Creating a Film to Teach Health Professions Students the Importance of Interprofessional Collaboration

Longitudinal Assessment of Pharmacy Students' Collaborative Practice Abilities

OBJECTIVE

Interprofessional education (IPE) varies across schools/colleges of pharmacy. Long-term impact of IPE on interprofessional collaborative competencies remains uncertain despite available data on singular experiences. This study aimed to evaluate changes in pharmacy students' collaborative abilities over the second and third professional years (PYs).

METHODS

Students completed the Interprofessional Collaborative Competency Attainment Scale - Revised (ICCAS-R) after 2 large-scale interprofessional forums that occurred approximately 8 months apart. Four cohorts of students were used to examine the longitudinal change in collaborative abilities: cohort 1 (2019), cohort 2 (2020), cohort 3 (2021) and cohort 4 (2022). The ICCAS-R was used to capture data from 4 timepoints for each student in each cohort: prior to the Spring Forum in PY2 (T1), after the Spring Forum in PY2 (T2), prior to the Fall Forum in PY3 (T3), and after the Fall Forum in PY3 (T4). Using repeated measures analysis of variance, 4 total mean scores (T1 = pre1, T2 = post1, T3 = pre2, T4 = post2) were compared.

RESULTS

Four cohorts (N = 414) completed the interprofessional forums and 336 (81%) completed the ICCAS-R instrument and were included. In each cohort, total mean scores increased T1 to T2 and T3 to T4, indicating an increase in self-assessed abilities pre/post-forum. Total mean scores decreased between T2 and T3, indicating that collaborative abilities decreased during the period between interprofessional forums.

CONCLUSION

While students' collaborative abilities increased around the time of the forum experiences, these changes decreased in between experiences. These findings suggest that interprofessional competencies should be reinforced at multiple time points to support enduring effects.

Effects of student-led drama on nursing students' attitudes to interprofessional working and nursing advocacy: A pre-test post-test educational intervention study

BACKGROUND

Nursing educators need to equip students to work in interprofessional teams and advocate for patients in increasingly integrated health and social care settings. Drama-based education has been used in nursing to help students understand complex concepts and practices, including communication, empathy, and patient safety. However, few studies have evaluated drama-based education to promote understanding of interprofessional care and advocacy, and none have involved student-led drama where students create dramatic performances to support learning.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the effects of student-led drama on student nurses' attitudes to interprofessional working and advocacy.

DESIGN

Pre-test post-test educational intervention study.

SETTINGS

Public university in Scotland.

PARTICIPANTS

400 undergraduate student nurses enrolled on a 15-week module focussed on health and social care integration and interprofessional working.

METHODS

Students completed paper questionnaires at the start (n = 274, response rate: 80.1 %) and end (n = 175, 63.9 %) of the module. Outcome measures were the validated Attitudes Towards Healthcare Teams Scale (ATHCTS) and Protective Nursing Advocacy Scale (PNAS). Change in mean ATHCTS and PNAS scores were assessed using paired samples t-tests, with Cohen's d to estimate effect size.

RESULTS

ATHCTS scores significantly increased from 3.87 to 4.19 (p < 0.001, d = 0.52). PNAS scores increased from 3.58 to 3.81 (p < 0.001, d = 0.79), with significant improvements in the 'acting as an advocate' (4.18 to 4.51, p < 0.001, d = 0.81) and 'environmental and educational influences' subscales (3.79 to 4.13, p < 0.001, d = 0.75). Statements focussed on promoting holistic, dignified care and enabling health professionals to be responsive to emotional and financial needs of patients, showed greatest change.

CONCLUSIONS

Education based on plays created and performed by student nurses led to significant improvements in student nurses' attitudes towards interprofessional working and nursing advocacy. Student-led drama should be embedded in nursing curricula to enable students to understand the realities and complexities of health and social care integration and interprofessional working.

Validation of the Interprofessional Collaborative Competency Attainment Survey (ICCAS) retrospective pre-test measures

Establishing the effectiveness of IPE experiences is essential, and current assessment measures may be subject to various types of bias. The Interprofessional Collaborative Competency Attainment Survey (ICCAS) is administered after the learning experience as retrospective pretest and posttest measures of perceived collaborative practice skills. Because the ICCAS does not have an actual pretest, there are potential risks of recall bias and social desirability bias. To address these concerns, Jackson (2017) proposed conducting a true ICCAS pretest before the learning experience and examining the differences between the true and retrospective pretest scores and the differences between these pretest and posttest scores. This study design was implemented for two in-person Interprofessional forums conducted in the Fall (N = 745) and following Spring (N = 599) semesters. Students from 11 (Fall) and 12 (Spring) health professions education programs were included. True ICCAS pretest scores did not significantly differ from the retrospective pretest scores in either sample, although the effect sizes for pretest to posttest gains were slightly smaller for the true pretest scores. These results support and provide confidence for using the standard ICCAS administration methodology by demonstrating the administration methodology is not adversely impacted by recall or social desirability biases.

Improving breast cancer nurses' management of challenging situations involving family carers: Pilot evaluation of a brief targeted online education module (TRIO-Conflict)

OBJECTIVE

Given the stressful and emotional nature of cancer, challenging interactions between nurses, patients, and family frequently occur. Nurses are rarely equipped with strategies to avoid or de-escalate stressful situations with carers, which can include displays of conflict, anger, or dominance. A brief online education module (TRIO-Conflict) was developed to provide nurses with management strategies to use in situations of conflict. This study aimed to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and potential efficacy of TRIO-Conflict.

METHODS

Nurses were recruited through an Australian breast cancer organisation (McGrath Foundation). Participants completed pre/post module measures of attitudes towards carers, confidence in their skills to effectively navigate challenging interactions with carers, and applied knowledge of management strategies. Data were analysed using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Qualitative feedback was analysed using content analysis.

RESULTS

52 nurses completed pre-/post- measures, with 4 semi-structured interviews conducted. Significant improvements in attitudes towards carers (p = .010) and confidence in one's own ability to manage challenging interactions with carers (p < .001) were found, but not knowledge of strategies. Most nurses found TRIO-Conflict very/extremely helpful (87%) and were satisfied with content (94%) and usability (93%).

CONCLUSION

TRIO-Conflict utilised evidence-based learning techniques (provision of example phrases, video vignettes, reflective exercises) to improve nurses attitudes and confidence.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

TRIO-Conflict is a brief, targeted, clinically relevant, and easily accessible online training programme which could be widely disseminated to oncology nurses.