Transfer Time After Acceptance to a Level I Trauma Center

Failure Mode Effects Analysis of Re-triage of Injured Patients to Receiving High-Level Illinois Trauma Centers

OBJECTIVE

This study identified failures in emergency inter-hospital transfer, or re-triage, at high-level trauma centers receiving severely injured patients.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

The re-triage process averages four hours despite the fact timely re-triage within two hours mitigates injury-associated mortality. Non-trauma and low-level trauma centers reported most critical failures were in finding an accepting high-level trauma center. Critical failures at high-level trauma centers have not been assessed.

METHODS

This was an observational cross-sectional study at nine high-level adult trauma centers and three high-level pediatric trauma centers. Failure Modes Effects Analysis (FMEA) of the re-triage process was conducted in four phases. Phase 1 purposively sampled trauma coordinators followed by snowball sampling of clinicians, operations, and leadership to ensure representative participation. Phase 2 mapped each re-triage step. Phase 3 identified failures at each step. Phase 4 scored each failure on impact, frequency, and safeguards for detection. Standardized rubrics were used in Phase 4 to rate each failure's impact (I), frequency (F), and safeguard for detection (S) to calculate their Risk Priority Number (RPN) (I x F x S). Failures were rank ordered for criticality.

RESULTS

A total of 64 trauma coordinators, surgeons, emergency medicine physicians, nurses, operations and quality managers across twelve high-level trauma centers participated. There were 178failures identified at adult and pediatric high-level trauma centers. The most critical failures were: Insufficient trained transport staff (RPN=648); Issues transmitting imaging from sending to receiving centers (RPN=400); Incomplete exchange of clinical information(RPN=384).

CONCLUSIONS

The most critical failures were limited transportation and incomplete exchange of clinical, radiological and arrival timing information. Further investigation of these failures that includes several regions is needed to determine the reproducibility of these findings.

Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fractures: Treatment by a Pediatric Orthopedic Surgeon Versus a Non-pediatric Orthopedic Surgeon

INTRODUCTION

Supracondylar humerus fractures are the most common surgically treated fracture in children. National trends have demonstrated an increase in transfers of supracondylar fractures to pediatric hospitals due to the perception that supracondylar fractures need to be treated by pediatric specialists. The objectives of the study are to compare the outcomes of surgically treated pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures (PSCHF) between a pediatric orthopedic surgeon and a non-pediatric orthopedic surgeon at a single academic medical center; to assess radiographic reduction, the number of pins used, surgical time, Flynn criteria outcomes, and complications associated with PSCHF treatment by both types of surgeons; to determine if there is a significant difference in outcomes between pediatric and non-pediatric orthopedic surgeons in the treatment of PSCHF.

METHODS

Forty-seven consecutive pediatric patients, with an average age of 5.5 years old, who had undergone surgical correction for supracondylar humerus fractures during 2019 were included in this study. The intervention performed was closed reduction and percutaneous pinning. The main outcome measured: radiographic reduction on the AP and lateral X-ray view, number of K wires used, use of a medial K wire, time of surgery, the Flynn criteria, and complications. The Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) at Penn State approval was obtained.

RESULTS

Radiographic reductions as measured by Bauman's angle and the position of the anterior humeral line were excellent and similar between surgeons. The pediatric orthopedic surgeon used more medial K wires (p=0.0007), fewer K wires (p=0.0065), and the length of surgery was shorter (p=0.019). The Flynn criteria were similar with equal excellent and good results. For both surgeons, no complications such as loss of reduction, infection, iatrogenic nerve injury, compartment syndrome, or cubitus varus occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes of treatment of displaced PSCHF by the pediatric and non-pediatric orthopedic surgeons were equal. The results of this study reaffirm the assertion that both pediatric and non-pediatric orthopedic surgeons have sufficient training and skill to treat these common fractures, thereby contributing to a more informed decision-making process in clinical practice.

The Impact of Delays in Interfaculty Transfer on Outcomes in Elderly Trauma Patients

BACKGROUND

Delay to definitive treatment is a significant and persistent challenge to trauma systems across the United States, especially in rural communities with limited resources. We hypothesized that elderly trauma patients with delay in transfer would have increased morbidity and mortality. This study evaluates the relationship between inter-facility transfer time and outcomes in elderly trauma patients, and the validity of the 4-hour dwell time as a performance improvement benchmark.

METHODS

The National Trauma Registry and Emergency Medical Services Database were queried from January 2010 to January 2018. Inclusion criteria included age ≥65, blunt mechanism, and transfer from another facility. Correlation analysis was used to evaluate the association between clinical and demographic variables and transfer time. Multicollinearity was evaluated using the variance inflation factor.

RESULTS

1535 patients were identified. This cohort was further subdivided into 4 cohorts based on dwell time: 0-1.5 hours (n = 384), ≥1.5-1.9 hours (n = 379), 1.9-<2.5 hours (n = 383), and ≥2.5 hours (n = 388). Analysis revealed that shorter dwell time was associated with male gender (P = .0039), higher ISS (injury severity score) (P < .0001), lower RTS (revised trauma score) (P < .0001), higher pre-hospital arrest (P = .0066), lower initial GCS (Glasgow Coma Scale) (P = .0012), higher mortality, longer ICU, and ventilator length of stay (P < .0001). Longer dwell times were associated with discharge from the hospital to home or skilled nursing facility as well as lower mortality (P < .0001).

DISCUSSION

Longer dwell time was inversely related to outcome. More severely injured patients were rapidly transferred. This represents a mature rural trauma system. In addition, dwell time should be scrutinized as a meaningful indicator within a performance improvement program.