The norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor reboxetine alone reduces obstructive sleep apnea severity: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized crossover trial

Effects of the antipsychotic quetiapine on sleep and breathing: a review of clinical findings and potential mechanisms

Quetiapine is an antipsychotic medication indicated for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. However, quetiapine also has hypnotic properties and as such is increasingly being prescribed at low doses 'off-label' in people with insomnia symptoms. Pharmacologically, in addition to its dopaminergic properties, quetiapine also modulates multiple other transmitter systems involved in sleep/wake modulation and potentially breathing. However, very little is known about the impact of quetiapine on obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), OSA endotypes including chemosensitivity, and control of breathing. Given that many people with insomnia also have undiagnosed OSA, it is important to understand the effects of quetiapine on OSA and its mechanisms. Accordingly, this concise review covers the existing knowledge on the effects of quetiapine on sleep and breathing. Further, we highlight the pharmacodynamics of quetiapine and its potential to alter key OSA endotypes to provide potential mechanistic insight. Finally, an agenda for future research priorities is proposed to fill the current key knowledge gaps.

Case-control study of heart rate variability and sleep apnea in childhood sickle cell disease

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is common in sickle cell disease (SCD) despite the absence of overweight, suggesting a specific pathophysiology. We previously showed that otherwise healthy children with increased pharyngeal compliance, a main endotype of OSA, exhibited decreased sympathetic modulation. Our objective was to assess whether modifications of heart rate variability (HRV) and compliance are associated in SCD. Cases (children with SCD, African or Caribbean ethnicity) and controls (otherwise healthy children, same ethnicity), aged 4-18 years, were selected from our database of children referred for OSA and matched for sex, age, and obstructive apnea-hypopnoea index (OAHI) score. The children underwent polysomnography and acoustic pharyngometry (to compute compliance). HRV analyses were performed from 5 min ECG recordings in wakeful, NREM, and REM sleep states and from the whole night. Twenty-one pairs were analysed (median age 10.5 years, 24 girls). Children with SCD had lower BMI z-scores and more tonsil hypertrophy than control children. Children with SCD and OSA (OAHI ≥2/hour) were characterised by lower compliance than children with SCD without OSA. An inverse relationship between compliance and SD2 (HRV from whole night, inversely related to sympathetic modulation) was evidenced (negative relationship in SCD: R = -0.63, p = 0.002 vs. positive relationship in controls R = 0.59, p = 0.006). In conclusion, while the decrease in sympathetic modulation in control children may contribute to increasing pharyngeal compliance, its decrease seems protective in children with sickle cell disease, which underlines the specificity of OSAS pathophysiology in SCD that could be due to sickle cell disease related smooth muscle dystonia.

Pharmacological treatment for obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Summarize the evidence on drug therapies for obstructive sleep apnea.

METHODS

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, SciELO, LILACS, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched on February 17th, 2023. A search strategy retrieved randomized clinical trials comparing the Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) in pharmacotherapies. Studies were selected and data was extracted by two authors independently. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. RevMan 5.4. was used for data synthesis.

RESULTS

4930 articles were obtained, 68 met inclusion criteria, and 29 studies (involving 11 drugs) were combined in a meta-analysis. Atomoxetine plus oxybutynin vs placebo in AHI mean difference of -7.71 (-10.59, -4.83) [Fixed, 95 % CI, I2 = 50 %, overall effect: Z = 5.25, p < 0.001]. Donepezil vs placebo in AHI mean difference of -8.56 (-15.78, -1.33) [Fixed, 95 % CI, I2 = 21 %, overall effect: Z = 2.32, p = 0.02]. Sodium oxybate vs placebo in AHI mean difference of -5.50 (-9.28, -1.73) [Fixed, 95 % CI, I2 = 32 %, overall effect: Z = 2.86, p = 0.004]. Trazodone vs placebo in AHI mean difference of -12.75 (-21.30, -4.19) [Fixed, 95 % CI, I2 = 0 %, overall effect: Z = 2.92, p = 0.003].

CONCLUSION

The combination of noradrenergic and antimuscarinic drugs shows promising results. Identifying endotypes may be the key to future drug therapies for obstructive sleep apnea. Moreover, studies with longer follow-up assessing the safety and sustained effects of these treatments are needed.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022362639.

The Combination of Aroxybutynin and Atomoxetine in the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea (MARIPOSA): A Randomized Controlled Trial

Rationale: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common sleep disorder for which the principal treatment option, continuous positive airway pressure, is often poorly tolerated. There is currently no approved pharmacotherapy for OSA. However, recent studies have demonstrated improvement in OSA with combined antimuscarinic and noradrenergic drugs. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of AD109, a combination of the novel antimuscarinic agent aroxybutynin and the norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor atomoxetine, in the treatment of OSA. Methods: Phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, 4-week trial comparing AD109 2.5/75 mg, AD109 5/75 mg, atomoxetine 75 mg alone, and placebo (www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT05071612). Measurements and Main Results: Of 211 randomized patients, 181 were included in the prespecified efficacy analyses. Sleep was assessed by two baseline and two treatment polysomnograms. Apnea-hypopnea index with a 4% desaturation criterion (primary outcome) was reduced from a median (IQR) of 20.5 (12.3-27.2) to 10.8 (5.6-18.5) in the AD109 2.5/75 mg arm (-47.1%), from 19.4 (13.7-26.4) to 9.5 (6.1-19.3) in the AD109 5/75 mg arm (-42.9%; both P < 0.0001 vs. placebo), and from 19.0 (11.8-28.8) to 11.8 (5.5-21.5) with atomoxetine alone (-38.8%; P < 0.01 vs. placebo). Apnea-hypopnea index with a 4% desaturation criterion decreased from 20.1 (11.9-25.9) to 16.3 (11.1-28.9) in the placebo arm. Subjectively, there was improvement in fatigue with AD109 2.5/75 mg (P < 0.05 vs. placebo and atomoxetine). Atomoxetine taken alone decreased total sleep time (P < 0.05 vs. AD109 and placebo). The most common adverse events were dry mouth, insomnia, and urinary hesitancy. Conclusions: AD109 showed clinically meaningful improvement in OSA, suggesting that further development of the compound is warranted. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05071612).

Pharmacological management of co-morbid obstructive sleep apnoea and insomnia

INTRODUCTION

Clinical presentation of both insomnia and obstructive sleep apnea (COMISA) is common. Approximately 30% of clinical cohorts with OSA have insomnia symptoms and vice versa. The underlying pathophysiology of COMISA is multifactorial. This poses a complex clinical challenge. Currently, there are no clinical guidelines or recommendations outside of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBTi). Clinically translatable precision medicine approaches to characterize individual causes or endotypes may help optimize future pharmacological management of COMISA.

AREAS COVERED

This review article provides an up-to-date account of COMISA and its consequences, the underlying pathophysiology of sleep apnea, insomnia and COMISA, current treatment approaches and limitations, pharmacotherapy targets and future priorities.

EXPERT OPINION

There are multiple promising emerging therapies, but clinical trial data specifically in COMISA populations are lacking. This is a priority for future investigation to inform development of evidence-based guidelines. Pharmacotherapies, particularly for insomnia, do not target the underlying causes of the disorder thus, are indicated for short-term use only and should remain second line. Future multidisciplinary research should be directed toward the multifactorial nature of COMISA and the challenges of adapting COMISA treatment in clinical practice and overcoming the practical barriers that health-care providers and consumers encounter.

Targets for obstructive sleep apnea pharmacotherapy: principles, approaches, and emerging strategies

INTRODUCTION

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common and serious breathing disorder. Several pathophysiological factors predispose individuals to OSA. These factors are quantifiable, and modifiable pharmacologically.

AREAS COVERED

Four key pharmacotherapeutic targets are identified and mapped to the major determinants of OSA pathophysiology. PubMed and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched through April 2023.

EXPERT OPINION

Target #1: Pharyngeal Motor Effectors. Increasing pharyngeal muscle activity and responsivity with noradrenergic-antimuscarinic combination is central to recent breakthrough OSA pharmacotherapy. Assumptions, knowledge gaps, future directions, and other targets are identified. #2: Upper Airway Sensory Afferents. There is translational potential of sensitizing and amplifying reflex pharyngeal dilator muscle responses to negative airway pressure via intranasal delivery of new potassium channel blockers. Rationales, advantages, findings, and potential strategies to enhance effectiveness are identified. #3: Chemosensory Afferents and Ventilatory Control. Strategies to manipulate ventilatory control system sensitivity by carbonic anhydrase inhibitors are supported in theory and initial studies. Intranasal delivery of agents to stimulate central respiratory activity are also introduced. #4: Sleep-Wake Mechanisms. Arousability is the fourth therapeutic target rationalized. Evolving automated tools to measure key pathophysiological factors predisposing to OSA will accelerate pharmacotherapy. Although not currently ready for general clinical settings, the identified targets are of future promise.

Pharmacotherapy for obstructive sleep apnea: targeting specific pathophysiological traits

INTRODUCTION

The pathophysiology of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is multi-factorial and complex. Varying OSA's pathophysiological traits have been identified, including pharyngeal collapsibility, upper airway muscle reactivity, arousal threshold, and regulation of the ventilatory drive. Being CPAP of difficult tolerance and other interventions reserved to specific subpopulations new pharmacological treatments for OSA might be resolutive.

AREAS COVERED

Several existing and newly developed pharmacological drugs can impact one or more endotypes and could therefore be proposed as treatment options for sleep disordered breathing. With this review we will explore different pathophysiological traits as new targets for OSA therapy. This review will summarize the most promising pharmacological treatment for OSA accordingly with their mechanisms of action on upper airway collapsibility, muscle responsiveness, arousal threshold, and loop gain.

EXPERT OPINION

Only understanding the pathophysiological traits causing OSA in each patient and placing the disease in the framework of patient comorbidities, we will be able to evolve interventions toward OSA. The development of new drug's combinations will permit different approaches and different choices beside conventional treatments. In the next future, we hope that sleep specialists will select the treatment for a specific patient on the base of its pathophysiology, defining a precision medicine for OSA.

Is obstructive sleep apnea a circadian rhythm disorder?

Obstructive sleep apnea is the most common sleep-related breathing disorder worldwide and remains underdiagnosed. Its multiple associated comorbidities contribute to a decreased quality of life and work performance as well as an increased risk of death. Standard treatment seems to have limited effects on cardiovascular and metabolic aspects of the disease, emphasising the need for early diagnosis and additional therapeutic approaches. Recent evidence suggests that the dysregulation of circadian rhythms, processes with endogenous rhythmicity that are adjusted to the environment through various cues, is involved in the pathogenesis of comorbidities. In patients with obstructive sleep apnea, altered circadian gene expression patterns have been demonstrated. Obstructive respiratory events may promote circadian dysregulation through the effects of sleep disturbance and intermittent hypoxia, with subsequent inflammation and disruption of neural and hormonal homeostasis. In this review, current knowledge on obstructive sleep apnea, circadian rhythm regulation, and circadian rhythm sleep disorders is summarised. Studies that connect obstructive sleep apnea to circadian rhythm abnormalities are critically evaluated. Furthermore, pathogenetic mechanisms that may underlie this association, most notably hypoxia signalling, are presented. A bidirectional relationship between obstructive sleep apnea and circadian rhythm dysregulation is proposed. Approaching obstructive sleep apnea as a circadian rhythm disorder may prove beneficial for the development of new, personalised diagnostic, therapeutic and prognostic tools. However, further studies are needed before the clinical approach to obstructive sleep apnea includes targeting the circadian system.