Clinical and radiologic results of endovascular coil embolization for cerebral aneurysm in young patients

Efficacy of Coil Embolization in Small, Anterior Circulation Aneurysms in Patients Less Than 40 Years Old

Background: Ruptured and unruptured aneurysms are less common in younger individuals compared to older patients. Endovascular treatment has gained popularity over surgical options in the general population, but surgery remains the primary treatment for younger patients due to concerns about higher recurrence rates with endovascular procedures. Methods: This study compared the immediate and long-term outcomes of endovascular treatment in patients under 40 years with those aged 41-60. The study included 239 patients who underwent endovascular treatment for intracranial aneurysms, divided into two age groups: under 40 and 41-60 years. The rates of immediate radiologic outcomes, complications, and recurrence were assessed. Results: The results showed successful aneurysm obliteration rates of 70.1% in the younger group and 64.0% in the older group. The complication rates were 1.5% in the younger group and 3.5% in the older group, with the older group experiencing more procedure-related complications, though this difference was not statistically significant. Long-term follow-up revealed recurrence rates of 23.2% in the younger group and 18.2% in the older group, with no significant difference. Conclusions: The study suggests that endovascular treatment is as effective and safe for patients under 40 years. Therefore, it may be considered an acceptable first-line treatment for younger patients, aligning its use with that in older populations.

Accuracy of 320-detector row nonsubtracted and subtracted volume CT angiography in evaluating small cerebral aneurysms

OBJECTIVE The study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of 320-detector row nonsubtracted and subtracted volume CT angiography (VCTA) in detecting small cerebral aneurysms (< 3 mm) compared with 3D digital subtraction angiography (3D DSA). METHODS Six hundred sixty-two patients underwent 320-detector row VCTA and 3D DSA for suspected cerebral aneurysms. Five neuroradiologists independently reviewed VCTA and 3D DSA images. The 3D DSA was considered the reference standard, and the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of nonsubtracted and subtracted VCTA in depicting small aneurysms were analyzed. A p value < 0.05 was considered a significant difference. RESULTS According to 3D DSA images, 98 small cerebral aneurysms were identified in 90 of 662 patients. Nonsubtracted VCTA depicted 90 small aneurysms. Ten small aneurysms were missed, and 2 small aneurysms were misdiagnosed. The missed small aneurysms were located almost in the internal carotid artery, near bone tissue. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of nonsubtracted VCTA in depicting small aneurysms were 89.8%, 99.2%, and 96.5%, respectively, on a per-aneurysm basis. Subtracted VCTA depicted 97 small aneurysms. Three small aneurysms were missed, and 2 small aneurysms were misdiagnosed. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of subtracted VCTA in depicting small aneurysms were 96.9%, 99.2%, and 98.6%, respectively, on a per-aneurysm basis. There was no difference in accuracy between subtracted VCTA and 3D DSA (p = 1.000). However, nonsubtracted VCTA had significantly less sensitivity than 3D DSA and subtracted VCTA (p = 0.039 and 0.016, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Subtracted 320-detector row VCTA is sensitive enough to replace 3D DSA in the diagnosis of small cerebral aneurysms (< 3 mm). The accuracy rate of nonsubtracted VCTA was lower than that of subtracted VCTA and 3D DSA, especially in the assessment of small internal carotid artery aneurysms adjacent to the skull base.

Standards of anesthesiology practice during neuroradiological interventions

Interventional radiology is a rapidly growing discipline with an expanding variety of indications and techniques in pediatric and adult patients. Accordingly, the number of procedures during which monitoring either under sedation or under general anesthesia is needed is increasing. In order to ensure high-quality care as well as patient comfort and safety, implementation of anes-thesiology practice guidelines in line with institutional radiology practice guidelines is paramount [1]. However, practice guidelines are no substitute for lack of communi-cation between specialties. Interdisciplinary indications within neurosciences call for efficient co-operation among radiology, neurology, neurosurgery, vascular surgery, anesthesiology and intensive care. Anesthesia team and intensive care personnel should be informed early and be involved in coordinated planning so that optimal results can be achieved under minimized risks and pre-arranged complication management.