The effects of bracing on sagittal spinopelvic parameters and Cobb angle in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis: A before-after clinical study

Conservative treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: the effectiveness of rigid bracing

BACKGROUND

The use of rigid braces and specialized exercises for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), is the most common non-surgical approach used to prevent curvature progression. The study aims to assess the efficacy of a rigid brace (the Chêneau brace), in conjunction with SEAS (Scientific Exercise Approach to Scoliosis), as a conservative approach to the treatment of AIS.

METHODS

The study involves a retrospective analysis of data collected prospectively from 119 patients with AIS who underwent treatment with the Chêneau brace and SEAS. Patients with AIS were eligible for treatment if they had a Cobb angle between 20° and 40° (at the time of initial treatment) and significant residual spine growth (Risser grade 0-2). It was recommended that patients wear the brace for a minimum of 22 h per day. The effectiveness of the treatment was assessed based on changes in the Cobb angle measurements. To evaluate the patients' perception of treatment outcomes, the Scoliosis Research Society-22 revised (SRS-22r) was administered before and after treatment. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors that may independently predict treatment success.

RESULTS

The use of the Chêneau brace, in combination with SEAS gymnastics, was effective for 99 patients (83.2%). Only six patients (5.1%) achieved a Cobb angle of the major curve greater than 45ο. There were no significant differences in treatment success based on the location of the curve. In the group of patients who followed the recommended wearing time for the brace and SEAS exercises, the rate of curvature progression was significantly lower than in the overall group (0% versus 16.8%, p = 0.004), and the group that partially or poorly followed the treatment protocol (0% versus 28%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The SRS-22r showed improvements in satisfaction with treatment from the start to the end of brace use, with an average score of 4.62 ± 0.54. The use of the Chêneau brace in combination with SEAS gymnastics has been shown to reduce the risk of spinal curvature progression in individuals with AIS.

Factors that influence in-brace derotation effects in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a study based on EOS imaging system

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of bracing on apical vertebral derotation and explore the factors that influence in-brace derotation effects in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients. For patients with AIS, vertebral rotation causes cosmetic appearance abnormalities and acts as an indicator for curve progression. However, there have been few studies investigating the precise derotation effects of bracing for apical vertebra. The application of EOS imaging system enables quantitative evaluation of vertebral rotation in the axial plane in a standing position.

METHODS

There were 82 eligible patients enrolled in current study, who underwent EOS imaging evaluation before and immediately after bracing. The clinical demographic data (age, gender, Risser sign and menstrual status) were recorded. The correlation analyses between derotation effects and key parameters (age, pre-brace Cobb angle, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, vertebral rotation, pelvis axial rotation and apical vertebral level) were performed. The in-brace derotation effects stratified by gender, Risser sign, apical vertebral level, menarche status, coronal balance and sagittal balance were also analyzed.

RESULTS

The rotation of apical vertebra was decreased from 8.8 ± 6.0 degrees before bracing to 3.8 ± 3.3 degrees immediately after bracing (p < 0.001), and the derotation rate was 49.2 ± 38.3%. The derotation degrees in brace was significantly correlated with major curve Cobb angle (r = 0.240, p = 0.030), minor curve Cobb angle (r = 0.256, p = 0.020) and total curve Cobb angle (r = 0.266, p = 0.016). Both the pre-brace apical vertebral rotation and apical vertebral level were significantly correlated with derotation effects in brace (p < 0.001). Patients with thoracic major curve showed worse derotation effects than those with lumbar major curve (p < 0.001). In addition, patients with coronal balance showed better in-brace derotation effects than those with coronal decompensation (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

A satisfactory apical vertebral derotation rate (approximately 50%) could be obtained immediately after bracing in AIS patients. Pre-brace Cobb angle of curve, pre-brace apical vertebral rotation, apical vertebral level and coronal balance exhibited close associations with in-brace derotation effects of apical vertebra.

Optimization of in-brace corrective force in adolescents with Lenke type 5 curve using finite element model

BACKGROUND

Pelvic parameters have been taken into consideration for the evaluation of the outcomes of bracing in AIS. To discuss the stress required to correct the pelvic deformity related to Lenke5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) by finite element analysis, and provide a reference for the shaping of the pelvic region of the brace.

METHODS

An three-dimensional (3D) corrective force on the pelvic area was defined. Computed tomography images were used to reconstruct a 3D model of Lenke5 AIS. Computer-aided engineering software Abaqus was used to implement finite element analysis. By adjusting the magnitude and position of corrective forces, coronal pelvic coronal plane rotation (PCPR) and Cobb angle (CA) of lumbar curve in the coronal plane, horizontal pelvic axial plane rotation, and apical vertebra rotation (AVR) were minimized to achieve the best effect on the spine and pelvic deformity correction. The proposed corrective conditions were divided into three groups: (1) forces applied on X-axis; (2) forces applied both in the X- and Y-axis; and (3) forces applied along the X-, Y-, and Z-axis at the same time.

RESULTS

In three groups, CA correction reduced by 31.5%, 42.5%, and 59.8%, and the PCPR changed to 12°, 13°, and 1° from 6.5°, respectively. The best groups of correction forces should simultaneously locate on the sagittal, transverse, and coronal planes of the pelvis.

CONCLUSIONS

For Lenke5 AIS, 3D correction forces can sufficiently reduce scoliosis and pelvic asymmetrical state. Force applied along the Z-axis is vital to correct the pelvic coronal pelvic tilt associated with Lenke5 AIS.

Effects of bracing on pelvic parameters in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A retrospective study

To evaluate the effects of Chêneau bracing on Cobb's angle (CA) and spinopelvic parameters in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients. In this retrospective study, we evaluated 51 AIS patients who received Chêneau bracing treatment between January 2020 and August 2021. The prebracing and in-bracing radiographs were analyzed about the spinopelvic parameters. The CA, pelvic coronal obliquity angle, thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), sagittal vertical angle, and coronal vertical angle were measured. Paired t-test was used to compare prebracing and in-bracing spinopelvic parameters. The Pearson correlation analysis was used to identify the relationships between the variations in the spinopelvic parameters. The mean age at the initiation of bracing was 13.6 ± 1.5 years. The mean prebracing CA was 24.0° ± 6.3°. There were no statistically significant differences between prebracing and in-bracing measurements of sagittal and coronal vertical angles. However, there were statistically significant differences between the prebracing and in-bracing measurements of the CA, pelvic coronal obliquity angle, TLK, LL, PT, and SS. A significant correlation was observed between PT and thoracolumbar kyphosis variations in the sagittal plane. The pelvic coronal obliquity angle variation was correlated to the prebracing pelvic coronal obliquity angle in the coronal plane. Chêneau's bracing effects of AIS can be extended to the pelvis. Affected by the Chêneau brace, the pelvis should be retro-rotated correspondingly to TLK hyperkyphosis on the sagittal plane, whereas in the coronal plane, pelvic obliquity was improved independently. The effect of Chêneau braces on the pelvic parameters should be fully considered before bracing treatment.

Does Risser Casting for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Still Have a Role in the Treatment of Curves Larger Than 40°? A Case Control Study with Bracing

Background: The most common conservative treatment for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) is bracing. However, several papers questioned the effectiveness of bracing for curves between 40° and 50° Cobb: the effectiveness in preventing curve progression could be as low as 35%. Seriate casting is considered a standard approach in early onset scoliosis; however, in the setting of AIS, cast treatment is seldom utilized, with only few studies reporting on its effectiveness. Aim of the study: The main aim of the study is to determine whether a seriate casting with Risser casts associated with bracing is more effective in preventing curve progression than bracing alone in curves larger than 40°. Furthermore, the secondary endpoints were: (1) is there a difference in effectiveness of casting between Thoracic (T) and Thoracolumbar/Lumbar (TL/L) curves? (2) Does the ‘in cast’ correction predicts the treatment outcome? (3) What is the effect on thoracic kyphosis of casting? Methods: This is a retrospective monocentric case−control study; through an Institutional Database search we identified all the patients treated at our institution between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2020, with a diagnosis of AIS, Risser grade between 0 and 4 at the beginning of the treatment, at least one curve above 40° Cobb and treatment with either seriate Risser casting and bracing (Study Group, SG) or bracing alone (Control Group, CG). Standing full spine X-rays in AP and LL are obtained before and after the cast treatment; only AP standing full spine X-rays ‘in-cast’ are obtained for each cast made. Patients were stratified according to the curve behavior at the end of treatment (Risser 5): progression was defined as ≥6° increase in the curve magnitude or fusion needed; stabilization is defined as a change in curve by ±5°; and improvement was defined as ≥6° reduction in the curve. Results: For the final analysis, 55 compliant patients (12 M, 43 F, mean age 13.5 ± 1.6) were included in the SG and 27 (4 M, 23 F, mean age 13.6 ± 1.6) in the CG. Eight (14.5%) patients in the SG failed the conservative treatment while 14 (51.3%) failed in the CG. Consequently, the Relative Risk for progression in the Efficacy Analysis was 1.8 (95% CI 1, 3−2.6, p = 0.001), and the Number Needed to Treat was 2,4. No significant difference was found between the T and TL/L curves concerning the ‘progressive’ endpoint (z-score 0.263, p = 0.79). The mean percentage of ‘in cast’ curve reduction was 40.1 ± 15.2%; no significant correlation was found between the percentage of correction and the outcome (Spearman Correlation Coefficient 0.18). Finally, no significant differences between baseline and end of FU TK were found (32° ± 16.2 vs. 29.6 ± 15.8, p = ns). Discussion: Seriate Risser casting for AIS with larger curves (>40° Cobb) is effective in reducing curve progression when compared with full time bracing alone in treatment compliant patients. The treatment is equally effective in controlling T and TL/L curves; furthermore, a slight but non-significant decrease in TK was observed in patients treated with casting. This type of treatment should be considered for AIS patients who present with large curves to potentially reduce the percentage of surgical cases. Short Abstract: The aim of the study is to determine whether seriate Risser casting associated with bracing is more effective in preventing curve progression than bracing alone in curves larger than 40°. This is a retrospective monocentric case−control study; we identified all the patients treated at our institution with a diagnosis of AIS, Risser grade 0−4 at the beginning of the treatment, at least one curve above 40° Cobb (35° if treated with bracing alone) and treatment with either seriate Risser casting and bracing (Study Group, SG) or bracing alone (Control Group, CG). Fifty-five patients (12 M, 43 F, mean age 13.5 ± 1.6) were included in the SG and 30 (5 M, 25 F, mean age 13.9 ± 1.7) in the CG. Eight (14,5%) patients in the SG failed the conservative treatment while fifteen (50%) failed in the CG. Consequently, the Relative Risk for progression in the Efficacy Analysis was 1.8 (95% CI 1.3−2.6, p = 0.001), and the Number Needed to Treat was 2,4. Seriate Risser casting for AIS with larger curves (>40°) is effective in reducing curve progression when compared with full time bracing alone. This type of treatment should be considered for AIS patients who present with large curves.