Radiobiology of stereotactic radiotherapy

Stereotactic Radiosurgery with Volumetric Modulated Arc Radiotherapy: Final Results of a Multi-arm Phase I Trial (DESTROY-2)

AIMS

To present the final results of a phase I trial on stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) delivered using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in patients with primary or metastatic tumors in different extracranial sites.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The DESTROY-2 trial, planned as a prospective dose escalation study in oligometastatic (one to five lesions) cancer patients relied on the delivery of a single high dose of radiation utilizing high-precision technology. The primary study endpoint was the definition of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of SRS-VMAT. The secondary objectives of the study were the evaluation of safety, efficacy, and long-term outcomes. All patients consecutively observed at our radiotherapy unit matching the inclusion criteria were enrolled. Each enrolled subject was included in a different phase I study arm, depending on the tumor site and the disease stage (lung, liver, bone, other), and sequentially assigned to a particular dose level.

RESULTS

Two hundred twenty seven lesions in 164 consecutive patients (male/female: 97/67, median age: 68 years; range: 29-92) were treated. The main primary tumors were: prostate cancer (60 patients), colorectal cancer (47 patients), and breast cancer (39 patients). The maximum planned dose level was achieved in all study arms, and the MTD was not exceeded. 34 Gy, 32 Gy, 24 Gy, and 24 Gy were established as the single-fraction doses for treating lung, liver, bone, and other extracranial lesions, respectively. The prescribed BED 2Gyα/β:10 to the planning target volume ranged from 26.4 Gy to 149.6 Gy. Twenty-seven patients (16.5%) experienced grade 1-2 and only one grade 3 acute toxicity, which was a pulmonary one. In terms of late toxicity, we registered only 5 toxicity>G2: a G3 gastro-intestinal one, three G3 bone toxicity, and a G3 laryngeal toxicity. The overall response was available for 199 lesions: 107 complete response (53.8%), 50 partial response (25.1%), and 31 stable disease (15.6%), leading to an overall response rate of 94.5%. Progression was registered only in 11 cases (5.5%). The overall response rate in each arm ranged from 88.6% to 96.4%. The overall two-year local control, distant metastasis free survival, disease free survival, and overall survival were 81.7%, 33.0%, 25.4%, and 78.7% respectively.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the planned doses of 34 Gy, 32 Gy, 24 Gy, and 24 Gy were successfully administered as single-fractions for the treatment of lung, liver, bone, and other extracranial lesions, respectively, in a prospective SRS dose-escalation trial. No dose-limiting toxicities were registered, and minimal acute and late toxicity were reported. New indications for SRS are currently being studied in oligoprogressive patients receiving targeted drugs or in combination with immunotherapy. The DESTROY-2 trial represents, in our opinion, a credible starting point for future modern radiosurgery trials.

Natural History and Histopathology of Expanding Cysts and Hematomas After Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Arteriovenous Malformations of the Brain: A Case Series

BACKGROUND

We reviewed the clinical course and histopathologic findings for cases involving the formation of expanding cysts and/or hematomas after gamma knife surgery (GKS) for arteriovenous malformations (AVMs).

METHODS

We report a single-center retrospective review of 18 patients who presented with cyst and/or hematoma expansion after GKS for AVMs between 1993 and 2023. Expanding cysts and hematomas were defined as well-demarcated cavities filled with fluid or well-marginated heterogenous hematomas presenting with expansion proximal to or in the location of the original AVM, respectively. Patient demographics, AVM characteristics, history of interventions and surgeries, and imaging and histopathologic features of expanding cysts and hematomas were collected for analysis.

RESULTS

Among 1072 AVM patients treated using GKS, 18 presented with expanding cysts or hematomas during a total follow-up period of 16,757 patient-years (0.11 case/100 persons/patient-year). The time to cyst or hematoma identification was 4-13 years after initial GKS, with a mean duration of 8.6 years. Among the patients examined, 7 (38.9%) presented mainly with hematoma, 10 (55.6%) presented mainly with cysts, and 1 presented with approximately equal components of both. Among the 18 patients, 13 (72.2%) underwent craniotomy to treat cyst or hematoma expansion. All the specimens had similar histopathologic characteristics, including organizing hematoma with fresh and old hemorrhage, fibrinoid necrosis of the vessels, gliosis of normal brain tissue, infiltration of hemosiderin-laden histiocytes, and extravascular protein leakage.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that the formation of these 2 complications can be attributed to a common mechanism involving radiation-induced vascular damage in brain tissue adjacent to the AVM and subsequent chronic inflammation and capillary dilatation.

The NOMS approach to metastatic tumors: Integrating new technologies to improve outcomes

Treatment paradigms for patients with spine metastases have evolved significantly over the past two decades. The most transformative change to these paradigms has been the integration of spinal stereotactic radiosurgery (sSRS). sSRS allows for the delivery of tumoricidal radiation doses with sparing of nearby organs at risk, particularly the spinal cord. Evidence supports the safety and efficacy of radiosurgery as it currently offers durable local tumor control with low complication rates even for tumors previously considered radioresistant to conventional external beam radiation therapy. The role for surgical intervention remains consistent, but a trend has been observed toward less aggressive, often minimally invasive techniques. Using modern technologies and improved instrumentation, surgical outcomes continue to improve with reduced morbidity. Additionally, targeted agents such as biologics and checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized cancer care by improving both local control and patient survival. These advances have brought forth a need for new prognostication tools and a more critical review of long-term outcomes. The complex nature of current treatment schemes necessitates a multidisciplinary approach including surgeons, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, interventionalists and pain specialists. This review recapitulates the current state-of-the-art, evidence-based data on the treatment of spinal metastases and integrates these data into a decision framework, NOMS, which is based on four sentinel pillars of decision making in metastatic spine tumors: Neurological status, Oncologic tumor behavior, Mechanical stability, and Systemic disease burden and medical co-morbidities.

The NOMS approach to metastatic tumors: Integrating new technologies to improve outcomes

Treatment paradigms for patients with spine metastases have evolved significantly over the past two decades. The most transformative change to these paradigms has been the integration of spinal stereotactic radiosurgery (sSRS). sSRS allows for the delivery of tumoricidal radiation doses with sparing of nearby organs at risk, particularly the spinal cord. Evidence supports the safety and efficacy of radiosurgery as it currently offers durable local tumor control with low complication rates even for tumors previously considered radioresistant to conventional external beam radiation therapy. The role for surgical intervention remains consistent, but a trend has been observed toward less aggressive, often minimally invasive techniques. Using modern technologies and improved instrumentation, surgical outcomes continue to improve with reduced morbidity. Additionally, targeted agents such as biologics and checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized cancer care by improving both local control and patient survival. These advances have brought forth a need for new prognostication tools and a more critical review of long-term outcomes. The complex nature of current treatment schemes necessitates a multidisciplinary approach including surgeons, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, interventionalists and pain specialists. This review recapitulates the current state-of-the-art, evidence-based data on the treatment of spinal metastases and integrates these data into a decision framework, NOMS, which is based on four sentinel pillars of decision making in metastatic spine tumors: neurological status, Oocologic tumor behavior, mechanical stability and systemic disease burden and medical co-morbidities.

Combination of radiotherapy and targeted therapy for HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastases

Radiotherapy and targeted therapy are essential treatments for patients with brain metastases from human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer. However, the combination of radiotherapy and targeted therapy still needs to be investigated, and neurotoxicity induced by radiotherapy for brain metastases has also become an important issue of clinical concern. It remained unclear how to achieve the balance of efficacy and toxicity with the application of new radiotherapy techniques and new targeted therapy drugs. This article reviews the benefits and potential risk of combining radiotherapy and targeted therapy for HER2-positive breast cancer with brain metastases.

Fifty-year history of the evolution of spinal metastatic disease management

Spine metastases are a significant source of morbidity in oncology. Treatment of these spine metastases largely remains palliative, but advances over the past 50 years have improved the effectiveness of interventions for preserving functional status and obtaining local control while minimizing morbidity. While the field began with conventional external beam radiation as the primary treatment modality, a series of paradigm shifts and technological advances in the 2000s led to a change in treatment patterns. These advances allowed for an increased role of surgical decompression of neural elements, a shift in the stereotactic capabilities of radiation oncologists, and an improved understanding of the radiobiology of metastatic disease. The result was improved local control while minimizing treatment morbidity. These advances fit within the larger framework of metastatic spine tumor management known as the Neurologic, Oncologic, Mechanical, and Systemic disease decision framework. This dynamic framework takes into account the neurological function of the patient, the radiobiology of their tumor, their degree of mechanical instability, and their systemic disease control and treatment options to help determine appropriate interventions based on the individual patient. Herein, we describe the 50-year evolution of metastatic spine tumor management and the impact of various advances on the field.