From open packing to negative wound pressure therapy: A critical overview of deep sternal wound infection treatment strategies after cardiac surgery

Is vacuum-assisted closure therapy the main culprit in right ventricular rupture after deep sternal wound infection?

Right ventricular rupture after deep sternal wound infection (DSWI) is a rare but fatal complication, and can occur with or without vacuum assisted closure (VAC) therapy. There is currently no strong evidence to suggest whether or not VAC therapy is a contributing factor to this complication. In total, 30 articles were retrieved and assessed through a systematic review strategy from 1953 to 2022. The keywords: 'vacuum assisted closure'; 'VAC'; 'negative pressure wound therapy'; 'deep sternal wound infection'; 'DSWI'; 'right ventricular rupture'; and 'cardiac rupture' were used in the search. Overall, 15 of the included articles satisfied the predefined eligibility criteria. Fatal right ventricular ruptures were reported in 18 (36%) out of 50 cases. In this article, the risk factors, mechanisms and management of right ventricular rupture are discussed. A novel view of the mechanism of VAC-associated right ventricular rupture is highlighted, with a focus on both pre- and intraoperative management.

Use of a negative pressure wound therapy system over closed incisions option in preventing post-sternotomy wound complications

Post-sternotomy surgical site infections may be serious complications responsible for increased morbidity, mortality and length of hospital stay. A variety of wound-healing strategies can be used over closed surgical incisions, including negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT). The aim of the study is to assess sternal wound complications after heart surgery using NPWT in patients at risk for surgical site complication. Considered risk factors affecting wound healing were type 2 diabetes, Body Mass Index (BMI) >30, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic renal failure (CRF) and myocardial revascularization by double mammary artery harvesting. With these premises, 90 patients were selected: 30 patients received traditional gauze dressings, 30 advanced dressings (hydrocolloid and carboxymethyl cellulose) and 30 patients NPWT. Thirty-four patients (37.7%) had two risk factors, 41 patients (45.5%) were affected by three risk factors and 15 patients (16.6%) by four risk factors. The NPWT group had lower rates of diabetes and CRF and only one patient presented four risk factors. With regard to surgical times and types of surgical procedure, no significant differences were observed within the three groups. The patients who received NPWT over closed incision experimented a significantly lower rate of deep sternal complication over traditional gauze and hydrocolloid and carboxymethyl cellulose dressings.