Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty After Prior Rotator Cuff Repair: A Matched Cohort Analysis

Prior nonarthroplasty shoulder surgery and modifiable risk factors negatively affect patient outcomes after shoulder arthroplasty

Background

Total shoulder arthroplasty frequently is performed in patients with a history of shoulder surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes after primary shoulder arthroplasty in patients with a history of nonarthroplasty shoulder surgery, and whether certain modifiable risk factors (MRFs) were negatively associated with final outcome measures. The secondary purpose was to determine if costs or complications were higher in patients with prior shoulder surgery.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all patients who underwent primary shoulder arthroplasty from January 2015 to December 2019 by one surgeon at one institution. Patients who received hemiarthroplasty were excluded. Univariate analysis was performed to assess the influence of prior shoulder surgery on costs, complications, and patient-reported outcome measures. Multivariable analysis was performed to determine if MRF negatively affected results, defined as anemia, malnutrition, obesity, uncontrolled diabetes, tobacco use, and opioid use.

Results

512 patients met inclusion criteria; 139 patients had at least one prior shoulder surgery. Patients with history of prior shoulder surgery were younger (65.2 ± 9.3 years vs. 70.7 ± 9.1 years, P < .001), more likely to be male (52.2% vs. 47.8%, P = .016), more likely to have smoking history (20.1% vs. 10.5%, P = .002), and borderline more likely to use preoperative opioids (47.5% vs. 38.9%, P = .078) while reporting significantly higher pain scores at final follow-up (visual analog scale for pain 1.7 ± 2.4 vs. 1.1 ± 1.9, P = .001) and lower patient-reported outcome measure (P ≤ .017 for all). The final American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (ASES) score was independently negatively impacted by a history of prior surgery (β = -4.25 (-7.92, -0.56), P = .024) and other nonmodifiable factors including prosthesis type of reverse arthroplasty (β = -6.31, confidence interval [CI] -10.02, -2.60, P = .001), cardiac disease (β = -3.59, CI -7.12, -.0.07, P = .046), and any complication (β = 0.28, CI 0.19, 0.36, P < .001). The final ASES score was negatively impacted by MRF including opioid use (β = -4.08, CI: -7.32, -0.84, P < .001) and smoking status (β = -7.59, CI: -12.69, -2.49, P < .001). Males had slightly higher final ASES scores (β = 3.79, CI 0.46, 7.11, P = .026). Patients with prior surgery were more likely to have an intraoperative stress fracture [odds ratio [OR] 4.6 (1.1, 19.5), P = .038] and borderline more likely to have neurologic complication [OR 1.7 (1.0, 3.0), P = .062] or any complication [OR 1.5 (1.0, 2.3), P = .075].

Conclusion

Patients with prior shoulder surgery were younger, more likely to be male, and more likely to have a history of tobacco use and opioid use. These patients experienced worse subjective clinical outcomes and were more likely to experience a complication.

Outcomes After Revision Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) is one of the most commonly performed orthopaedic procedures; however, it is unclear how to manage patients with symptomatic retears.

PURPOSE

To perform a systematic review to evaluate the outcomes of revision ARCR in the literature.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

A systematic literature search based on PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines was performed utilizing the Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library databases. Eligible for inclusion were clinical studies reporting on revision rotator cuff repair. Clinical outcomes were recorded.

RESULTS

The 17 included studies were composed of 888 shoulders in 885 patients. The mean age of the 885 patients was 58.6 ± 9.1 years, with a mean follow-up of 28.1 ± 22.1 months. The mean visual analog scale score was 2.1 ± 1.8, the mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was 75.0 ± 18.3, and the mean Constant score was 67.4 ± 16.6. The overall rate of retears after revision was 25.3%, with an 8.0% reoperation rate including 2.7% undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty and 2.0% undergoing subsequent rotator cuff repair. Finally, the complication rate was 8.6%.

CONCLUSION

Revision ARCR improved patient-reported outcomes, with 92% of patients free from reoperations at a mean follow-up of 2 years. Overall, 78.4% of patients were satisfied at final follow-up; however, the rate of retears was found to be higher than after primary ARCR.

Preoperative Risk Factors for Pain After Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

Despite being a generally successful procedure, pain following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is a known complication. The aim of this systematic review is to identify preoperative risk factors for pain following rTSA to encourage evidence-based interventions, inform clinicians, and aid in surgical planning. Studies that reported preoperative risk factors and pain after rTSA were included. Studies which reported outcome measures that incorporated pain scores yet did not display them independently, studies which only reported intraoperative risk factors, and studies involving participants under 18 were excluded. The search was conducted on May 31, 2023, across the following databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Four independent researchers conducted this systematic review, and a descriptive analysis was subsequently performed. Twenty-five studies were included following the evaluation of full-text articles, involving a total of 9,470 shoulders. Preoperative risk factors identified were categorised into the following groups: BMI, smoking, radiographic findings, age and sex, prior surgery, functional ability and pain, and psychosocial. The strongest associations identified were preoperative opioid use and smoking, which were both associated with worse pain outcomes following rTSA; other preoperative risk factors highlighted in this review showed either weak or no correlation. Preoperative opioid use and smoking are likely risk factors for the development of pain after rTSA. Although the studies included varying levels of quality, the identification of modifiable risk factors is useful in optimising management prior to surgery and guiding patient expectations. The lack of evidence regarding associations with non-modifiable risk factors further reinforces the potential benefits of the procedure on diverse population groups and is useful in itself for assessing the candidacy of patients for the procedure, particularly when postoperative pain is a factor being considered.

Outcomes of arthroscopic single-row repair alone vs. repair with human dermal allograft patch augmentation in patients with large to massive, posterosuperior rotator cuff tears: a retrospective comparative study

BACKGROUND

Large to massive rotator cuff tears (RCTs) affect shoulder functions profoundly with unmanageable disability without intervention. The retear rates with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) in these patients are abysmal. Patch augmentation has been credited for preventing retears, improving functions by increasing the strength, and acting as a bioconductive scaffold. This study aimed to assess the retear rates and compare the clinical and radiological outcomes between the ARCR with and without acellular human dermal allograft (HDA) augmentation.

METHODS

This is a retrospective comparative study among patients diagnosed with large to massive, posterosuperior RCTs, operated between January 2020 and December 2021, including 36 patients (group I) with and 131 patients (group II) without HDA augmentation, with a mean follow-up of 20 (range, 12-35) months. The average age was 64 (range, 49-80) and 66 (range, 41-81) years in groups I and II, respectively. In group I, there were 16 male and 20 female patients, whereas in group II, there were 58 male and 73 female patients.

RESULTS

The visual analog scale score improved to 1.1 ± 1.7 in group I and 2.1 ± 1.7 in group II (P = .005). There was a greater improvement in the University of California, Los Angeles shoulder score to 30.1 ± 4.2 in group I compared with 23.2 ± 3.9 in group II (P = .046). Forward flexion (degrees) improved from a mean of 103.2 ± 18.6 to 138.9 ± 23.5 in group I and from 106.4 ± 21.3 to 127.0 ± 19.5 in group II (P = .004). The acromiohumeral interval (mm) measured in anteroposterior radiographs increased to 8.4 ± 1.8 in group I and 8.2 ± 2.0 in group II (P = .006). The satisfaction after the procedure was 4.4 ± 0.6 in group I and 3.1 ± 1.1 in group II (P = .044). The retear rate in the HDA-augmented group was 5.6% as compared with 29.1% in the nonaugmented group, which was statistically significant (P = .007). There were no complications or adverse tissue reactions against HDA seen in any patients.

CONCLUSION

In patients with large to massive, posterosuperior RCTs, patch augmentation with acellular HDA significantly averted the retears after ARCR without any graft-related complications. The augmentation also resulted in improved shoulder function and greater range of motion compared with the nonaugmented group.

Clinical outcomes of anatomic vs. reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in primary osteoarthritis with preoperative external rotation weakness and an intact rotator cuff: a case-control study

BACKGROUND

Anatomic (aTSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) are well-established treatments for patients with primary osteoarthritis and an intact cuff. However, it is unclear whether aTSA or rTSA provides superior outcomes in patients with preoperative external rotation (ER) weakness.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a prospectively collected shoulder arthroplasty database was performed between 2007 and 2020. Patients were excluded for preoperative diagnoses of nerve injury, infection, tumor, or fracture. The analysis included 333 aTSAs and 155 rTSAs performed for primary cuff-intact osteoarthritis with 2-year minimum follow-up. Defining preoperative ER weakness as strength <3.3 kilograms (7.2 pounds), 3 cohorts were created and matched: (1) weak aTSAs (n = 74) vs. normal aTSAs (n = 74), (2) weak rTSAs (n = 38) vs. normal rTSAs (n = 38), and (3) weak rTSAs (n = 60) vs. weak aTSAs (n = 60). We compared range of motion, outcome scores, strength, complications, and revision rates at the latest follow-up.

RESULTS

Despite weak aTSAs having poorer preoperative strength in forward elevation and ER (P < .001), neither of these deficits persisted postoperatively compared with the normal cohort. Likewise, weak rTSAs had poorer preoperative strength in forward elevation and ER, overhead motion, and Constant, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, and University of California, Los Angeles scores (P < .029). However, no statistically significant differences were found between preoperatively weak and normal rTSAs. When comparing weak aTSA vs. weak rTSA, no differences were found in preoperative and postoperative outcomes, proportion of patients achieving the minimal clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit, and complication and rate of revision surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

In preoperatively weak patients with cuff-intact primary osteoarthritis, aTSA leads to similar postoperative strength, range of motion, and outcome scores compared with patients with normal preoperative strength, indicating that preoperative weakness does not preclude aTSA use. Furthermore, patients who were preoperatively weak in ER demonstrated improved postoperative rotational motion after undergoing aTSA and rTSA, with both groups achieving the minimal clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit at similar rates.

Shoulder Arthroplasty After Previous Nonarthroplasty Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes and Complications

BACKGROUND

Many patients who undergo shoulder arthroplasty (SA) have had at least 1 nonarthroplasty shoulder surgery before the surgery. There is conflicting evidence regarding the effects of previous shoulder surgery on the outcome of SA. A systematic review was conducted to compare functional outcomes and complications between SA patients with and without prior non-SA surgery on the ipsilateral shoulder.

METHODS

We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and searched MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science comprehensively from inception to January 2023. Based on 9,279 records reviewed, 26 comparative studies were included in the meta-analysis consisting of 5,431 shoulders with prior nonarthroplasty procedures (cases) and 55,144 shoulders without previous surgery (controls). Variables such as functional scores, complications, and range of motion were compared between cases and controls using Review Manager Software. In addition, subgroup analysis was conducted based on prior surgery type (rotator cuff repair [RCR], open reduction and internal fixation [ORIF], soft tissue repairs, and not specified) and type of SA (hemiarthroplasty, anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty, and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty [RTSA]). The results were presented as odds ratios (ORs) or standardized mean differences (SMDs).

RESULTS

Except for a higher rate of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in patients who had undergone previous arthroscopic surgery (OR, 2.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.66-4.01; p < 0.01), a higher rate of complications was only observed in patients with previous ORIF. These complications included aseptic loosening (OR, 3.43; 95% CI, 2.14-5.50; p < 0.01), shoulder dislocation (OR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.05-4.84; p = 0.04), overall complication (OR, 3.95; 95% CI, 2.38-6.55; p < 0.01), and revision (OR, 2.52; 95% CI, 1.28-4.97; p = 0.01). Patients with a history of previous surgery demonstrated inferior functional outcomes in comparison with the control group, including American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (SMD, -0.39; 95% CI, -0.51 to -0.27; p < 0.01; I2 = 36%), Constant-Murley score (SMD, -0.34; 95% CI, -0.44 to -0.24; p < 0.01; I2 = 0%), abduction (SMD, -0.26; 95% CI, -0.45 to -0.08; p = 0.01; I2 = 54%), and flexion (SMD, -0.33; 95% CI, -0.46 to -0.21; p < 0.01; I2 = 40%). Subgroup analysis by previous type of surgery was not possible regarding functional outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Patients who have had prior fracture surgery are at a higher risk of complications, reoperations, and revisions after SA than controls. The normal shoulder anatomy may be disrupted by prior surgery, which makes arthroplasty technically challenging, particularly when it comes to soft tissue balance. On the other hand, RCR before SA did not negatively affect clinical outcomes after RTSA and did not have a higher rate of overall complications (except PJI).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III (Treatment Studies). See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

When is a Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Indicated for a Rotator Cuff Tear?

Rotator cuff tears are the most frequent shoulder injury in patients over 50 years old. Treatment of rotator cuff tears is individualized based on the age, demands, and symptoms of the patient. Nonoperative treatment may often be effective, especially in lower-demand or elderly patients. Surgical repair is indicated after failure of nonoperative treatment or in patients whose high-demand lifestyle requires full strength and function of the shoulder. In older patients, larger tears are less likely to heal and rotator cuff repair may not reliable. In cases of failed previous rotator cuff repair, there may not be enough viable tissue for complete repair. If there is underlying arthritis, a rotator cuff repair is unlikely to resolve all symptoms, and treatment to care for the arthritis and rotator cuff tear is indicated. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty provides the surgical answer for these scenarios and is now being used for numerous indications of shoulder pathology.

Influence of acromioclavicular joint arthritis on outcomes after reverse total shoulder

Background

Although substantial motion at the acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) occurs during overhead shoulder motion, the influence of ACJ arthritis on postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is unclear. We assessed the influence of ACJ arthritis, defined by degenerative radiographic changes, and its severity on clinical outcomes after primary rTSA.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective review of a prospectively collected shoulder arthroplasty database of patients that underwent primary rTSA with a minimum 2-year clinical follow-up. Imaging studies of included patients were evaluated to assess ACJ arthritis classified by radiographic degenerative changes of the ACJ; severity was based upon size and location of osteophytes. Both the Petersson classification and the King classification (a modified Petersson classification addressing superior osteophytes and size of the largest osteophyte) were used to evaluate the severity of degenerative ACJ radiographic changes. Severe ACJ arthritis was characterized by large osteophytes (≥2 mm). Active range of motion (ROM) in abduction, forward elevation, and external and internal rotation as well as clinical outcome scores (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder, Constant, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, simple shoulder test, University of California, Los Angeles scores) were assessed both preoperatively and at the latest follow-up; outcomes were compared based on severity of ACJ arthritis. Multivariable linear regression models were used to determine whether increasing severity of ACJ arthritis was associated with poorer outcomes.

Results

A total of 341 patients were included with a mean age of 71 ± 8 years and 55% were female. The mean follow-up was 5.1 ± 2.4 years. Preoperatively, there were no differences in outcomes based on the severity of ACJ pathology. Postoperatively, there were no differences in outcomes based upon the severity of ACJ arthritis except for greater preoperative to postoperative improvement in active internal rotation in patients with normal or grade 1 ACJ arthritis vs. grade 2 and 3 (3 ± 2 vs. 1 ± 2 and 1 ± 3, P = .029). Patients with ACJ arthritis and osteophytes ≥2 mm had less favorable Shoulder Pain and Disability Index scores, corresponding to greater pain (-49.3 ± 21.5 vs. -41.3 ± 26.8, P = .015). On multivariable linear regression, increased severity of ACJ arthritis was not independently associated with poorer postoperative ROM or outcome scores.

Conclusion

Overall, our results demonstrate that greater ACJ arthritis severity score is not associated with poorer outcome scores and has minimal effect on ROM. However, patients with the largest osteophytes (≥2 mm) did have slightly worse pain postoperatively. Radiographic presence of high-stage ACJ arthritis should not alter the decision to undergo rTSA.

Clinical outcomes of anatomical versus reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with primary osteoarthritis, an intact rotator cuff, and limited forward elevation

Aims

Both anatomical and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA and rTSA) provide functional improvements. A reported benefit of aTSA is better range of motion (ROM). However, it is not clear which procedure provides better outcomes in patients with limited foward elevation (FE). The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of aTSA and rTSA in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis (OA), an intact rotator cuff, and limited FE.

Methods

This was a retrospective review of a single institution's prospectively collected shoulder arthroplasty database for TSAs undertaken between 2007 and 2020. A total of 344 aTSAs and 163 rTSAs, which were performed in patients with OA and an intact rotator cuff with a minimum follow-up of two years, were included. Using the definition of preoperative stiffness as passive FE ≤ 105°, three cohorts were matched 1:1 by age, sex, and follow-up: stiff aTSAs (85) to non-stiff aTSAs (85); stiff rTSAs (74) to non-stiff rTSAs (74); and stiff rTSAs (64) to stiff aTSAs (64). We the compared ROMs, outcome scores, and complication and revision rates.

Results

Compared with non-stiff aTSAs, stiff aTSAs had poorer passive FE and active external rotation (ER), whereas there were no significant postoperative differences between stiff rTSAs and non-stiff rTSAs. There were no significant differences in preoperative function when comparing stiff aTSAs with stiff rTSAs. However, stiff rTSAs had significantly greater postoperative active and passive FE (p = 0.001 and 0.004, respectively), and active abduction (p = 0.001) compared with stiff aTSAs. The outcome scores were significantly more favourable in stiff rTSAs for the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, Simple Shoulder Test, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, University of California, Los Angeles score, and the Constant score, compared with stiff aTSAs. When comparing the proportion of stiff aTSAs versus stiff rTSAs that exceeded the minimal clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit, stiff rTSAs achieved both at greater rates for all measurements except active ER. The complication rate did not significantly differ between stiff aTSAs and stiff rTSAs, but there was a significantly higher rate of revision surgery in stiff aTSAs (p = 0.007).

Conclusion

Postoperative overhead ROM, outcome scores, and rates of revision surgery favour the use of a rTSA rather than aTSA in patients with glenohumeral OA, an intact rotator cuff and limited FE, with similar rotational ROM in these two groups.

An Algorithmic Approach to the Surgical Management of Massive Rotator Cuff Tears Based on Imaging, Function, and Repairability

Massive rotator cuff tears are one the most challenging conditions to treat in the shoulder. A variety of surgical approaches have been used to manage massive rotator cuff tears, such as repair with or without augmentation, superior capsule reconstruction, tendon transfer, and reverse shoulder arthroplasty. The choice between joint preservation or reverse shoulder arthroplasty is first considered based on preoperative imaging and functional status, as well as patient factors. When joint preservation is the goal of treatment, a combination of repairability, patient function, and age can be used to provide an algorithmic approach to treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, expert opinion.

Outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients with previous rotator cuff repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Rotator cuff tears are a common injury encountered by orthopedic surgeons. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has become a treatment option for those with acute tears, as well as those with prior failed rotator cuff repair (RCR). The objective of this study was to determine if there are differences in postoperative outcomes for patients with previous RCR compared to those undergoing primary RSA for rotator cuff tears.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases. All relevant studies were reviewed by two authors according to inclusion and exclusion criteria defined in the study. Demographics and postoperative outcomes including functional scores, range of motion, pain scores, and complications were recorded.

Results

Six level III articles encompassing 2176 shoulders were included in the analysis (846 with previous RCR and 1330 without). Average postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores were 75.41 in the prior RCR group and 81.61 in the group without prior repair (mean difference [MD] = -5.95, P ≤ .0001 I2 = 36). Average postoperative Simple Shoulder Test scores were 8.40 in the RCR group and 9.57 in the group without prior RCR (MD = -0.93, P ≤ .0001, I2 = 66). Average postoperative Constant Score was 62.97 in the RCR group and 66.63 in the group without prior RCR (MD = -5.02, P ≤ .0001, I2 ≤ 0.001). Average postoperative University of California at Los Angeles Shoulder Scale score was 28.27 in the RCR group and 29.13 in the group without prior RCR (MD = -1.75, P ≤ .001, I2 ≤ 0.001). Average postoperative visual analog scale pain score was 1.77 in the RCR group and 0.95 in the group without prior RCR (MD = 0.75, P ≤ .0001, I2 = 35).

Conclusion

Patients with prior RCR undergoing RSA have worse postoperative functional scores and pain scores than those without prior RCR. However, these differences are below the minimal clinically important difference for each outcome.

Arthroscopic Repair of Massive Rotator Cuff Tears Leads to Functional Improvement in Most Patients at 4-Year Follow-up

Purpose

To assess functional outcomes and healing 4 years after arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears (MRCTs).

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study of patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair of an MRCT-defined as a complete 2-tendon tear or a tear greater than 5 cm in any dimension-performed by 2 surgeons at different institutions between January 2015 and December 2018. At a minimum of 4 years postoperatively, patient-reported outcomes collected included the visual analog scale pain score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Veterans RAND 12 (VR-12) score, and Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) score. Repair technique and concomitant procedures were also gathered. Tendon healing was evaluated via ultrasound at final follow-up.

Results

Functional outcomes were available for 101 patients at a mean of 63.6 ± 8.8 months (range, 48-82 months) postoperatively. Mean ASES scores improved from 40.1 to 78 (P < .001); VR-12 scores, from 37.1 to 47.7 (P < .001); and SSV scores, from 36.7 to 84.6 (P < .001). Forward flexion improved from 126° to 144° (P = .001), external rotation remained unchanged (from 47° to 44°, P = .268), and internal rotation improved by 2 spinal levels (from L4 to L2, P = .0001). Eighty-eight percent of patients (89 of 101) were satisfied with the procedure, and only 5% underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty within the study period. Among the 39 patients who underwent postoperative ultrasound to assess healing, 56% showed complete tendon healing. There was no difference in healing or outcomes according to tear pattern. Additionally, tendon healing did not affect outcomes.

Conclusions

Arthroscopic repair of MRCTs leads to functional improvements and patient satisfaction in most cases at 4-year follow-up. The rates of patients achieving the minimal clinically important difference were 77.5%, 87.6%, 59.7%, and 80.6% for the ASES score, SSV score, VR-12 score, and visual analog scale pain score, respectively. Complete tendon healing is difficult to achieve but does not appear to limit functional improvements.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, therapeutic case series.