Gunshot Wounds to the Upper Extremity

Introduction to Ballistic Injuries

Firearm-related trauma in the United States is a public health crisis with increasing rates of gun-mortality annually. Within the United States, minorities are disproportionally affected by firearms, and nonmedical factors play a significant role in predicting an individual's risk for experiencing gun trauma. Devastating injuries associated with head gunshot wounds often require care from multidisciplinary teams to achieve favorable outcomes. Despite collaborative care, complications after firearm injuries transcend beyond physical damage and result in lasting psychological, social, and economic burdens. This article reviews ballistic terminology, epidemiology, social determinants of health, and the quality of life of gunshot wound survivors.

Interosseous impasse: a unique case of bullet lodgement between the radius and ulna

Gunshot injuries to the upper limb are complex, particularly when a projectile lodges between the radius and ulna. These cases demand a detailed approach due to the complicated anatomy and potential for severe functional impairment. A 42-year-old female presented with severe right upper limb pain and motor impairment following a gunshot injury. The bullet entered through the posterior shoulder, shattered the mid-humerus and proximal radius, and lodged between the distal radius and ulna. Multidisciplinary surgical intervention included external fixator application and removal, open reduction, and internal fixation of the humerus, complete nerve decompression, and vascular repair using an interposition reversed saphenous vein graft. The patient's postoperative course was uneventful, and follow-up showed sensory improvement and some motor recovery. This case highlights the complexity of managing gunshot injuries with bullets lodged between the radius and ulna. Multidisciplinary care is essential for addressing the varied challenges posed by such injuries. Further research is needed to refine treatment strategies and improve patient outcomes in similar cases.

Treatment of Brachial Plexus Injuries following Gunshot Injuries: A Systematic Review

Introduction

Brachial plexus injuries (BPI) from gunshot injuries are uncommon but usually severe and can cause chronic pain, loss of function, and permanent nerve damage. Multiple surgical techniques including neurolysis, end-to-end suture repair, and graft repair have been described for the treatment of these injuries. However, surgical indication, timing, and technique for these injuries remain controversial. This systematic review aims to investigate the treatment modalities for patients with BPI due to gunshot-related injuries.

Methods

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) methodology was employed for this review. PubMed, Cochrane Reviews, Embase, and CINAHL databases were included. The following keywords constituted our search criteria: gun-shot-wounds, brachial plexus, traum∗, and management.

Results

A total of 90 studies were imported for screening, from which 9 papers met our final inclusion/exclusion criteria. The most common studies utilized in this review were retrospective chart reviews followed by case series. In total, there were 628 patients that suffered from gunshot wounds to the brachial plexus. Most patients underwent some form of delayed nerve repair consisting of neurolysis, end-to-end epineural repair, or graft repair with a sural or antebrachial cutaneous nerve graft. Several patients suffered from complications, with neuroma being the most common long-term complication that required reoperation.

Conclusion

The optimal timing for surgeries involving BPIs should be determined after examining the level of nerve damage, associated injuries, operative risks, and electrophysiological workup for indications of spontaneous regeneration. Early surgical interventions were indicated for patients presenting with associated vascular or thoracic injuries, compressive masses, and nerve transection by sharp instruments in most selected papers.

Upper Extremity Ballistic Nerve Injury: A Scoping Review and Algorithm for Management

» Gunshot injuries to the upper extremity (UE) have high likelihood for causing peripheral nerve injury secondary to the high density of vital structures. Roughly one-fourth of patients sustaining a gunshot wound (GSW) to the UE incur a nerve injury. Of these nerve injuries, just over half are neurapraxic. In cases of surgical exploration of UE nerve injuries, nearly one-third demonstrate a transected or discontinuous nerve.» Existing literature regarding surgical management of nerve injuries secondary to GSWs comes from both military and civilian injuries. Outcomes are inconsistently reported, and indications are heterogeneous; however, reasonable results can be obtained with nerve reconstruction.» Our proposed management algorithm hinges on 4 treatment questions: if there is a nerve deficit present on examination, if there is a concomitant injury in the extremity (i.e., fracture or vascular insult), whether the injured nerve would be in the operative field of the concomitant injury, and whether there was an identified nerve lesion encountered at the time of surgery by another surgeon?» Early exploration rather than continued expectant management may offer improved recovery from GSW nerve injuries in particular situations. When an UE nerve deficit is present, establishing follow-up after the initial GSW encounter and early referral to a peripheral nerve surgeon are pivotal.

Antibiotic Prophylaxis and Infectious Complications in Isolated Gunshot Wounds to the Upper Extremity

BACKGROUND

Prophylactic antibiotics are variably prescribed after isolated upper extremity gunshot wounds (UE GSWs). The risk of infection and factors influencing prescribing practice remain poorly understood, and clinical practice guidelines are lacking.

METHODS

Adults with isolated UE GSWs over a 10-year period were included. Medical records were reviewed for demographic and injury variables, comorbidities, surgical treatments, antibiotic administration, infectious complications, and follow-up duration. Infection rate was calculated. Bivariate and multivariable linear regression analyses were used to identify patient-related and injury-related factors predictive of prophylactic antibiotic prescription.

RESULTS

A total of 281 patients were eligible for inclusion. Prophylactic antibiotics were prescribed at discharge for 111 patients (40%). Multivariable analysis revealed that patients with more distal injuries and ballistic fractures were significantly more likely to receive prophylactic antibiotics. Of patients with at least 30-day postinjury follow-up, 6% developed infections.

CONCLUSION

Prophylactic antibiotic administration after UE GSWs was inconsistent but more common in patients with ballistic fractures and injuries in the hand. The overall incidence of infection was found to lie between 3% and 6%. The rate of infection in the antibiotic prophylaxis (2%-6%) group was similar to that in the no-antibiotic (5%-7%) group, suggesting that antibiotic prophylaxis may not have a large impact on infectious risk. However, because this study is nonrandomized, and because this study is underpowered for multivariable modeling of infectious risk, it remains possible that subgroups of this population may still benefit from antibiotic prophylaxis.

Outcomes in Ballistic Injuries to the Hand: Fractures and Nerve/Tendon Damage as Predictors of Poor Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Gunshot injuries can be devasting, regardless of their location. However, ballistic injuries involving the upper extremity have not been thoroughly investigated. The goal of this study is to evaluate the injury patterns and outcomes of patients who sustained gunshot injuries to the hand.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of patients with gunshot injuries to the upper extremity at a single, level 1 trauma center between January 2016 and December 2017 was performed. Patient demographics and mechanisms of injuries were reviewed. The injury patterns, location, tendon/nerve involvement, and bony involvement were analyzed. Surgical interventions and long-term outcomes were reviewed. Outcomes were compared using the presence of fractures and nerve/tendon injuries as independent variables.

RESULTS

In all, 32 patients met our inclusion criteria. Of these, 15 patients had gunshots to the hand, 10 patients to the fingers, and 7 patients involving both the finger and hand. In patients with isolated hand injuries, 60% had fractures and 53% had nerve/tendon injuries. The presence of fractures was associated with a 7.9-fold increase in tendon and nerve injuries (P = .032). Patients who sustained tendon/nerve injuries had significantly higher rates of permanent disability (P = .01). The presence of a fracture leads to a higher likelihood of long-term complications, although not statistically significant (P = .13).

CONCLUSION

Ballistic injuries to the hand are frequently associated with fractures and neurovascular and tendon injuries. The presence of fractures is associated with a higher incidence of nerve and tendon injuries. Involvement of these structures is linked to an increased risk of long-term disability.

The Epidemiology, Management, and Outcomes of Civilian Gunshot Wounds to the Upper Extremity at an Urban Trauma Center

Background

Gunshot wounds (GSWs) create significant morbidity in the United States. Upper extremity (UE) GSWs are at high risk of combined injuries involving multiple organ systems and may require variable treatment strategies. This study details the epidemiology, management, and outcomes of civilian UE GSWs at an urban level 1 trauma center.

Methods

Using the University of Pennsylvania Trauma Registry, all adult patients with UE GSWs from 2015 to 2020 who were at least 6-months postinjury were studied for demographics, injury pattern, operative details, and postoperative outcomes. Fisher exact and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to determine differences in treatment modalities and outcomes.

Results

In 360 patients, the most common victim was young (x̄ = 29.5 y old), African American (89.4%), male (94.2%), and had multiple GSWs (70.3%). Soft tissue-only trauma (47.8%) and fractures (44.7%) predominated. Presence of fracture was independently predictive of neurologic, vascular, and tendinous injuries (P < 0.001). Most soft tissue-only injuries were managed nonoperatively (162/173), whereas fractures frequently required operative intervention (115 of 161, P < 0.001). Despite a prevalence of comminuted (84.6%) and open (43.6%) fractures, hardware complications (7.5%) and wound infection (1.1%) occurred infrequently.

Conclusions

Civilian GSWs to the UE with only soft tissue involvement can often be managed conservatively with antibiotic administration, bedside washout, and local wound care. Even with combined injuries and open fractures, single-stage operative debridement and fracture care with primary or secondary closure often prevail. As civilian ballistic trauma becomes more frequent in the United States, these data help inform patient expectations and guide management.

Low energy gunshot injuries: Does removal of retained bullet fragmentation at the time of internal fixation reduce the risk of fracture related infection?

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effects of RBF (Retained Bullet Fragment) removal at the time of long bone fixation on FRI (fracture related infection) rates in low energy GSI (Gunshot Injury) related fractures.

DESIGN

Retrospective Cohort Study SETTING: Level 1 Academic Trauma Center INTERVENTION: Retrospective review of the impact of RBFs on the risk of FRI when employing internal fixation in low energy GSI (Gunshot Injury) related fractures. In situations where the injury pattern requires surgical fixation, the question arises as to whether or not the RBFs need to be removed to prevent FRI.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Whether or not the RBFs removed in our patient population prevented short- and long-term fracture related infection after low-energy gunshot injury (FRI-LGI).

RESULTS

Of the 2,136 GSI related fractures, 131 patients met inclusion criteria, 81 patients underwent removal (R) of RBFs at the time of internal fixation while 50 patients did not undergo any removal (NR) at time of internal fixation. Among the patients who underwent surgical intervention, (Open Reduction Internal Fixation) ORIF was performed in 55 cases (R: 39; NR: 16), and (Intramedullary Nail) IMN was performed in 76 cases (R: 42; NR: 34). The overall rate of deep FRI-LGI was 6.9 % of the 131-patient cohort. We found that removal of RBFs had a statistically significant impact on the rate of deep FRI-LGI when compared to the NR group (p = 0.031). In the RBF removal group, only two patients (2.4 %) developed deep FRI-LGIs, whereas in the NR group, seven patients (14.0 %) developed deep FRI-LGIs. The incidence of early FRI-LGI was higher in the NR group (median 0.6 months) compared to the R group, which was associated with late FRI-LGIs (median 10.1 months) when they occurred.

DISCUSSION

In our study population, we found a statistically significantly increased incidence of deep and early FRI-LGI when RBFs are not removed at the time of extra-articular long bone internal fixation. The presence of retained bullet fragments following internal fixation may pose a risk factor for future development of deep FRI-LGI. We believe a surgeon should use their best judgment as to whether a RBF can safely be removed at the time of long bone fixation. Based on our findings, if safely permitted, RBF removal should be considered at the time of GSI long bone fixation resulting from low energy hand gun injuries.

Evaluation of Self-Inflicted versus Non-Self-Inflicted Gunshot Wounds and Associated Injuries Involving the Hand and Upper Extremity

Orthopedic costs associated with gunshot wounds (GSWs) totaled approximately USD 510 million from 2005 to 2014. Previous studies have identified differences in injuries associated with self-inflicted (SI) GSWs; however, there remains a gap in understanding injury patterns. This study aims to expand upon the current literature and shed light on injury patterns and outcomes associated with SI vs. non-self-inflicted (NSI) GSWs. This is a retrospective cohort study of upper extremity GSWs from January 2012 to December 2022. Data were analyzed using the two-sample t-test, Pearson's chi-squared test, and Fisher's exact test. SI GSWs tended to be high-velocity GSWs and occurred more often in distal locations compared to NSI GSWs (p = 0.0014 and p < 0.0001, respectively). SI GSWs were associated with higher Gustilo-Anderson (GA) and Tscherne classifications (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0048, respectively) and with a greater frequency of neurovascular damage (p = 0.0048). There was no difference in fracture rate or need for operative intervention between the groups. GA and Tscherne classifications were associated with the need for and type of surgery (p < 0.0001), with a higher classification being associated with more intricate operative intervention; however, GSW velocity was not associated with operative need (p = 0.42). Our findings demonstrate that velocity, wound grading systems, and other factors are associated with the manner in which GSWs to the upper extremity are inflicted and may thus have potential for use in the prediction of injury patterns and planning of trauma management and surgical intervention.

Management of severe defects of humerus in combat patients injured in Russo-Ukrainian war

INTRODUCTION

Russo-Ukrainian war is associated with application of high-energy weapon, causing severe multifragmental injuries to the bones an associating with severe bone defects. The aim of the study was to evaluate various methods to treat combat patients with severe defects of humerus and to demonstrate the experience of orthopedic war surgeons in managing gunshot injuries to the humerus defects in the ongoing war.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A 24 patients were active-duty military personnel of Armed Forces of Ukraine. These patients were diagnosed with severe humerus defects due to gunshot injury in battlefield zone in various areas of Ukraine. Data was collected within period between February, 24th 2022 till January, 01st 2023. The following approaches were applied to replace bone defect: preoperative 3D printing with polyetheretherketone (PEEK) as orthobiological material; closed reduction, percutaneous lag screw and Ilizarov external fixation; vascularized fibula grafting.

RESULTS

Data analyses of the segmental defects of humerus showed 5 cm defect in 3 (13 %) patients, from 5 to 10 cm in 4 (17 %) patients, over 10 cm in 17 (71 %) patients. Analyses were performed in these 17 (71 %) patients, showing 5 patients treated with 3D-printed PEEK implants, 6 patients with vascular-pedicle graft of fibula, 6 patients with closed reduction, percutaneous lag screw, Ilizarov external fixation. Osteomyelitis was diagnosed in one case (20 %) after the use of PEEK implants, requiring to remove both PEEK implant and metal implants followed by application of the antibiotic joint spacers and Ex-Fix fragments of the humerus. In our opinion, the osteomyelitis happened due to inadequate debridement of the wound and non-compliance with the conversion criteria (replacement of the fixation method). The mean length of hospital stay was 5.5 months for patients treated with 3D-printed PEEK implants.

CONCLUSIONS

Closed reduction, percutaneous lag screw and Ilizarov external fixation as well as vascularized fibula grafting are associated with good outcomes in management of the patients with severe humerus defect due to gunshot injury. 3D printing and PEEK implants could also be considered for the reconstructions of the humerus multifragmental fractures with a bone defect over 10 cm associated with gunshot injury due to high-energy weapon in the war settings.

Brachial Gunshot Wounds: Injury Patterns and Considerations for Managing the Abnormal Neurological Examination

BACKGROUND

Nerve injuries from gunshot wounds (GSWs) to the upper arm can cause significant morbidity and loss of function. However, indications for surgical exploration and nerve reconstruction remain unclear as both low- and high-grade injuries can present with an abnormal neurological examination.

METHODS

Adult patients presenting with a history of isolated GSW to the upper arm between 2010 and 2019 at a single urban level 1 trauma center were screened for inclusion in this retrospective study. Patient demographics, neurological examination findings, concurrent injuries, and intraoperative findings were gathered. Bivariate analysis was performed to characterize factors associated with nerve injuries.

RESULTS

There were 139 adult patients with isolated brachial GSWs, and 49 patients (35%) presented with an abnormal neurological examination and significantly associated with concurrent humerus fractures (39% vs 21%, P = .026) and brachial artery injuries (31% vs 2%, P < .001). Thirty of these 49 patients were operatively explored. Fifteen patients were found to have observed nerve injuries during operative exploration including 8 patients with nerve transections. The radial nerve was the most commonly transected nerve (6), and among the 16 contused nerves, the median (8) was most common.

CONCLUSION

Nerve injury from upper arm GSWs is common with directly traumatized nerves confirmed in at least 39% and nerve transection in at least 16% of patients with an abnormal neurological examination. Timely referral to a hand and/or peripheral nerve surgeon for close clinical follow-up, appropriate diagnosis, and any necessary surgical reconstruction with nerve grafts, tendon transfers, and nerve transfers is recommended.

Firearm Injuries to the Wrist and Hand in Children and Adults: An Epidemiologic Study

BACKGROUND

Gunshot wounds (GSWs) to the wrist and hand are a major health and economic burden in the United States. There are few studies examining the circumstances and epidemiological factors surrounding these injuries. This study assesses the epidemiological factors, as well as the shooting circumstances, injury details, and surgical management of wrist and hand GSWs in children and adults.

METHODS

Medical records and radiographs were reviewed for all patients with ballistic injury to the wrist or hand treated at an urban academic level 1 trauma center from 2016 to 2019. Fisher exact and Pearson χ2 tests were used to assess differences between groups.

RESULTS

Two hundred forty-nine victims (29 children, 220 adults) with complete documentation were identified. Among 180 victims with known shooting circumstances, 132 (70%) were shot by another person and 110 (65%) were injured by intentional gunfire. Eighty-seven victims (35%) suffered a concurrent GSW to another body region. Metacarpal fracture was the most commonly diagnosed bony injury (37%), followed by proximal phalanx fracture (25%). One hundred twenty-nine victims (52%) underwent surgery following their injuries. Nerve discontinuity was diagnosed in 27 victims (11%), while 20 victims (8%) had vascular disruption. There was no significant difference between children and adult victims' type of fracture, concurrent injuries, rates of surgery, or in the most common fracture fixation method.

CONCLUSIONS

Most wrist and hand GSW victims were injured due to intentional, non-self-inflicted gunfire. Most patients present with hand fractures, and fortunately, nerve and vascular disruptions are uncommon.

Ballistic diaphyseal forearm fractures result in high incidence of neurovascular injury and compartment syndrome but have low rates of early infection: A single level I trauma center experience

INTRODUCTION

Ballistic injuries to the upper extremity represent a small subset of injuries, and there is little data to provide guidance on management and outcomes. The purpose of this study is to assess the incidence of neurovascular injuries, compartment syndrome, and early postoperative infection, as well as patient and injury factors predictive of neurovascular injury following ballistic fractures of the forearm.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of operatively treated ballistic forearm fractures at a single level I trauma center between 2010 and 2022 was performed. Thirty-three patients with 36 forearm fractures were identified. Only diaphyseal injuries in patients greater than 18 years old were included. Medical and radiographic records were reviewed to identify pre-injury patient-specific factors, including age, sex, smoking status, and history of diabetes. Injury characteristics, including the type of firearm used, forearm fracture location, and any associated neurologic or vascular injury, as well as compartment syndrome, were collected and analyzed. Short-term outcomes such as post-operative infection and recovery of neurologic function were also collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

The median age was 27 years (range: 18-62), with a majority of male patients (78.8%, n = 26). 4 patients (12.1%) sustained high-energy injuries. 4 patients (12.1%) were found to have compartment syndrome pre-operatively or intra-operatively. 11 patients (33.3%) had nerve palsies postoperatively with 8 patients (24.2%) continuing to have nerve palsies at their final follow-up (mean follow-up= 149.9 +/- 187.2 days). The median length of stay was 4 days. There were no patients with infection at follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Ballistic forearm fractures are complex injuries and can result in severe complications such as neurovascular injury and compartment syndrome. As such, a comprehensive evaluation and appropriate management of ballistic forearm fractures are essential to minimize the risk of severe complications and optimize patient outcomes. In our experience, when treated operatively, these injuries have a low rate of infection.

Surgery as an Effective Therapy for Ulnar Nerve Neuropathic Pain Caused by Gunshot Wounds: A Retrospective Case Series

BACKGROUND

Peripheral nerve injuries remain a major medical problem worldwide and are associated with multiple causes, including gunshot wounds (GSWs), which are the second most common cause of brachial plexus injuries in peacetime and the main, or only, cause reported in wartime studies. The ulnar nerve (UN) is one of the most affected nerves. Peripheral nerve trauma may cause intense neuropathic pain, which is very difficult to control. Particularly UN gunshot injuries may impact individual daily life, as injuries to this nerve result in both sensory and motor deficits within the hand. We evaluated the improvement of neuropathic pain after surgical treatment in a consecutive series of 20 patients with UN injury due to GSWs.

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective, consecutive case series included 20 patients with UN injuries due to GSWs, who presented with excruciating neuropathic pain and underwent surgical treatment between 2005 and 2017.

RESULTS

Of injuries, 13 occurred in the right upper limb (65%); 12 patients had a high UN injury (60%). Regarding associated injuries, 8 patients had bone injuries (40%), and 4 patients had arterial injuries (20%). A neuroma in continuity was detected in 8 cases (40%), and 4 patients (20%) had shrapnel lodged within the UN. All patients had severe neuropathic pain and functional deficit, with a mean visual analog scale score of 8.45 ± 1.4 and a mean reduction of 6.95 points 12 months after surgery; 10 patients (50%) had a British Medical Research Council score ≥M3.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery is an effective treatment for neuropathic pain from GSWs. Early isolated external neurolysis is associated with better pain management and functional outcomes postoperatively.

A global perspective on gun violence injuries

INTRODUCTION AND DEFINITIONS

Civilian gunshot violence is a growing public health issue on a global scale. Treatment of patients with gunshot injuries is based on algorithms derived from military studies, but the distinct differences in weaponry, energy of injury, timing and type of care, and environment translate to a gap in knowledge. With a focus on non-accidental gunshot trauma and excluding suicide etiologies, we propose to build a collaborative research group to address important questions focused on best practices for gunshot injury patients.

PRE-HOSPITAL CARE

There are important differences in the care of gunshot victims across the globe; some countries provide advanced interventions in the field and others deliver basic support until transport to a higher level of care in hospital. Some simple interventions include the use of extremity tourniquets and intravenous fluid support; others to consider are tranexamic acid, whole blood, and hemostatic agents.

ACUTE TREATMENT

Control of exsanguinating hemorrhage is a key priority for gunshot injuries. Military doctrine has evolved to prioritize exsanguination over airway or breathing as the critical first step. The X-ABC protocol focuses on exsanguinating hemorrhage, then standard evaluation of Airway, Breathing and Circulation (ABCs) to enhance survival in trauma patients. The timing of bony stabilization, in terms of damage-control vs definitive care, needs further study in this population, as does use of antibiotics for bony extremity injuries. Finally, recognition of the mental health effects of gun trauma, including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety disorders, substance abuse and depression is important in advocating for prevention such as implementation of social support and specific interventions.

DEFINITIVE CARE

The need for abdominal closure after exploratory laparotomy, definitive fracture treatment, and other treatment all contribute to length of stay for gunshot injured patients. Optimizing stabilization allows earlier mobilization and decreases nosocomial complications. Nerve injuries are often a source of long-term disability and their evaluation and treatment require further investigation.

RESOURCES AND ETHICS

There are growing numbers of mass-casualty gunshot events, which require consideration of how to organize and use resources for treatment, including staff, operating room access, blood products, and order of treatment. Drills and planning for incident command hierarchy and communication are key to optimizing resource utilization. The ethics of choosing treatment priorities and resources are important considerations as well.

Radial nerve transection after ballistic humeral shaft fractures: A retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Radial nerve palsy following fracture of the humeral shaft is common. However, the incidence of nerve transection in the setting of ballistic trauma is unknown. The purpose of this study was to estimate the incidence of radial nerve transection after ballistic fracture of the humerus.

METHODS

Patients presenting to an urban, level-1 trauma center with a ballistic fracture of the humeral shaft were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, clinical exam on presentation, and operative data were reviewed to determine the incidence of radial nerve palsy on initial examination, the incidence of operative treatment, the incidence of how frequently the nerve was directly visualized, and the incidence of radial nerve transection.

RESULTS

One-hundred and thirteen ballistic humeral shaft fractures were identified. Of these, 30 (26.5%) patients had a complete radial nerve palsy on exam. Of patients with a radial nerve palsy, on exam 20 were taken to the operating room and the nerve was visualized in 17 of those cases. There 2 were partially lacerated nerves and 12 nerves were completely transected. Thus, in patients with a complete nerve deficit on examination who underwent operative treatment with nerve exploration, the rate of nerve transection was 70.6%. The lower bound rate of nerve transection for all patients with radial nerve palsy (assuming all unexplored nerves were intact) was 40.0%.

CONCLUSION

The rate of nerve transection in patients with humerus shaft fractures with associated radial nerve palsies is likely higher than the rate of nerve transection in similar injuries caused by blunt mechanisms. The authors recommend early exploration and fixation of these injuries.

Complications Are Infrequent After Humeral Shaft Fractures Due to Low-Energy Gunshot Injuries

OBJECTIVE

To describe humerus shaft fractures after low-energy gunshot wound (GSW) and compare with blunt injuries. We hypothesized that nerve injury, infection, and fracture union would be similar.

DESIGN

Retrospective.

SETTING

Urban Level 1 trauma center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Four hundred three patients were treated for a humeral shaft fracture over 18 years. Sixty-two patients sustained injury due to GSW.

INTERVENTION

Primary open reduction and internal fixation was pursued in 59%, including 32% after GSW.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Rates of nerve injury, infection, and fracture union.

RESULTS

Patients with GSW were younger with a mean age of 30 years, more likely male (90%), with isolated injuries (84%), and less likely to have simple fractures (84%). Both groups experienced high rates of union (98% of GSW fractures vs. 99% of closed high-energy fractures). Deep infection occurred in 1 patient (1.6%) after GSW. Rates of deep infection in the closed and open blunt trauma fracture groups were similarly low at 1% and 4.5%, respectively. Nerve injury on presentation after GSW was more common than after low-energy and high-energy closed fractures (47% vs. 13% and 27%), but similar to blunt open fracture (52%). Despite higher rates of nerve injury, nerve recovery occurred at similarly high rates after both GSW and blunt injuries (78% vs. 86%).

CONCLUSIONS

Nerve injuries are more common after GSW, but most recover without intervention. Infection is uncommon after GSW, and secondary unplanned operations are rare. Initial nonoperative care of most GSW humerus fractures, even with radial nerve injury at the time of presentation, seems appropriate.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Gunshot Injuries of the Hand: Incidence, Treatment Characteristics, and Factors Associated With Healthcare Utilization

BACKGROUND

The objectives of this study are to: (1) describe the demographics, injury patterns, and treatment characteristics of patients who sustained a gunshot injury (GSI) of the hand; and (2) examine the utilization of healthcare resources in patients with a GSI of the hand.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 148 adult patients who were treated for a GSI of the hand between January 2000 to December 2017 using multiple International Classification of Diseases Ninth and Tenth Edition (ICD-9 and ICD-10) codes. We used bivariate and multivariable analysis to identify which factors are associated with unplanned reoperation, length of hospitalization, and number of operations.

RESULTS

Multivariable logistic regression showed that fracture severity was associated with unplanned reoperation. Multivariable linear regression showed that fracture severity is associated with a higher number of hand operations after a GSI of the hand, and that a retained bullet (fragment) and patients having gunshot injuries in other regions than the hand had a longer length of hospitalization. Seventy (47%) patients had sensory or motor symptoms in the hand after their GSI, of which 22 (15%) patients had a transection of the nerve.

CONCLUSIONS

Sensory and motor nerve deficits are common after a GSI of the hand. However, only 31% of patients with symptoms had a transection of the nerve. A retained bullet (fragment), having more severe hand fractures, and GSI in other regions than the hand are associated with a higher number of operation and a longer period of hospitalization.

Clean Shot: Bacterial Contamination After Positive Pressure Irrigation of Low-Velocity Gunshot Wounds

OBJECTIVE

Low-velocity gunshot wounds (LV-GSWs) are a common reason for emergency department visits. Optimal nonsurgical treatment has not been thoroughly studied and is not standardized. The goal of this study was to determine whether positive pressure irrigation reduces the bacterial contamination after a simulated GSW to soft tissue.

METHODS

Nineteen lamb shank specimens were prepared with denim inoculated with Serratia marcescens cultures. A 9-mm pistol round was fired from a distance of 3 m through the contaminated denim into the lamb shank. A culture swab was placed in the wound directly after firing, after 250 cubic-centimeters (cc) irrigation with normal saline, and after an additional 250 cc irrigation (for a total of 500 cc). Swabs were then cultured to determine the amount of bacterial growth.

RESULTS

Before irrigation, 0 (0%) plates showed no growth, 2 (10.5%) showed rare growth, 8 (42.1%) showed few growth, 6 (31.6%) showed moderate growth, and 3 (15.8%) showed many growth. After 500 cc irrigation, 2 (10.5%) showed no growth, 1 (5.3%) showed rare growth, 11 (57.9%) showed few growth, 2 (10.5%) showed moderate growth, and 3 (15.8%) showed many growth. Fisher exact test confirmed no significant change in bacterial concentration after irrigation ( P = 0.59). A Pearson test found no correlation between irrigation and bacterial growth (r = -0.15, P = -0.25).

CONCLUSIONS

Positive pressure irrigation with up to 500 cc normal saline did not significantly alter the quantity of bacterial growth within a simulated GSW cavity. The data suggest that bedside positive pressure irrigation may not be beneficial in the initial emergency department treatment of LV-GSWs.

Retained bullets and lead toxicity: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Lead toxicity secondary to retained bullet(s) (RB) after a penetrating gunshot wound is a rare but likely underdiagnosed condition, given the substantial number of firearm injuries in the United States. There is currently no consensus on the indications for surveillance, chelation, or surgical intervention.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of our review is to summarize the literature on systemic lead toxicity secondary to RBs to help guide clinicians in the management of these patients.

METHODOLOGY

The primary literature search was conducted in Medline (PubMed), EMBASE, Cochrane, and CENTRAL using the following MESH terms: "chelation" and "lead poisoning" or "lead toxicity" or "lead" and "bullet" or "missile" or "gunshot", or "bullet".

RESULTS

The search identified 1,082 articles. After exclusions, a total of 142 articles were included in our final review, the majority of which were case reports. Several factors appear to increase the risk of developing lead toxicity including the location of the RB, the presence of a fracture or recent trauma, number of fragments, hypermetabolic states, and bullet retention duration. Particularly, RBs located within a body fluid compartment like an intra-articular space appear to be at a substantially higher risk of developing lead toxicity. Even though patients with lead toxicity from RBs will have similar symptoms to patients with lead toxicity from other sources, the diagnosis of lead poisoning may occur months or years after a gunshot wound. Symptomatic patients with high blood lead levels (BLLs) tended to improve with a combination of chelation and surgical removal of RBs.

CONCLUSIONS

We suggest surveillance with serial BLLs should be performed. Patients with intra-articular RBs appear to be at increased risk of lead toxicity and if possible, early surgical removal of the RBs is warranted, especially given that signs of toxicity are vague, and patients may not have access to follow-up. Long-term chelation should not be used as a surgical alternative and management should be multidisciplinary.

Gunshot Wounds: Ballistics, Pathology, and Treatment Recommendations, with a Focus on Retained Bullets

As the epidemic of gunshot injuries and firearm fatalities continues to proliferate in the United States, knowledge regarding gunshot wound (GSW) injury and management is increasingly relevant to health-care providers. Unfortunately, existing guidelines are largely outdated, written in a time that high-velocity weapons and deforming bullets were chiefly restricted to military use. Advances in firearm technology and increased accessibility of military grade firearms to civilians has exacerbated the nature of domestic GSW injury and complicated clinical decision-making, as these weapons are associated with increased tissue damage and often result in retained bullets. Currently, there is a lack of literature addressing recent advances in the field of projectile-related trauma, specifically injuries with retained bullets. This review aims to aggregate the available yet dispersed findings regarding ballistics, GSW etiology, and treatment, particularly for cases involving retained projectiles.

Low-velocity, civilian firearm extremity injuries-review and update for radiologists

Firearm injuries are a preventable epidemic in the USA. Extremities are commonly affected in gunshot injuries. Such injuries may be complex with concomitant osseous, soft tissue, and neurovascular components. The maximum wounding potential of a projectile is determined by its kinetic energy and the proportion of the kinetic energy that is transmitted to the target. Accurate assessment of ballistic injuries is dependent on utilizing the principles of wound ballistics, accurate bullet count, and ballistic trajectory analysis. The goals of this article are to review wound ballistics and the imaging evaluation of extremity civilian firearm injuries in the adult population, with emphasis on ballistic trajectory analysis, specific ballistic fracture patterns, and diffuse, secondary soft tissue ballistic injuries.

Gunshot-Related Upper Extremity Nerve Injuries at a Level 1 Trauma Center

PURPOSE

Gunshot wounds can result in a spectrum of injuries to nerves, with little data to guide definitive treatment. We performed a retrospective evaluation of gunshot-related upper extremity injuries in an urban trauma center to analyze epidemiology, associated injuries, and short-term outcomes. We hypothesized that gunshot-related injuries would involve soft tissue cavitation, inducing axonotmesis and neuropraxia rather than neurotmesis injuries.

METHODS

All patients over the age of 16 with upper extremity gunshot trauma from May 2018 to May 2019 were identified through the University of Chicago orthopaedic and general surgery trauma databases. Initial nerve injuries were identified by physical examination. Patient demographic data, soft tissue and skeletal injury, treatment modality, and return of function were collected.

RESULTS

Ballistic injuries in 1302 patients were treated over 12 months. We identified 126 upper extremity gunshot injuries in 117 patients. Thirty-eight upper extremities (38 patients) had a documented nerve deficit (38/126, 30%) with a follow-up rate of 94% (34/36) at a mean of 351 days after injury (median, 202 days; range, 13-929 days). One patient had a subacute transradial amputation, and 1 patient was deceased at final follow-up. The presence of vascular injury and fracture increased the rate of neurologic injury after gunshot injuries. At the most recent follow-up, 68% (23/34) of patients with upper extremity injury had improvement in nerve function as measured by objective clinical assessment, with 24% (8/34) experiencing full recovery at an average of 368 days (median, 261 days; range, 41-929 days).

CONCLUSIONS

Nerve injury after ballistic trauma to the upper extremity is common. Vascular injury and fractures were associated with a higher risk of nerve injury. Short-term improvement in nerve function was seen in over half the cohort, suggesting a predominance of neuropraxic effects.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic IV.

Pediatric upper extremity firearm injuries: an analysis of demographic factors and recurring mechanisms of injury

BACKGROUND

Little is known regarding risk factors specific to pediatric upper extremity firearm injuries. The purpose of this study is to evaluate pediatric patients treated for these injuries to identify at-risk populations and recurring mechanisms of injury.

METHODS

A 20-year retrospective review was conducted. Patients 17 years of age and younger, with upper extremity injuries related to a firearm, were included. Analysis involved Fisher's exact and Chi-square tests.

RESULTS

One hundred and eighty patients were included. The mean age was 12.04 ± 4.3 years. Most included patients were male (85%). Interestingly, females were more frequently victims of assault (P = 0.03), and males were more frequently injured due to accidental discharge (P < 0.001). The most affected race/ethnicity was White-not Hispanic or Latino (48%). The hand was the most frequent location injured (31%) and was more likely to be accidental than proximal injuries (P = 0.003). Air rifles were the most common firearm type used (56%). Pistols were implicated in 47 (26%) cases, rifles in 17 (9%), and shotguns in 10 (6%). Ninety-nine (55%) patients had procedures in the operating room. The most frequent procedure was foreign body removal (55%).

CONCLUSIONS

Risk factors such as male sex, White-not Hispanic or Latino race/ethnicity, and adolescent age were attributed to increased risk for injury. Male sex was associated with increased risk of injury by accidental discharge and female sex with intentional assault. Air rifles were the most common firearm type overall, although female sex was associated with increased risk for injury by powder weapon.

Follow the Shoestring: A Unique Case of Bullet Extraction

Firearm-related injuries and deaths remain a major issue in the United States. Gunshot injuries to the foot can be particularly difficult to manage when they occur as they can cause fractures or devastating neurovascular damage. There are limited reasons for routine bullet removal in most cases. Acute indications include wounds involving joints, palms, and soles as well as increased risk of infection, persistent pain, and lead intoxication. Here, we bring attention to a case of a gunshot wound to the left foot of a 53-year-old male, in which the bullet was able to be extracted using a shoe fiber that had become wrapped around the bullet.

Surgical Treatment of Upper Extremity Gunshot Injures: An Updated Review

INTRODUCTION

Firearm morbidity and mortality have been increasing in recent years, and with this, the demand for medical personnel firearm injury treatment knowledge. Extremities contribute to a majority of firearm injuries, with these injuries being particularly complex because of neurovascular proximity within a confined space. Knowledge of firearm mechanism of injury and treatment management options is important for any trauma hand surgeon. Many factors play vital roles in the treatment of complex upper extremity (UE) gunshot wounds (GSWs). The aim of our review and case illustrations is to provide hand surgeons with an up-to-date guide for initial emergent management, soft tissue, bony, and nerve repair and reconstruction.

PATIENT AND METHODS

A literature review was conducted in the current management of UE GSW injuries, and 2 specific patient case examples were included. High-energy versus low-energy GSWs were documented and compared, as well as containment injures. Management including soft tissue, bony, and nerve injuries was explored along with patient outcome. Based on these findings, guidelines for GSW management were purposed.

CONCLUSION

Gunshot wounds of the UE encompass a group of highly heterogeneous injuries. High-energy wounds are more extensive, and concomitant injuries to bone, vessel, nerve, muscle, and soft tissue are common. Early treatment with adequate debridement, skeletal fixation, and soft tissue coverage is indicated for complex injuries, and antibiotic treatment in the pre-, peri-, and postoperative period is indicated for operative injuries. Soft tissue coverage options include the entire reconstructive ladder, with pattern of injury and considerations of wound characteristics dictating reconstructive choice. There are arguments to using either external or internal bony fixation techniques for bone fracture management, with choice tailored to the patient. For management of nerve injuries, we advocate earlier nerve repair and a shorter duration of observation before secondary reconstruction in selective cases. If transected nerve endings cannot be brought together, nerve autografts of shorter length are recommended to bridge nerve ending gaps. A significant number of patients with GSW fail to make necessary follow-up appointments, which adds to challenges in treatment.

High Velocity Gunshot Fractures of Humerus: Results of Primary Plate Osteosynthesis

BACKGROUND

High velocity gunshot fractures usually seen in conflict zones, often mandate external fixation due to delayed presentation and associated contamination. In the presented observational study, we managed high velocity gunshot fractures of humerus with adequate debridement and primary plate osteosynthesis under controlled conditions with gratifying results.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Eighteen consecutive cases of fracture of the humerus secondary to high velocity gunshot wounds with ages ranging from 28 to 45 years reporting within 6 h of the initial injury formed our study group. Immediate debridement, lavage and primary plate osteosynthesis was carried out following hemodynamic stabilisation and intravenous antibiotics. All the cases were followed up at 2, 4, 6 months, 1 year and then annual follow-up including telephonic follow-up for six patients.

RESULTS

Fifteen cases of Gustillo Anderson type III A, two of type III B and one of type III C were managed with primary plate osteosynthesis. Brachial artery injury was addressed immediately, however injured radial nerve ends were tagged. Five cases showed delayed/non-union and were managed with decortication and autologous bone grafting. Two cases of deep infection could be managed with implant retention till union. The implants were removed following fracture consolidation. All the fractures united and no patient was left with sequelae of chronic infection.

CONCLUSION

Timely presentation of high velocity gunshot fractures of humerus teamed up with adequate debridement, soft tissue management and primary plate osteosynthesis can offer satisfactory outcomes. Associated vascular injury needs immediate attention. Nerve injuries can be addressed in a staged procedure. Our results have been satisfactory and add to the scant literature available on the subject, however further studies are warranted.

Management of upper extremity war injuries in the subacute period: A review of 62 cases

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we aimed to describe the relationship between the localization of rarely seen upper extremity war injuries and their complications in the subacute period, and define our preferences for surgery and antibiotic use.

METHODS

Patients with an upper extremity war injury who presented to our institution between 2015 and 2018 were retrospectively evaluated. Data regarding demographics, time between injury and presentation, location of injury, type of damage, complications, treatment methods, infection rates and antibiotic use were recorded. Tissue defects, fracture fixation, neurovascular damage, infection development and treatment approaches were analyzed.

RESULTS

Sixty-two male patients with isolated upper extremity injuries (mean age: 31.66 ± 8.28 years) were included in the study. The average time between trauma and hospitalization was 14 days. The mean hematocrit (Hct) level at presentation was 36.3 ± 6.8%. Patients had been followed up for an average period of 95.6 ± 32.1 days. Twenty-nine patients (46.8%) had nerve injury, eight (12.9%) had arterial injury that required repair, and 23 had infection (37.1%), of which five developed osteomyelitis. Infection was polymicrobial in nine cases and monobacterial in 14. A positive correlation was found between the presence of fracture and nerve injury (p = 0.013). The frequency of nerve injuries due to gunshot wounds was higher in the mid-section and lower part of the arms and in the proximal forearm when compared to other regions (p = 0.011). The infection rates were significantly higher in patients with fractures (p = 0.033). The mean hematocrit (Hct) level at presentation of the patients with infection (32.1 ± 6.3%) was significantly lower than that of those who did not have infection (38.8 ± 5.9%) (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Upper extremity war injuries require case-specific solutions. Microbiological samples should be taken prior to empirical antibiotic treatment for infection management and rational antibiotic use principles should be applied according to the culture and antibiogram results. The holistic and ambiguous character of nerve injuries often requires early exploration and combined reconstructive interventions. Arterial injuries can be overlooked by physical examination alone and thus routine angiography should be performed. Completion of the bone and soft tissue reconstructions in the same session using a holistic approach minimizes the possible risks.

Navigating the Intersection of Evidence and Policy in Hand Surgery Practice

Collaboration with organizations beyond the clinical setting is necessary to identify safety hazards that contribute to the high incidence and severity of hand conditions. Hand surgeons are acutely aware of obstacles patients face while navigating the health care system. Advocacy efforts encourage the development of equitable insurance policies and improve health resource allocation so that hand surgeons can treat a larger patient population. Participation in quality initiatives supports the development of evidence-based clinical guidelines. Further evidence must be generated to ensure that surgeons remain proficient in the latest techniques and uphold high standards of care as hand surgery procedures evolve.