High-dose exposure to valsartan with suicidal intention

Fatal misuse of transdermal fentanyl patches

Fentanyl is a potent synthetic opioid with a variety of possible applications. Transdermal fentanyl patches are regularly prescribed for patients with severe chronic or cancer-related pain. The potential for abuse is well-known and cases associated with illicit fentanyl intake are common. Fentanyl related fatalities due to unintentional misuse are relatively rare. This study focused on those instances and their identification in forensic examinations and adds new cases and consolidates the existing femoral blood concentrations in the event of fatal fentanyl patch misapplications. A total of 35 cases between 2010 and 2018 in which transdermal fentanyl patches were detected during forensic autopsies were identified and reviewed for the frequency of unspecific macroscopic signs of opioid intoxication. Furthermore, a detailed examination is presented for 11 cases in which toxicological results were available. The cause of death was eventually considered to be related to fentanyl patch misuse in 5 of these 11 cases. Co-administered drugs and signs of opioid intoxication, especially pulmonary edema, were frequently found. Lastly, it is advised to include norfentanyl and hair analysis in the interpretation of post-mortem fentanyl concentrations.

Effectiveness and safety of high-dose valsartan monotherapy in hypertension treatment: the ValTop study

Early combination therapy is increasingly recommended in hypertension management because of increased risk of adverse effects with high-dose monotherapy. However, this risk is not necessarily increased for high doses of angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB). ValTop study compared efficacy and safety of high vs. conventional dose of valsartan in hypertensive patients. ValTop was a controlled, randomized, double-blind trial. Of 6035 screened subjects, 4004 mild-to-moderate hypertensive patients (mean seated diastolic blood pressure (MSDBP) 90-109 mm Hg) started 4-week open-label treatment with valsartan 160 mg. Of them, 3776 were randomized to receive valsartan 160 mg (N=1900) or 320 mg (N=1876) o.d. for 4 weeks. In 28-week open-label extension study, all participating patients (N=642) received valsartan 320 mg. Valsartan 160 mg reduced MSDBP by 10.0 mm Hg in the initial open-label phase. Further BP reductions in the double-blind phase were significantly (P<0.0001) greater in the 320 mg group than in the 160 mg group for MSDBP (1.6 ± 0.18 mm Hg vs. 0.5 ± 0.18 mm Hg) and mean seated systolic BP (3.3 ± 0.31 mm Hg vs. 0.7 ± 0.31 mm Hg). The size of the additional effect of the 320 mg dose on BP was similar in subjects controlled or not by the initial 160 mg dose. Adverse event (AE) rates were similar in both treatment groups, drug-related AEs occurring in <5% of subjects in each phase. High-dose valsartan is safe and effective in uncomplicated mild-to-moderate hypertension independently of the initial response to a moderate dose. High-dose ARB monotherapy may thus be a viable option in hypertension management.