1
|
Ureteroscopic Managment of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Bladder Cancer 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-70646-3_35] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
2
|
Gupta N, Hoffman-Censits JH, Pierorazio PM. Oncologic Monitoring After Radical Nephroureterectomy. Bladder Cancer 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-70646-3_40] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
3
|
Kim SY, Cho JY, Lee J, Hwang SI, Moon MH, Lee EJ, Hong SS, Kim CK, Kim KA, Park SB, Sung DJ, Kim Y, Kim YM, Jung SI, Rha SE, Kim DW, Lee H, Shim Y, Hwang I, Woo S, Choi HJ. Low-Tube-Voltage CT Urography Using Low-Concentration-Iodine Contrast Media and Iterative Reconstruction: A Multi-Institutional Randomized Controlled Trial for Comparison with Conventional CT Urography. Korean J Radiol 2018; 19:1119-1129. [PMID: 30386143 PMCID: PMC6201985 DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2018.19.6.1119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2017] [Accepted: 06/07/2018] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the image quality of low-tube-voltage and low-iodine-concentration-contrast-medium (LVLC) computed tomography urography (CTU) with iterative reconstruction (IR) with that of conventional CTU. MATERIALS AND METHODS This prospective, multi-institutional, randomized controlled trial was performed at 16 hospitals using CT scanners from various vendors. Patients were randomly assigned to the following groups: 1) the LVLC-CTU (80 kVp and 240 mgI/mL) with IR group and 2) the conventional CTU (120 kVp and 350 mgI/mL) with filtered-back projection group. The overall diagnostic acceptability, sharpness, and noise were assessed. Additionally, the mean attenuation, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and figure of merit (FOM) in the urinary tract were evaluated. RESULTS The study included 299 patients (LVLC-CTU group: 150 patients; conventional CTU group: 149 patients). The LVLC-CTU group had a significantly lower effective radiation dose (5.73 ± 4.04 vs. 8.43 ± 4.38 mSv) compared to the conventional CTU group. LVLC-CTU showed at least standard diagnostic acceptability (score ≥ 3), but it was non-inferior when compared to conventional CTU. The mean attenuation value, mean SNR, CNR, and FOM in all pre-defined segments of the urinary tract were significantly higher in the LVLC-CTU group than in the conventional CTU group. CONCLUSION The diagnostic acceptability and quantitative image quality of LVLC-CTU with IR are not inferior to those of conventional CTU. Additionally, LVLC-CTU with IR is beneficial because both radiation exposure and total iodine load are reduced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sang Youn Kim
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Korea
| | - Jeong Yeon Cho
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Korea
- Institute of Radiation Medicine and Kidney Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul 03080, Korea
| | - Joongyub Lee
- Medical Research Collaborating Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Korea
| | - Sung Il Hwang
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam 13621, Korea
| | - Min Hoan Moon
- Department of Radiology, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 07061, Korea
| | - Eun Ju Lee
- Department of Radiology, Ajou University Hospital, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon 16499, Korea
| | - Seong Sook Hong
- Department of Radiology, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul 04401, Korea
| | - Chan Kyo Kim
- Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea
| | - Kyeong Ah Kim
- Department of Radiology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul 08308, Korea
| | - Sung Bin Park
- Department of Radiology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul 06973, Korea
| | - Deuk Jae Sung
- Department of Radiology, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul 02841, Korea
| | - Yongsoo Kim
- Department of Radiology, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Guri 11923, Korea
| | - You Me Kim
- Department of Radiology, Dankook University Hospital, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan 31116, Korea
| | - Sung Il Jung
- Department of Radiology, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul 05030, Korea
| | - Sung Eun Rha
- Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea
| | - Dong Won Kim
- Department of Radiology, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan 49201, Korea
| | - Hyun Lee
- Department of Radiology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang 14068, Korea
| | - Youngsup Shim
- Department of Radiology, Gachon University, Gil Medical Center, Incheon 21565, Korea
| | - Inpyeong Hwang
- Department of Radiology, Cheongyang-gun Health Center and County Hospital, Cheongyang 33324, Korea
| | - Sungmin Woo
- Department of Radiology, Armed Forces Daejeon Hospital, Daejeon 34059, Korea
| | - Hyuck Jae Choi
- Department of Radiology, Sheikh Khalifa Specialty Hospital, Ras al Khaimah, UAE
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Locke JA, Hamidizadeh R, Kassouf W, Rendon RA, Bell D, Izawa J, Chin J, Kapoor A, Shayegen B, Lattouf JB, Saad F, Lacombe L, Fradet Y, Fairey AS, Jacobson NE, Drachenberg DE, Cagiannos I, So AI, Black PC. Surveillance guidelines based on recurrence patterns for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Can Urol Assoc J 2018; 12:243-251. [PMID: 29688881 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.5377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) accounts for 5% of all urothelial tumours. Due to its rarity, evidence regarding postoperative surveillance is lacking. The objective of this study was to develop a post-radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) surveillance protocol based on recurrence patterns in a large, multi-institutional cohort of patients. METHODS Retrospective clinical and pathological data were collected from 1029 patients undergoing RNU over a 15-year period (1994-2009) at 10 Canadian academic institutions. A multivariable model was used to identify prognostic clinicopathological factors, which were then used to define risk categories. Risk-based surveillance guidelines were proposed based on actual recurrence patterns. RESULTS Overall, 555 (49.9%) patients developed recurrence, including 289 (25.9%) in the urothelium and 266 (23.9%) with loco-regional and distant recurrences. Based on multivariable analysis, three risk groups were identified: 1) low-risk patients with pTa-T1, pN0 disease, and no adverse histological features (high tumour grade, lymphovascular invasion [LVI], tumour multifocality); 2) intermediate-risk patients with pTa-T1, pN0 disease with one or more of the adverse histological features; and 3) high-risk patients with a ≥pT2 tumour and/or nodal involvement. Low-, intermediate-, and high-risk patients were free of urothelial recurrence at three years in 72%, 66%, and 63%, respectively, and free of regional/distant recurrence in 93%, 87%, and 62%, respectively. The risks of loco-regional and distant recurrences (p<0.0001) and time to death (p<0.0001) were significantly different between the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk patients. CONCLUSIONS Based on recurrence patterns in a large, multicentre patient cohort, we have proposed an evidence-based, risk-adapted post-RNU surveillance protocol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - David Bell
- Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | | | - Joseph Chin
- University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Fred Saad
- University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Alan I So
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Peter C Black
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Patterns of Recurrence in Upper Tract Transitional Cell Carcinoma: Imaging Surveillance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2016; 207:789-796. [PMID: 27382922 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.16.16064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of our study was to evaluate recurrence patterns of upper tract transitional cell carcinomas (UT-TCCs) after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). MATERIALS AND METHODS Sixty-eight patients (mean age, 78 years; 34 men and 34 women) with UT-TCC after having undergone RNU from 2001 to 2008 were included in this study. Radiologic examinations and clinical notes were reviewed to record tumor location, tumor morphology, histologic T stages and grades, lymphovascular invasion (LVI) status, and surgical procedures. Five-year imaging and clinical follow-up (2001-2013) findings were noted at 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60, and more than 60 months after RNU for recurrence pattern and tumor-free survival. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox regression models were used to assess tumor-free survival and to perform a multivariate analysis. RESULTS Forty-one postoperative recurrences were noted in 20 patients. The mean time to relapse was 16 months, and time to relapse ranged from 1 to 66 months. Tumor site (multifocal lesions involving both renal collecting system and ureter), tumor morphology (mass), T stage (muscle invasion [T2-T4]), histologic grade (grade 3), and the presence of LVI were identified as risk factors for postoperative recurrence in UT-TCC. T stage was the only independent risk factor. CONCLUSION Urinary tract, lymph node, liver, bone, and lung recurrences were common in patients with UT-TCC and were detected most frequently at 3-24 months. Tumor site, tumor morphology, T stage, grade, and LVI status were associated with recurrence after RNU. T stage was the only independent predictor of tumor-free survival. Close surveillance for extra-urinary tract recurrences in high-risk groups and a shorter-interval follow-up of the urinary tract in low-risk patients with adjuvant chemotherapy are recommended. Identifying recurrence patterns in UT-TCC can aid in planning an effective tailored imaging surveillance strategy.
Collapse
|
6
|
Kapoor A, Dason S, Allard CB, Shayegan B, Lacombe L, Rendon R, Jacobsen NE, Fairey A, Izawa J, Black P, Tanguay S, Chin J, So A, Lattouf JB, Bell D, Saad F, Drachenberg D, Cagiannos I, Fradet Y, Alamri A, Kassouf W. The impact of method of distal ureter management during radical nephroureterectomy on tumour recurrence. Can Urol Assoc J 2014; 8:E845-52. [PMID: 25485014 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.1985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTON Radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) must include some form of distal ureter management to avoid high rates of tumour recurrence. It is uncertain which distal ureter management technique has the best oncologic outcomes. To determine which distal ureter management technique resulted in the lowest tumour recurrence rate, we analyzed a multi-institutional Canadian radical nephroureterectomy database. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent radical nephroureterectomy with distal ureter management for UTUC between January 1990 and June 2010 at 10 Canadian tertiary hospitals. Distal ureter management approaches were divided into 3 categories: (1) extravesical tenting for ureteric excision without cystotomy (EXTRAVESICAL); (2) open cystotomy with intravesical bladder cuff excision (INTRAVESICAL); and (3) extravesical excision with endoscopic management of ureteric orifice (ENDOSCOPIC). Data available for each patient included demographic details, distal ureter management approach, pathology and operative details, as well as the presence and location of local or distant recurrence. Clinical outcomes included overall recurrence-free survival and intravesical recurrence-free survival. Survival analysis was performed with the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was also performed. RESULTS A total of 820 patients underwent radical nephroureterectomy with a specified distal ureter management approach at 10 Canadian academic institutions. The mean patient age was 69.6 years and the median follow-up was 24.6 months. Of the 820 patients, 406 (49.5%) underwent INTRAVESICAL, 316 (38.5%) underwent EXTRAVESICAL, and 98 (11.9%) underwent ENDOSOPIC distal ureter management. Groups differed significantly in their proportion of females, proportion of laparoscopic cases, presence of carcinoma in situ and pathological tumour stage (p < 0.05). Recurrence-free survival at 5 years was 46.3%, 35.6%, and 30.1% for INTRAVESICAL, EXTRAVESICAL and ENDOSCOPIC, respectively (p < 0.05). Multivariable Cox regression analysis confirmed that INTRAVESICAL resulted in a lower hazard of recurrence compared to EXTRAVESICAL and ENDOSCOPIC. When looking only at intravesical recurrence-free survival (iRFS), a similar trend held up with INTRAVESICAL having the highest iRFS, followed by ENDOSCOPIC and then EXTRAVESICAL management (p < 0.05). At last follow-up, 406 (49.5%) patients were alive and free of disease. CONCLUSION Open intravesical excision of the distal ureter (INTRAVESICAL) during radical nephroureterectomy was associated with improved overall and intravesical recurrence-free survival compared with extravesical and endoscopic approaches. These findings suggest that INTRAVESICAL should be considered the gold standard oncologic approach to distal ureter management during radical nephroureterectomy. Limitations of this study include its retrospective design, heterogeneous cohort, and limited follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Peter Black
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | | | | | - Alan So
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | | | | | - Fred Saad
- University of Montreal, Montreal, QC
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|