Comparison of single-port laparoscopy and laparotomy in early ovarian cancer surgical staging

Comparative Study of Complications and Incision Esthetic Satisfaction Between Single-Port Laparoscopy and Traditional Laparoscopy in Benign Gynecological Surgery

OBJECTIVE

Single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) is an effective, minimally invasive, feasible, and promising surgical technique for the treatment of various benign and malignant gynecological diseases. This study aimed to evaluate the differences in surgical conditions, complications, and esthetic incisions between SPLS and traditional laparoscopic surgery (TLS) in benign gynecological surgeries.

METHODS

Fifty-one eligible patients were included, and their general information (age, surgical approach), surgical conditions (surgical time, blood loss, postoperative first flatus), postoperative pain, and incision healing were collected.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference in the results of hysterectomy between the two groups. The surgical time in the SPLS group was significantly shorter than that in the TLS group (p = 0.026). Furthermore, the SPLS group had less blood loss (p < 0.05) and earlier postoperative first flatus (p < 0.05) than the control group. There was no significant difference in postoperative conditions between the two groups. During the follow-up, it was found that the Vancouver Scar Scale score was 8.37 ± 2.30 in the control group and 6.81 ± 2.14 in the study group. The cosmetic effect and satisfaction were better in the SPLS group (p = 0.018). Subgroup analysis showed that in other benign gynecological diseases without uterine lesions, SPLS significantly improved surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative first flatus (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

SPLS demonstrated good clinical efficacy in benign gynecological surgery, with shorter surgical time, less blood loss, earlier postoperative first flatus, fewer complications, and better cosmetic effects of scars.

Single-port laparoscopic surgery as a useful diagnostic tool for primary ovarian lymphoma: a case report

The preoperative diagnosis of ovarian lymphoma, a rare pathology, is often difficult. Consequently, laparotomy is usually performed under the presumptive diagnosis of ovarian cancer. In cases where the initial curative surgery for ovarian cancer is challenging, diagnostic laparoscopy is performed. Herein, we report a case in which single-port laparoscopic surgery effectively diagnosed primary ovarian lymphoma. A 55-year-old woman presented with abnormal uterine bleeding. PET-CT findings suggested ovarian cancer with multiple metastases. Single-port laparoscopic surgery was performed because curative surgery was deemed difficult. She had an uneventful recovery and was discharged on the fourth postoperative day. After the pathological diagnosis was made, she was referred to the hematology department for treatment. Diagnostic laparoscopy is recommended for advanced ovarian cancer to facilitate early postoperative treatment. This case highlights the utility of single-port laparoscopic surgery in the accurate diagnosis and early treatment of intraperitoneal malignancies.

Efficacy and safety of minimally invasive surgery versus open laparotomy for epithelial ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To examine the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and conventional abdominal surgery for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), stratified by treatment type.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted by an Expert Panel of the Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology Ovarian Cancer Committee. Several academic databases, including PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Database, and Ichushi were searched by the Japan Medical Library Association on November 11, 2023, using the keywords "epithelial ovarian cancer", "minimally invasive surgery", "laparoscopic", and "robot-assisted". Articles describing MIS treatment for EOC compared with conventional abdominal surgery were independently assessed by two authors. The primary outcomes were survival and perioperative adverse events.

RESULTS

After screening 1114 studies, 35 articles were identified, including primary staging surgery (PSS) for early-stage EOC EOC (n = 20) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy following interval debulking surgery (NACT-IDS; n = 10) and upfront primary debulking surgery (PDS; n = 5) for advanced-stage EOC. These studies included 29,888 patients (7661 undergoing MIS and 22,227 undergoing abdominal surgery). Patients receiving MIS and abdominal surgery had similar overall survival (PSS: odds ratio [OR] 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75-1.37; NACT-IDS: OR 0.93, 95%CI 0.25-3.44 and PDS: OR 0.66, 95%CI 0.36-1.22, all P > 0.05). MIS showed perioperative complication rates comparable to those of abdominal surgery (intraoperative and postoperative, all treatment types P ≥ 0.05). However, the rate of lymph node dissection in early-stage EOC (PSS: OR 0.49, 95%CI0.26-0.91) and multivisceral resections in advanced-stage EOC (NACT-IDS: OR 0.27 95%CI 0.16-0.44 and PDS: OR 0.27, 95%CI 0.16-0.44) was lower in MIS than in abdominal surgery (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

MIS did not negatively impact the survival and perioperative complications of patients with EOC compared to abdominal surgery. While MIS is a viable option, varied case selection and surgical procedures suggest potential bias, requiring further validation studies.

Clinical study on laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery and transumbilical single-port laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of benign ovarian tumours and its influence on ovarian functions

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to explore the influence of traditional laparoscopic surgery and transumbilical single-port laparoscopic surgery on ovarian function in patients with benign ovarian tumours.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-four patients with benign ovarian tumours who were treated in our hospital from January 2020 to June 2021 were selected and randomly divided into two groups, with 22 cases in each group according to random number table. The conventional group was treated with conventional laparoscopic surgery, while the modified group was treated with transumbilical single-port laparoscopic surgery. The measurement method was t -test, and the enumeration method was two tests. The clinical operation-related indicators, ovarian function (follicle-stimulating hormone, E 2 and luteinising hormone), complication incidence, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and landscaping satisfaction scores of the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in complications and operation duration between the two groups ( P > 0.05). After treatment, the ovarian function indexes and beautification satisfaction scores of the modified group were significantly superior to those of the conventional group ( P < 0.05). Besides, the intraoperative bleeding volume, post-operative exhaust time, hospital stay and three-dimensional VAS scores on day 1 and day 3 after surgery of the modified group were lower than those of the conventional group ( P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Transumbilical single-port laparoscopic surgery for benign ovarian tumours has a significant clinical effect, which can effectively reduce bleeding during the operation, improve ovarian function, relieve surgical pain, promote rapid post-operative recovery and improve patients' satisfaction with landscaping. It is worthy of clinical application.

Clinical relevance of sentinel lymph node biopsy in early ovarian cancer

The first-line treatment for early ovarian cancer typically involves primary debulking surgery aimed at maximal cytoreduction, alongside adjuvant chemotherapy if clinically indicated. Nodal assessment involving pelvic and para-aortic lymph node dissection is typically performed during the primary debulking surgery. However, the survival benefit of lymphadenectomy in patients with early ovarian cancer has not been well established, and the procedure is associated with longer operation time and higher perioperative complications. With the emergence of minimally invasive surgery as a potential alternative to laparotomy for early ovarian cancer, sentinel lymph node biopsy has been evaluated in this setting. In this review, we summarized the current literature regarding sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with early ovarian cancer, focusing on the clinical relevance of this method, including its detection rate and diagnostic accuracy. Additionally, we discuss the current status of clinical trials investigating sentinel lymph node biopsy in early ovarian cancer cases.

Omentectomy for oncological surgical staging by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES): a preliminary study

Objective

This study aimed to determine the feasibility of performing omentectomy by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) for surgical staging of ovarian and high-risk endometrial malignancies.

Methods

This descriptive study was realized in a non-university hospital in Switzerland. Eighteen patients with suspicious adnexal masses or high-risk endometrial cancer underwent surgical staging comprising infracolic omentectomy by vNOTES between May 2020 and April 2023.

Results

Patients underwent oncological surgical staging for suspicious adnexal masses in 14 cases (77.8%) and high-risk endometrial cancer in 4 cases (22.2%). vNOTES omentectomies were performed in all patients without complications. Associated procedures included salpingo-oophorectomy (94.4%), hysterectomy (55.6%), peritoneal biopsies (33.3%), pelvic sentinel lymph node biopsies (22.2%), and appendectomy (5.6%). The median time to perform omentectomies was 9 (4-13) min. All oncological staging were completed by vNOTES. No significant intraoperative complications occurred. We observed 1 case (5.6%) of postoperative fever probably associated with vaginal cuff infection (Clavien-Dindo grade II).

Conclusions

This study demonstrated the feasibility of performing vNOTES oncological staging requiring complex extrapelvic procedures such as infracolic omentectomy, supporting its potential role for managing gynecological malignancies such as ovarian and high-risk endometrial cancers. However, before expanding this approach outside study settings, strong evidence of its feasibility, practical benefits, and long-term oncological outcomes are needed.

A single institution's experience with minimally invasive surgery for ovarian cancer, and a systematic meta-analysis of the literature

BACKGROUND

This study assesses the feasibility of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for well-selected epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients.

METHODS

We performed a review of data prospectively collected from a single center from 2017 to 2022. Only patients with histologically confirmed EOC, with a tumor diameter of less than 10 cm, were eligible. We also performed a meta-analysis of similar studies comparing the outcomes of laparoscopy and laparotomy. We used MINORS (Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies) to assess the risk of bias and calculated the odds ratio or mean difference.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients were included; 13 in re-staging group, four in PDS group, and one in IDS group. All achieved complete cytoreduction. One case was converted to laparotomy. The median number of removed pelvic lymph nodes was 25 (range 16-34), and 32 (range 19-44) for para-aortic nodes. There were two (15.4%) intraoperative urinary tract injuries. The median follow-up was 35 months (range 1-53). Recurrence was observed in one case (7.7%). Thirteen articles for early-stage ovarian cancer were included in our meta-analysis. Analysis of the pooled results found that MIS had a higher frequency of spillage (OR, 2.15; 95% CI 1.27-3.64). No differences were observed in recurrence, complications, or up-staging.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience supports the possibility of conducting MIS for EOC in well-selected patients. Except for spillage, our meta-analysis findings are consistent with previous reports, the majority of which were also retrospective. Ultimately, randomized clinical trials will be needed to authenticate the safety.

Feasibility study on the use of single-port laparoscopic surgery for diagnosis and tumor sampling in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer - Case series of three cases

INTRODUCTION

In advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (AEOC), it is often difficult to achieve optimal surgery at primary debulking surgery (PDS) due to intra-abdominal dissemination and/or metastasis. When it is determined that optimal surgery is not possible, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is performed prior to subsequent debulking surgery. Also, a histological diagnosis of the tumor is very important before initiation of NAC. Laparoscopic surgery is thus useful to objectively diagnose whether an optimal primary debulking surgery is feasible and to obtain tumor biopsy samples. In order to minimize the invasive procedures at initial surgery, we performed laparoscopic surgery using a single-port method.

CASE PRESENTATION

Three patients were diagnosed as stage IV ovarian cancer based on imaging and physical examination. Single-port laparoscopic surgery was performed. The intraabdominal findings were evaluated in all patients by predictive index scoring and objectively diagnosed as not ideal candidates for optimal surgery at PDS. Our use of single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) allowed for safe surgical outcomes and sufficient tissue sampling for histological diagnosis.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

Laparoscopic surgery is not appropriate for tumor reduction surgery in AEOC; however, its use as an alternative method to laparotomy is recommended for tumor tissue biopsy and/or intraperitoneal observation. Previous studies have reported on the use of conventional multi-port laparoscopic surgery. The single-port method, when compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery, is less invasive with only one abdominal wound at the umbilicus.

CONCLUSION

SPLS is feasible and clinically useful for diagnosis and tumor sampling in AEOC.

Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery for Surgical Staging of Early-Stage Ovarian Cancers: A Report of Two Cases

Surgical staging is essential in the management of ovarian cancers. This staging has traditionally been performed by laparotomy, but minimally invasive techniques are increasingly employed. Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) is a promising technique in the field of gynecological oncology. We report 2 cases of vNOTES surgical staging for suspicious ovarian tumors. We operated on 2 patients aged of 81 and 62 years for low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma and ovarian cystadenofibroma, respectively. We performed surgical staging with a pure vNOTES technique for the first patient and used a hybrid approach for the second. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were observed. We suggest that vNOTES is a feasible and effective approach to surgically manage early-stage ovarian cancers.

During the COVID-19 Epidemic: Recommendations for the Admission and Treatment of Patients With Ovarian Cancer

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) had become a health care event endangering humans globally. It takes up a large number of healthcare resources. We studied the impact of COVID-19 on patients with ovarian cancer by comprehensively analyzing their admissions before and after the epidemic, and made reasonable suggestions to improve their current situation.

Methods: We randomly divided the enrolled patients into three groups, PreCOVID-19 Group (PCG) (2019.8.20–2020.1.20), COVID-19 Group (CG) (2020.1.21–2020.6.14), and Secondary Outbreak COVID-19 Group (SOCG) (2020.6.15–2020.10.10). One-way ANOVA and chi-square test were used for analysis.

Results: The number of patients from other provinces decreased significantly (p < 0.05). The total hospital stay during the epidemic was substantially more extended (p < 0.05). Before the epidemic, our department performed more open surgery while during the epidemic outbreak, we tended to choose laparoscopy (p < 0.01). We took a longer surgery time (P < 0.05). Patients had significantly less post-operative fever during the epidemic (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: During the COVID-19 epidemic, no patient was infected with COVID-19, and no patient experienced severe post-operative complications. We recommend maintaining the admissions of patients with ovarian cancer during the epidemic following the rules: 1. The outpatients must complete a nucleic acid test and chest CT in the outpatient clinic; 2. Maintain full daily disinfection of the ward and insist that health care workers disinfect their hands after contact with patients; 3. Increase the use of minimally invasive procedures, including laparoscopy and robotics; 4. Disinfect the ward twice a day with UV light and sodium hypochlorite disinfectant; 5. Patients need to undergo at least three nucleic acid tests before entering the operating room.