Preferences of women with low obstetric risk for cesarean or vaginal birth in Poland: Areas for intervention

BACKGROUND

In Poland, the rate of cesarean birth (CB) is 43%, which is much higher than the European average of 27%. Optimizing the CB birth rate is of critical importance, especially among women with low-risk pregnancies. However, the determinants of cesarean preference among low-risk women in Poland have not been well explored.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included 1011 pregnant women and aimed to identify associations between selected determinants of women's preferences for CB vs. vaginal birth (VB) in Poland. A descriptive questionnaire was distributed online, and a theoretical model was validated against empirically gathered data. Group comparisons were performed using the Welch t test for continuous data or chi-square test for categorical data. All statistical analyses were performed using R (R Core Team, 2018).

RESULTS

The mean age of women preferring CB (30.46 years) was 1.25 years higher than that of women preferring VB (29.21 years). Pregnant women who expressed a preference for CB tended to be multigravid, inhabited cities, and were characterized by higher levels of anxiety and depression. Moreover, the majority of women who underwent a previous CB asserted their intention to repeat the procedure for the current pregnancy.

CONCLUSIONS

The primary factors that were correlated with high CB preference among the low-risk group included age, previous childbirth experiences, and anxiety. The underlying reasons that drive birth preferences remain poorly understood. However, women who have previously undergone difficult childbirth experiences and are afraid of pain require specialized care.

Factors associated with fear of childbirth among Polish pregnant women

The purpose of our study was to elucidate the association between obstetric and psychological factors and fear of childbirth (FOC) during the third trimester of pregnancy and to identify women at risk of severe FOC in Poland. An additional goal of the study was to verify the Polish version of the Wijma Delivery Expectancy Questionnaire (W-DEQ) and to establish its psychometric characteristics. Cross-sectional study with a total of 359 women recruited during routine visits to an antenatal clinic in Poland during the third trimester (≥ 27 weeks gestation). The survey included obstetric details (parity, obstetric history and preferred mode of delivery), and standardized psychological measures: the W-DEQ (fear of childbirth) and the EPDS (depressive symptoms). We demonstrated the satisfactory psychometric properties of the Polish version of the W-DEQ. Our findings confirm the one-factor structure found by the authors of the original version of the scale. A greater FOC was reported by women with unplanned pregnancies, women whose preferred mode of delivery was a cesarean section, and women who had previously undergone psychiatric treatment. The risk factors for severe FOC were depression, unplanned pregnancy or parity, and disagreement with the birth plan proposed by the obstetrician. The W-DEQ is a widely used, valid instrument for the assessment of FOC in pregnant women and can be used in Poland. Findings support the key role of obstetric and psychological variables in predicting fear of childbirth.

Selected predictors of maternal-fetal attachment in pregnancies with congenital disorders, other complications, and in healthy pregnancies

BACKGROUND

The mother-infant attachment begins to form during pregnancy and is important for the future development of the child. Pregnancy complications can affect this relationship. The purpose of the study was to identify predictors of maternal-fetal attachment in physiological and high-risk pregnancies.

PARTICIPANTS AND PROCEDURE

The study group included women in pregnancies with congenital disorders (n = 65) or with other pregnancy complications (n = 65). A third group included women in healthy pregnancies (n = 65). Data were collected by: the Maternal-Fetal Attachment Scale, the Questionnaire of Attachment Styles, the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, the Social Support Scale, a standardized interview, the Dependency on Intimate Partner Scale, and the Pregnancy Experiences Scale.

RESULTS

No significant differences in maternal-fetal attachment (MFA) were found between the groups. No predictors of MFA were observed for the women with a pregnancy with a congenital disorder. In the group of pregnancies with other complications, the only predictor of attachment intensity was pregnancy experience: a more negative attitude toward pregnancy was associated with lower MFA. In physiological pregnancies, MFA was found to be determined by pregnancy experience, gestational age, maternal age and dependency on one's intimate partner. MFA increased as pregnancy progressed. Younger mothers in physiological pregnancies, who have more positive pregnancy experiences and are less dependent on a partner, achieve higher levels of MFA.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of high-risk pregnancy, or its absence, does not differentiate the intensity of the emotional bond between mother and fetus. However, women with healthy pregnancies demonstrate different predictors of MFA than those with high-risk pregnancies.