Trans-arterial Onyx Embolization of a Functional Thoracic Paraganglioma

Refinement of nBCA embolization technique in treatment of metastatic spinal tumors: Case series and technical report

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Preoperative embolization of metastatic spinal tumors (MSTs) has proven advantageous in limiting intraoperative blood loss (IBL) during resection. N-butyl cyanoacrylate (nBCA) is a liquid embolic agent known for its rapid hemostatic effects. However, nBCA is associated with a higher risk of distal nontarget embolization. This study highlights the refinement of the embolization technique and assesses its efficacy in performing an initial distal segmental artery plug with concentrated nBCA followed by proximal diluted nBCA for MSTs.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients with MST (2018-2023) was performed. Patients who underwent preoperative nBCA endovascular embolization prior to tumor resection and spinal instrumentation were included. Baseline standard spinal angiography was performed.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients (13 men, 3 women; 56.0 ± 12.4 years) met inclusion criteria. And 43.75% (7 of 16) had thoracic levels, 37.5% (6 of 16) lumbar, and 18.75% (3 of 16) sacral. The most common primary tumor was renal cell carcinoma (43.75%, 7 of 16). A total of 43 pedicles were embolized (median 3), resulting in complete/near complete obliteration of the tumor blush. Most pedicles (83.7%, 36 of 43) received a single dilute concentration of nBCA; however, 16.3% (7 of 43) received two separate concentrations of nBCA, a denser concentration distally into the segmental artery and a diluted concentration proximally into the tumor bed. Mean IBL was 1150 ± 1201 mL in 3 distal plug patients distal plug patients versus 1625 ± 681 mL in 12 other patients. There were no complications related to embolization.

CONCLUSION

Performing a distal, concentrated nBCA plug during preoperative nBCA embolization of MSTs may increase tumor penetration and reduce IBL.

Primary Paraganglioma of the Spine: A Systematic Review of Clinical Features and Surgical Management in Cauda Equina vs Non-Cauda Equina Lesions

BACKGROUND

Primary spine paragangliomas are rare tumors. Surgical resection plays a role, but aggressive lesions are challenging. We reviewed the literature on primary spine paragangliomas.

METHODS

PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane were searched upon the PRISMA guidelines to include studies on primary spine paragangliomas. Clinical-radiological features, treatments, and outcomes were analyzed and compared between cauda-equina vs non-cauda-equina tumors.

RESULTS

We included 143 studies comprising 334 patients. Median age was 46 years (range, 6-85). The most frequent symptoms were lower-back (64.1%) and radicular (53.9%) pain, and sympathetic in 18 patients (5.4%). Cauda-equina paragangliomas (84.1%) had frequently lumbar (49.1%) or lumbosacral (29%) locations. Non-cauda-equina tumors were mostly in the thoracic (11.4%), thoracolumbar (5.1%), and cervical (3.6%) spine. Median tumor diameter was 2.5cm (range, 0.5-13.0). Surgical resection (98.5%) was preferred over biopsy (1.5%). Decompressive laminectomy (53%) and spine fusion (6.9%) were also performed. Adjuvant radiotherapy was delivered in 39 patients (11.7%) with aggressive tumors. Post-treatment symptomatic improvement was described in 86.2% cases. Median follow-up was 19.5 months (range, 0.1-468.0), and 23 patients (3.9%) had tumor recurrences. No significant differences were found between cauda-equina vs non-cauda-equina tumors.

CONCLUSION

Surgical resection is effective and safe in treating primary spine paragangliomas; however, adjuvant treatments may be needed for aggressive lesions.

Surgical treatment of malignant paraganglioma with spinal invasion in a juvenile patient: A case report

RATIONALE

Paragangliomas are rare neuroendocrine tumors that originate in specialized cells derived from the neural crest with metastasis to the thoracic spine being among the rarest forms. Here, we are presenting a detailed analysis of a case of malignant paraganglioma in the thoracic spinal region in a 14-year-old boy. Our focus is to emphasize the importance of considering malignant paraganglioma as a diagnosis and guiding the perioperative management upon surgical treatment. The management of these unique cases has yet to be well-documented.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 14-year-old boy presented with a 5-month history of continuous and progressive elevated blood pressure and back pain. The patient, who had been diagnosed of malignant paraganglioma in the left posterior mediastinum for 3 months, received surgical resection of paraganglioma in the left posterior mediastinum, which had involved the left intervertebral foramen of T4. However, the tumor was not completely resected during the first operation.

DIAGNOSES

Magnetic resonance imaging of spine and positron emission tomography-computed tomography showed spinal cord compression secondary to the epidural component of the T4 mass, with increased marrow infiltration of the left T4 intervertebral foramen, which was difficult to be removed. Postoperative pathology confirmed the diagnosis of spinal involvement of malignant paraganglioma.

INTERVENTIONS

The patient underwent biopsy and percutaneous vertebroplasty of T4 and paravertebral lesions, and needle-track cement augmentation via a posterior approach.

OUTCOMES

The patient's neurological deficits improved significantly after the surgery, and the postoperative period was uneventful at the 10-month follow-up visit. There were no other complications associated with the operation during the follow-up period.

LESSONS

Combined efforts of specialists from orthopedics, neurosurgery, thoracic surgery, and medical oncology led to the successful diagnosis and management of this patient. Malignant paraganglioma of thoracic spine, although rare, should be part of the differential diagnosis when the patient has a history of paraganglioma and presents with back pain and radiculopathy. We recommend the posterior approach for spinal decompression of the malignant paraganglioma when the tumor has caused neurological deficits. Osteoplasty by cement augmentation is also a good choice for surgical treatment. However, we need to take the potential risk of complications in bone cement applications into full consideration.