Dettmar PW, Gil-Gonzalez D, Fisher J, Flint L, Rainforth D, Moreno-Herrera A, Potts M. A comparative study on the raft chemical properties of various alginate antacid raft-forming products.
Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2017;
44:30-39. [PMID:
28836872 DOI:
10.1080/03639045.2017.1371737]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
Research to measure the chemical characterization of alginate rafts for good raft performance and ascertain how formulation can affect chemical parameters.
SIGNIFICANCE
A selection of alginate formulations was investigated all claiming to be proficient raft formers with significance between products established and ranked.
METHODS
Procedures were selected which demonstrated the chemical characterization allowing rafts to effectively impede the reflux into the esophagus or in severe cases to be refluxed preferentially into the esophagus and exert a demulcent effect, with focus of current research on methods which complement previous studies centered on physical properties. The alginate content was analyzed by a newly developed HPLC method. Methods were used to determine the neutralization profile and the acid neutralization within the raft determined along with how raft structure affects neutralization.
RESULTS
Alginate content of Gaviscon Double Action (GDA) within the raft was significantly superior (p < .0001) to all competitor products. The two products with the highest raft acid neutralization capacity were GDA and Rennie Duo, the latter product not being a raft former. Raft structure was key and GDA had the right level of porosity to allow for longer duration of neutralization.
CONCLUSION
Alginate formulations require three chemical reactions to take place simultaneously: transformation to alginic acid, sodium carbonate reacting to form carbon dioxide, calcium releasing free calcium ions to bind with alginic acid providing strength to raft formation. GDA was significantly superior (p <.0001) to all other comparators.
Collapse