Functional fracture bracing

[Three-dimensional analysis of posttraumatic tibial shaft malunion and correction based on the healthy, contralateral leg]

OBJECTIVE

Three-dimensional (3D) analysis and implementation with patient-specific cutting and repositioning blocks enables correction of complex tibial malunions. Correction can be planned using the contralateral side or a statistical model. Patient-specific 3D-printed cutting guide blocks enable a precise osteotomy and reduction guide blocks help to achieve anatomical reduction. Depending on the type and extent of correction, fibula osteotomy may need to be considered to achieve the desired reduction.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

a) Poor soft tissue (flap surgery, adherent skin in field of operation); b) infection; c) peripheral artery disease (stage III and IV classified according to Fontaine, critical transcutaneous oxygen partial pressure, TcPO2); d) general contraindication to surgery.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

Before surgery, a 3D model of both lower legs is created based on computed tomography (CT) scans. Analysis of the deformity based on the contralateral side in a 3D computer model (CASPA) and planning of the osteotomy. If the contralateral side also has a deformity, a statistical model can be used. Printing of patient-specific guides made of nylon (PA2200) for the osteotomy and reduction. Surgery is performed in supine position, antibiotic prophylaxis, thigh tourniquet, which is used as needed. Ventrolateral approach to the tibia. Attachment of the patient-specific osteotomy guide, performance of the osteotomy. Reduction using the guide. Fibula osteotomy through a lateral approach is performed if the reduction of the tibia is hindered by the fibula. This can be performed freehand or with patient-specific guides. Wound closure.

POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

Compartment monitoring. Passive mobilization of the ankle in the cast as soon as the wound healing has progressed. Partial weightbearing in a lower leg cast for at least 6-12 weeks, depending on the routinely performed radiographic assessment 6 weeks postoperatively. Thromboprophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin until cast removal.

RESULTS

Patient-specific correction of malunions are generally good. This could be confirmed for distal tibial corrections. For tibial shaft deformities, the final results are still pending. Preliminary results, however, show good feasibility with a pseudarthrosis rate of 10% without postoperative infection.

Evaluation and treatment of postoperative periprosthetic humeral fragility fractures

Postoperative periprosthetic humeral shaft fractures represent a growing and difficult complication to treat given the aging patient population and associated bone loss. Determining the best treatment option is multifactorial, including patient characteristics, fracture pattern, remaining bone stock, and implant stability. Possible treatment options include nonoperative management with bracing or surgical intervention. Nonoperative treatment has been shown to have higher nonunion rates, thus should only be selected for a specific patient population with minimally displaced fractures or those that are unfit for surgery. Surgical management is recommended with prosthetic loosening, fracture nonunion, or failure of nonoperative treatment. Surgical options include open reduction and internal fixation, revision arthroplasty, or hybrid fixation. Careful evaluation, decision making, and planning is required in the treatment of these fractures.

A Shift From Non-operative Care to Surgical Fixation of Pediatric Humeral Shaft Fractures Even Though Their Severity Has Not Changed

Introduction: Humeral shaft fractures have traditionally been treated non-operatively due to their good union and low rate of functional impairment. In the recent years, upper extremity fractures and their operative treatment have increased in children. Nevertheless, the trends of humeral shaft fractures are not clear. Materials and Methods: All children aged <16 years, with a humeral shaft fracture in the geographical catchment area of Northern Finland Hospital District, with a yearly child population-at-risk of ~86 000 from the year 2001 until the end of 2015 were included. There were 88 cases, who comprised the study population. Radiographs were available of all. Injury, patient, and treatment characteristics were reviewed from hospital databases. Results: There was an increasing trend of surgical fixation of humeral shaft fractures during the 15 years' study period (β = 1.266, 95% CI 0.17 to 2.36, p = 0.035). However, we found no patient or fracture-related reasons that could have explained the increasing trend of surgical care. Comminuted fracture increased the risk of operative treatment 8-fold (Odds Ratio, OR 7.82, 95% CI 1.69 to 36.3, p = 0.009). Higher age, greater angular deformity or greater diameter of the humerus were not associated with the increased operation risk. Conclusions: The treatment philosophy concerning pediatric humeral shaft fractures has presented a shift from conservative care to surgical fixation. To authors' understanding there is not evidence supporting the increasing rate of osteosynthesis.

Open reduction-internal fixation versus intramedullary nailing for humeral shaft fractures: an expected value decision analysis

BACKGROUND

Previous randomized controlled studies and meta-analyses have failed to collectively favor either open reduction-internal fixation (ORIF) or intramedullary nailing (IMN) fixation. The purpose of our investigation was to elucidate the optimal decision between ORIF and IMN for acute traumatic operative humeral shaft fractures through an expected value decision analysis.

METHODS

We performed an expected value decision analysis and sensitivity analysis to elucidate the difference between ORIF and IMN fixation for patients with acute traumatic humeral shaft fractures. We surveyed 100 consecutive, randomly selected volunteers for their outcome preferences. Outcomes included union, delayed union, major complications, minor complications, and infection. A literature review was used to establish probabilities for each of these respective outcomes. A decision tree was constructed and a fold-back analysis was performed to find an expected patient value for each treatment option.

RESULTS

The overall patient expected values for ORIF and IMN were 12.7 and 11.2, respectively. Despite artificially decreasing the rates of major complications, infection, delayed union, and nonunion each to 0% for IMN fixation (sensitivity analysis), ORIF continued to maintain a greater overall patient expected value (12.7 vs. 11.4, 11.2, 11.2, and 12.1, respectively). Only if the rate of nonunion after ORIF was increased from 6.1% to 16.8% did the overall expected outcome after ORIF equal that of IMN (11.2).

CONCLUSION

Our expected value decision analysis demonstrates that patients favor ORIF over IMN as the optimal treatment decision for an acute traumatic humeral shaft fracture.

Protrusive maxillomandibular fixation for intracapsular condylar fracture: a report of two cases

Clinical limitations following closed reduction of an intracapsular condylar fracture include a decrease in maximum mouth opening, reduced range of mandibular movements such as protrusion/lateral excursion, and reduced occlusal stability. Anteromedial and inferior displacement of the medial condyle fragment by traction of the lateral pterygoid muscle can induce bone overgrowth due to distraction osteogenesis between the medial and lateral condylar fragments, causing structural changes in the condyle. In addition, when conventional maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) is performed, persistent interdental contact sustains masticatory muscle hyperactivity, leading to a decreased vertical dimension and premature contact of the posterior teeth. To resolve the functional problems of conventional closed reduction, we designed a novel method for closed reduction through protrusive MMF for two weeks. Two patients diagnosed with intracapsular condylar fracture had favorable occlusion after protrusive MMF without premature contact of the posterior teeth. This particular method has two main advantages. First, in the protrusive position, the lateral condylar fragment is moved in the anterior-inferior direction closer to the medial fragment, minimizing bone formation between the two fragments and preventing structural changes. Second, in the protrusive position, posterior disclusion occurs, preventing masticatory muscle hyperactivity and the subsequent gradual decrease in ramus height.

Leg hammock for closed reduction of tibial shaft fractures

Tibial shaft fractures are common injuries in emergency departments (EDs). Although many of these fractures require surgery, nearly all are stabilized in the ED with a long leg splint or bivalved cast. Long leg splinting is often challenging for a single health care provider. Further, even with assistance or previously described techniques for fracture reduction and stabilization, fracture angulation may occur, potentially leading to pain for the patient, fracture displacement, or further soft tissue injury. The authors propose a method for splinting tibial fractures that avoids fracture angulation, is cost-effective and quick, and can be easily performed by a single health care provider.

A meta-analysis of plate fixation versus intramedullary nailing for humeral shaft fractures

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of consensus on whether intramedullary nailing (IMN) or plating is superior for humeral shaft fractures.

METHODS

In this meta-analysis, we combined data from PubMed, the Excerpta Medica Database (Embase), the Cochrane Library, and the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) (all to Dec 31, 2011). Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and two quasi-RCTs including 384 participants were selected and assessed by use of an 11-item scale. Heterogeneity was assessed by use of the standard chi-squared test and the I (2) statistic.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The results indicated that two primary outcomes (total number of complications and functional measurement) were significantly better for plate fixation. Significantly lower risk of delayed-union, restriction, impingement of the shoulder, shoulder pain, and re-operation were found for the plating group, which suggested that plating is superior to IMN for humeral shaft fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II; meta-analysis of RCTs and quasi-RCTs; treatment study.

Risk factors for infection after 46,113 intramedullary nail operations in low- and middle-income countries

BACKGROUND

The fields of surgery and trauma care have largely been neglected in the global health discussion. As a result the idea that surgery is not safe or cost effective in resource-limited settings has gone unchallenged. The SIGN Online Surgical Database (SOSD) is now one of the largest databases on trauma surgery in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). We wished to examine infection rates and risk factors for infection after IM nail operations in LMIC using this data.

METHODS

The SOSD contained 46,722 IM nail surgeries in 58 different LMIC; 46,113 IM nail operations were included for analysis.

RESULTS

The overall follow-up rate was 23.1 %. The overall infection rate was 1.0 %, 0.7 % for humerus, 0.8 % for femur, and 1.5 % for tibia fractures. If only nails with registered follow-up (n = 10,684) were included in analyses, infection rates were 2.9 % for humerus, 3.2 % for femur, and 6.9 % for tibia fractures. Prophylactic antibiotics reduced the risk of infection by 29 %. Operations for non-union had a doubled risk of infection. Risk of infection was reduced with increasing income level of the country.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall infection rates were low, and well within acceptable levels, suggesting that it is safe to do IM nailing in low-income countries. The fact that operations for non-union have twice the risk of infection compared to primary fracture surgery further supports the use of IM nailing as the primary treatment for femur fractures in LMIC.

Surgical treatment of humeral-shaft fractures: a register-based study in Finland between 1987 and 2009

INTRODUCTION

Humeral-shaft fractures are not uncommon osteoporotic fractures. While most of the humeral-shaft fractures can be treated conservatively, some need surgical treatment. The purpose of this study was to assess the trends of the surgical treatment of humeral-shaft fractures. The study determined whether surgical treatment of humeral-shaft fractures has changed in Finland between 1987 and 2009. We assessed the number and incidence of surgically treated humeral-shaft fractures in each year and recorded the type of surgery used.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study covered the entire adult (>18 years) population in Finland over the 23-year period from 1 January 1987 to 31 December 2009. Data on surgically treated humeral-shaft fractures were obtained from the nationwide National Hospital Discharge Registry.

RESULTS

During the 23-year study period, a total of 4469 surgical operations of the humeral shaft were performed in Finland. The male patients were markedly younger (49 years) than their female counterparts (63 years). The incidence of surgical treatment nearly doubled in men and over tripled in women. Between 1987 and 2009, there occurred a clear shift towards plating in the surgical treatment of humeral-shaft fractures.

CONCLUSIONS

A marked increase in the surgical treatment of humeral-shaft fractures was seen in Finland in 1987-2009. Fracture plating increased during the first decade of the millennium. Since high-quality evidence for treatment of humeral-shaft fractures is absent, critical evaluation of the chosen treatment options is needed.

Dual plating for fractures of the distal third of the humeral shaft

In this study, we present a novel method for performing dual plating of extra-articular fractures of the distal third of the humerus. Since 2006, we have treated 15 such fractures with dual plates from a single posterior midline incision. In the first part of the study, we provide the surgical protocol we have used in addressing these fractures. In the second part, the charts of these patients were reviewed retrospectively to examine their clinical and radiographic outcomes. Using this technique, we have achieved an excellent union rate without significant complications while allowing early and aggressive range of motion.

Prediction of outcome after humeral diaphyseal fracture

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to examine the demographic factors, functional outcome and radiological data to predict the outcome of humeral diaphyseal fractures.

METHODS

We performed a prospective study on a consecutive series of 110 patients of 16 years or over, who had sustained a humeral diaphyseal fracture. There were 42 males and 68 females, with an average age of 59 years (range 16-93 years). A total of 72% sustained low-energy injuries, and 89 patients (81%) were primarily treated non-operatively. Shoulder function was assessed using the Neer's and Constant's scores at 8 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year after injury. Muscle strength was determined isokinetically using a Biodex System 2 dynamometer. Non-union was defined as a failure to bridge at least three cortices and persistence of tenderness or mobility at the fracture site 16 weeks after fracture.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients (17%) had non-union at 16 weeks, while 80 had achieved union and a further 14 were lost to follow-up. After stepwise multiple linear regression was performed to isolate independent factors affecting outcome, only the presence of a proximal diaphyseal fracture was found to predict non-union along with a poor Neer's score at 8 and 12 weeks. Poor Neer's scores could be predicted at 26 weeks by age (P<0.05), previous stroke (P<0.001) and non-union (P<0.001). At 52 weeks both age (P<0.01) and previous stroke (P<0.01) were independently predictive of poorer Neer's scores. Malunion of any degree had no detectable effect on function.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that non-union of humeral diaphyseal fractures can be predicted in the presence of a proximal third fracture with a Neer's score of less than 45 by 12 weeks after fracture. Early surgery improves early function, but this is not a lasting effect. Poor shoulder function is predicted by increasing age, proximal third fractures and non-union. We recommend that surgery to promote union be considered at 12 weeks after fracture in fit patients with fractures of the proximal third of the humerus, poor Neer's scores and no radiographic progression to union.

Plate fixation or intramedullary fixation of humeral shaft fractures

BACKGROUND

The optimal approach to operative treatment of humeral shaft fractures remains debatable. Previously published trials have been limited in size and have been inconclusive regarding important patient outcome variables following treatment with either intramedullary nails or plates. We conducted a meta-analysis of available trials comparing treatment of humeral shaft fractures.

METHODS

We performed a literature search from 1967 to November 2007 in the main medical search engines and selected 4 randomized trials that compared nails and plates in patients with humeral shaft fractures and that reported on complications due to surgery. We statistically pooled patient data using standard meta-analytic approaches. Our primary outcome was the total complication rate, comprised of all complications listed in the articles included. Secondary outcomes included non-union, infection, nerve palsy, and reoperation rate. Methodology was assessed using the CLEAR NPT.

RESULTS

When pooling the data of the 4 trials (n = 203 patients), we did not find a statistically significant difference between implants in the rate of total complications, non-union, infection, nerve-palsy, or the need for reoperation. The studies included were small and had methodological limitations.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis suggests stastistically insignificant differences between plates and nails in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures. Small sample sizes, study heterogeneity, and methodological limitations argue strongly for a definitive, large trial. We recommend that this trial should be a randomized controlled trial with appropriate allocation of patients and blinding of patients and care providers and outcome assessors, and that it should include patient-important outcomes.

Local soft tissue compression enhances fracture healing in a rabbit fibula

Local soft tissue compression of fractures enhances fracture healing. The mechanism remains uncertain. Past studies have focused on intermittent soft tissue compression. We report a preliminary study assessing the relationship between constant soft tissue compression and enhanced fracture healing in an osteotomy model designed to minimize confounding variables. Fibulae of nine New Zealand white rabbits were bilaterally osteotomized, openly stabilized, and fitted with spandex stockinets. Soft tissue at the osteotomy site was unilaterally compressed using a deforming element (load = 26 mmHg). The contralateral side was saved as the control and was not compressed. Osteotomies were monitored with weekly radiographs. All fibulae in both groups were healed 6 weeks postoperatively. Micro-CT analysis of bone mineral density (BMD) and bone volume (BV) was then performed on both the experimental and control sides. Radiographic measurement of transverse callus-to-shaft ratios (TCSR) was compared. BMD of the experimental callus was greater than the noncompressed controls. BV and TCSR were not different between controls and experimental osteotomies. Constant local soft tissue compression produced significant increases in BMD, but not in BV or transverse callus size, indicating significant measurable increases in callus composition without significant change in gross dimensions. Our experimental design minimizes confounding factors, such as micromotion, immobilization, and altered venous flow, suggesting that these are not the primary mechanisms for fracture healing enhancement. Further studies with more animals and study groups are necessary to confirm efficacy and identify optimal compression pressures and schedules.

[Humeral diaphyseal fractures: functional bracing]

Functional bracing of humeral diaphyseal fractures was conceived after initial experiences with a similar method was used in the management of diaphyseal tibial fractures. Over the years, tibial functional bracing underwent major evolutionary changes, and found its indications basically limited to a smaller group of fractures, consisting of closed, axially unstable fractures that experience at the time of the injury an acceptable degree of shortening, and to transverse fracture that are appropriately reduced and rendered stable. On the other hand, functional bracing of diaphyseal humeral fractures has, maintained the initial indications, contraindications and methodology. This article describes the concept, indications and contraindications of functional bracing of humeral diaphyseal fractures and provides results of 620 fractures with complete follow-up. In 97.5% of the patients, the average healing time was 11.5 weeks. 16 patients (2.5%) required operative intervention because of a nonunion and 4 patients (<1 degrees) of the patient had a refracture after brace removal. Nerve function did not return in only one of the 67 patient who had radial nerve palsy.

Early controlled passive motion improves early fracture alignment and structural properties in a closed extra-articular metacarpal fracture in a rabbit model

PURPOSE

To investigate if early controlled passive mobilization was likely to cause harm with regard to affecting the quality and rate of early fracture healing in a closed, potentially unstable, diaphyseal fracture in a rabbit model.

METHODS

This was a preclinical, block-randomized, single-blind efficacy trial examining 3 time periods (baseline [day 5], day 14, day 28) and 2 treatment conditions (immobilization, passive motion). Fifty mature, female, New Zealand white rabbits were preconditioned to a non-weight-bearing brace before creating a closed third metacarpal fracture. Fractures were reduced under fluoroscopy and placed in a custom-molded fracture brace. On day 5, rabbits randomly allocated to the early passive motion protocol received twice-daily 15-minute sessions of passive digital motion combined with gentle pinch stabilization of the fracture. Outcome evaluations included lateral x-rays, peripheral quantitative computerized tomography imaging, and 4-point bending to structural failure.

RESULTS

Compared with the immobilized fractures, the early controlled passive motion fractures showed significantly better gains in initial stiffness, maximum stiffness, failure load, and energy absorbed per unit area, as well as showing a significant reduction in dorsal fracture angulation. The total callus area was not significantly different between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

During the initial 28 days after the fracture, in this simulated hand, closed, potentially unstable, extra-articular fracture, the early controlled passive motion protocol used in this study led to a clinical and statistical significant reduction in fracture dorsal angulation and improvement in the fracture's ability to resist and bear 4-point bending loads without increasing the total callus area. Therefore, early controlled passive mobilization after a closed, potentially unstable, diaphyseal hand fracture warrants further clinical consideration.

Extra-articular distal-third diaphyseal fractures of the humerus. A comparison of functional bracing and plate fixation

BACKGROUND

There are strong advocates for both operative and nonoperative treatment of distal-third diaphyseal fractures of the humerus, but there are few comparative data. We performed a retrospective comparison of these two treatment methods.

METHODS

Fifty-one consecutive patients with a closed, extra-articular fracture of the distal one-third of the humeral diaphysis were identified from an orthopaedic trauma database. Forty patients were followed for at least six months or until healing of the fracture. Eleven patients were excluded because of inadequate follow-up. Nineteen patients had been managed with plate-and-screw fixation, and twenty-one had been managed with functional bracing.

RESULTS

Among the operatively treated patients, one had loss of fixation, one had a postoperative infection, and one required tendon transfers for the treatment of a preoperative radial nerve palsy that did not resolve. Three new postoperative radial nerve palsies developed, and one had not resolved when the patient was last evaluated, three months after surgery. All operatively treated fractures healed with <10 degrees of angular deformity, and one patient lost 20 degrees of shoulder or elbow motion. Among the nonoperatively treated fractures, two were converted to plate fixation because of the treating surgeons' concern regarding alignment and radial nerve palsy. Only one patient had >30 degrees of malalignment in any plane. Two patients had development of skin breakdown during treatment and completed treatment in a sling. Two patients lost >/=20 degrees of elbow or shoulder motion.

CONCLUSIONS

For extra-articular distal-third diaphyseal humeral fractures, operative treatment achieves more predictable alignment and potentially quicker return of function but risks iatrogenic nerve injury and infection and the need for reoperation. Functional bracing can be associated with skin problems and varying degrees of angular deformity, but function and range of motion are usually excellent.

Tibial nonunion

Nonunions of the tibia represent challenging orthopedic problems, which require the surgeon to analyze numerous factors and choose an appropriate treatment. Tibial nonunion treatment requires establishing its existence and cause. The treatment algorithm necessitates consideration of a wide variety of factors: the location of the nonunion, the presence or absence of infection, and any angular or rotational deformity. Given advances in implant design and biologic agents, a wide variety of management options exist for the treatment of tibial nonunions. This article reviews surgical treatments for tibial nonunions.

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation enhances fracture healing: results of an animal model

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) could simulate physiological muscle functions known to be associated with the normal bone healing process. The object of the present study was to evaluate the effect of NMES on fracture healing, using an animal model. Thirty rabbits received unilateral, transverse, mid-tibial, 3-mm gapped osteotomies that were stabilized with double-bar external fixators. The femoral vein was ligated to induce venous stasis. From the fourth post-operative day, the study group was treated with 1 h daily of NMES for four weeks, while the control group was treated without NMES. For NMES, two surface electrodes were used: one above the patellar tendon and another around the lateral thigh. Callus area and mineral content at the osteotomy gap were measured, biweekly, using computerized tomographic examinations. Biomechanical properties of healing were evaluated with a torsion test, eight weeks after the index operation. Osteotomies treated with NMES exhibited 31% (p=0.01) higher mineral content and 27% (p=0.009) larger callus area than control osteotomies at eight weeks. The maximum torque, torsional stiffness, angular displacement at maximum torque, and energy required to failure of specimens in the study group were 62% (p=0.006), 29% (p=0.03), 34.6% (p=0.008), and 124% (p<0.0001) higher, respectively, than those in the control group at eight weeks. The results of the present study demonstrated that the use of NMES can enhance callus development and mineralization, with the consequent improvement in biomechanical properties of the healing bone.

Results of treatment of infected humeral nonunions: the Mayo Clinic experience

Between 1987 and 2001, 15 infected humeral nonunions were treated of which nine were distal, four were proximal, and two were midshaft. One patient was lost to followup. The remaining 14 patients were followed up for a mean of 37 months (range, 8-156 months). All patients were treated with debridement and intravenous antibiotics. Ten patients had surgical attempts at achieving bony union: external fixation (four patients), plating (two patients), external fixation and plating (two patients), tension band wiring (one patient), and bone grafting with shoulder spica casting (one patient). Three patients were treated definitively with a functional brace because of low functional demands and one patient had resection arthroplasty followed by delayed total elbow arthroplasty. Of the 10 nonunions treated with surgical attempts at achieving bony union, only seven healed. None of those nonunions in patients treated with a functional brace healed. At final followup, 12 of 14 patients had minimal or no pain and two patients had moderate pain, both with ununited fractures. Complications included one seroma and two cases of posttraumatic elbow stiffness for which the patients required capsular release. This study documents the challenges in achieving bony union in the infected humeral nonunion in contradistinction to the predictable union rates reported for aseptic humeral nonunions. Although pain relief was predictable in most patients, functional results generally were poor and bony union was difficult to obtain.

Early controlled mobilization of potentially unstable extra-articular hand fractures

This article presents early controlled mobilization options for potentially unstable, nondisplaced, nonarticular hand fractures. Early controlled mobilization of tissues surrounding a healing fracture has the potential to enhance the quality and rate of fracture healing and a person's functional recovery. The options discussed protect the integrity of the fracture alignment, while permitting safe, pain-free protected motion of joints adjacent to the fracture. Traditionally, healing fractures are thought of as clinically stable or unstable. If clinically unstable, the fracture often is considered unable to tolerate unrestricted active motion during the initial stages of healing. This article offers an alternative perspective, in which clinicians can consider the clinical factors that can be controlled to allow for early protected motion of the regional tissues surrounding a potentially unstable hand fracture. These additional clinical options offer an alternative to acute fracture immobilization and help progress the rehabilitation of hand fracture patients.

Functional bracing for distal radioulnar joint instability

Symptomatic chronic distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) instability can be a challenging disorder to treat surgically. This study used a cadaver model to assess the effect of functional forearm bracing on DRUJ instability. The specimen upper extremities were mounted on a platform and the DRUJ was destabilized sequentially. The effect of both prefabricated commercial braces and custom-made braces on joint stability was documented by computed tomography. Both braces markedly reduced DRUJ translation in both full pronation and full supination. The custom-made brace overreduced the DRUJ in full pronation. Our results suggest that functional forearm bracing may be effective in reducing instability of the DRUJ without greatly restricting motion of the wrist, forearm, or elbow.

The results of functional (Sarmiento) bracing of humeral shaft fractures

At the Department of Orthopaedics of the Kantonsspital Fribourg, 67 humeral shaft fractures were treated by Sarmiento bracing in a 15-year period. There were 54 isolated fractures and 13 fractures sustained as a component of polytrauma. Fifty-eight cases (87%) had healed clinically at a mean of 10 weeks; 9 cases failed to heal, so further treatment was carried out operatively. Of the conservatively managed fractures, 95% (55 cases) healed with an excellent or good result. Three patients noted a slight limitation of active range of motion, but all 58 patients returned to full duty at their jobs. Among 9 patients with delayed or nonunion leading to operative intervention, there were 6 cases with transverse fractures. Major reasons for failed conservative management were an incorrect indication, a significant axial deformity, or a hyperextended position of the fracture fragments. In our experience, active repositioning of humeral shaft fractures is not effective in avoiding a delay in fracture healing. The decision to use functional bracing in polytrauma patients should depend on the time of expected bedridden immobilization, on the presence of additional fractures of the ipsilateral upper extremity, and on the patient's need for crutches. The conservative treatment of humeral shaft fractures with the Sarmiento brace remains the treatment of choice, in spite of newer intramedullary operations that are allegedly minimally invasive and technically less complicated.