Mycophenolate mofetil toxicity mimicking acute cellular rejection in a small intestinal transplant

Immune reactions following intestinal transplantation: Mechanisms and prevention

For patients with intestinal failure, small bowel transplantation remains one of the most effective treatments despite continuous advancements in parenteral nutrition techniques. Long-term use of parenteral nutrition can result in serious complications that lead to metabolic dysfunction and organ failure. However, the small intestine is a highly immunogenic organ with a large amount of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue and histocompatibility antigens; therefore, the small intestine is highly susceptible to severe immune rejection. This article discusses the mechanisms underlying immune rejection after small bowel transplantation and presents various options for prevention and treatment. Our findings offer new insights into the development of small bowel transplantation.

Immunosuppression Protocols in Intestinal and Multivisceral Transplantation-A Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Intestinal transplantation (IT) and multivisceral transplantation (MVT) are curative therapies for patients with intestinal failure and severe complications associated with total parenteral nutrition. High levels of immunosuppression are required to prevent acute cellular rejection (ACR) from the bowel. Studies regarding pre-treatment, induction, and post-transplant therapy have improved graft acceptance, reducing immunosuppression doses and infectious complications. However, the low rate of IT and MVT and the small number of specialized centers have resulted in a limited number of evidence-based immunosuppression protocols. We reviewed immunosuppression in IT and MVT to draw useful conclusions regarding the best protocol strategies for the induction, maintenance, and management of ACR.

METHODS

A review was performed using the PubMed database. Articles on immunosuppression protocols in IT and MVT that addressed graft rejection, infection, or survival, published between 2006 and 2022, were selected.

RESULTS

A total of 690 articles were selected. Two researchers applied the inclusion and exclusion criteria and selected 14 articles independently. For induction, thymoglobulin, alemtuzumab, and basiliximab are the most frequently used immunosuppressants for induction. Classic maintenance therapy consists of a combination of corticosteroids and tacrolimus. Methylprednisolone with an increased tacrolimus dose is used most frequently to manage ACR. Depending on the receptor response, such as thymoglobulin, infliximab, adalimumab, or bortezomib, other immunosuppressants should be considered.

CONCLUSIONS

There have been great advances in IT and TMV immunosuppression. We conclude that the gold standard immunosuppressive protocol is triple therapy, comprising induction with thymoglobulin, maintenance with steroids for a few months, and tacrolimus and mycophenolate therapy. Innovative approaches for treating intestinal rejection episodes with more appropriate drugs, such as infliximab, adalimumab, or bortezomib, are necessary.

5-gene differential expression predicts stability of human intestinal allografts

In intestinal allografts, endoscopy and histology detect the injury once changes in the bowel wall architecture have occurred. We aimed to identify a molecular signature that could predict early deterioration, within histologically indistinguishable biopsies with "minimal changes" (MC) pathology. Sixty biopsies from 12 adult recipients were longitudinally taken during 8years post-transplant. They were classified as either stable (STA) or non-stable (NSTA) according to the prospectively recorded number, frequency and severity of rejection events of the allograft. In a discovery set of MC samples analyzed by RNA-Seq, 816 genes were differentially expressed in STA vs NSTA biopsies. A group of 5 genes (ADH1C, SLC39A4, CYP4F2, OPTN and PDZK1) correctly classified all NSTA biopsies in the discovery set and all STA biopsies from an independent set. These results were validated by qPCR in a new group of MC biopsies. Based on a logistic regression model, a cutoff of 0.28 predicted the probability of being a NSTA biopsy with 85% sensitivity and 69% specificity. In conclusion, by analyzing MC samples early after transplantation, the expression of a 5-gene set may predict the evolution of the bowel allograft. This prognostic biomarker may be of help to personalize care of the intestinal transplant recipient.