Influence of a Post-Test Factor on the Results of the Multiple Sleep Latency Test

Rapid eye movement sleep duration during the multiple sleep latency test to diagnose hypocretin-deficient narcolepsy

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To assess the performances of alternative measures of the multiple sleep latency test (MSLT) to identify hypocretin-deficiency in patients with a complaint of hypersomnolence, including patients with narcolepsy.

METHODS

MSLT parameters from 374 drug-free patients with hypersomnolence, with complete clinical and polysomnographic (PSG) assessment and cerebrospinal hypocretin-1 measurement were collected. Conventional (sleep latency, number of sleep onset REM-SOREM-periods) and alternative (sleep duration, REM sleep latency and duration, sleep stage transitions) MSLT measures were compared as function of hypocretin-1 levels (≤110 vs > 110 pg/mL). We performed receiver-operating characteristics analyses to determine the best thresholds of MSLT parameters to identify hypocretin-deficiency in the global population and in subgroups of patients with narcolepsy (i.e. typical cataplexy and/or positive PSG/MSLT criteria, n = 223).

RESULTS

Patients with hypocretin-deficiency had shorter mean sleep and REM sleep latencies, longer mean sleep and REM sleep durations and more direct REM sleep transitions during the MSLT. The current standards of MSLT/PSG criteria identified hypocretin-deficient patients with a sensitivity of 0.87 and a specificity of 0.69, and 0.81/0.99 when combined with cataplexy. A mean REM sleep duration ≥ 4.1 min best identified hypocretin-deficiency in patients with hypersomnolence (AUC = 0.932, sensitivity 0.87, specificity 0.86) and ≥ 5.7 min in patients with narcolepsy (AUC = 0.832, sensitivity 0.77, specificity 0.82).

CONCLUSION

Compared to the current neurophysiological standard criteria, alternative MSLT parameters would better identify hypocretin-deficiency among patients with hypersomnolence and those with narcolepsy. We highlighted daytime REM sleep duration as a relevant neurophysiological biomarker of hypocretin-deficiency to be used in clinical and research settings.

Multiple Sleep Latency Test: when are 4 naps enough?

STUDY OBJECTIVES

The Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT) is central to the diagnosis of narcolepsy and idiopathic hypersomnia. This study is the first to assess the impact of a 5-nap protocol on meeting MSLT-derived diagnostic criteria in a general cohort referred for MSLT, without selection bias.

METHODS

Data for all MSLTs performed at 2 tertiary sleep units in Australia between May 2012 and May 2018 were retrospectively assessed for the impact of the fifth nap on mean sleep latency (MSL) and sleep onset rapid eye movement periods.

RESULTS

There were 122 MSLTs included. The MSL was 8.7 ± 5.1 minutes after 4 naps, compared with 9.2 ± 5.2 minutes for 5 naps (P < .0001). In 8 cases, inclusion of the fifth nap changed the MSL to a value above the diagnostic threshold of 8 minutes. There were no instances in which the MSL moved to ≤ 8 minutes based on fifth nap data. A sleep onset rapid eye movement period occurred in the fifth nap in 9 patients and altered the interpretation in 2 cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The fifth nap in an MSLT is associated with an increased MSL, although this difference is rarely clinically significant. In patients with borderline MSL or 1 sleep onset rapid eye movement period after 4 naps, a fifth nap can alter the outcome and should be performed. However, for many cases, a 4-nap MSLT protocol will suffice, potentially allowing resource savings without compromising diagnostic accuracy. We propose the adoption of a conditional 4-nap or 5-nap protocol based on specific criteria.