Comparison of the Effects of Cardiac Rehabilitation Between Obese and Non-obese Patients After Acute Myocardial Infarction

Exploring the effects of real-time online cardiac telerehabilitation using wearable devices compared to gym-based cardiac exercise in people with a recent myocardial infarction: a randomised controlled trial

Background

Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a non-pharmacological multidisciplinary programme for individuals after myocardial infarction (MI) that offers multiple health benefits. One of the greatest barriers to CR participation is the travel distance to the rehabilitation centre. Remotely monitored CR appears to be at least as effective in improving cardiovascular risk factors and exercise capacity as traditional centre-based CR. Nevertheless, the efficacy of remotely monitored CR in individuals with a recent MI has yet to be examined.

Methods

A total of 30 individuals (8 women, 22 men) after a recent (i.e., <4 weeks) MI were randomly allocated into two groups (online home-based and gym-based groups). Both groups underwent a 26-week CR programme three times per week. All patients performed baseline and 24-week follow-up measurements where peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak), mean daily steps, distance, and calories were assessed.

Results

The online group showed an improvement in mean daily steps (p < 0.05) and mean daily distance (p < 0.05) at 24 weeks compared to the gym-based group. The paired-sample t-test showed that all the assessed variables were statistically (p < 0.001) improved for both groups at 24 weeks. Pearson's r demonstrated positive correlations between VO2peak and mean daily distance (r = 0.375), and negative correlations between VO2peak and muscle (r = -0.523) and fat masses (r = -0.460). There were no exercise-induced adverse events during the study.

Conclusion

Our findings might indicate that a real-time online supervised CR exercise programme using wearable technology to monitor the haemodynamic responses in post-MI patients is equally effective as a gym-based exercise programme.

The Clinical Outcome of Cardiac Rehabilitation in Coronary Artery Disease Patients with Regard to the Presence of Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction

Background: Despite the use of advanced treatment techniques, coronary artery disease (CAD) still remains the main cause of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and heart failure. Participation in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programs can lead to a number of beneficial effects, but some patients do not demonstrate the expected improvement. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of CR on changes in exercise capacity with regard to the presence of LV dysfunction. Methods: A group of 428 patients with CAD were consecutively admitted to an outpatient comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation program comprising 24 exercise sessions of interval training on cycle ergometers, three times a week for 45 min, and a health education. The patients were compared in two subgroups, i.e., with LV systolic dysfunction (LVEF < 50%, n = 175) and LVEF ≥ 50% (n = 253). Results: In the LVEF < 50% group, the exercise capacity improved by 1 ± 0.78 MET (median 1.15 MET), and 0.86 ± 0.77 MET (median 1.08 MET) in the LVEF ≥ 50% group. Women with LVEF < 50% demonstrated a significant increase in exercise capacity by 1.2 MET, while those with LVEF ≥ 50% did not display any such increase. All men, regardless of LVEF, exhibited a similar improvement in exercise capacity greater than 1 MET. Conclusions: An outpatient eight-week cardiac rehabilitation program based on 45 min aerobic interval training sessions three times a week appears less effective for women with CAD and EF ≥ 50%. In this group, the proposed training intervention is insufficient in improving exercise capacity to an extent that could indicate a reduction in mortality risk.

Effects of cardiac rehabilitation on obese hypertensive patients: A controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

The relationship between obesity and hypertension is clearly known and cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is shown as an effective treatment method in both obese and hypertensive patients. The aim of this study is to reveal the effect of CR on obese hypertensive patients by comparing them with non-obese hypertensive patients.

METHODS

Eighty eligible, volunteer participants with hypertension (SBP ≥140mmHg and/or DBP ≥90mmHg) were enrolled in this study. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to their BMI values: obese (BMI ≥30kg/m2) hypertensive patients and non-obese (BMI <30kg/m2) hypertensive patients. The CR program, in which aerobic exercise training was the main part, was performed on the patients. At the end of the 10-week CR program, the resting SBP and DBP values were measured.

RESULTS

A total of 74 patients (37 obese and 37 non-obese) completed the study. After CR significant improvements were achieved in all evaluated parameters compared to pre-CR values. When the amounts of changes before and after CR were compared, the decrease in SBP was found to be significantly higher in obese patients compared to non-obese patients (p=.003). Higher BMI was associated with more reduction in SBP (r=0.287, p=0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

Exercise-based CR effectively reduced SBP in obese and non-obese hypertensive patients. However, it was more effective in obese patients compared to non-obese patients.

Clinical Outcomes of Cardiac Rehabilitation in Women with Coronary Artery Disease-Differences in Comparison with Men

This study evaluated the clinical outcomes of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) in women with coronary artery disease (CAD) in comparison to men. Methods: Patients after acute coronary syndrome or after revascularization procedures (106 women, 180 men) were consecutively admitted to a comprehensive outpatient CR program, comprising of 45-min ergometer interval training three times a week for eight weeks. The training intensity was determined on the basis of training heart rate, calculated following an exercise test. Patients were divided into subgroups according to age (≤55, >55 years), BMI (<25, ≥25 kg/m2), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF; ≤40%, 41−49%, ≥50%), and number of affected coronary vessels. Results: After eight weeks, exercise capacity increased significantly by 0.6 ± 0.77 MET (women) and by 1.0 ± 0.74 MET (men). The greatest benefit was observed in men, women under 55 years, women with LVEF 41−49%, and women with single-vessel CAD. An outpatient CR program appears less beneficial for women, especially those over 55 years, with two or three coronary vessels affected with atherosclerosis or with LVEF > 50%. In women with CAD, eight weeks of 45-min interval training, with sessions three times a week, is insufficient to improve exercise capacity to an extent that is considered a predictor of mortality risk reduction.

Differential Effects of Cardiac Rehabilitation in Obese and Non-Obese Population

Background Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) improves outcomes in patients with heart disease. We investigated the differences in outcomes of comprehensive phase II CR in obese and non-obese patients. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of functional outcomes including metabolic equivalents (METS), heart rate (chronotropic competence - CC), and blood pressure response (BPR) in 178 patients undergoing CR based on underlying body mass index (BMI). Demographic and clinical variables were assessed for age, gender, race, smoking, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, stroke, heart failure, medication use, and several sessions attended. Results Initial CC and METS were impaired in majority of patients attending CR, whereas BPR to exercise was mostly preserved. Significant improvement occurred in CC (non-obese: 0.71 ± 0.11 vs 0.76 ± 0.11, p < 0.001; obese: 0.72 ± 0.10 vs 0.75 ± 0.12, p = 0.0010) and METS (non-obese: 4.96 ± 1.98 vs 7.33 ± 2.94, p < 0.001; obese: 4.39 ± 1.81 vs 6.79 ± 3.34, p < 0.001). Post-CR obese patients were able to reach similar level of physical activity as non-obese patients (6.79 ± 3.34 vs 7.33 ± 2.94; p = 0.2). Improvement in BPR was only seen in non-obese patients (24.02 ± 20.07 vs 30.18 ± 21.93; p = 0.019). Improvement in functional variables occurred despite increase in BMI in non-obese (25.91 ± 2.85 vs 26.21 ± 2.96; p = 0.031), and there was no significant change in BMI in obese (35.30 ± 5.60 vs 34.93 ± 5.42; p > 0.05). Conclusion CR concurrently improves functional outcomes in both obese and non-obese patients despite no associated weight loss. The difference in BPR, however, is seen in only non-obese individuals. Future studies are needed to validate the role of weight-optimized CR protocols as a potential target for improving cardiac outcomes.

Exercise-Based Interventions in Middle-Aged and Older Adults after Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review

This study summarized the relevant literature and aimed to determine the effect of exercise-based interventions after myocardial infarction in middle-aged and older adults. Studies were identified and analyzed according to the PRISMA guidelines. The following electronic databases were used: Google Scholar, PubMed, Mendeley, Science Direct, and Scopus. The identified studies had to be longitudinal, be published in English, have taken place between 2010 and 2020, involve participants who had suffered myocardial infarction, and address different types of exercise-based interventions to be included. Of the 592 relevant studies identified, 20 were included in the qualitative analysis. After analyzing the results obtained, it could be concluded that different types of exercise-based interventions or their combination have a positive effect after myocardial infarction in middle-aged and elderly adults. It can also be suggested that the combination of a cycle ergometer and a treadmill may be the most effective exercise-based intervention. An adequate choice of intensity and volume is crucial, with the optimal duration of the experimental program and the type(s) of exercises adapted to participants after myocardial infarction.

The Beneficial Role of Exercise Training for Myocardial Infarction Treatment in Elderly

Worldwide, elderly people have a higher prevalence of myocardial infarction (MI), which is associated with body function aging and a sedentary lifestyle. In addition to medication, exercise training is a well-established supplementary method to prevent and treat cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Substantial evidence has shown the value of different intensity exercise programs in the prevention and treatment of MI, and exercise rehabilitation programs are also applicable to elderly patients with MI. Although exercise rehabilitation programs could significantly improve function, quality of life (QoL), and lower mortality and morbidity for people with MI, such programs are underused because their mechanisms are not accurately elucidated. To promote the application of exercise therapy for MI, this review summarizes the benefits and mechanisms of exercise rehabilitation for post-MI patients and provides rationalized proposals for outpatient cardiac rehabilitation.

Effectiveness of Cardiac Rehabilitation in Exercise Capacity Increase in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Background: The efficacy of interventions in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) assessed by a decrease in inpatient mortality in Poland is very high. However, a rise in mortality rate is recorded within 3 years of the discharge from the intervention centre. In order to reduce out-of-hospital mortality, the treatment should be continued with cardiac rehabilitation after hospitalization. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the effect of cardiac rehabilitation on exercise capacity increase patients with STEMI with regard to their age, gender, Body Mass Index (BMI), ejection fraction (EF), concomitant diabetes and nicotine dependence. The effectiveness of cardiac rehabilitation was assessed by exercise ECG (electrocardiogram) stress test or the 6-min walk test, prior to and after cardiac rehabilitation completion. Methods: The study group included 100 randomly selected patients undergoing cardiac rehabilitation after STEMI, aged 40–75 years, with BMI ≤ 40 kg/m², with controlled arterial hypertension, without anemia and any pulmonary comorbidities. Results: The study patients’ exercise capacity was observed to have increased significantly (+1 metabolic equivalent (MET) in exercise ECG stress test and +75.4 m in the 6-min walk test) regardless of their gender, age, BMI and nicotine dependence. Conclusions: This study proved that every patient with STEMI could benefit from cardiac rehabilitation. Nicotine-dependents, males, patients aged ≤55 and those with reduced EF (<50%) were found to have benefitted most substantially.

Predictors of cardiorespiratory fitness improvement in phase II cardiac rehabilitation

BACKGROUND

Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) improves cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and has been shown to reduce cardiovascular events and death. However, data about predictors of fitness improvement during CR are limited and conflicting. The objective of this study was to determine predictors of improvement in metabolic equivalents of task (METs) based on formal exercise testing throughout phase II CR.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 20 671 patients enrolled in phase II CR at our center from 2006 to 2016. Patients who completed 36 sessions and had entry and exit exercise stress tests were included for study. The short form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire was used to assess quality-of-life. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to determine independent predictors of METs improvement.

RESULTS

Of the full cohort, 827 patients completed 36 sessions and had entry/exit stress test data. The majority of patients (N = 647, 78.2%) had improvement in METs (mean Δ 2.0 ± 1.2 METs), including patients ≥65 and < 65 years old (77% vs 79%, P = 0.46 for difference). METs improvement was negatively associated with body mass index, diabetes, left ventricular dysfunction, and poor baseline fitness; and positively associated with SF-36 score (P < 0.05 for all). After multivariable adjustment, improvement was no longer affected by age, ejection fraction, or baseline fitness. Patients with poor fitness (≤5 METS) and adequate fitness (> 5 METS) both had improvement, with no statistical difference between the groups (P = 0.36).

CONCLUSIONS

In a large cohort of phase II CR patients, improvement in CRF was seen in the majority of patients across all ages, genders, and levels of baseline fitness.