1
|
Schreuder A(N, Hsi W, Greenhalgh J, Kissick M, Lis M, Underwood TSA, Freeman H, Bauer M, Towe S, Mackie R. Anatomical changes in the male pelvis between the supine and upright positions-A feasibility study for prostate treatments in the upright position. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2023; 24:e14099. [PMID: 37488974 PMCID: PMC10647982 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2022] [Revised: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Treating and imaging patients in the upright orientation is gaining acceptance in radiation oncology and radiology and has distinct advantages over the recumbent position. An IRB approved study to investigate the positions and orientations of the male pelvic organs between the supine and upright positions was conducted. The study comprised of scanning 15 male volunteers (aged 55-75 years) on a 0.6 T Fonar MRI scanner in the supine and upright positions with a full bladder and in the upright position with an empty bladder. The Pelvic study revealed that in the upright position the 1. Position and shape of the prostate are not impacted significantly by bladder fill. 2. Distance between the sacrum and the anterior bladder wall is significantly smaller. 3. Anterior-Posterior length and the bladder width is significantly larger. 4. Seminal vesicles are pushed down by the bladder. 5. Top of the penile bulb is further away from the apex of the prostate. These observed differences could positively impact upright prostate treatments by 1. Reducing the risk of small bowel approximating the treatment volume. 2. Prostate treatments can be done with a reduced focus on bladder fill. 3. Radiation beams for treating intermediate risk prostrate can be made smaller or a larger portion of the seminal vesicles can be treated with the same beam size than typically used for supine treatments. 4. Reducing the average dose to the penile bulb.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Wen‐Chien Hsi
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS)Department of Radiation OncologyLittle Rock, ArkansasUSA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Morsinkhof LM, Schulten MK, DeLancey JOL, Simonis FFJ, Grob ATM. Pelvic inclination correction system for magnetic resonance imaging analysis of pelvic organ prolapse in upright position. Int Urogynecol J 2022; 33:2801-2807. [PMID: 35907021 PMCID: PMC9477951 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-022-05289-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2022] [Accepted: 06/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS Pelvic organ prolapse quantification by means of upright magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a promising research field. This study determines the angle for the pelvic inclination correction system (PICS) for upright patient position, which is hypothesized to deviate from the supine PICS angle. The necessity of different PICS angles for various patient positions will also be discussed. METHODS Magnetic resonance scans of 113 women, acquired in an upright patient position, were used to determine the upright PICS angle, defined as the angle between the sacrococcygeal-inferior pubic point (SCIPP) line and the horizontal line. The difference and correlation between the upright and supine PICS angles were calculated using the paired Student's t-test and the Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) respectively. The effect of the difference between the upright and supine PICS angle on the measured pelvic organ extent was calculated using goniometry. RESULTS The mean (interquartile range) PICS angles were 29° (26-35°) for the upright and 33° (30-37°) for the supine patient position. They were significantly different (p<0.001) and very strongly correlated (r = 0.914, p<0.001). The 4° difference between the average upright and supine PICS angle results in an average underestimation of the measured cervix height of approximately 0.5 cm for patients scanned in upright position. CONCLUSIONS The PICS angle for the upright patient position is 29°. The use of a dedicated PICS angle for different patient positions allows for more accurate pelvic organ extent analysis in patients with prolapse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisan M Morsinkhof
- Magnetic Detection and Imaging Group, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, 7522 NB, Enschede, The Netherlands.
| | - Martine K Schulten
- Multi Modality Medical Imaging Group, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - John O L DeLancey
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Frank F J Simonis
- Magnetic Detection and Imaging Group, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, 7522 NB, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Anique T M Grob
- Multi Modality Medical Imaging Group, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Volz L, Sheng Y, Durante M, Graeff C. Considerations for Upright Particle Therapy Patient Positioning and Associated Image Guidance. Front Oncol 2022; 12:930850. [PMID: 35965576 PMCID: PMC9372451 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.930850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2022] [Accepted: 06/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Particle therapy is a rapidly growing field in cancer therapy. Worldwide, over 100 centers are in operation, and more are currently in construction phase. The interest in particle therapy is founded in the superior target dose conformity and healthy tissue sparing achievable through the particles’ inverse depth dose profile. This physical advantage is, however, opposed by increased complexity and cost of particle therapy facilities. Particle therapy, especially with heavier ions, requires large and costly equipment to accelerate the particles to the desired treatment energy and steer the beam to the patient. A significant portion of the cost for a treatment facility is attributed to the gantry, used to enable different beam angles around the patient for optimal healthy tissue sparing. Instead of a gantry, a rotating chair positioning system paired with a fixed horizontal beam line presents a suitable cost-efficient alternative. Chair systems have been used already at the advent of particle therapy, but were soon dismissed due to increased setup uncertainty associated with the upright position stemming from the lack of dedicated image guidance systems. Recently, treatment chairs gained renewed interest due to the improvement in beam delivery, commercial availability of vertical patient CT imaging and improved image guidance systems to mitigate the problem of anatomical motion in seated treatments. In this review, economical and clinical reasons for an upright patient positioning system are discussed. Existing designs targeted for particle therapy are reviewed, and conclusions are drawn on the design and construction of chair systems and associated image guidance. Finally, the different aspects from literature are channeled into recommendations for potential upright treatment layouts, both for retrofitting and new facilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lennart Volz
- Biophysics, GSI Helmholtz Center for Heavy Ion Research GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany.,Department of Medical Physics, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Yinxiangzi Sheng
- Biophysics, GSI Helmholtz Center for Heavy Ion Research GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany.,Department of Medical Physics, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Marco Durante
- Biophysics, GSI Helmholtz Center for Heavy Ion Research GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany.,Institute of Condensed Matter Physics, Technical University of Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Christian Graeff
- Biophysics, GSI Helmholtz Center for Heavy Ion Research GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany.,Institute of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, Technical University of Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yagi T, Kodama M, Bun M, Shimura H, Sawada K, Endo M, Kimura T. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of pelvic floor structure during pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2021; 264:289-293. [PMID: 34352425 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.07.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2021] [Revised: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 07/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Among the various risk factors of pelvic floor disorders, pregnancy has been reported to affect the pelvic floor structure; however, not all these effects have been understood yet. The aim of this study is to elucidate how pregnancy affects pelvic floor structure via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). STUDY DESIGN We conducted a retrospective study between January 2010 and December 2019 to extract clinical records of pregnant and non-pregnant women, who underwent MRI for obstetrical diseases and ovarian benign tumors, respectively. The data on age, body mass index (BMI), complications, gravida, parity, gestational age, and obstetrical history were collected, and pubo-coccygeal line (PCL), pubo-rectal line (PRL), and M line (ML) on their MR images were measured. Statistical analyses were performed with Wilcoxon test, chi-square test, and Kruskal-Wallis test with Steel-Dwass post hoc test as appropriate. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS We analyzed the reports of 56 (pregnancy group) and 106 women (non-pregnancy group). There was no significant difference in age or BMI, while the obstetric history was significantly different between these groups. Median PCL, PRL, and ML in the pregnancy group were significantly longer than those in the non-pregnancy group (114.1 mm vs. 110.0 mm, P = 0.018; 48.6 mm vs. 41.6 mm, P < 0.0001 and 21.7 mm vs. 10.0 mm, p < 0.0001. respectively). The subgroup analysis of the effect of pregnancy and vaginal delivery (VD) history on changes in these lines revealed that pregnancy-induced PRL increase tended to recover to the reference level of "non-pregnant without VD," but ML increase did not fully recover. CONCLUSION MRI revealed a strong effect of pregnancy on pelvic floor structure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taro Yagi
- Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2-2, Yamada-oka, Suita-city, Osaka, Japan.
| | - Michiko Kodama
- Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2-2, Yamada-oka, Suita-city, Osaka, Japan.
| | - Michiko Bun
- Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2-2, Yamada-oka, Suita-city, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hiroko Shimura
- Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2-2, Yamada-oka, Suita-city, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kenjiro Sawada
- Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2-2, Yamada-oka, Suita-city, Osaka, Japan.
| | - Masayuki Endo
- Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2-2, Yamada-oka, Suita-city, Osaka, Japan.
| | - Tadashi Kimura
- Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2-2, Yamada-oka, Suita-city, Osaka, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Contemporary Review of MRI in Benign Genitourinary Pelvic Medicine: What Every Urologist Should Know. CURRENT BLADDER DYSFUNCTION REPORTS 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s11884-021-00631-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
6
|
Lalwani N, Khatri G, El Sayed RF, Ram R, Jambhekar K, Chernyak V, Kamath A, Lewis S, Flusberg M, Scholz F, Arif-Tiwari H, Palmer SL, Lockhart ME, Fielding JR. MR defecography technique: recommendations of the society of abdominal radiology's disease-focused panel on pelvic floor imaging. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2021; 46:1351-1361. [PMID: 31385010 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-019-02160-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop recommendations for magnetic resonance (MR) defecography technique based on consensus of expert radiologists on the disease-focused panel of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR). METHODS An extensive questionnaire was sent to a group of 20 experts from the disease-focused panel of the SAR. The questionnaire encompassed details of technique and MRI protocol used for evaluating pelvic floor disorders. 75% agreement on questionnaire responses was defined as consensus. RESULTS The expert panel reached consensus for 70% of the items and provided the basis of these recommendations for MR defecography technique. There was unanimous agreement that patients should receive coaching and explanation of commands used during MR defecography, the rectum should be distended with contrast agent, and that sagittal T2-weighted images should include the entire pelvis within the field of view. The panel also agreed unanimously that IV contrast should not be used for MR defecography. Additional areas of consensus ranged in agreement from 75 to 92%. CONCLUSION We provide a set of consensus recommendations for MR defecography technique based on a survey of expert radiologists in the SAR pelvic floor dysfunction disease-focused panel. These recommendations can be used to develop a standardized imaging protocol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neeraj Lalwani
- Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center, 1 Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA.
| | - Gaurav Khatri
- Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | | - Roopa Ram
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Kedar Jambhekar
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Victoria Chernyak
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, The Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Amita Kamath
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sara Lewis
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Milana Flusberg
- Department of Radiology, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Suzanne L Palmer
- Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Mark E Lockhart
- Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Julia R Fielding
- Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Development of Upright Computed Tomography With Area Detector for Whole-Body Scans: Phantom Study, Efficacy on Workflow, Effect of Gravity on Human Body, and Potential Clinical Impact. Invest Radiol 2020; 55:73-83. [PMID: 31503082 PMCID: PMC6948833 DOI: 10.1097/rli.0000000000000603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Multiple human systems are greatly affected by gravity, and many disease symptoms are altered by posture. However, the overall anatomical structure and pathophysiology of the human body while standing has not been thoroughly analyzed due to the limitations of various upright imaging modalities, such as low spatial resolution, low contrast resolution, limited scan range, or long examination time. Recently, we developed an upright computed tomography (CT), which enables whole-torso cross-sectional scanning with 3-dimensional acquisition within 15 seconds. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance, workflow efficacy, effects of gravity on a large circulation system and the pelvic floor, and potential clinical impact of upright CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS We compared noise characteristics, spatial resolution, and CT numbers in a phantom between supine and upright CT. Thirty-two asymptomatic volunteers (48.4 ± 11.5 years) prospectively underwent both CT examinations with the same scanning protocols on the same day. We conducted a questionnaire survey among these volunteers who underwent the upright CT examination to determine their opinions regarding the stability of using the pole throughout the acquisition (closed question), as well as safety and comfortability throughout each examination (both used 5-point scales). The total access time (sum of entry time and exit time) and gravity effects on a large circulation system and the pelvic floor were evaluated using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and the Mann-Whitney U test. For a large circulation system, the areas of the vena cava and aorta were evaluated at 3 points (superior vena cava or ascending aorta, at the level of the diaphragm, and inferior vena cava or abdominal aorta). For the pelvic floor, distances were evaluated from the bladder neck to the pubococcygeal line and the anorectal junction to the pubococcygeal line. We also examined the usefulness of the upright CT in patients with functional diseases of spondylolisthesis, pelvic floor prolapse, and inguinal hernia. RESULTS Noise characteristics, spatial resolution, and CT numbers on upright CT were comparable to those of supine CT. In the volunteer study, all volunteers answered yes regarding the stability of using the pole, and most reported feeling safe (average rating of 4.2) and comfortable (average rating of 3.8) throughout the upright CT examination. The total access time for the upright CT was significantly reduced by 56% in comparison with that of supine CT (upright: 41 ± 9 seconds vs supine: 91 ± 15 seconds, P < 0.001). In the upright position, the area of superior vena cava was 80% smaller than that of the supine position (upright: 39.9 ± 17.4 mm vs supine: 195.4 ± 52.2 mm, P < 0.001), the area at the level of the diaphragm was similar (upright: 428.3 ± 87.9 mm vs supine: 426.1 ± 82.0 mm, P = 0.866), and the area of inferior vena cava was 37% larger (upright: 346.6 ± 96.9 mm vs supine: 252.5 ± 93.1 mm, P < 0.001), whereas the areas of aortas did not significantly differ among the 3 levels. The bladder neck and anorectal junction significantly descended (9.4 ± 6.0 mm and 8.0 ± 5.6 mm, respectively, both P < 0.001) in the standing position, relative to their levels in the supine position. This tendency of the bladder neck to descend was more prominent in women than in men (12.2 ± 5.2 mm in women vs 6.7 ± 5.6 mm in men, P = 0.006). In 3 patients, upright CT revealed lumbar foraminal stenosis, bladder prolapse, and inguinal hernia; moreover, it clarified the grade or clinical significance of the disease in a manner that was not apparent on conventional CT. CONCLUSIONS Upright CT was comparable to supine CT in physical characteristics, and it significantly reduced the access time for examination. Upright CT was useful in clarifying the effect of gravity on the human body: gravity differentially affected the volume and shape of the vena cava, depending on body position. The pelvic floor descended significantly in the standing position, compared with its location in the supine position, and the descent of the bladder neck was more prominent in women than in men. Upright CT could potentially aid in objective diagnosis and determination of the grade or clinical significance of common functional diseases.
Collapse
|
8
|
Pelvic floor morphology in the standing position using upright computed tomography: age and sex differences. Int Urogynecol J 2020; 31:2387-2393. [DOI: 10.1007/s00192-020-04335-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2020] [Accepted: 05/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
9
|
Grob ATM, Olde Heuvel J, Futterer JJ, Massop D, Veenstra van Nieuwenhoven AL, Simonis FFJ, van der Vaart CH. Underestimation of pelvic organ prolapse in the supine straining position, based on magnetic resonance imaging findings. Int Urogynecol J 2019; 30:1939-1944. [PMID: 30656361 PMCID: PMC6834735 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-018-03862-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2018] [Accepted: 12/28/2018] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Objective Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is clinically diagnosed in the supine position, where the effect of gravity is simulated by having the patients put strain on their pelvic floor. The objective of this study was to determine the degree of POP underestimation in the supine position based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings. Methods This prospective study was conducted with symptomatic POP grade ≥ 2 patients. Fifteen female patients were examined with an MRI system that allows supine and upright imaging. The differences between supine and upright in distances of the bladder neck, cervix, and pouch of Douglas from the pubococcygeal line (PCL) were estimated, together with changes in the genital hiatal area. Patients were scanned at rest and during straining. All distances were compared using the Wilcoxon ranking test. Results All mean distances from the PCL increased from the supine–strain to the upright–rest and from the supine–strain to the upright–strain position. These distances were found in the supine and upright positions: the bladder descended 1.3 cm to 1.4 cm, the cervix 1.1 cm to 2.2 cm, and the pouch of Douglas 0.8 cm to 1.5 cm respectively (all p values <0.05). The hiatal area was larger in the upright–strain position (mean 42.0 cm2; SD ±14.8) than during the supine–strain position (mean 33.5 cm2; SD ±14.5), with a p value of 0.02. Conclusion Upright MRI scanning of patients with POP grade ≥ 2 both at rest and during straining shows a significantly larger extent of the prolapse than that observed during supine straining.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anique T M Grob
- MultiModality Medical Imaging (M3i), Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Carre Building, Drienerlolaan 5, 7522 NB, Enschede, The Netherlands.
| | - Judith Olde Heuvel
- Magnetic Detection and Imaging (MD&I), Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Jurgen J Futterer
- Robotics and Mechatronics, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.,Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Diana Massop
- Department of Gynaecology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.,Department of Gynaecology, Ziekenhuis Groep Twente, Hengelo/Almelo, The Netherlands
| | - Angelique L Veenstra van Nieuwenhoven
- Department of Gynaecology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.,Department of Gynaecology, Ziekenhuis Groep Twente, Hengelo/Almelo, The Netherlands
| | - Frank F J Simonis
- Magnetic Detection and Imaging (MD&I), Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Carl H van der Vaart
- Department of Gynaecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|