"New" inhalant plant allergens

Relationship between antihistamine residues in wastewater and airborne pollen concentrations: Insights into population-scale pollinosis response

Pollinosis is the most prevalent allergic disorder. Assessing the impact of real-world pollen exposure on symptoms remains challenging due to extensive patient-level efforts required. This study explores the potential of wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE) to investigate the relationship between airborne pollen concentrations and antihistamine residues in wastewater as an indicator of pollinosis symptom treatment at the population-scale. In Zurich (Switzerland), 279 wastewater samples were collected during 2021-2023. Each sample represents a 24-h period with excreta from approximately 471,000 individuals. Eleven antihistamine markers were analyzed in the samples using liquid chromatography high-resolution mass spectrometry. The relationship between antihistamine loads in wastewater and airborne pollen concentrations (47 taxa and miscellaneous pollen) was investigated by determining seasonal components of antihistamine loads and exploring pollen-specific contributions using Non-Negative Least Squares (NNLS) optimization. Four antihistamines were detected in quantifiable amounts in wastewater. The first-generation antihistamine, diphenhydramine, demonstrated rather constant levels. In contrast, the three second-generation antihistamines - bilastine, cetirizine, and fexofenadine - showed pronounced day-to-day variation with strong correlations among each other. For fexofenadine, which was investigated in detail for its correlation with airborne pollen concentrations, approximately 50 % of the annual wastewater loads were associated with acute pollen exposure. Another 20 % related to baseline consumption during the pollen season, while the remaining 30 % seems unrelated to pollen. Birch, grasses, hazel, hornbeam, plane, and plantain explained most of the variance in wastewater loads (R2 = 0.82), with grass pollen alone accounting for a quarter of the annual loads. Increased fexofenadine loads during periods without elevated concentrations of common allergenic pollen suggests the presence of additional triggers for allergy symptoms, potentially yew pollen. Our study demonstrates that WBE can effectively reveal substantial day-to-day variation in antihistamine use related to pollen exposure. Thus, WBE presents an objective and questionnaire-independent method for investigating pollinosis symptom treatment at a population-scale.

[Allergen-specific immunotherapy : A brief overview in association with allergic conjunctivitis]

Allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) is the only causal and disease-modifying treatment for immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated type I allergies. Regular exposure to the causative allergen results in an immunomodulatory effect by which the predominant T‑helper (Th) 2 lymphocyte response is shifted to a Th1 lymphocyte response and more allergen-specific blocking immunoglobulins are produced. The approval of substances for AIT is regulated by the Therapy Allergens Ordinance (TAV). There are subcutaneous and/or sublingual AITs for the following indications: allergic rhinitis, allergic conjunctivitis, allergic asthma and insect venom allergy. In this article the indications for allergic conjunctivitis are discussed in particular. Clinical symptoms and a relevant type 1 sensitization are the prerequisites for the indications for AIT. The assessment of the indications and carrying out an AIT should only be carried out by physicians who have been trained in allergology.

Allergy screening with extract-based skin prick tests demonstrates higher sensitivity over in vitro molecular allergy testing

BACKGROUND

As extract-based skin testing as well as in vitro tests for major allergens have their own advantages, both procedures are usually performed in routine settings. In times of shortages in medical staff and supplies, we asked ourselves, how many patients would be underdiagnosed, if only one test could be used.

METHODS

In a retrospective analysis, we investigated a cohort of 2646 patients seen by a single physician in a large Austrian outpatient allergy clinic in 2018. Only patients with an allergen source-specific history and pairs of extract-based skin prick (SPT) and in vitro molecular allergy tests to major allergens were included.

RESULTS

For all tested allergen sources, sensitivity was higher for SPT than for sIgE-based molecular allergy testing. Concerning 1006 birch pollen-allergic patients, 791 (78.6%) had positive results with both tests, while 153 (15.2%) only with the SPT and 62 (6.2%) only with the sIgE to Bet v1. The other allergen sources showed similar results: For house dust mite 816/1120 (72.9%), grass pollen 1077/1416 (76.1%) and cat 433/622 (69.6%) remained test-positive with both procedures, whereas in 276 (24.6%), 224 (15.8%) and 173 (27.8%) times only the SPT and 28 (2.5%), 115 (8.1%) and 16 (2.6%) times only the sIgE to Der p1/2/23, Phl p1/5 and Fel d1 showed a positive result. Each comparison was statistically significant (each p < 0.0001, Chi-squared test).

CONCLUSIONS

Screening for allergy with major molecular allergens has lower sensitivity when compared with extract-based skin tests. A combination of both is required for an optimal sensitivity.

Anaphylaxis across Europe: are pollen food syndrome and lipid transfer protein allergy so far apart?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Traditionally pollen-food syndrome (PFS) is considered to be a mild cross-reacting food allergy affecting only Northern Europe, with lipid transfer protein (LTP) allergy being more severe and mainly occurring in Southern Europe. This review seeks to update the reader on both types of plant food allergy and to determine whether the stereotypical presentations of these plant food allergies remain the same, with a particular focus on reaction severity.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent findings suggest that both these types of plant food allergy occur in children and adults. Although it is true that PFS allergy is more prevalent in Northern Europe and LTP allergy is more well known in Southern Europe, these conditions are not hidebound by geography, and the increasing spread and allergenicity of pollen due to global warming continues to change their presentation. Both conditions have a spectrum of symptom severity, with PFS sometimes presenting with more severe symptoms, including anaphylaxis and LTP allergy with milder reactions.

SUMMARY

It is important to consider that in many parts of Europe, reactions to plant foods, especially fruits or vegetables, could be mediated either by pollen cross-reactivity or primary sensitization to LTP allergens. All those presenting with symptoms to plant foods will benefit from a detailed clinical history and appropriate tests so that an accurate diagnosis can be made, and correct management implemented.

Guideline on allergen immunotherapy in IgE-mediated allergic diseases: S2K Guideline of the German Society of Allergology and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI), Society of Pediatric Allergology and Environmental Medicine (GPA), Medical Association of German Allergologists (AeDA), Austrian Society of Allergology and Immunology (ÖGAI), Swiss Society for Allergology and Immunology (SSAI), German Dermatological Society (DDG), German Society of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (DGHNO-KHC), German Society of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (DGKJ), Society of Pediatric Pulmonology (GPP), German Respiratory Society (DGP), German Professional Association of Otolaryngologists (BVHNO), German Association of Paediatric and Adolescent Care Specialists (BVKJ), Federal Association of Pneumologists, Sleep and Respiratory Physicians (BdP), Professional Association of German Dermatologists (BVDD)

Not available.