1
|
Jóźwik-Plebanek K, Saracyn M, Kołodziej M, Kamińska O, Durma AD, Mądra W, Gniadek-Olejniczak KA, Dedecjus M, Kucharz J, Stec R, Kamiński G. Theranostics in Renal Cell Carcinoma-A Step Towards New Opportunities or a Dead End-A Systematic Review. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2024; 17:1721. [PMID: 39770563 PMCID: PMC11678666 DOI: 10.3390/ph17121721] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2024] [Revised: 12/14/2024] [Accepted: 12/16/2024] [Indexed: 01/11/2025] Open
Abstract
Background: Renal cell carcinoma is one of the most aggressive urogenital malignancies, with an increasing number of cases worldwide. The majority of cases are diagnosed at an advanced stage, as this form of growth is typically silent. An accurate evaluation of the extent of the disease is crucial for selecting the most appropriate treatment approach. Nuclear medicine imaging is increasingly being applied in oncological diagnostics, prompting ongoing research into renal cell carcinoma markers that could serve as a foundation for theranostic approaches in this disease. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligands has already demonstrated successful utility in diagnosis of other cancers, including prostate cancer and gliomas. Emerging evidence of high sensitivity and specificity in detecting renal cell carcinoma lesions provides a suitable foundation for its application in both the diagnosis and subsequent management of this malignancy. Methods: This systematic review synthesizes the current scientific evidence on the molecular imaging of renal cell carcinoma using PSMA ligands, emphasizing the potential future applications of this imaging marker in theranostic approaches. Results and Conclusions: Based on a systematic review of the literature, it appears that PET/CT with PSMA ligands has the potential to surpass traditional imaging techniques in diagnostic accuracy while also providing valuable prognostic information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katarzyna Jóźwik-Plebanek
- Department of Endocrinology and Radioisotope Therapy, Military Institute of Medicine—National Research Institute, 04-141 Warsaw, Poland; (M.S.); (M.K.); (A.D.D.); (W.M.); (G.K.)
| | - Marek Saracyn
- Department of Endocrinology and Radioisotope Therapy, Military Institute of Medicine—National Research Institute, 04-141 Warsaw, Poland; (M.S.); (M.K.); (A.D.D.); (W.M.); (G.K.)
| | - Maciej Kołodziej
- Department of Endocrinology and Radioisotope Therapy, Military Institute of Medicine—National Research Institute, 04-141 Warsaw, Poland; (M.S.); (M.K.); (A.D.D.); (W.M.); (G.K.)
| | - Olga Kamińska
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Military Institute of Medicine—National Research Institute, 04-141 Warsaw, Poland;
| | - Adam Daniel Durma
- Department of Endocrinology and Radioisotope Therapy, Military Institute of Medicine—National Research Institute, 04-141 Warsaw, Poland; (M.S.); (M.K.); (A.D.D.); (W.M.); (G.K.)
| | - Weronika Mądra
- Department of Endocrinology and Radioisotope Therapy, Military Institute of Medicine—National Research Institute, 04-141 Warsaw, Poland; (M.S.); (M.K.); (A.D.D.); (W.M.); (G.K.)
| | | | - Marek Dedecjus
- Department of Oncological Endocrinology and Nuclear Medicine, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Jakub Kucharz
- Department of Uro-Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Rafał Stec
- Department of Oncology, Warsaw Medical University, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Grzegorz Kamiński
- Department of Endocrinology and Radioisotope Therapy, Military Institute of Medicine—National Research Institute, 04-141 Warsaw, Poland; (M.S.); (M.K.); (A.D.D.); (W.M.); (G.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Klinkhammer BM, Ay I, Caravan P, Caroli A, Boor P. Advances in Molecular Imaging of Kidney Diseases. Nephron Clin Pract 2024; 149:149-159. [PMID: 39496240 DOI: 10.1159/000542412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2024] [Accepted: 10/20/2024] [Indexed: 11/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diagnosing and monitoring kidney diseases traditionally rely on blood and urine analyses and invasive procedures such as kidney biopsies, the latter offering limited possibilities for longitudinal monitoring and a comprehensive understanding of disease dynamics. Current noninvasive methods lack specificity in capturing intrarenal molecular processes, hindering patient stratification and patient monitoring in clinical practice and clinical trials. SUMMARY Molecular imaging enables noninvasive and quantitative assessment of physiological and pathological molecular processes. By using specific molecular probes and imaging technologies, e.g., magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography, single-photon emission computed tomography, or ultrasound, molecular imaging allows the detection and longitudinal monitoring of disease activity with spatial and temporal resolution of different kidney diseases and disease-specific pathways. Several approaches have already shown promising results in kidneys and exploratory clinical studies, and validation is needed before implementation in clinical practice. KEY MESSAGES Molecular imaging offers a noninvasive assessment of intrarenal molecular processes, overcoming the limitations of current diagnostic methods. It has the potential to serve as companion diagnostics, not only in clinical trials, aiding in patient stratification and treatment response assessment. By guiding therapeutic interventions, molecular imaging might contribute to the development of targeted therapies for kidney diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ilknur Ay
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Peter Caravan
- Institute for Innovation in Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Anna Caroli
- Bioengineering Department, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Peter Boor
- Institute for Pathology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rajagopal R, Yoztyurk E, Ravendran K. Renal Oncocytoma: A Systematic Review of Its Metastatic Features. Cureus 2024; 16:e71649. [PMID: 39417067 PMCID: PMC11483153 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.71649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/16/2024] [Indexed: 10/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Oncocytomas are referred to as benign kidney neoplasms. They primarily affect adults, with patients over 70 years old being the most affected. Renal oncocytomas (ROs) are frequently detected by excision, biopsy, or scan. Hematuria, flank pain, and a palpable mass are the traditional trio of symptoms. Oncocytomas appear as well-circumscribed, tan or mahogany-coloured masses with a central scar that is stellate. Histological features include well-circumscribed lesions, bland cytology, eosinophilic cytoplasm, regular nuclei with prominent central nucleoli, and nested architecture. ROs are rarely linked to an aggressive clinical course and have an excellent prognosis. There is proof that the disease can spread to the liver and bones. Some literature has also reported oncocytoma metastases to the lung and liver. This systematic review of the literature examines and evaluates the malignant potential of oncocytoma. The purpose of the study was to determine whether ROs can be diagnosed as a benign condition or if malignancy needs to be considered and investigated. Seventeen studies were analysed which had a total of 412 ROs. Four patients (one percent) died as a result of their illness. There was evidence of disease progression in every patient who passed away from their illness. Six patients (1.5%) experienced disease progression in total. Three hundred and seventeen patients (80%) underwent radical nephrectomy, while 81 patients (20%) underwent partial nephrectomy. Liver, bone, lung, lymphadenopathy, and local recurrence were among the metastasis sites. Perinephric fat invasion, renal sinus fat invasion, renal capsular invasion, and vascular invasion are characteristics of metastatic behavior that have been found. Despite this, the small number of patients who experienced disease progression and/or death as a result of ROs implies that aggressive malignant behavior is not always correlated with the presence of metastatic features or disease. Oncocytomas should be viewed as having a low potential for malignancy rather than as benign. Individuals who exhibit aggressive characteristics, such as vascular invasion and/or perinephric fat invasion, have an atypically good prognosis. Despite advancements in imaging and immunochemical techniques, it is indisputable that ROs, which were first classified as renal tumours in 1976, continue to pose a diagnostic challenge for multidisciplinary teams. There is considerable variation in practice across the globe due to difficulties in confirming ROs, especially when it comes to metastatic disease. There is even more variation in the management of follow-up care that follows. This will remain the MDT's current state until randomised controlled trials, long-term results, and a better comprehension of the behavior of this tumour are obtained.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ragaul Rajagopal
- Urology, East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust, Eastbourne, GBR
- Urology, Gradscape, London, GBR
| | - Edzhem Yoztyurk
- Internal Medicine, Medical University Sofia, Sofia, BGR
- Internal Medicine, Gradscape, London, GBR
| | - Kapilraj Ravendran
- Rheumatology, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, London, GBR
- Surgery, Gradscape, London, GBR
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Warren H, Tran MGB. 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT/CT-the jury is still out! Transl Androl Urol 2024; 13:1053-1055. [PMID: 38983466 PMCID: PMC11228679 DOI: 10.21037/tau-23-623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 07/11/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Warren
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK
- Urology Department, Specialist Centre for Kidney Cancer, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Maxine G. B. Tran
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK
- Urology Department, Specialist Centre for Kidney Cancer, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Warren H, Wagner T, Gorin MA, Rowe S, Holman BF, Pencharz D, El-Sheikh S, Barod R, Patki P, Mumtaz F, Bex A, Kasivisvanathan V, Moore CM, Campain N, Cartledge J, Scarsbrook A, Hassan F, O'Brien TS, Stewart GD, Mendichovszky I, Dizdarevic S, Alanbuki A, Wildgoose WH, Wah T, Vindrola-Padros C, Pizzo E, Dehbi HM, Lorgelly P, Gurusamy K, Emberton M, Tran MGB. Protocol for a MULTI-centre feasibility study to assess the use of 99mTc-sestaMIBI SPECT/CT in the diagnosis of kidney tumours (MULTI-MIBI study). BMJ Open 2023; 13:e067496. [PMID: 36693694 PMCID: PMC9884914 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The incidence of renal tumours is increasing and anatomic imaging cannot reliably distinguish benign tumours from renal cell carcinoma. Up to 30% of renal tumours are benign, with oncocytomas the most common type. Biopsy has not been routinely adopted in many centres due to concerns surrounding non-diagnostic rate, bleeding and tumour seeding. As a result, benign masses are often unnecessarily surgically resected. 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT/CT has shown high diagnostic accuracy for benign renal oncocytomas and other oncocytic renal neoplasms of low malignant potential in single-centre studies. The primary aim of MULTI-MIBI is to assess feasibility of a multicentre study of 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT/CT against a reference standard of histopathology from surgical resection or biopsy. Secondary aims of the study include obtaining estimates of 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT/CT sensitivity and specificity and to inform the design and conduct of a future definitive trial. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A feasibility prospective multicentre study of participants with indeterminate, clinical T1 renal tumours to undergo 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT/CT (index test) compared with histopathology from biopsy or surgical resection (reference test). Interpretation of the index and reference tests will be blinded to the results of the other. Recruitment rate as well as estimates of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value will be reported. Semistructured interviews with patients and clinicians will provide qualitative data to inform onward trial design and delivery. Training materials for 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT/CT interpretation will be developed, assessed and optimised. Early health economic modelling using a decision analytic approach for different diagnostic strategies will be performed to understand the potential cost-effectiveness of 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT/CT. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval has been granted (UK HRA REC 20/YH/0279) protocol V.5.0 dated 21/6/2022. Study outputs will be presented and published nationally and internationally. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN12572202.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Warren
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
- Specialist Centre for Kidney Cancer, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Thomas Wagner
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Michael A Gorin
- Milton and Carroll Petrie Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Steven Rowe
- Department of Urology, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | | | - Soha El-Sheikh
- Specialist Centre for Kidney Cancer, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
- Department of Pathology, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Ravi Barod
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
- Specialist Centre for Kidney Cancer, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Prasad Patki
- Specialist Centre for Kidney Cancer, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Faiz Mumtaz
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
- Specialist Centre for Kidney Cancer, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Axel Bex
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
- Specialist Centre for Kidney Cancer, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Veeru Kasivisvanathan
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Caroline M Moore
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Urology, University College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Nicholas Campain
- Department of Urology, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - Jon Cartledge
- Department of Urology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Andrew Scarsbrook
- Department of Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Fahim Hassan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Tim S O'Brien
- Department of Urology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Grant D Stewart
- Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Iosif Mendichovszky
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sabina Dizdarevic
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Worthing, UK
- Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
| | - Ammar Alanbuki
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Worthing, UK
| | | | - Tze Wah
- Department of Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Cecilia Vindrola-Padros
- Rapid Research, Evaluation and Appraisal Lab (RREAL), Department of Targeted Intervention, University College London, London, UK
| | - Elena Pizzo
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
| | - Hakim-Moulay Dehbi
- Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Paula Lorgelly
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
| | - Kurinchi Gurusamy
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Mark Emberton
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Urology, University College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Maxine G B Tran
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
- Specialist Centre for Kidney Cancer, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wilson MP, Katlariwala P, Abele J, Low G. A review of 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT/CT for renal oncocytomas: A modified diagnostic algorithm. Intractable Rare Dis Res 2022; 11:46-51. [PMID: 35702579 PMCID: PMC9161129 DOI: 10.5582/irdr.2022.01027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2022] [Revised: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 04/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
99mTc-sestamibi SPECT/CT is a promising nuclear medicine imaging investigation for benign renal lesions such as renal oncocytomas. The purpose of this article is to i) review the current literature on 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT/CT, ii) to review to current application of 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT/CT for indeterminate renal lesion imaging, and iii) to discuss present limitations and areas for future research. The literature has been reviewed up to April 2022 for articles relating to the application of 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT/CT for benign renal lesions including a recently published systematic review and meta-analysis performed by the authors. One study evaluating 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT alone and five studies evaluating 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT/CT have been performed to date. 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT/CT demonstrates high sensitivity and specificity for detecting benign renal lesions, particularly renal oncocytomas. 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT/CT demonstrates near-perfect specificity for benign and low-grade renal lesions. The optimal quantified threshold ratio for tumor-to-background renal parenchyma radiotracer uptake for a positive result is > 0.6. In this article, we propose a modified diagnostic algorithm for small enhancing renal masses measuring 1-4 cm in which suspected benign lesions after conventional imaging are considered for 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT-CT. In this algorithm, positive studies can be monitored with active surveillance rather than requiring invasive biopsy and/or targeted therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitchell P Wilson
- Address correspondence to:Mitchell P Wilson, Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, 2B2.41 WMC, 8440-112 Street NW, T6G 2B7, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yin Q, Xu H, Zhong Y, Ni J, Hu S. Diagnostic performance of MRI, SPECT, and PET in detecting renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:163. [PMID: 35148700 PMCID: PMC8840296 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09239-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2021] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is one of the most common malignancies worldwide. Noninvasive imaging techniques, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), and positron emission tomography (PET), have been involved in increasing evolution to detect RCC. This meta-analysis aims to compare to compare the performance of MRI, SPECT, and PET in the detection of RCC in humans, and to provide evidence for decision-making in terms of further research and clinical settings. Methods Electronic databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library were systemically searched. The keywords such as “magnetic resonance imaging”, “MRI”, “single-photon emission computed tomography”, “SPECT”, “positron emission tomography”, “PET”, “renal cell carcinoma” were used for the search. Studies concerning MRI, SPECT, and PET for the detection of RCC were included. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve (AUC), etc. were calculated. Results A total of 44 articles were finally detected for inclusion in this study. The pooled sensitivities of MRI, 18F-FDG PET and 18F-FDG PET/CT were 0.80, 0.83, and 0.89, respectively. Their respective overall specificities were 0.90, 0.86, and 0.88. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of MRI studies at 1.5 T were 0.86 and 0.94, respectively. With respect to prospective PET studies, the pooled sensitivity, specificity and AUC were 0.90, 0.93 and 0.97, respectively. In the detection of primary RCC, PET studies manifested a pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of 0.77, 0.80, and 0.84, respectively. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of PET/CT studies in detecting primary RCC were 0.80, 0.85, and 0.89. Conclusion Our study manifests that MRI and PET/CT present better diagnostic value for the detection of RCC in comparison with PET. MRI is superior in the diagnosis of primary RCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qihua Yin
- Department of Radiology, Wuxi No. 2 People's Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Address: No. 68, Zhongshan Rd., Wuxi, 214002, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Huiting Xu
- Department of Radiology, Wuxi No. 2 People's Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Address: No. 68, Zhongshan Rd., Wuxi, 214002, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Yanqi Zhong
- Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, No. 1000, Hefeng Road, Wuxi, 214122, China
| | - Jianming Ni
- Department of Radiology, Wuxi No. 2 People's Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Address: No. 68, Zhongshan Rd., Wuxi, 214002, Jiangsu Province, China. .,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai, 201318, China.
| | - Shudong Hu
- Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, No. 1000, Hefeng Road, Wuxi, 214122, China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Richard PO, Violette PD, Bhindi B, Breau RH, Kassouf W, Lavallée LT, Jewett M, Kachura JR, Kapoor A, Noel-Lamy M, Ordon M, Pautler SE, Pouliot F, So AI, Rendon RA, Tanguay S, Collins C, Kandi M, Shayegan B, Weller A, Finelli A, Kokorovic A, Nayak J. Canadian Urological Association guideline: Management of small renal masses - Full-text. Can Urol Assoc J 2022; 16:E61-E75. [PMID: 35133268 PMCID: PMC8932428 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.7763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick O. Richard
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Philippe D. Violette
- Departments of Health Research Methods Evidence and Impact (HEI) and Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Bimal Bhindi
- Southern Alberta Institute of Urology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Rodney H. Breau
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Wassim Kassouf
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Luke T. Lavallée
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Michael Jewett
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Urology, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - John R. Kachura
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Anil Kapoor
- McMaster Institute of Urology, St. Joseph Healthcare, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Maxime Noel-Lamy
- Department of Medical Imaging, Division of Interventional Radiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Michael Ordon
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Stephen E. Pautler
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Frédéric Pouliot
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Alan I. So
- Division of Urology, British Columbia Cancer Care, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Ricardo A. Rendon
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Capital Health - QEII, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Simon Tanguay
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Maryam Kandi
- Departments of Health Research Methods Evidence and Impact (HEI) and Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Bobby Shayegan
- McMaster Institute of Urology, St. Joseph Healthcare, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | | - Antonio Finelli
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Urology, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Andrea Kokorovic
- Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Jay Nayak
- Department of Surgery, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|