Use of cumulative summation (CUSUM) as a tool for early feedback and monitoring in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy outcomes and performance

Use of statistical process control in quality improvement projects in abdominal surgery: a PRISMA systematic review

BACKGROUND

The use of quality improvement methodology has increased in recent years due to a perceived benefit in effectively reducing morbidity, mortality and length of stay. Statistical process control (SPC) is an important tool to evaluate these actions, but its use has been limited in abdominal surgery. Previous systematic reviews have examined the use of SPC in healthcare, but relatively few surgery-related articles were found at that time.

OBJECTIVE

To perform a systematic review (SR) to evaluate the application of SPC on abdominal surgery specialties between 2004 and 2019.

METHODS

An SR following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram was completed using Embase and Ovid Medline with terms related to abdominal surgery and SPC.

RESULTS

A total of 20 articles were selected after applying the exclusion criteria. Most of the articles came from North America, Europe and Australia, and half have been published in the last 5 years. The most common outcome studied was surgical complications. Urology, colorectal and paediatric surgery made up most of the articles. Articles show the application of SPC in various outcomes and the use of different types of graphs, demonstrating flexibility in using SPC. However, some studies did not use SPC in a robust way and these studies were of variable quality.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that SPCs are being applied increasingly for most surgical specialties; however, it is still less used than in other fields, such as anaesthesia. We identified conceptual errors in several studies, such as issues with the design or incorrect data analysis. SPCs can be used to increase the quality of surgical care; the use should increase, but critically, the analysis needs to improve to prevent erroneous conclusions being drawn.

Safe Implementation of a Next-Generation Surgical Robot: First Analysis of 2,083 Cases in the Versius Surgical Registry

OBJECTIVE

To present the first report of data from the Versius Surgical Registry, a prospective, multicenter data registry with ongoing collection across numerous surgical indications, developed to accompany the Versius Robotic Surgical System into clinical practice.

BACKGROUND

A data registry can be utilized to minimize risk to patients by establishing the safety and effectiveness of innovative medical devices and generating a thorough evidence base of real-world data.

METHODS

Surgical outcome data were collected and inputted through a secure online platform. Preoperative data included patient age, sex, body mass index, surgical history, and planned procedures. Intraoperative data included operative time, complications during surgery, conversion from robot-assisted surgery to an alternative surgical technique, and blood loss. Postoperative outcome data included length of hospital stay, complications following surgery, serious adverse events, return to the operating room, readmission to the hospital, and mortality within 90 days of surgery.

RESULTS

This registry analysis included 2083 cases spanning general, colorectal, hernia, gynecologic, urological, and thoracic indications. A considerable number of cases were recorded for cholecystectomy (n=539), anterior resection (n=162), and total laparoscopic hysterocolpectomy (n=324) procedures. The rates of conversion to an alternative technique, serious adverse events, and 90-day mortality were low for all procedures across all surgical indications.

CONCLUSIONS

We report the large-scale analysis of the first 2083 cases recorded in this surgical registry, with substantial data collected for cholecystectomies, anterior resections, and total laparoscopic hysterectomies. The extensive surgical outcome data reported here provide real-world evidence for the safe implementation of the surgical robot into clinical practice.

A cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis studying operative times and complications for a surgeon transitioning from laparoscopic to robot-assisted pediatric pyeloplasty: Defining proficiency and competency

INTRODUCTION

The transition from laparoscopic to robot-assisted procedures leads to potential increase in operative times and health care costs. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis can objectively study the learning curve to detect significant changes in operative timing and monitor complication rates.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to investigate the total and step-specific times for pediatric robot-assisted pyeloplasty (RAP) to investigate the learning curve of a single surgeon transitioning from laparoscopic to RAP.

STUDY DESIGN

This prospective cohort study included 50 consecutive RAP procedures performed since the inception of our robotic program from June 2013 to January 2019. The CUSUM of RAP total operative time (OT) was calculated to determine the breakpoints between learning phases using piecewise linear regression. Cumulative-observed-minus-expected failure chart with 80% and 95% reassurance boundary lines was constructed using 5% acceptable and 10% unacceptable complication rates. Step-specific operative times were prospectively recorded by an independent observer for port placement, dissection and hitch stitch placement, pelvis dismemberment and spatulation, suturing and port removal.

RESULTS

Piecewise linear regression for OT identified breakpoints at case 13 and 29 suggesting transition at these points between Learning to Proficiency, and Proficiency to Competency. The overall mean OT was 142.2 ± 46.0 min. There was a significant difference in the mean OT between Learning (203.9 ± 35.3 min, the initial 13 cases), Proficiency (159.2 ± 18.6 min, the middle 16 cases), and Competency (126.6 ± 19.7 min, the last 21 cases) phases (p < 0.001). The complication rate for RAP stabilized around the acceptable level of 5% up to case 41 before finalizing at 8% overall. The step-specific analysis suggested that suturing entered the Competency phase at case 27, with a 50% decrease in suturing time from Learning to Proficiency and Competency.

DISCUSSION

Our study suggests that by case 30 a surgeon transitioning to RAP can achieve a significant decrease in OT. Complication rates remained within acceptable limits throughout, indicating that RAP can be safely adopted, even in low volume RAP centres. Suturing competency seems to be a significant advantage of the robotic platform as suggested by early significant decrease in suturing times noted between the Learning and Proficiency phases.

CONCLUSION

Future studies can confirm these findings and establish reference operative times to aid surgeons and trainees transitioning from laparoscopic pyeloplasty to RAP. Moreover, total OT decreases significantly and relatively soon after transition to RAP.

The Learning Curve of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic (UBE) Spinal Surgery by CUSUM Analysis

Objective

To assess the learning curve of the unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) technique for the treatment of single-level lumbar disc herniation by cumulative summation (CUSUM) method analysis.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted to assess 97 patients' general condition, operation time, complications, and curative effect of single segmental UBE surgery performed by a spinal surgeon in his early stage of this technique. The learning curve of operation time was studied using a CUSUM method, and the cut-off point of the learning curve was obtained.

Results

The operation time was 30 – 241(97.9 ± 34.7) min. The visual analog scale score of lower limb pain decreased from 5.75 ± 0.81 before the operation to 0.39 ± 0.28 at the last follow-up (P &lt; 0.05). The Oswestry disability index score decreased from 66.48 ± 4.43 before the operation to 14.57 ± 3.99 at the last follow-up (P &lt; 0.05). The CUSUM assessment of operation time revealed the learning curve was the highest in 24 cases. In the learning stage (1–24 cases), the operation time was 120.3 ± 43.8 min. In the skilled stage (25–97 cases), the operation time was 90.5 ± 27.8 min.

Conclusions

About 24 cases of single segmental UBE operation are needed to master the UBE technique.

Benchmarking PASADENA Consensus along the Learning Curve of Robotic Radical Cystectomy with Intracorporeal Neobladder: CUSUM Based Assessment

(1) Aim: Robot assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with intacorporeal neobladder (iN) is a challenging procedure. There is a paucity of reports on RARC-iN, the extracorporeal approach being the most used. The aim of our study was to assess the learning curve of RARC-iN and to test its performance in benchmarking Pasadena consensus outcomes. (2) Material and methods: The single-institution learning curve of RARC-iN was retrospectively evaluated. Demographic, clinical and pathologic data of all patients were recorded. Indications to radical cystectomy included muscle invasive bladder cancer (pT ≥ 2) or recurrent high grade non muscle invasive bladder cancer. The cumulative sum (CUSUM) technique, one of the methods developed to monitor the performance and quality of the industrial sector, was adopted by the medical field in the 1970s to analyze learning curves for surgical procedures. The learning curve was evaluated using the following criteria: 1. operative time (OT) <5 h; 2. 24-h Hemoglobin (Hb) drop <2 g/dl; 3. severe complications (according to the Clavien classification system) <30%; 4. positive surgical margins <5%; and 5. complete lymph-node dissection defined as more than 16 nodes. Benchmarking of all five items on quintile analysis was tested, and a failure rate <20% for any outcome was set as threshold. (3) Results: the first 100 consecutive RARC-iN patients were included in the analysis. At CUSUM analysis, RARC required 20 cases to achieve a plateau in terms of operative time (defined as more than 3 consecutive procedures below 300 min). Hemoglobin drop, PSM and number of removed lymph-nodes did not change significantly along the learning curve. Overall, 41% of the patients presented at least one complication. Low-grade and high-grade complication rates were 30% and 17%, respectively. When assessing the benchmarks of all five Pasadena consensus outcomes on quintile analysis, a plateau was achieved after the first 60 cases. (4) Conclusions: RARC-iN is a challenging procedure. The potential impact of the learning curve on significant outcomes, such as high grade complications and positive surgical margins, has played a detrimental effect on its widespread adoption. According to this study, in tertiary referral centers, 60 procedures are sufficient to benchmark all outcomes defined in Pasadena RARC consensus.

[Learning curves in acquisition of experience for new technologies]

OBJECTIVE

Analysis of national and foreign trials investigating accumulation of experience in innovative technologies using the learning curves.

MATERIAL AND METHODS. S

Earching for Russian-language manuscripts was carried out within the references of the articles and in the ELIBRARY database. Foreign trials were selected from the PubMed database according to the keywords «learning curves in surgical practice». The discovered publications were studied for accordance with the objectives of this study.

RESULTS

Accumulation of experience in new technologies by using of learning curves is valuable to improve the training, determine duration of development of new technology and the factors affecting its characteristics.

CONCLUSION

The method is high-quality for comprehensive analysis of experience accumulation in new surgical technologies.