Configuration of the circle of Willis and its two parts among Egyptian: a magnetic resonance angiographic study

Anatomical differences of intracranial arteries according to sex: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Intracranial aneurysms are more common in women than in men. Some anatomical variants of the circle of Willis (CoW) are associated with a higher risk of developing intracranial aneurysms. We hypothesized that variations of the CoW are sex dependent which may partly explain why intracranial aneurysms are more common in women. We systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed the literature to compare the presence of anatomical variations of the CoW between women and men in the general population.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A systematic search in Pubmed and EMBASE using predefined criteria, following the PRISMA guidelines was performed. The presence of different CoW anatomical variants and a complete CoW was compared between women and men using an inverse variance weighted random effects meta-analysis to calculate relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs).

RESULTS

Fourteen studies were included reporting on 5478 healthy participants (2511 women, 2967 men). Bilateral fetal type posterior cerebral arteries (RR 2.79; 95%CI 1.65-4.72, I2=0%), and a complete CoW (RR 1.24, 95%CI 1.13-1.36; I2=0%) were more prevalent in women than in men. The variants absence or hypoplasia of one of the anterior cerebral arteries (RR 0.58, 95%CI 0.38-0.88, I2=57%) and hypoplasia or absence of both posterior communicating arteries (RR 0.79, 95%CI 0.71-0.87, I2=0%) were more prevalent in men.

CONCLUSIONS

Several anatomical variations of the CoW are sex dependent, with some variants being more common in women while others in men. Future research should assess how these sex-specific CoW variants relate to the sex-specific occurrence of intracranial aneurysms.

Morphologic variants of the Cerebral Arterial Circle on computed tomographic angiography (CTA): a large retrospective study

PURPOSE

To confirm and illustrate the great variability of morphology of the Cerebral Arterial Circle (CAC)-also commonly called "Circle of Willis"-in current clinical Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA) practice.

METHODS

Computed Tomographic Angiographic 3D Volume Rendering reconstructions of the CAC performed in a series of 511 patients were retrospectively reviewed and classified following their anatomic configuration.

RESULTS

An amount of 27 CAC configurations were listed. Complete and "nearly complete" (1 missing segment) CACs were found in 115 (22.58%) and 157 (28.6%) patients. The posterior arch was much more frequently incomplete (374 patients = 73.18%) than the anterior arch (96 patients = 18.4%). The main cause was a high prevalence of missing posterior communicating arteries (PCoAs). The left or right PCoA were unilaterally lacking in 156 patients (30.53%) and both PCoAs were lacking in 179 patients (35.02%). Cases with 2 and 3 missing segments were observed in 184 (36%) and 44 patients (8.6%). Precarious situations were also identified including 7 cases (1.4%) of complete isolation of the middle cerebral artery (MCA), 11 cases (2.15%) of absence of interhemispheric supply, 205 cases (40.1%) of full separation of the carotid and vertebra-basilar (VB) territories and 44 cases (8.6%) of full separation of the three main arterial axes (both ICAs and VB). The prevalence of Fetal Posterior Cerebral Arteries (FPCA) variants was also reported. A "Full" FPCA was found unilaterally in 48 (9.4%) and bilaterally in 13 (2.54%) of patients. Apart from agenesis and hypoplasia reported in our study, various other variations of the anterior complex of the CAC (ACoA and A2 segments of the ACA) were also noted.

CONCLUSION

CTA with 3D Volume Rendering may powerfully assess the numerous variations of the CAC. This assessment is of prime importance for the evaluation of patients presenting with risk factors or in whom neurosurgery, cardiac surgery, interventional radiology or carotid endarterectomy (CEA) are being considered.

Proportion of Variant Anatomy of the Circle of Willis and Association with Vascular Anomalies on Cerebral CT Angiography

Background and Purpose

There is a wide variation in the anatomy of the CW in different individuals and population groups. The purpose of this study was to determine the proportion of variant anatomy of the circle of Willis (CW) and associated anomalies in patients with suspected cerebrovascular disease referred for cerebral computed tomography angiography (CTA) in two tertiary hospitals in Kenya.

Methodology

This was a cross-sectional descriptive study conducted on 94 patients referred for cerebral CTA at the Kenyatta and Nairobi hospitals from August 2017 to February 2018. MIP and 3D reformatted images were analyzed by two senior radiologists to determine the final configuration of the CW and presence of vascular pathology. Vessels with diameters <0.8 mm were considered to be absent or hypoplastic. Chen et al. classification was used to determine the final configuration of CW.

Results

Complete CW was seen in 37.2% (37.7% vs. 36.6% in males and females, respectively, p=0.909). Type A variant was the commonest anterior variant at 78.7%. Type E variant was the dominant posterior variant at 41.5%. Fetal PCA was demonstrated in 25.5%, unilateral > bilateral fetal PCA. Aneurysms were seen in 24.5% of patients. ACoA aneurysms were commonest at 43.6%. AVMs were seen in 8.5% of patients. Azygous ACA, fenestration, and duplication of vessels and persistent TA were not demonstrated. There is no significant association between aneurysms/AVMs and CW configuration.

Conclusion

The findings in this study demonstrate slight differences in the CW configuration. A higher proportion of complete anterior CW was seen in female patients. Type A anterior and type E posterior circulation variants were the commonest in both males and females. No significant association was demonstrated between CW configuration and occurrence of aneurysms/AVMs in this study. Various methods of classification of CW configuration have been proposed with no standardized method to date, thus the need for consensus building between neuroanatomists, neurologists, neurosurgeons, and neuroradiologists for ease of comparison between similar future studies on the CW.