The Effect of Sleeping Environment and Sleeping Location Change on Positive Airway Pressure Adherence

Correlation between positive airway pressure and medication adherence: the healthy user effect

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Despite the efficacy of positive airway pressure (PAP) for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea, adherence remains challenging and negatively affects assessments of effectiveness. It is unclear whether low adherence is due to intolerance of PAP or whether this reflects overall adherence with medical therapy. We sought to correlate PAP use with medication adherence to determine whether poor adherence with PAP was specific to this treatment or represented global compliance with medical therapy.

METHODS

A total of 600 consecutive patients with obstructive sleep apnea were treated with PAP. Objective measures of PAP use were correlated with medication adherence. We included all chronically used medications, defined as medications used daily for at least 90 days prior to PAP initiation. Medication use was verified using an electronic health record. PAP adherence ("regular use") was defined as PAP use for ≥ 4 hours/night on ≥ 70% of nights. Medication adherence was defined as > 70% of pills taken as prescribed.

RESULTS

Complete records were available for 566 patients; 361 (63.8%) used chronic medications. The cohort was primarily men (90.3%, age 44.6 ± 10.2 years) with moderate obstructive sleep apnea (apnea-hypopnea index, 18.1 ± 13.9 events/h). In patients on chronic medications, PAP was used 55.8% of nights and 37.7% were regular users. Patients who were adherent with medications used PAP more hours/night (5.4 vs 4.6, P < .001) and were more likely to have regular PAP use compared with those nonadherent with medications (P = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence with PAP correlated with adherence to chronic medications. Low PAP adherence may reflect an individual's global adherence to medical care. This association may lead to better identification of patients who benefit from targeted therapy to improve overall health care adherence.

CITATION

Lettieri MJ, Warren WA, Walter RJ, Lettieri CJ. Correlation between positive airway pressure and medication adherence: the healthy user effect. J Clin Sleep Med. 2024;20(7):1087-1092.

International Consensus Statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea

BACKGROUND

Evaluation and interpretation of the literature on obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) allows for consolidation and determination of the key factors important for clinical management of the adult OSA patient. Toward this goal, an international collaborative of multidisciplinary experts in sleep apnea evaluation and treatment have produced the International Consensus statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea (ICS:OSA).

METHODS

Using previously defined methodology, focal topics in OSA were assigned as literature review (LR), evidence-based review (EBR), or evidence-based review with recommendations (EBR-R) formats. Each topic incorporated the available and relevant evidence which was summarized and graded on study quality. Each topic and section underwent iterative review and the ICS:OSA was created and reviewed by all authors for consensus.

RESULTS

The ICS:OSA addresses OSA syndrome definitions, pathophysiology, epidemiology, risk factors for disease, screening methods, diagnostic testing types, multiple treatment modalities, and effects of OSA treatment on multiple OSA-associated comorbidities. Specific focus on outcomes with positive airway pressure (PAP) and surgical treatments were evaluated.

CONCLUSION

This review of the literature consolidates the available knowledge and identifies the limitations of the current evidence on OSA. This effort aims to create a resource for OSA evidence-based practice and identify future research needs. Knowledge gaps and research opportunities include improving the metrics of OSA disease, determining the optimal OSA screening paradigms, developing strategies for PAP adherence and longitudinal care, enhancing selection of PAP alternatives and surgery, understanding health risk outcomes, and translating evidence into individualized approaches to therapy.

Moving toward Equitable Care for Sleep Apnea in the United States: Positive Airway Pressure Adherence Thresholds: An Official American Thoracic Society Policy Statement

Background: Positive airway pressure (PAP) is a highly effective treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), but adherence limits its efficacy. In addition, coverage of PAP by CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) and other insurers in the United States depends on adherence. This leaves many beneficiaries without PAP, disproportionally impacting non-white and low socioeconomic position patients with OSA and exacerbating sleep health disparities. Methods: An inter-professional, multidisciplinary, international committee with various stakeholders was formed. Three working groups (the historical policy origins, impact of current policy, and international PAP coverage models) met and performed literature reviews and discussions. Using surveys and an iterative discussion-based consensus process, the policy statement recommendations were created. Results: In this position paper, we advocate for policy change to CMS PAP coverage requirements to reduce inequities and align with patient-centered goals. We specifically call for eradicating repeat polysomnography, eliminating the 4-hour rule, and focusing on patient-oriented outcomes such as improved sleepiness and sleep quality. Conclusions: Modifications to the current policies for PAP insurance coverage could improve health disparities.

Racial Differences in Positive Airway Pressure Adherence in the Treatment of Sleep Apnea

Although data are limited, studies suggest on average lower positive airway pressure use in Black, indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC) compared with Whites in most but not all studies. Most of these observational studies are certainly limited by confounding by socioeconomic status and other unmeasured factors that likely contribute to differences. The etiology of these observed disparities is likely multifactorial, due in part to financial limitations, differences in sleep opportunity, poor sleep quality due to environmental disruptions, and so forth. These disparities in sleep health are likely related to chronic inequities, including experiences of racism, neighborhood features, structural, and contextual factors. Dedicated studies focusing on understanding adherence in BIPOC are lacking. Further research is needed to understand determinants of PAP use in BIPOC subjects and identify feasible interventions to improve sleep health and reduce sleep apnea treatment disparities.

Socioeconomic status impacts blood pressure response to positive airway pressure treatment

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Positive airway pressure (PAP) treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) reduces blood pressure (BP). Retrospective data suggest that African Americans (AA), a group at high-risk for hypertensive organ dysfunction, may have a greater BP response to PAP therapy than European Americans (EA). We examined the difference in 24-hour BP response to three months of PAP treatment between AA and EA.

METHODS

Participants (N=259, 161 AA and 98 EA) with apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥15/hour from two prospective cohorts were included. T-tests and multiple linear regression were used to examine BP outcomes in AA vs. EA, adjusting for PAP adherence, socioeconomic status (SES), and baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

Participants were middle-aged (mean ± standard deviation, 53.8±9.3 years), 86% (227) men, AHI 35.6±19.2/hour, and PAP adherence of 3.36±2.24 hours/day. The reductions in 24-hour systolic and diastolic BP (mm Hg) were not different in AA vs. EA (systolic=-1.13±12.1 vs. -0.61±12.8, p=0.80 and diastolic=-0.74±7.9 vs. -0.80±7.4, p=0.96), and race was not a predictor of 24-hour systolic or diastolic BP reduction (p=0.75 and 0.54). SES and PAP adherence demonstrated a significant interaction; low SES was associated with an increase in 24-hour systolic BP (β=19.3, p=0.03) in the absence of PAP use but a greater reduction in 24-hour systolic BP with higher PAP adherence (β=-3.96, p=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

24-hour BP response to PAP treatment is similar in AA and EA. Adherence to PAP treatment is more effective in improving 24-hour systolic BP in those with low SES.

The study was a clinical trial. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT01960465 and NCT01578031.

Neighborhoods with Greater Prevalence of Minority Residents Have Lower Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Adherence

Rationale: Limited data suggest racial disparities in continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) adherence exist.Objectives: To assess whether CPAP adherence varies by neighborhood racial composition at a national scale.Methods: Telemonitoring data from a CPAP manufacturer database were used to assess adherence in adult patients initiating CPAP therapy between November 2015 and October 2018. Mapping ZIP code to ZIP code tabulation areas, age- and sex-adjusted CPAP adherence data at a neighborhood level was computed as a function of neighborhood racial composition. Secondary analyses adjusted for neighborhood education and poverty.Measurements and Main Results: Among 787,236 patients living in 26,180 ZIP code tabulation areas, the prevalence of CPAP adherence was 1.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0-1.6%) lower in neighborhoods with high (⩾25%) versus low (<1%) percentages of Black residents and 1.2% (95% CI, 0.9-1.5%) lower in neighborhoods with high versus low percentages of Hispanic residents (P < 0.001 for both), even after adjusting for neighborhood differences in poverty and education. Mean CPAP usage was similar across neighborhoods for the first 2 days, but by 90 days, differences in CPAP usage increased to 22 minutes (95% CI, 18-27 min) between neighborhoods with high versus low percentages of Black residents and 22 minutes (95% CI 17-27 min) between neighborhoods with high versus low percentages of Hispanic residents (P < 0.001 for both).Conclusions: CPAP adherence is lower in neighborhoods with greater proportions of Black and Hispanic residents, independent of education or poverty. These differences lead to a lower likelihood of meeting insurance coverage requirements for CPAP therapy, potentially exacerbating sleep health disparities.

Socioeconomic Disparities in Positive Airway Pressure Adherence: An Integrative Review

Nonadherence with positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy impedes the effectiveness of treatment and increases risk of mortality. Disparities in PAP adherence as a function of socioeconomic status (SES) are not well understood. A literature search identified 16 original publications meeting inclusion criteria that described effects of SES factors on objective PAP adherence; 69% of these articles found evidence of lower adherence as a function of SES. This integrative review provides a structured summary of the findings, highlights factors that may contribute to disparities among adult PAP users, and identifies future directions to improve equity in the management of OSA.

Acceptance of and six-month adherence to continuous positive airway pressure in patients with moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea

BACKGROUND

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the most effective treatment for moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Acceptance of and adherence to CPAP are crucial for optimal treatment outcomes. The aim of this study was to investigate the factors influencing patients' acceptance of and adherence to CPAP treatment.

METHODS

One hundred eighty-eight patients with moderate to severe OSA who had received CPAP titration from October 2017 to September 2018 were recruited. They were interviewed at 2 weeks and at 6 months to assess CPAP use and barriers to acceptance and adherence.

RESULTS

One hundred fourteen patients (60.6%) accepted CPAP treatment. Disease severity, assessed by apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) (odds ratio [OR], 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.08), subjective satisfaction of titration (OR, 12.83; 95% CI, 3.83-42.99), initial intention of CPAP therapy (OR, 3.33; 95% CI, 1.05-10.51) and short-term home CPAP trial (OR, 9.40; 95% CI, 2.85-31.08) were associated with acceptance of CPAP treatment. Two-third of the 98 CPAP acceptors reported good CPAP adherence at 6 months follow-up. Average hours of CPAP use per day for the first 2 weeks (OR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.28-3.04) and the global problems associated with CPAP use (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.73-0.91) were independent predictors of the six-month CPAP adherence.

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly 40% of patients with moderate to severe OSA did not accept CPAP treatment, and one-third of those CPAP acceptors had poor adherence to CPAP treatment. Improvement in disease awareness, comfortable titration experience, short-term home CPAP trial may be of help to increase CPAP acceptance and early experience with CPAP is important for long-term adherence. The differences in predicting factors for CPAP acceptance and adherence highlight the importance of focusing on specific aspects during the whole process management of OSA.

A survey of positive airway pressure therapy preparedness and outcomes following Hurricane Irma in patients with obstructive sleep apnea

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Clinical benefit from positive pressure therapy is dependent on treatment adherence. Extreme weather events, such as floods, hurricanes, and tornadoes, can contribute to nonadherence by electricity loss and mandatory evacuation. We aimed to evaluate the concerns and behaviors of regular positive airway pressure users surrounding the extreme weather event Hurricane Irma.

METHODS

A questionnaire on positive pressure concerns surrounding Hurricane Irma was completed by 117 patients with pre-hurricane objectively confirmed treatment adherence as defined by Medicare. Responses were tabulated to identify concerns and behavior in preparation for and after Hurricane Irma. Cloud-based monitoring, available on 50 (43%) cases, was used to determine the effect of self-reported electricity loss on treatment adherence before and after the storm. Quantitative use data pre- and post-Hurricane Irma was compared by t test with P < .05 considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Post-hurricane 78 (67%) patients were unable to use treatment with mean duration of 4.3 days. Of these, snoring, choking, and sleepiness were reported in 64%, 19%, and 42%, respectively. Loss of electricity was identified as the cause of missed treatment in 71 patients. In those with cloud monitoring, mean 14-day pre- and post-hurricane use differed by 8 minutes (P =.056). Cloud-monitored cases with loss of electricity had a decline in mean use of 33 minutes for the first 7 days post-hurricane. There was a trend towards increased use post-hurricane in those that retained electricity. Many patients expressed dissatisfaction with the availability of preparedness guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

Although common, loss of electricity was not the sole disruptor of positive pressure use after extreme weather events. Regular users of positive airway pressure experience both disruption in patterns of use and concerns regarding preparedness for extreme weather events.