Minimization of Radiation Exposure due to Computed Tomography in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Making computed tomography safer for patients with Crohn's disease

Background and aims: Computed tomography (CT), often more accessible than magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), remains widely used though radiation exposure is an obvious disadvantage. We previously showed that modern CT technology can achieve over 70% reduction in radiation-dose without loss of accuracy. Here, we compare low- versus conventional-dose CT in patients with known Crohn's disease to assess clinical confidence and accuracy of the low-dose procedure in the semi-acute setting.Methods: A comparative study of low-dose CT with full iterative reconstruction (IR) versus conventional-dose CT was conducted in 50 consecutive outpatients with Crohn's disease. Clinicians were provided with the low-dose images and reports, whereas conventional-dose images were reviewed after 4 weeks.Results: The clinical question was adequately addressed with low-dose IR imaging in all cases. Complications of Crohn's were detected in 37/50 (74%) with no disagreement between low- and conventional-dose imaging. The effective radiation dose reduction was 76.5% (low-dose mean 2.15 mSv versus conventional-dose CT 6.99 mSv).Conclusion: Low-dose IR CT is safe and accurate for evaluating distribution and complications of known Crohn's disease in the outpatient setting. We propose that low-dose radiation imaging should be adopted as standard-of-care for the evaluation of Crohn's disease and an acceptable alternative to MR particularly in the acute setting. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03140306.

Low-Dose Computed Tomography for the Optimization of Radiation Dose Exposure in Patients with Crohn's Disease

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the mainstay method for the radiological imaging of the small bowel in patients with inflammatory bowel disease without the use of ionizing radiation. There are circumstances where imaging using ionizing radiation is required, particularly in the acute setting. This usually takes the form of computed tomography (CT). There has been a significant increase in the utilization of computed tomography (CT) for patients with Crohn's disease as patients are frequently diagnosed at a relatively young age and require repeated imaging. Between seven and eleven percent of patients with IBD are exposed to high cumulative effective radiation doses (CEDs) (>35–75 mSv), mostly patients with Crohn's disease (Newnham E 2007, Levi Z 2009, Hou JK 2014, Estay C 2015). This is primarily due to the more widespread and repeated use of CT, which accounts for 77% of radiation dose exposure amongst patients with Crohn's disease (Desmond et al., 2008). Reports of the projected cancer risks from the increasing CT use (Berrington et al., 2007) have led to increased patient awareness regarding the potential health risks from ionizing radiation (Coakley et al., 2011). Our responsibilities as physicians caring for these patients include education regarding radiation risk and, when an investigation that utilizes ionizing radiation is required, to keep radiation doses as low as reasonably achievable: the “ALARA” principle. Recent advances in CT technology have facilitated substantial radiation dose reductions in many clinical settings, and several studies have demonstrated significantly decreased radiation doses in Crohn's disease patients while maintaining diagnostic image quality. However, there is a balance to be struck between reducing radiation exposure and maintaining satisfactory image quality; if radiation dose is reduced excessively, the resulting CT images can be of poor quality and may be nondiagnostic. In this paper, we summarize the available evidence related to imaging of Crohn's disease, radiation exposure, and risk, and we report recent advances in low-dose CT technology that have particular relevance.

Comparison between multi-slice spiral CT and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of peritoneal metastasis in primary ovarian carcinoma

The advent of disease evaluation by means of multi-slice spiral computed tomography (MSCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) represents a continually emerging role in the evaluation of various diseases; however, its role is yet to be adequately defined. Thus, the aim of the study was to compare the diagnostic value of MSCT and MRI in the diagnosis of peritoneal metastasis in primary ovarian carcinoma. Between January 2013 and December 2015, MSCT or MRI data were collected from 42 patients who had been previously diagnosed with peritoneal metastasis of ovarian carcinoma at the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University. The tumor location, size, edge, and shape were all evaluated independently by three qualified imaging physicians using a double-blind method to confirm whether the patients were indeed suffering from peritoneal metastasis, as well as to rank the metastatic lesions recorded on a five-point scale. It was hypothesized that MRI and MSCT were comparable in the evaluation of ovarian carcinoma. Therefore, a receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was used to analyze the results and also to directly compare the respective diagnostic values of MSCT and MRI. In total, 165 metastatic lesions were confirmed by means of surgical operation. MSCT revealed 131 metastatic lesions, while MRI confirmed 154 metastatic lesions. The metastatic sites were primarily located on the subphrenic, epiploon, and gastrocolic ligaments and were further confirmed by either MRI or CT. In regard to MSCT, the most common site of underdiagnoses was in the vicinity of the uterus-rectum-fossa. MRI displayed a high detection rate in every site. The omission diagnostic rate of MSCT and MRI were 20.61% and 6.67%, respectively, while the accuracy rates were 79.39% and 93.33%, respectively. The obtained results revealed that the MSCT value of area under the ROC curve was smaller than that for MRI. Our findings provided evidence asserting that MRI, in comparison to MSCT, was more accurate in diagnosing peritoneal metastasis in patients with ovarian carcinoma.

Imaging in Patients with Crohn's Disease: Trends in Abdominal CT/MRI Utilization and Radiation Exposure Considerations over a 10-Year Period

PURPOSE

To study the trends in utilization of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with Crohn's disease and to evaluate changes in CT radiation exposure over a 10-year period.

METHODS

In this institutional review board-approved single-institution retrospective study, we included patients who underwent CT and MRIs for evaluation of Crohn's disease between 2006 and 2015. A total of 3196 CTs and 1924 MR scans were performed in 2156 patients (mean age: 34.8 ± 17.71 yr; range: 3-91 yr) for initial diagnosis or follow-up of Crohn's disease between 2006 and 2015. Trends in CT/MR utilization was assessed by comparing the volume of CT/MRI studies performed each year. The changes in CT radiation exposure over the study period were estimated and compared.

RESULTS

The annual combined CT/MR utilization demonstrated a 1.9-fold rise over the last decade (2006: n = 358, 2015: n = 681, P < 0.001, r = 0.96). It was predominantly because of a substantial growth (9.2-fold increase) in the MR scan volume (2006: n = 37, 2015: n = 341, P < 0.001, r = 0.93), whereas CT volume did not show significant change (2006: n = 321, 2015: n = 340, P = 0.6). Over this same period, there was a 59.4% reduction in mean radiation exposure (2006: CT dose indexvol 16.9 ± 7.1 mGy, 2015: CT dose indexvol 6.87 ± 4.62 mGy, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A 9-fold growth in annual MR scan volume contributed to a nearly 2-fold rise in yearly cross-sectional imaging utilization in Crohn's patients between 2006 and 2015. Rising trend in imaging utilization paralleled a 60% reduction of CT radiation exposure.

Does clinical indication play a role in CT radiation dose in pediatric patients?

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to identify the main pathologies for which CT is applied on pediatric patients and the related radiation doses as reported in the literature in order to facilitate justification and CT optimization.

METHODS

A critical analysis of a literature review was performed. Different search engines were used such as PubMed, Google Scholar and Science Direct. Various terms and keywords were used to locate pertinent articles such as Pediatric, Computed tomography, Radiation Dose, Organ dose, Effective dose.

RESULTS

The results showed that the main pathologies for which CT is applied are: Crohn's disease, hydrocephalus, cystic fibrosis and pediatric malignancies-mainly lymphoma. The related radiation dose data are extremely scarce and are in the range of 3.48-17.56, 0.2-15.3mSv, 0.14-6.20mSv, and 2.8-518.0mSv, respectively. The radiation doses reported are high especially in pediatric oncology.

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric patients with malignancies are those exposed to the higher levels of radiation during CT imaging. Literature is lacking reporting of dose in Pediatric CT imaging. More studies need to be realized for the determination of radiation dose in those patients. Special protocols need to be recommended in order to reduce the exposure of children in radiation.

Radiation Exposure in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: a Fourteen-Year Review at a Tertiary Care Centre in Malaysia

Background and Aims:

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are subjected to a large amount of ionizing radiation during the course of their illness. This may increase their risk of malignancy to a greater level than that due to the disease itself. In Caucasian patients with Crohn’s disease, this has been well documented and recommendations are in place to avoid high radiation imaging protocols. However, there are limited data available on radiation exposure in Asian IBD patients. We therefore sought to identify total radiation exposure and any differences between ethnically diverse ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD) patients at our centre along with determining factors that may contribute to any variation.

Methods:

The cumulative effective dose (CED) was calculated retrospectively from 2000 to 2014 using data from our online radiology database and patients’ medical records. Total CED in the IBD population was measured. High exposure was defined as a radiation dose of greater than 0.2mSv (equivalent to slightly less than ½ a year of background radiation).

Results:

A total of 112 cases of IBD (36 CD and 76 UC) were reviewed. Our CD patients were diagnosed at an earlier age than our UC cases (mean age 26.1 vs 45.7). The total CED in our IBD population was 8.53 (95% CI: 4.53-12.52). Patients with CD were exposed to significantly higher radiation compared to those with UC. The mean CED was 18.6 (7.30-29.87) and 3.65 (1.74-5.56, p=0.01) for CD and UC patients respectively. 2 patients were diagnosed as having a malignancy during follow up with respective CED values of 1.76mSv and 10mSv.

Conclusions:

CD patients, particularly those with complicated disease, received a higher frequency of diagnostic imaging over a shorter period when compared to UC patients. Usage of low radiation imaging protocols should be encouraged in IBD patients to reduce their risk of consequent malignancy.

CT enterography: Diagnostic value of 4th generation iterative reconstruction algorithm in low dose studies in comparison with standard dose protocol for follow-up of patients with Crohn's disease

PURPOSE

To compare radiation dose, image quality and diagnostic performance of low dose CT enterography (CTE) protocol combined with iterative reconstruction algorithm (iDose(4)) with standard dose CTE in follow-up of patients with known Crohn's disease (CD).

MATERIALS AND METHOD

Thirty-six patients (12 females), with CD underwent a low-dose CTE scan during single venous phase on 256 MDCT scanner, with the following parameters: 120 kV, automated mAs dose-modulation, slice thickness 2mm and iDose(4) iterative reconstruction algorithm. A control group of thirty-seven patients underwent standard dose CTE examination on the same CT scanner. Two radiologists, blinded to clinical and pathological findings, independently evaluated in each scan, HU values in bowel wall and any presence of CD activity features and disease complications. Image noise and diagnostic quality were evaluated using a 4-point scale. Dose-length product (DLP) and CT-dose-index (CTDI) were recorded and data from both examinations were compared and statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

Low-dose CTE protocol showed high diagnostic quality in assessment of Crohn's disease obtaining significantly (p ≤ 0.001) lower values of DLP and CTDI (604.98 mGy*cm and 12.29 mGy) as compared to standard dose examinations (974.85 mGy*cm and 19.71 mGy), with an overall dose reduction of 37.6%. Noise resulted slightly higher in iDose(4) images (SD=15.97) than in standard dose ones (SD=13.61) but this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.064).

CONCLUSION

Low-dose CTE combined with iDose(4) reconstruction algorithm offers high quality images with significant reduction of radiation dose, and therefore can be considered a useful tool in the management of CD patients, considering their young age and the frequent imaging follow-up required.

Imaging the small bowel

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Radiologic investigations continue to play a pivotal role in the diagnosis of pathologic conditions of the small intestine despite enhancement of capsule endoscopy and double-balloon endoscopy. Imaging techniques continue to evolve and new techniques in MRI in particular, are being developed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Continued advances in computed tomography (CT) and MRI techniques have reinforced the importance of these imaging modalities in small bowel assessment. The more invasive enteroclysis technique yields better small bowel distension for both CT and MRI when compared with peroral enterography, but no clinically significant difference is seen in terms of diagnostic accuracy. Recent concern regarding radiation exposure means that MRI is gaining in popularity. Fluoroscopic studies such as barium follow through and small bowel enteroclysis are being replaced by the cross-sectional alternatives. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound is showing results comparable with CT and MRI, but concern remains regarding reproducibility, especially outside centres that specialize in advanced sonographic techniques.

SUMMARY

CT and MRI enterography are comparable first-line modalities for patients with suspected small bowel disease, but magnetic resonance enterography is favoured given the absence of ionizing radiation. Capsule endoscopy is a reasonable alternative investigation in exploration of chronic gastrointestinal blood loss, but is best kept as a second-line test in patients with other symptoms.

Diagnostic medical radiation in inflammatory bowel disease: how to limit risk and maximize benefit

Diagnosis and management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) requires repeat diagnostic imaging for monitoring of disease activity. Recent evidence has suggested that patients with IBD are at increased risk of radiation exposure from repeat imaging. The aim of this article was to highlight risks associated with increasing radiation exposure and identify alternatives to minimize exposure. The increasing use of computed tomography (CT) in both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis has brought additional benefits to guiding management through non-invasive measures. However, the massive increase in use of CT scans poses a risk of exposing patients with IBD to high levels of diagnostic medical radiation. High levels of diagnostic medical radiation are associated with an increased risk of malignancy in several studies. Numerous studies have identified particular risk factors in IBD associated with high levels of diagnostic medical radiation which are also associated with a more severe disease course. Imaging techniques such as magnetic resonance enterography, ultrasound, small bowel follow through, and capsule endoscopy are alternatives to CT scans as they do not utilize radiation. Gastroenterologists managing patients with IBD, particularly Crohn's disease, should be aware of the increased risk of high cumulative doses of radiation exposure, particularly from CT scanning. Alternative forms of imaging should be carefully considered when evaluating patients, in particularly those with identifiable risk factors for an aggressive disease course.

3.0-T whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography: comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadofosveset trisodium

Gadolinium enhanced coronary magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) at 3 T appears to be superior to non-contrast methods. Gadofosveset is an intravascular contrast agent that may be well suited to this application. The purpose of this study was to perform an intra-individual comparison of gadofosveset and gadobenate for coronary MRA at 3 T. In this prospective randomized study, 22 study subjects [8 (36%) male; 27.9 ± 6 years; BMI = 22.8 ± 2 kg/m(2)] underwent two studies using a contrast-enhanced inversion recovery three-dimensional fast low angle shot MRA at 3 T. The order of contrast agent administration was varied randomly, separated by an average of 30 ± 5 days, using either gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA; Bracco, 0.1 mmol/Kg) or gadofosveset trisodium (MS-325; Lantheus Med, 0.03 mmol/Kg). Acquisition time, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of coronary vessels and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were evaluated. Of 308 coronary arteries and veins segment analyzed, overall SNR of coronary arteries and veins segments were not different for the two contrast agents (132 ± 79 for gadofosveset vs. 135 ± 78 for gadobenate, p = 0.69). Coronary artery CNR was greater for gadofosveset in comparison to gadobenate (73.5 ± 46.9 vs. 59.3 ± 75.7 respectively, p = 0.03). Gadofosveset-enhanced MRA images displayed better image quality than gadobenate-enhanced MRA images (2.77 ± 0.61 for gadofosveset vs. 2.11 ± 0.51, p < .001). Inter- and intra-reader variability was excellent (ICC > 0.90) for both contrast agents. Gadofosveset trisodium appears to show slightly better performance for coronary MRA at 3 T compared to gadobenate.