Future Perspectives for Management of Stage A Heart Failure

Preventing new-onset heart failure: Intervening at stage A

Heart failure (HF) prevention is an urgent public health need with national and global implications. Stage A HF patients do not show HF symptoms or structural heart disease but are at risk of HF development. There are no unique recommendations on detecting Stage A patients. Patients in Stage A are heterogeneous; many patients have different combinations of risk factors and, therefore, have markedly different absolute risks for HF. Comprehensive strategies to prevent HF at Stage A include intensive blood pressure lowering, adequate glycemic and lipid management, and heart-healthy behaviors (adopting Life's Essential 8). First and foremost, it is imperative to improve public awareness of HF risk factors and implement healthy lifestyle choices very early. In addition, recognize the HF risk-enhancing factors, which are nontraditional cardiovascular (CV) risk factors that identify individuals at high risk for HF (genetic susceptibility for HF, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease, chronic liver disease, chronic inflammatory disease, sleep-disordered breathing, adverse pregnancy outcomes, radiation therapy, a history of cardiotoxic chemotherapy exposure, and COVID-19). Early use of biomarkers, imaging markers, and echocardiography (noninvasive measures of subclinical systolic and diastolic dysfunction) may enhance risk prediction among individuals without established CV disease and prevent chemotherapy-induced cardiomyopathy. Efforts are needed to address social determinants of HF risk for primordial HF prevention.Central illustrationPolicies developed by organizations such as the American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology, and the American Diabetes Association to reduce CV disease events must go beyond secondary prevention and encompass primordial and primary prevention.

Moving the Paradigm Forward for Prediction and Risk-Based Primary Prevention of Heart Failure in Special Populations

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Heart failure (HF) treatment paradigms increasingly recognize the importance of primary prevention. This review explores factors that enhance HF risk, summarizes evidence supporting the pharmacologic primary prevention of HF, and notes barriers to the implementation of primary prevention of HF with a focus on female and sexual and gender minority patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

HF has pathophysiologic sex-specific distinctions, suggesting that sex-specific preventive strategies may be beneficial. Pharmacologic agents that have shown benefit in reducing the risk of HF address the pathobiology underpinning these sex-specific risk factors. The implementation of pharmacologic therapies for primary prevention of HF needs to consider a risk-based model. Current pharmacotherapies hold mechanistic promise for the primary prevention of HF in females and gender and sexual minorities, although research is needed to understand the specific populations most likely to benefit. There are significant systemic barriers to the equitable provision of HF primary prevention.

Myocardial strain impairment, heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and systemic arterial hypertension: Is there a link?

Dyslipidemia is known as a strong risk factor for premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and increased morbidity and mortality and can have an adverse effect on left ventricular function due to direct or indirect macrovascular and/or microvascular damage. Speckle-tracking echocardiography allows the assessment of subclinical cardiac dysfunction in different diseases on the basis of myocardial deformation indices, and decrease in longitudinal and circumferential strain was shown in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (heFH) without comorbidities. In this issue of the journal a new study presents the results in a well-defined population which included asymptomatic treatment-naive heFH individuals without known coronary/peripheral arterial disease, with normal left ventricular ejection fraction and no other risk factors as formal arterial hypertension or diabetes mellitus. A slight impairment of global longitudinal strain was present, despite normal standard echocardiographic parameters. Also, the higher rise in systolic and diastolic blood pressure of heHF patients during exercise treadmill test might reflect early preclinical hypertension. High cholesterol level may have produced endothelial dysfunction, which has been shown to be related to the extent of atherosclerotic process and cardiovascular damage. Relevant findings are reported on left ventricular strain reduction and increase in systolic/diastolic blood pressure in asymptomatic heFH males. The relationship between myocardial strain impairment and developing systemic arterial hypertension in hypercholesterolemic patients could be the subject of further subsequent investigation.

Assessment of subclinical diabetic cardiomyopathy by speckle-tracking imaging

BACKGROUND

Diastolic dysfunction is traditionally believed to be the first subclinical manifestation of diabetic cardiomyopathy (DCM), leading to systolic dysfunction and then overt heart failure. However, in the last few years, several studies suggested that systolic subclinical dysfunction measured by speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) may appear ahead of diastolic dysfunction. In this review, the main endpoint is to show whether subclinical myocardial systolic dysfunction appears ahead of diastolic dysfunction and the implication this may have on the evolution and management of DCM.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a search in PubMed for all relevant publications on the assessment of DCM by STE from 1 June 2015 to 1 June 2020.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The results illustrate that subclinical systolic dysfunction assessed by STE is present in early DCM stages, with or without the association of diastolic dysfunction. This could be a promising perspective for the early management of patients with DCM leading to the prevention of the overt form of disease.

Stage A Heart Failure: Modern Strategies for an Effective Prevention

Stage A heart failure (HF) patients do not show HF symptoms or any structural heart disease but are at risk of HF development. Cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, metabolic syndrome, sedentary lifestyle, poor diet, and exposure to cardiotoxic agents) characterize subjects affected by stage A HF. It is essential to identify these subjects early and ensure that, despite being asymptomatic, they grasp the importance of undertaking correct lifestyle and therapeutic interventions. A careful stratification of asymptomatic subject's risk profile is needed to adopt proper preventive strategies and to set individualized therapeutic targets that avoid progression to advanced stages of HF.

Impact of hypertension on left ventricular function in patients after anthracycline chemotherapy for malignant lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Hypertension is considered an important risk factors for cancer therapeutics-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) as well as heart failure. However, the impact of hypertension and left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy (LVH), which is associated with hypertension, on LV function in patients treated with anthracycline chemotherapy for malignant lymphoma remains uncertain.

METHOD

We studied 92 patients with malignant lymphoma and with preserved LV ejection fraction (LVEF). Echocardiography was performed before and two-month after anthracycline chemotherapy. CTRCD was defined as the presence of an absolute decrease in LVEF ≥10% to a final value <53%. LVH was defined as concentric hypertrophy, which was determined as relative wall thickness ≥ 0.42 and LV mass index >95 g/m² for females and > 115 g/m² for males.

RESULTS

Relative decrease in LVEF after anthracycline chemotherapy in patients with hypertension (n = 23) was significantly higher than that in patients without hypertension (n = 69) (-5.8% [-9.4, -1.3]) vs. (-1.1% [-4.1, 2.5]); P = .005). Moreover, the prevalence of CTRCD in patients with hypertension tended to be higher than in those without hypertension (17% vs. 5%, p = .09). A sequential logistic model for predicting CTRCD, based on baseline clinical variables including major clinical risk factors, was improved by the addition of the complication of hypertension (P = .049), and further improved by the addition of the presence of LVH (P = .023).

CONCLUSIONS

Hypertension, especially when complicated by LVH, was found to be associated with LV dysfunction after anthracycline chemotherapy in patients with malignant lymphoma and preserved LVEF. Watchful observation or early therapeutic intervention may thus be needed for such patients by the addition of the presence of LVH.