1
|
Chetwood JD, Ko Y, Pudipeddi A, Kariyawasam V, Paramsothy S, Leong RW. Biological Agents in the Treatment of Crohn's Disease: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis From the Prospective Persistence Australian National IBD Cohort (PANIC3) Study. Am J Gastroenterol 2024:00000434-990000000-00991. [PMID: 38275272 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Comparative effectiveness research provides data on the relative benefits and risks between treatments. In Crohn's disease (CD), however, there are few head-to-head studies comparing advanced therapies and none with long-term follow-up. Real-world effectiveness, defined by treatment persistence, obtained from prospective population-based patient cohorts, may help determine the best sequencing and positioning of biological agents. METHODS We analyzed the prospectively collected population-based Australian national Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme dispensing data registry (2005-2019) for CD. There is no mandated biological agent prescribing order, and all citizens and permanent residents are eligible for treatment irrespective of insurance status. Propensity score matching was performed to reduce selection bias. RESULTS There were 2,029 lines of therapy in 1,446 patients (median age 43 years, interquartile range 34-58, 44% male patients) over the 15-year period with 5,618 patient-years of follow-up. Per line of therapy, 915/2,029 (45.1%) patients used adalimumab, 722/2,029 (35.6%) used infliximab, 155/2,029 (7.6%) used vedolizumab, and 237/2,029 (11.7%) used ustekinumab. When used in biological agent-naive patients, there was no difference in persistence between any agent ( P > 0.05). Used after first line in biological agent-experienced CD, ustekinumab had significantly better persistence than non-ustekinumab biological agents ( P = 0.0018), vs anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha therapy ( P = 0.006) or vedolizumab ( P < 0.001). Ustekinumab persistence was unaffected by prior biological agent exposure ( P = 0.51). After anti-TNF use, ustekinumab had superior persistence to an alternative anti-TNF agent ( P = 0.033) and to vedolizumab ( P = 0.026). Using a propensity score-matched analysis adjusted for age, immunomodulator use, and bio-exposed status, ustekinumab had superior persistence to anti-TNF ( P = 0.01). Multivariate predictors of worse persistence were the use of a non-ustekinumab biological agent (adjusted hazard ratio 2.10, P < 0.001), and bio-experienced status (adjusted hazard ratio 1.23, P < 0.001). DISCUSSION This large national prospective database with nonhierarchical prescribing of biological agents did not identify superior persistence of any agent in bio-naive CD. However, for patients with bio-experienced CD, persistence was greater with ustekinumab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John David Chetwood
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Concord Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Yanna Ko
- Canterbury Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Aviv Pudipeddi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Concord Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Viraj Kariyawasam
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Blacktown and Mount Druitt Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Blacktown Clinical School, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Sudarshan Paramsothy
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Concord Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Gastroenterology, Macquarie University Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Rupert W Leong
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Concord Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Gastroenterology, Macquarie University Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Palomba S, Costanzi F, Nelson SM, Besharat A, Caserta D, Humaidan P. Beyond the Umbrella: A Systematic Review of the Interventions for the Prevention of and Reduction in the Incidence and Severity of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome in Patients Who Undergo In Vitro Fertilization Treatments. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:14185. [PMID: 37762488 PMCID: PMC10531768 DOI: 10.3390/ijms241814185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Revised: 09/09/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is the main severe complication of ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles. The aim of the current study was to identify the interventions for the prevention of and reduction in the incidence and severity of OHSS in patients who undergo IVF not included in systematic reviews with meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and assess and grade their efficacy and evidence base. The best available evidence for each specific intervention was identified, analyzed in terms of safety/efficacy ratio and risk of bias, and graded using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (CEBM) hierarchy of evidence. A total of 15 interventions to prevent OHSS were included in the final analysis. In the IVF population not at a high risk for OHSS, follitropin delta for ovarian stimulation may reduce the incidence of early OHSS and/or preventive interventions for early OHSS. In high-risk patients, inositol pretreatment, ovulation triggering with low doses of urinary hCG, and the luteal phase administration of a GnRH antagonist may reduce OHSS risk. In conclusion, even if not supported by systematic reviews with homogeneity of the RCTs, several treatments/strategies to reduce the incidence and severity of OHSS have been shown to be promising.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Palomba
- Unit of Gynecology, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00189 Rome, Italy; (F.C.); (A.B.); (D.C.)
| | - Flavia Costanzi
- Unit of Gynecology, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00189 Rome, Italy; (F.C.); (A.B.); (D.C.)
| | - Scott M. Nelson
- School of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK;
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol BS1 3NY, UK
- The Fertility Partnership, Oxford OX4 2HW, UK
| | - Aris Besharat
- Unit of Gynecology, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00189 Rome, Italy; (F.C.); (A.B.); (D.C.)
| | - Donatella Caserta
- Unit of Gynecology, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00189 Rome, Italy; (F.C.); (A.B.); (D.C.)
| | - Peter Humaidan
- The Fertility Clinic, Skive Regional Hospital, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark;
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Palomba S, Costanzi F, Nelson SM, Caserta D, Humaidan P. Interventions to prevent or reduce the incidence and severity of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a systematic umbrella review of the best clinical evidence. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2023; 21:67. [PMID: 37480081 PMCID: PMC10360244 DOI: 10.1186/s12958-023-01113-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a potentially life-threating iatrogenic complication of the early luteal phase and/or early pregnancy after in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. The aim of the current study was to identify the most effective methods for preventing of and reducing the incidence and severity of OHSS in IVF patients. A systematic review of systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with meta-analysis was used to assess each potential intervention (PROSPERO website, CRD 268626) and only studies with the highest quality were included in the qualitative analysis. Primary outcomes included prevention and reduction of OHSS incidence and severity. Secondary outcomes were maternal death, incidence of hospital admission, days of hospitalization, and reproductive outcomes, such as incidence of live-births, clinical pregnancies, pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy, miscarriages, and oocytes retrieved. A total of specific interventions related to OHSS were analyzed in 28 systematic reviews of RCTs with meta-analyses. The quality assessment of the included studies was high, moderate, and low for 23, 2, and 3 studies, respectively. The certainty of evidence (CoE) for interventions was reported for 37 specific situations/populations and resulted high, moderate, and low-to-very low for one, 5, and 26 cases, respectively, while it was not reported in 5 cases. Considering the effective interventions without deleterious reproductive effects, GnRH-ant co-treatment (36 RCTs; OR 0.61, 95% C 0.51 to 0.72, n = 7,944; I2 = 31%) and GnRH agonist triggering (8 RCTs; OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.47, n = 989; I2 = 42%) emerged as the most effective interventions for preventing OHSS with a moderate CoE, even though elective embryo cryopreservation exhibited a low CoE. Furthermore, the use of mild ovarian stimulation (9 RCTs; RR 0.26, CI 0.14 to 0.49, n = 1,925; I2 = 0%), and dopaminergic agonists (10 RCTs; OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.44, n = 1,202; I2 = 13%) coadministration proved effective and safe with a moderate CoE. In conclusion, the current study demonstrates that only a few interventions currently can be considered effective to reduce the incidence of OHSS and its severity with high/moderate CoE despite the numerous published studies on the topic. Further well-designed RCTs are needed, particularly for GnRH-a down-regulated IVF cycles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Palomba
- Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant'Andrea Hospital, via di Grottarossa, n. 1035/1039, Rome, 00189, Italy.
| | - Flavia Costanzi
- Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant'Andrea Hospital, via di Grottarossa, n. 1035/1039, Rome, 00189, Italy
| | - Scott M Nelson
- School of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
- NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University of Bristol, Oakfield House, Oakfield Grove, Bristol, UK
- TFP, Oxford Fertility, Institute of Reproductive Sciences, Oxford, UK
| | - Donatella Caserta
- Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant'Andrea Hospital, via di Grottarossa, n. 1035/1039, Rome, 00189, Italy
| | - Peter Humaidan
- The Fertility Clinic, Faculty of Health, Skive Regional Hospital, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jost ST, Kaldenbach MA, Antonini A, Martinez-Martin P, Timmermann L, Odin P, Katzenschlager R, Borgohain R, Fasano A, Stocchi F, Hattori N, Kukkle PL, Rodríguez-Violante M, Falup-Pecurariu C, Schade S, Petry-Schmelzer JN, Metta V, Weintraub D, Deuschl G, Espay AJ, Tan EK, Bhidayasiri R, Fung VSC, Cardoso F, Trenkwalder C, Jenner P, Ray Chaudhuri K, Dafsari HS. Levodopa Dose Equivalency in Parkinson's Disease: Updated Systematic Review and Proposals. Mov Disord 2023. [PMID: 37147135 DOI: 10.1002/mds.29410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2022] [Revised: 03/07/2023] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 05/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To compare drug regimens across clinical trials in Parkinson's disease (PD) conversion formulae between antiparkinsonian drugs have been developed. These are reported in relation to levodopa as the benchmark drug in PD pharmacotherapy as 'levodopa equivalent dose' (LED). Currently, the LED conversion formulae proposed in 2010 by Tomlinson et al. based on a systematic review are predominantly used. However, new drugs with established and novel mechanisms of action and novel formulations of longstanding drugs have been developed since 2010. Therefore, consensus proposals for updated LED conversion formulae are needed. OBJECTIVES To update LED conversion formulae based on a systematic review. METHODS The MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and Embase databases were searched from January 2010 to July 2021. Additionally, in a standardized process according to the GRADE grid method, consensus proposals were issued for drugs with scarce data on levodopa dose equivalency. RESULTS The systematic database search yielded 3076 articles of which 682 were eligible for inclusion in the systematic review. Based on these data and the standardized consensus process, we present proposals for LED conversion formulae for a wide range of drugs that are currently available for the pharmacotherapy of PD or are expected to be introduced soon. CONCLUSIONS The LED conversion formulae issued in this Position Paper will serve as a research tool to compare the equivalence of antiparkinsonian medication across PD study cohorts and facilitate research on the clinical efficacy of pharmacological and surgical treatments as well as other non-pharmacological interventions in PD. © 2023 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie T Jost
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Marie-Ann Kaldenbach
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Angelo Antonini
- Parkinson and Movement Disorders Unit, Department of Neurosciences (DNS), University of Padua, Padova, Italy
| | - Pablo Martinez-Martin
- Center for Networked Biomedical Research in Neurodegenerative Diseases (CIBERNED), Carlos III Institute of Health, Madrid, Spain
| | - Lars Timmermann
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Per Odin
- Division of Neurology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Neurology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Regina Katzenschlager
- Department of Neurology, Karl Landsteiner Institute for Neuroimmunological and Neurodegenerative Disorders at Klinik Donaustadt, Vienna, Austria
| | - Rupam Borgohain
- Department of Neurology, Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, India
| | - Alfonso Fasano
- Edmond J. Safra Program in Parkinson's Disease, Morton and Gloria Shulman Movement Disorders Clinic, Toronto Western Hospital-University Health Network (UHN), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Neurology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Krembil Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Parkinson's Disease & Movement Disorders Rehabilitation, Moriggia-Pelascini Hospital-Gravedona ed Uniti, Como, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Stocchi
- University and Institute for Research and Medical Care IRCCS San Raffaele, Rome, Italy
| | - Nobutaka Hattori
- Department of Neurology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Prashanth Lingappa Kukkle
- Center for Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders, Manipal Hospital, Bangalore, India
- Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders Clinic, Bangalore, India
| | - Mayela Rodríguez-Violante
- Insituto Nacional de Neurologia y Neurocirugia, Movement Disorders Clinic, Mexico City, Mexico
- Movement Disorder Clinic, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Cristian Falup-Pecurariu
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Transilvania University of Brașov, Brașov, Romania
- Department of Neurology, County Emergency Clinic Hospital, Brașov, Romania
| | - Sebastian Schade
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Jan Niklas Petry-Schmelzer
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Vinod Metta
- Parkinson Foundation International Centre of Excellence, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel Weintraub
- Departments of Psychiatry and Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Parkinson's Disease Research, Education and Clinical Center (PADRECC), Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Guenther Deuschl
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Alberto J Espay
- University of Cincinnati Gardner Neuroscience Institute, Gardner Family Center for Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders, Department of Neurology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Eng-King Tan
- Department of Neurology, National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
- Neuroscience and Behavioral Disorders (NBD) Department, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Roongroj Bhidayasiri
- Chulalongkorn Centre of Excellence for Parkinson's Disease & Related Disorders, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
- The Academy of Science, The Royal Society of Thailand, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Victor S C Fung
- Movement Disorder Unit, Department of Neurology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia
| | - Francisco Cardoso
- Movement Disorders Unit, Internal Medicine Department, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | - Claudia Trenkwalder
- Paracelsus-Elena-Klinik, Kassel, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Peter Jenner
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - K Ray Chaudhuri
- Department of Neurology, County Emergency Clinic Hospital, Brașov, Romania
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
- NIHR Mental Health Biomedical Research Centre and Dementia Biomedical Research Unit, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Haidar S Dafsari
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|