1
|
Bociek A, Bociek M, Bielejewska A, Dereziński T, Jaroszyński A. Comparison of commonly used creatinine-based GFR estimating formulas in elderly female non-diabetic patients with chronic kidney disease. POLISH ANNALS OF MEDICINE 2020. [DOI: 10.29089/2020.20.00098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/05/2020] [Indexed: 10/18/2023]
Abstract
Introduction:
Measuring glomerular filtration rate (GFR) with the isotopic method is a gold standard. However, it is an elaborate and expensive procedure, so in everyday practice GFR is estimated with creatinine-based formulas. Despite the number of studies, it remains unclear which GFR estimating equation is the most accurate, especially in increasing elderly population.
Aim:
The aim of this study was to compare the commonly used formulas to assess which one of them should be used in elderly female non-diabetic patients suffering from chronic kidney disease (CKD)
Material and methods:
336 non-diabetic females aged 70 and more were qualified to the study. On the basis of serum creatinine concentration, estimated GFR (eGFR) was estimated using various formulas.
Results and discussion:
The eGFR and CKD stages differ significantly depending on the used formula. The modification of diet in renal disease equation (MDRD) formula showed slightly, but still significantly, better correlation with creatinine concentration in serum than the CKD epidemiology collaboration equation. The Cockcroft-Gault equation formula was significantly inferior to above mentioned equations. The receiver operating characteristic curves showed that MDRD is the most sensitive equation and the differences between formulas compared in pairs were significant.
Conclusions:
Due to its highest correlation with creatinine and its highest sensitivity and specificity, the MDRD formula seems to be the most accurate equation to estimate GFR in elderly non-diabetic females.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Martyna Bociek
- Faculty of Medical Science, Higher School of Economy, Law and Medical Science of professor Edward Lipiński in Kielce, Poland
| | - Ada Bielejewska
- Collegium Medicum, Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce, Poland
| | | | - Andrzej Jaroszyński
- Department of Nephrology, Institute of Medical Science, Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Liu L, Wang Y, Zhang W, Chang W, Jin Y, Yao Y. Waist height ratio predicts chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis, 1998-2019. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019; 77:55. [PMID: 31867106 PMCID: PMC6918668 DOI: 10.1186/s13690-019-0379-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2019] [Accepted: 11/18/2019] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Background The incidence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) increases each year, and obesity is an important risk factor for CKD. The main anthropometric indicators currently reflecting obesity are body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), but the rationality and merits of various indicators vary. This article aims to find whether the WHtR is a more suitable physical measurement that can predict CKD. Methods Pubmed, embase, the cochrane library, and web of science were systematically searched for articles published between 1998 and 2019 screening CKD through physical indicators. Two reviewers independently screened the literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted the data, and evaluated the quality of the methodology included in the study. Meta-analysis used the Stata 12.0 software. Results Nine studies were included, with a total of 202,283 subjects. Meta-analysis showed that according to the analysis of different genders in 6 studies, regardless of sex, WHtR was the area with the largest area under the curve (AUC). Except WHtR and visceral fat index (VFI) in women which showed no statistical difference, WHtR and other indicators were statistically different. In three studies without gender-based stratification, the area under the curve AUC for WHtR remained the largest, but only the difference between WHtR and BMI was statistically significant. When the Chinese population was considered as a subgroup, the area under the curve AUC for WHtR was the largest. Except for WHtR and VFI which showed no statistical difference in women, there was a statistically significant difference between WHtR and other indicators in men and women. Conclusion WHtR could be better prediction for CKD relative to other physical measurements. It also requires higher-quality prospective studies to verify the clinical application of WHtR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ling Liu
- School of Public Health,Wannan Medical College, Wenchang West Road 22, Wuhu, China
| | - Yanqiu Wang
- School of Public Health,Wannan Medical College, Wenchang West Road 22, Wuhu, China
| | - Wanjun Zhang
- School of Public Health,Wannan Medical College, Wenchang West Road 22, Wuhu, China
| | - Weiwei Chang
- School of Public Health,Wannan Medical College, Wenchang West Road 22, Wuhu, China
| | - Yuelong Jin
- School of Public Health,Wannan Medical College, Wenchang West Road 22, Wuhu, China
| | - Yingshui Yao
- School of Public Health,Wannan Medical College, Wenchang West Road 22, Wuhu, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dong Y, Wang Z, Chen Z, Wang X, Zhang L, Nie J, Zheng C, Wang J, Shao L, Tian Y, Gao R. Comparison of visceral, body fat indices and anthropometric measures in relation to chronic kidney disease among Chinese adults from a large scale cross-sectional study. BMC Nephrol 2018; 19:40. [PMID: 29454330 PMCID: PMC5816526 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-018-0837-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2017] [Accepted: 02/07/2018] [Indexed: 04/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of the study was to assess the association between chronic kidney disease (CKD) and obesity in predicting CKD among Chinese adults, distinguishing between 5 different adiposity indices: visceral fat index (VFI), percentage body fat (PBF), body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC) and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR). Methods A total of 29,516 participants aged 35 years or above were selected using a stratified multistage random sampling method across China during 2012–2015. CKD was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration (eGFR) < 60 ml/min/1.72m2. Results The overall weighted prevalence of CKD was 3.94% (3.62% in males and 4.25% in females). All five adiposity indices had significant negative correlations to eGFR (P < 0.05). The area under the ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curves (AUC) for PBF was almost significantly larger than the other adiposity indices (P < 0.001). In addition, PBF yielded the highest Youden index in identifying CKD (male: 0.15; female: 0.20). In the logistic analysis, PBF had the highest crude odds ratios (ORs) in both males (OR: 1.819, 95% CI 1.559–2.123) and females (OR: 2.268, 95% CI 1.980–2.597). After adjusted for age, smoking status, alcohol use, education level, marital status, rural vs. urban area, geographic regions, and diagnosis of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, myocardial infarction and stroke, the ORs on PBF remained significant for both genders (P < 0.05). Conclusions Obesity is associated with an increased risk of CKD. Furthermore, PBF was a better predictor for identifying CKD than other adiposity indices (BMI, WC, WHtR, and VFI). Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12882-018-0837-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Dong
- Division of Prevention and Community Health, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, Pecking Union Medical College & Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 102308, China
| | - Zengwu Wang
- Division of Prevention and Community Health, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, Pecking Union Medical College & Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 102308, China.
| | - Zuo Chen
- Division of Prevention and Community Health, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, Pecking Union Medical College & Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 102308, China
| | - Xin Wang
- Division of Prevention and Community Health, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, Pecking Union Medical College & Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 102308, China
| | - Linfeng Zhang
- Division of Prevention and Community Health, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, Pecking Union Medical College & Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 102308, China
| | - Jingyu Nie
- Division of Prevention and Community Health, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, Pecking Union Medical College & Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 102308, China
| | - Congyi Zheng
- Division of Prevention and Community Health, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, Pecking Union Medical College & Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 102308, China
| | - Jiali Wang
- Division of Prevention and Community Health, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, Pecking Union Medical College & Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 102308, China
| | - Lan Shao
- Division of Prevention and Community Health, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, Pecking Union Medical College & Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 102308, China
| | - Ye Tian
- Division of Prevention and Community Health, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, Pecking Union Medical College & Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 102308, China
| | - Runlin Gao
- Fuwai Hospital, Pecking Union Medical College & Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100037, China
| |
Collapse
|