was 65° (15–90°) and supination 66° (5–90°). The mean MEPI was 87 points (range 45–100). The mean DASH score was 13 points (range 1–88). According to the Broberg and Morrey functional scoring system, the average score was 92 points (range 88–100). Complete bone union was achieved in 9 cases, partial union in 4 cases and nonunion in one case. There were no signs of avascular necrosis of the radial head. Signs of post-traumatic osteoarthritis were seen in 11 cases. Five patients needed an implant removal due to a radio-ulnar impingement and one patient a revision surgery due to the nonunion and implant breakage.

Conclusions

An on-table (ex situ) reconstruction of the radial head is a reliable option with a good clinical outcome and low complication rate in the surgical treatment of comminuted radial head fractures. It can restore joint alignment and maintain radial length. The risk for avascular necrosis is neglectable, and the bone healing rate is high.

Radial head arthroplasty vs. open reduction and internal fixation for the treatment of terrible triad injury of the elbow: A systematic review and meta‑analysis update

Terrible triad injury of the elbow (TTIE) is a severe high-energy injury to the elbow, mainly including elbow dislocation, coronoid fracture and radial head fracture. It is difficult to maintain the stability of the elbow joint using traditional conservative treatment, and there is a high risk of redislocation and various complications. Therefore, surgical treatment is currently advocated, mainly for repairing damaged ligaments and reconstructing bony structures, but there is still controversy about the treatment plan for the radial head. The current meta-analysis was conducted to compare the differences in efficacy of radial head arthroplasty (RHA) and open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) in the treatment of TTIE. Published literature related to the treatment (either ORIF or RHA) of TTIE was searched for in Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, Cochrane Library and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database. According to the search strategy, a total of 1,928 related publications were retrieved. The patient must have been diagnosed with TTIE and required surgery on the radial head. The interventions were RHA and ORIF. Non-case-control studies, case reports, review articles, letters, duplicate reports and literature without sufficient relevant data were excluded. The quality of the literature was evaluated according to the Cochrane systematic review methodology and the Jadad scale. After data extraction, meta-analysis was performed using ReviewManager 5.4 software (Cochrane). A total of 15 studies involving 455 patients (189 who underwent RHA and 266 who underwent ORIF) were included. Range of motion (ROM) of the forearm (pronation-supination arc) after surgery in the RHA group [95% CI (0.28, 9.59); P=0.04] was found to be significantly superior to the ORIF group, with a lower incidence of complications [95% CI (0.22, 0.84); P=0.01]. However, there was no statistically significant difference for the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score nor for ROM of the elbow (flexion-extension arc). Overall, compared with the ORIF group, the RHA group had better forearm rotational ROM and fewer complications after surgery. Therefore, RHA was found to be superior to ORIF in the treatment of TTIE.

A hybrid technique combining intramedullary pinning with extramedullary plate fixation in unstable and comminuted radial head fractures following on-table reconstruction

Background

Management of comminuted radial fractures remains controversial. Currently, the emergence of on-table reconstruction technique has made fixation in comminuted radial head fractures more viable. However, the present study reported an intro-operative unstable displacement from the reconstructed radial head to the neck during plate fixation, characterized by a poor radiocapitellar contact and incongruity between the radial head and neck. A hybrid technique combining with intramedullary pining was performed in our study to restore the normal alignment and maintain the stability of fixation. Therefore, the purpose of this article aimed to prove the feasibility of unstable comminuted radial head fractures treated with the extramedullary plate and intramedullary pinning fixation using titanium elastic nails.

Methods

The clinical, functional and radiographic outcomes of the groups were compared during follow-up. The radiographic examination was conducted to evaluate the status of bone union, heterotopic ossification and post-traumatic arthritis. The functional assessment was performed to evaluate clinical effects, which included measurements of range of motion (ROM) in the elbow, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, Elbow Self-Assessment score (ESAS), Mayo Elbow Performance score (MEPS), and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH)Outcome Measure score.

Results

Thirteen patients with unstable fractures were participated with an average follow-up of (38.6 ± 4.5) months for the experimental group and (32.0 ± 6.3) months for the control group, respectively. The functional outcomes in the experimental group, including MEPS and DASH, were significantly superior to the control group. However, no significant difference was observed in the elbow ROM and VAS score between two groups. In the last follow-up, one patient with post-traumatic arthritis rated as grades 1 and two with heterotopic ossifications were observed in the experimental group. In the control group, degenerative changes were observed in three cases (grade 1 in two cases and grade 2 in one case) and heterotopic ossifications rated as grade I were found in two patients.

Conclusion

Collectively, intramedullary pinning with extramedullary plate fixation is feasible in unstable comminuted radial head fractures, which can be considered as a remedial surgery for on-table reconstruction technique.