Good response of membranous lupus nephritis to tacrolimus

Revisited Cyclophosphamide in the Treatment of Lupus Nephritis

Lupus nephritis (LN) is the most common serious complication of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The pathogenesis of LN is complex, and the majority causes of LN are the renal deposition of circulating or/and in situ-formed immune complexes. These immune complexes trigger glomerular and tubulointerstitial inflammation, which finally leads to proteinuria and loss of renal function. Despite the emergence of new biological agents, cyclophosphamide (CY), an alkylating agent, is still the first-line drug widely used to treat patients with severe LN. In this review, we outline the application history, molecular structure, and pharmacokinetics of CY in the treatment of LN. We also detail its latest known immunopharmacological mechanisms, with a focus on supplemental regulation and inhibition of CD4 and CD8 positive T cells, differences in the use of various guidelines, and the combination with other drugs. The side effects of CY are also mentioned in this review.

Treatment of young patients with lupus nephritis using calcineurin inhibitors

Recent advances in the management of lupus nephritis, together with earlier renal biopsy and selective use of aggressive immunosuppressive therapy, have contributed to a favorable outcome in children and adolescents with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Nevertheless, we believe that a more effective and less toxic treatment is needed to attain an optimal control of the activity of lupus nephritis. Recent published papers and our experiences regarding treatment of young patients with lupus nephritis using calcineurin inhibitors are reviewed. Although it has been reported that intermittent monthly pulses of intravenous cyclophosphamide (IVCY) are effective for preserving renal function in adult patients, CPA is a potent immunosuppressive agent that induces severe toxicity, including myelo- and gonadal toxicity, and increases the risk of secondary malignancy. Thus, treatment for controlling lupus nephritis activity, especially in children and adolescents, remains challenging. Cyclosporine A (CsA) and tacrolimus (Tac) are T-cell-specific calcineurin inhibitors that prevent the activation of helper T cells, thereby inhibiting the transcription of the early activation genes of interleukin (IL)-2 and suppressing T cell-induced activation of tumor necrosis factor-α, IL-1β and IL-6. Therefore, both drugs, which we believe may be less cytotoxic, are attractive therapeutic options for young patients with lupus nephritis. Recently, a multidrug regimen of prednisolone (PDN), Tac, and mycophenolate mofetile (MMF) has been found effective and relatively safe in adult lupus nephritis. Since the mechanisms of action of MMF and Tac are probably complementary, multidrug therapy for lupus nephritis may be useful. We propose as an alternative to IVCY, a multidrug therapy with mizoribine, which acts very similarly to MMF, and Tac, which has a different mode of action, combined with PDN for pediatric-onset lupus nephritis. We also believe that a multidrug therapy including CsA and Tac may be an attractive option for young patients with SLE and lupus nephritis.

Tacrolimus is an alternative therapeutic option for the treatment of refractory lupus nephritis

We conducted an open-labeled, prospective study to determine the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus as an alternative therapeutic option for those patients with refractory lupus nephritis. The study population comprised one male and eight female patients with diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis. All patients had failed to respond to sufficient intravenous cyclophosphamide therapy with proteinuria of >or=1 g/day and active urinary sediments. Tacrolimus (0.1 mg/kg/day) was administered for 1 year with adjusting drug level (4-10 microg/l). The mean serum creatinine level and spot urine protein creatinine ratio (UPCR) at baseline were 1.39 mg/dl and 2.27, respectively. After the treatment, proteinuria reduced significantly from median UPCR value of 2.19 (range, 1.19-3.34) to 0.44 (range, 0.12-2.13) (p < 0.05). Seven (78%) of the nine patients showed a complete clinical response, which was defined as stabilization in the disease-activity markers and serum creatinine level with reduction of >or=50% in UPCR; two patients showed complete remission with UPCR <0.2. One patient showed treatment failure because of the disease progression. No serious adverse effects were observed during the study. This study demonstrates that tacrolimus can show a significant therapeutic response in cases that are refractory to the standard regimen for diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis.

Efficacy and cytokine modulating effects of tacrolimus in systemic lupus erythematosus: a review

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex systemic autoimmune disease with involvement of both B cells and cytotoxic T lymphocytes and several cytokines aberrations. Standard therapy for SLE has its limitations. Tacrolimus, a novel calcineurin inhibitor with potent immunosuppressive effects, has been shown in the recent years to be effective in SLE therapy. This paper serves to collate the experimental and clinical data on the efficacy of tacrolimus in the treatment of SLE and lupus nephritis. Tacrolimus as a key component of multitarget therapy in SLE is also discussed. The immunocytokine modulatory effects of tacrolimus are also reviewed with reference to SLE. It can be concluded that tacrolimus has an established role in the management of SLE.

Combination therapy of mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus in lupus nephritis

Since most lupus nephritis patients have an incomplete response to mycophenolate mofetil, combination regimens may improve outcomes. Tacrolimus (FK506) has shown some benefit in lupus nephritis in small trials, and combined with mycophenolate mofetil is standard immunosuppression in transplant patients. We investigate the addition of FK506 to mycophenolate mofetil, in patients who were mycophenolate mofetil failures. All patients were part of a prospective cohort, but evaluated retrospectively. Seven lupus nephritis patients (mean age 27.1, 100% female, 42% Caucasian and 42% African American) were evaluated. Three patients had combined ISN class III and V, two ISN class IV, one ISN class V and II and one ISN class IV and V. Six were taking an ACE-inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker, 6 hydroxychloroquine and 5 prednisone (mean dose 11.5 mg; range 0-30 mg). Mean mycophenolate mofetil dose at time of tacrolimus addition was 2.8 g (range 2-3 g). Mean tacrolimus dose was 3.4 mg (range 2-8 mg) titrated to a mean level of 4.67 ng/dl (range 2.2-11.8 ng/dl) for a mean of duration of 16 months (range 2-54 months). Two patients continued both therapies, while five discontinued therapy. One patient achieved a complete renal remission, while three achieved partial remission with 82.9%, 77.1%, 55.3% reductions in proteinuria. Toxicity limited the use of combination therapy: diabetic ketoacidosis (one patient), pneumonia (two) and muscle pain (two). These data suggest that adding tacrolimus in patients refractory to mycophenolate mofetil might have some benefit, although complete responses were rare. Unfortunately, tacrolimus toxicity appeared to be prevalent in these systemic lupus erythematosus patients, limiting its long term use.

Membranous nephropathy in systemic lupus erythematosus: a therapeutic enigma

Renal disease is a major cause of mortality and morbidity in systemic lupus erythematosus. Among the histological classes of lupus nephritis, membranous nephropathy comprises only one-fifth of all cases. Reported survival and rates of end-stage renal disease in membranous lupus nephropathy (MLN) vary considerably, because of substantial heterogeneity among the published studies. The risk of progression from MLN to renal failure is generally reduced in the absence of proliferative lesions, but patients are, nevertheless, at risk of thromboembolic complications. The optimal therapy for MLN remains elusive because of a lack of controlled trials; however, cardiovascular protection and blockade of the renin-angiotensin system should be instituted early in all patients. Mixed membranous and proliferative lupus nephritis should be treated in the same way as pure proliferative lupus nephritis. If MLN is not accompanied by proliferative lesions but is associated with clinically relevant proteinuria, renal insufficiency or failure to respond to supportive therapies, immunosuppressive treatment is indicated. Treatment options include glucocorticoids combined with azathioprine, calcineurin inhibitors or alkylating agents. The efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil in MLN remains to be confirmed. Controlled trials to compare existing immunosuppressive agents and experimental modalities such as sirolimus, rituximab and infliximab should be undertaken in the future.

Pharmacotherapy of lupus nephritis: time for a consensus?

BACKGROUND

The optimal therapy for lupus nephritis has been the subject of considerable debate.

OBJECTIVE

To provide evidence- and expert-based recommendations.

METHODS

To review the literature and the European League Against Rheumatism recommendations.

RESULTS

Risk stratification based on histological, demographical, clinical and laboratory characteristics allows the identification of patients at high risk for loss of renal function, and thus more likely to benefit from more aggressive therapy. Achieving remission within the first months of treatment, irrespective of the agent used, correlates with good long-term renal outcomes; maintenance of remission can be achieved with less toxic therapies. Aggressive management of atherosclerosis risk factors and renoprotective therapy for those patients with chronic renal disease improve long-term survival and prognosis.

Tacrolimus: approved and unapproved dermatologic indications/uses-physician's sequential literature survey: part II

Tacrolimus has been a useful therapeutic tool in dermatology practice ever since its inception. Accordingly, many "off-label" applications have been reported. Thus, its local immunosuppressive and steroid-sparing action stands recognized. Hence, its indications/uses were extended beyond atopic dermatitis to cover several dermatoses including other types of eczema, papulosquamous disorder of cornification, rosacea, other inflammatory skin conditions, vesicobullous disease, connective tissue disease, graft versus host disease, and follicular disorders. Many such diseases found to respond to tacrolimus therapy have been briefly recounted. It is worthwhile to conceive, however, that this topical immunomodulator should be reserved for use only as an alternative, should the conventional treatment be unresponsive. Hence, guarded use is warranted.

Effective treatment of young patients with pediatric-onset, long-standing lupus nephritis with tacrolimus given as a single daily dose: an open-label pilot study

The objective of the current work is to report the preliminary experience with tacrolimus (TL) administered as a single-dose daily for maintenance therapy of young patients with pediatric-onset, long-standing systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Six consecutive patients with long-standing SLE were recruited for a 6-month open-label trial of single-dose-daily administration of tacrolimus (3 mg/day) without dose up of concomitantly administered prednisolone (PDN). TL treatment was started at the time of the most recent flares. Data on the clinical and serologic lupus activity were collected prospectively. The baseline characteristics of the patients were: mean age, 20 years; urinary protein/creatinine ratio, 1.22 +/- 1.94; serum C3 level, 70.8 +/- 21.2 (normal, 79-152 mg/dL); serum complement hemolytic activity (CH50), 22.2 +/- 10.3 (normal, 23-46 U/mL); serum anti-dsDNA antibody titer, 60.4 +/- 71.7 IU/mL (normal, < 12.0 IU/mL); serum creatinine, 0.55 +/- 0.11 mg/dL; European Consensus Lupus Activity Measurement (ECLAM) index, 5.2 +/- 2.6. Despite the gradual tapering of the PDN dose, marked improvement as compared with the baseline values was observed in the ECLAM index examined at one and three months and serological parameters examined at three months after the start of treatment. After a 6-months' therapy, complete response was achieved in all of the patients (serum CH50 value, 27.7 +/- 8.3 U/mL; serum anti-dsDNA antibody titer, 28.4 +/- 27.9 U/mL and the ECLAM index, 1.2 +/- 1.2 (P < 0.05), respectively), except in one patient who showed WHO class V lupus nephritis. No serious adverse effects were observed. These data suggest that TL, even when administered as a single-daily dose, is effective and safe for selected young patients with pediatric-onset, long-standing SLE. However, further studies on a larger number of patients are needed to confirm these results.

A pilot study on tacrolimus treatment in membranous or quiescent lupus nephritis with proteinuria resistant to angiotensin inhibition or blockade

Persistent proteinuria in patients with quiescent lupus can result from membranous lupus nephritis and/or glomerular scarring following previous flares. This pilot study examined the effects of tacrolimus over two years in six patients with membranous/inactive lupus nephritis and persistent proteinuria despite angiotensin inhibition/blockade. Tacrolimus treatment reduced proteinuria and increased serum albumin (time effect, P = 0.047 and 0.032 respectively). Compared with baseline levels, proteinuria improved by more than 50% in five patients (83.3%) and hypoalbuminaemia was corrected in four patients. The efficacy was most prominent in four patients with biopsy-proven membranous lupus nephritis, whose protienuria improved by over 80%. One patient developed biopsy-proven chronic nephrotoxicity after 10 months of tacrolimus treatment, despite non-excessive blood levels. These data suggest that tacrolimus is an effective treatment for proteinuria due to membranous lupus nephritis, but should probably be reserved for patients who are refractory to other non-nephrotoxic treatments, in view of the potential risk of subclinical nephrotoxicity.