[Evaluation of the BD Phoenix100 System and Colistin Broth Disk Elution Method for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Colistin Against Gram-negative Bacteria]

Evaluation of different methods for in vitro susceptibility testing of colistin in carbapenem resistant Gram-negative bacilli

Introduction

The increasing antibiotic resistance like the advent of carbapenem resistant Enterobactarales (CRE), Carbapenem Resistant Acinetobacter baumanii (CRAB), and Carbapenem Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) has led to to the use of toxic and older drugs like colistin for these organisms. But worldwide there is an increase in resistance even to colistin mediated both by chromosomes and plasmids. This necessitates accurate detection of resistance. This is impeded by the unavailability of a user-friendly phenotypic methods for use in routine clinical microbiology practice. The present study attempts to evaluate two different methods - colistin broth disc elution and MIC detection by Vitek two in comparison to CLSI approved broth microdilution (BMD) for colistin for Enterobactarales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa , and Acinetobacter baumanii clinical isolates.

Methods

Colistin susceptibility of 6013 carbapenem resistant isolates was determined by BMD, Colistin Broth Disc Elution (CBDE), and Vitek two methods and was interpreted as per CLSI guidelines. The MIC results of CBDE, Vitek two were compared with that of BMD and essential agreement (EA), categorical agreement (CA), sensitivity, specificity, very major error (VME), major error (ME) and Cohen's kappa (CK) was calculated. The presence of any plasmid-mediated colistin resistance (mcr-1, 2, 3, 4 and 5) was evaluated in all colistin-resistant isolates by conventional polymerase chain reaction.

Results

Colistin resistance was found in 778 (12.9 %) strains among the carbapenem resistant isolates. Klebsiella pneumoniae had the highest (18.9 %) colistin resistance by the BMD method. MIC of Vitek two had sensitivity ranging from 78.2-84.8% and specificity of >92 %. There were 171 VMEs and 323 MEs by Vitek two method, much more than CLSI acceptable range. The highest percentage of errors was committed for Acinetobacter baumanii (27.8 % of VME and 7.9 % ME). On the other hand, the CBDE method performed well with EA, CA, VME and ME within acceptable range for all the organisms. The sensitivity of the CBDE method compared to gold standard BMD varied from 97.5-98.8 % for different strains with a specificity of more than 97.6 %. None of the isolated colistin resistant organisms harboured mcr plasmids.

Conclusion

As BMD has many technical complexities, CBDE is the best viable alternative available for countries like India. A sensitive MIC reported by Vitek two needs to be carefully considered due high propensity for VMEs particularly for Klebsiella spp.

Comparative Evaluation of Colistin Broth Disk Elution Method With Two Commercially Available Systems for Colistin Susceptibility Testing Against Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: A Single-Center Exploratory Study

Purpose: The purpose is to explore the diagnostic utility of colistin broth disk elution (CBDE) as a simple and reliable method of colistin susceptibility testing.

Materials and methods: An exploratory study was undertaken in a tertiary care teaching hospital in Uttarakhand, from September 2021 to March 2022, after obtaining approval from the Institute Ethics Committee. Twenty-five non-repetitive carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolates were included in the study. Matrix‐assisted laser desorption ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) and BD Phoenix M50 system were used to perform species-level identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST), respectively, as per the manufacturer’s instructions. AST results (including those of colistin) were interpreted as per the CLSI guidelines 2022. The test isolates were further subjected to additional in vitro colistin susceptibility testing using a commercially available Mikrolatest colistin susceptibility testing kit and CBDE, respectively.

Results: The in vitro colistin resistance rates varied from 8% by BD Phoenix system to 20% by Mikrolatest kit and 32% by CBDE, respectively. For colistin susceptibility, a higher CA was observed between the BD Phoenix system and CBDE (64.71%) than between the Mikrolatest kit and CBDE (31.60%). Overall, a statistically significant fair agreement was observed between the BD Phoenix system and CBDE (Kappa: 0.312; 95% CI: 0.036 to 0.660) and Mikrolatest MIC colistin kit and CBDE (Kappa: 0.286; 95% CI: 0.111 to 0.683), respectively.

Conclusions: In vitro colistin testing remains a significant challenge globally. Although the present study results are inconclusive due to the small sample size, we should conduct multi-centric studies globally, taking a considerable sample size representing different Gram-negative bacilli to generate conclusive evidence on the utility of CBDE as a reliable method of colistin susceptibility testing.

Evaluation of rapid polymyxin Nordmann Poirel test for detection of polymyxin resistance in clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae

Polymyxins play a significant role against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE). A total of 121 clinical samples yielded growth of CRE that were included in the study. Rapid Polymyxin NP test was performed on all the isolates as described by Nordmann P et al. and results were compared with broth microdilution method. Majority of the isolates were Klebsiella pneumoniae (70.2%) followed by Escherichia coli (17.4%). A total of 71 isolates were found resistant and 50 as susceptible by broth microdilution. Sensitivity and specificity of rapid polymyxin NP test were found to be 97.2% and 100%, respectively. Our study concluded that rapid polymyxin NP test is reliable and can be used as an alternative to broth microdilution in resource limited settings.