Consensus guidelines for the management of adult immune thrombocytopenia in Australia and New Zealand

Efficacy and safety of a new 10% intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) in Chinese patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP): a multicenter, single-arm, phase III trial

A novel, highly purified 10% intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) formulation was evaluated for both therapeutic efficacy and safety profile in adult patients diagnosed with persistent or chronic primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). This phase III, multicenter, open-label, single-arm clinical trial enrolled Chinese adult patients diagnosed with persistent or chronic ITP presenting with baseline platelet counts below 30 × 109/L. Participants received intravenous administration of 10% IVIG at a standardized dosage of 1 g/kg/day for two consecutive days. The primary efficacy endpoint was defined as the proportion of subjects achieving both a platelet count elevation to ≥ 30 × 109/L and a minimum two-fold increase from baseline values within a 7-day post-treatment observation period following the first dose administration. Seventy-two patients were enrolled and sixty patients completed the study. 52 (72.2%; 95% CI: 60.4, 82.1) patients achieved platelet count ≥ 30 × 109/L and experienced a ≥ twofold increase from baseline within 7 days, and 52 (72.2%; 95% CI: 60.4, 82.1) patients achieved complete response (CR) or response (R) within 7 days. 64 patients (88.9%; 95% CI: 79.3, 95.1) achieved platelet count ≥ 50 × 109/L within 7 days with a median time of 3 days. 71 patients completed the ITP bleeding scale assessment after 7 days, showing a decrease of 0.6 ± 1.07 from baseline. A total of 66 patients (91.7%) reported treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) during the study, and 37 patients (51.4%) reported adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The most prevalent ADRs with an incidence exceeding 5% included headache (n = 12, 16.7%), fever (n = 10, 13.9%), decreased white blood cell count (n = 5, 6.9%), and nausea (n = 5, 6.9%). The therapeutic regimen of 10% IVIG administered at a dosage of 1 g/kg/day for two consecutive days demonstrated both favorable safety profiles and clinical efficacy. These robust findings provide substantial evidence supporting the clinical application of this novel 10% IVIG formulation in the management of adult patients with ITP.

Treatment of Critical Bleeds in Patients With Immune Thrombocytopenia: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

Evidence-based protocols for managing bleeding emergencies in patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) are lacking. We conducted a systematic review of treatments for critical bleeding in patients with ITP.

METHODS

We included all study designs and extracted data in aggregate or individually for patients who received one or more interventions and for whom any of the following outcomes were reported: platelet count response, bleeding, disability, or death.

RESULTS

We identified 49 eligible studies reporting 112 critical bleed patients with ITP, including 66 children (median age, 10 years), 36 adults (median age, 41.5 years), and 10 patients with unreported age. Patients received corticosteroids (n = 67), IVIG (n = 49), platelet transfusions (n = 41), TPO-RAs (n = 17), and splenectomy (n = 28) either alone or in combination. Studies reported 29 different treatment combinations, the 5 most common were corticosteroids, platelet transfusion and splenectomy (n = 13), corticosteroids and IVIG (n = 13), or splenectomy alone (n = 13); IVIG alone (n = 11); and corticosteroids, IVIG and TPO-RA (n = 8). Mortality among patients with critical bleeds in ITP was 30.6% for adults and 19.7% for children.

CONCLUSIONS

The effects of individual treatments on patient outcomes were uncertain due to very low-quality evidence. There is a need for a standardized approach to the treatment of ITP critical bleeds.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

CRD42020161206.

Autoimmune Thrombocytopenia in Pregnancy: Insights from an Uncommon Case Presentation and Mini-Review

Thrombocytopenia, defined as a platelet count below 150 × 109/L, is the second most common hematological abnormality after anemia found among European women in the third trimester of pregnancy. Most of the cases are mild, asymptomatic, and diagnosed accidentally. The primary causes of thrombocytopenia are linked to the pregnancy itself and include gestational thrombocytopenia (GT), autoimmune thrombocytopenia (ITP), and pre-eclampsia or HELLP syndrome-associated thrombocytopenia. First-line therapies for ITP include corticosteroids and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). We came across a case of severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count of 9 × 109/L) associated with severe anemia (Hb 5.9 g/dL) at 30 weeks of gestation, with no personal or family history of bleeding disorders. A comprehensive hematologic, infectious, and rheumatological workup was performed to narrow the diagnosis. Despite aggressive corticosteroid therapy and immunoglobulin treatment, the patient's thrombocytopenia persisted, imposing delivery at 34 weeks. This article highlights the complex presentation and management of severe thrombocytopenia and anemia during pregnancy.

Real-life clinical practice in Spain in the setting of new drug availability for ITP treatment. A Delphi-based Spanish expert panel consensus

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is a common autoimmune hematological disorder. Despite this, diagnosis is still challenging due to clinical heterogeneity and the lack of a specific diagnostic test. New findings in the pathology and the availability of new drugs have led to the development of different guidelines worldwide. In the present study, the Delphi methodology has been used to get a consensus on the management of adult patients with ITP in Spain and to help in decision-making. The Delphi questionnaire has been designed by a scientific ad hoc committee and has been divided into 13 topics, with a total of 127 items, covering the maximum possible scenarios for the management of ITP. As a result of the study, a total consensus of 81% has been reached. It is concluded that this Delphi consensus provides practical recommendations on topics related to diagnosis and management of ITP patients to help doctors to improve outcomes. Some aspects remain unclear, without consensus among the experts. Thus, more advances are needed to optimize ITP management.

Desialylation and Apoptosis in Immune Thrombocytopenia: Implications for Pathogenesis and Treatment

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune disease in which platelet autoantibodies play a significant role in its pathogenesis. Regulatory T cell dysfunction and T cell-mediated cytotoxicity also contribute to thrombocytopenia. Current therapies are directed towards immune suppression and modulation as well as stimulation of platelet production with thrombopoietin receptor agonists. Additional mechanisms of the pathogenesis of ITP have been suggested by recent experimental data. One of these processes, known as desialylation, involves antibody-induced removal of terminal sialic acid residues on platelet surface glycoproteins, leading to hepatic platelet uptake and thrombocytopenia. Apoptosis, or programmed platelet death, may also contribute to the pathogenesis of ITP. The extent of the impact of desialylation and apoptosis on ITP, the relative proportion of patients affected, and the role of antibody specificity are still the subject of investigation. This review will discuss both historical and new evidence of the influence of desialylation and apoptosis in the pathogenesis of ITP, with an emphasis on the clinical implications of these developments. Further understanding of both platelet desialylation and apoptosis might change current clinical practice and improve patient outcomes.

Platelet Responses After Tapering and Discontinuation of Fostamatinib in Patients with Immune Thrombocytopenia: A Continuation of the Fostasur Study

Background/objectives: Fostamatinib is a spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK) inhibitor approved for the treatment of adult patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). There is little information about dose tapering and sustained remission after discontinuation in ITP. In this retrospective multicenter study, we evaluated efficacy and safety of fostamatinib in adult patients with ITP before, during, and after tapering/discontinuation (T/D). Methods: T/D was performed on subjects who achieved complete platelet response (CR) with progressive, conditional dose reduction every four weeks. Results: Sixty-one patients were included from 14 reference centers between October 2021 and May 2023. In subjects that completed T/D (n = 9), the median time from treatment initiation to response was 21 days (IQR: 7.5-42), median time from treatment initiation to CR was 28 days (IQR: 28-42), median time from treatment initiation to the start of tapering was 116 days (IQR: 42-140), and duration of tapering was 112.5 days (IQR: 94.5-191). The median platelet count was 232 × 109/L (IQR: 152-345 × 109/L) at tapering and 190 × 109/L (IQR: 142.5-316.5 × 109/L) at discontinuation. With a median follow-up since discontinuation of 263 days (IQR: 247-313 days), only two patients have relapsed (at 63 and 73 days). Fostamatinib was restarted, achieving a new CR. Platelet counts higher than 100 × 109/L in week 12 were the only positive predictive factors for successful tapering and discontinuation. Conclusions: Sustained response in patient with ITP treated with fostamatinib could be developed. The prognostic factors and recommended scheme of tapering still have to be evaluated.

The immune thrombocytopenia paradox: Should we be concerned about thrombosis in ITP?

Despite the predisposition to bleeding, patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) may also have an increased risk of arterial and venous thrombosis, which can contribute to significant morbidity. The risk of thrombosis increases with age and the presence of cardiovascular risk factors. This narrative review explores the multifactorial nature of thrombosis in ITP, focusing on new pathological mechanisms, emerging evidence on the association between established treatments and thrombotic risk, the role of novel treatment approaches, and the challenges in assessing the balance between bleeding and thrombosis in ITP. The review also explores the challenges in managing acute thrombotic events in ITP, since the platelet count does not always reliably predict either the risk of bleeding or thrombosis and antithrombotic strategies lack specific guidelines for ITP. Notably, second-line therapeutic options, such as splenectomy and thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs), exhibit an increased risk of thrombosis especially in older individuals or those with multiple thrombotic risk factors or previous thrombosis, emphasizing the importance of careful risk assessment before treatment selection. In this context, it is important to consider second-line therapies such as rituximab and other immunosuppressive agents, dapsone and fostamatinib, which are not associated with increased thrombotic risk. In particular, fostamatinib, an oral spleen tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has promisingly low thrombotic risk. During the current era of the emergence of several novel ITP therapies that do not pose additional risks for thrombosis, it is critical to outline evidence-based strategies for the prevention and treatment of thrombosis in ITP patients.

Recombinant human thrombopoietin therapy for primary immune thrombocytopenia in pregnancy: a retrospective comparative cohort study

BACKGROUND

Treatment options for pregnant women with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) who do not respond to first-line treatment are limited. Few studies have reported the use of recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO) for this subset of patients.

AIMS

To investigate the efficacy and safety of rhTPO in ITP during pregnancy and determine obstetric outcomes and predictors of treatment response.

METHODS

From July 2013 to October 2022, the data of 81 pregnant women with ITP and a platelet count < 30 × 109/L who did not respond to steroids and/or intravenous immunoglobulin were retrospectively analysed. Of these patients, 33 received rhTPO treatment (rhTPO group) while 48 did not (control group). Baseline characteristics, haematological disease outcomes before delivery, obstetric outcomes, and adverse events were compared between groups. In the rhTPO group, a generalised estimating equation (GEE) was used to investigate the factors influencing the response to rhTPO treatment.

RESULTS

The baseline characteristics were comparable between both groups (P > 0.05, both). Compared with controls, rhTPO patients had higher platelet counts (median [interquartile range]: 42 [21.5-67.5] vs. 25 [19-29] × 109/L, P = 0.002), lower bleeding rate (6.1% vs. 25%, P = 0.027), and lower platelet transfusion rate before delivery (57.6% vs. 97.9%, P < 0.001). Gestational weeks of delivery (37.6 [37-38.4] vs 37.1 [37-37.2] weeks, P = 0.001) were longer in the rhTPO group than in the control group. The rates of caesarean section, postpartum haemorrhage, foetal or neonatal complications, and complication types in both groups were similar (all P > 0.05). No liver or renal function impairment or thrombosis cases were observed in the rhTPO group. GEE analysis revealed that the baseline mean platelet volume (MPV) (odds ratio [OR]: 0.522, P = 0.002) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) (OR: 1.214, P = 0.025) were predictors of response to rhTPO treatment.

CONCLUSION

rhTPO may be an effective and safe treatment option for pregnancies with ITP that do not respond to first-line treatment; it may have slightly prolonged the gestational age of delivery. Patients with a low baseline MPV and high baseline PLR may be more responsive to rhTPO treatment. The present study serves as a foundation for future research.

Recommendations for the Clinical Approach to Immune Thrombocytopenia: Spanish ITP Working Group (GEPTI)

Primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is a complex autoimmune disease whose hallmark is a deregulation of cellular and humoral immunity leading to increased destruction and reduced production of platelets. The heterogeneity of presentation and clinical course hampers personalized approaches for diagnosis and management. In 2021, the Spanish ITP Group (GEPTI) of the Spanish Society of Hematology and Hemotherapy (SEHH) updated a consensus document that had been launched in 2011. The updated guidelines have been the reference for the diagnosis and management of primary ITP in Spain ever since. Nevertheless, the emergence of new tools and strategies makes it advisable to review them again. For this reason, we have updated the main recommendations appropriately. Our aim is to provide a practical tool to facilitate the integral management of all aspects of primary ITP management.

Is splenectomy a good strategy for refractory immune thrombocytopenia in adults?

Rituximab and thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) have profoundly changed the management of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) over the last 20 years. Even if most current guidelines put splenectomy, rituximab and TPO-RAs on the same treatment level, most clinicians and patients clearly prefer to postpone splenectomy and to multiply the lines of medical treatment before considering surgery. The management of ITP refractory to rituximab and TPO-RAs is challenging. Splenectomy is currently performed much less frequently because of a better knowledge of its complications, particularly severe late infections and deep vein thrombosis, and the inability to reliably predict its effectiveness. Furthermore, there is a reluctance to propose splenectomy when other treatments have been ineffective, based on the not well-documented risk that splenectomy could not be effective in such a case. The objective of this update was to review the most recent published data on the long-term tolerability and side effects of splenectomy and the predictors of response and efficacy, especially for patients exposed to multiple medical lines. This update can help physicians and patients with failure of multiple lines of therapy make an informed decision on the indication for splenectomy with the help of up-to-date data.

Efficacy and Safety Analysis of Combination Therapy Consisting of Intravenous Immunoglobulin and Corticosteroids versus Respective Monotherapies in the Treatment of Relapsed ITP in Adults

Objective  In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination therapy, consisting of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) and corticosteroids, in comparison to respective monotherapies in the treatment of relapsed immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in adults. Methods  A retrospective analysis of clinical data was conducted on 205 adult patients with relapsed ITP who received first-line combination therapy or monotherapy in multiple centers across China from January 2010 to December 2022. The study evaluated the patients' clinical characteristics, efficacy, and safety. Results  We found that the proportion of patients with platelet counts in complete response was significantly higher in the combination group (71.83%) compared with the IVIg group (43.48%) and the corticosteroids group (23.08%). The mean PLT _max in the combination group (178 × 10 ⁹ /L) was significantly higher than that in the IVIg group (109 × 10 ⁹ /L) and the corticosteroids group (76 × 10 ⁹ /L). Additionally, the average time for platelet counts to reach 30 × 10 ⁹ /L, 50 × 10 ⁹ /L, and 100 × 10 ⁹ /L in the combination group was significantly shorter than in the monotherapy groups. The proportion curves for reaching these platelet counts during treatment were also significantly different from those in the monotherapy groups. However, there were no significant differences in the effective rate, clinical characteristics, and adverse events among the three groups. Conclusion  We concluded that combining IVIg and corticosteroids was a more effective and faster treatment for relapsed ITP in adults than using either therapy alone. The findings of this study provided clinical evidence and reference for the use of first-line combination therapy in the treatment of relapsed ITP in adults.

Immune thrombocytopenia and COVID-19 vaccination: Outcomes and comparisons to prepandemic patients

Background

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) has been reported following COVID-19 vaccination. After index case fatalities, there was concern among patients both with and without a prior history of ITP in Australia.

Objectives

To describe treatment outcomes of ITP after COVID-19 vaccination and compare relapsed vs historical pre-COVID-19 ITP cohorts.

Methods

We collected ITP cases in Australia within 6 weeks of receiving any COVID-19 vaccination as part of primary vaccination (up to October 17, 2021). Second, we reviewed platelet charts in a historical ITP cohort to determine whether platelet variability was distinct from relapsed ITP after vaccination.

Results

We report on 50 patients (37 de novo, 13 relapsed ITP) vaccinated from March 22, 2021, to October 17, 2021. Although there was 1 fatality, bleeding was otherwise mostly minor: (70% WHO bleeding grade <2). De novo ITP was more likely after AstraZeneca ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (89%) than Pfizer BNT162b2 (11%). Most patients responded quickly (median, 4 days; complete response, 40 of 45 [89%]). In the historical cohort, only 6 of 47 patients exhibited platelet variability (>50% decrease and platelets <100 × 10⁹/L), but median platelet nadir was significantly higher than vaccination relapse (27 vs 6 × 10⁹/L, P =.005).

Conclusion

ITP was more frequently reported after AstraZeneca ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 than Pfizer BNT162b2 vaccination. Standard ITP treatments remain highly effective for de novo and relapsed ITP (96%). Although thrombocytopenia can be severe after vaccination, bleeding is usually mild. Despite some sampling bias, our data do not support a change in treatment strategies for patients with ITP after vaccination.

Recommendations on the Management of Patients with Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP) in the Context of SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Vaccination: Consensus Guidelines from a Spanish ITP Expert Group

Primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an acquired autoimmune disease with highly variable presentation, characteristics, and clinical course. Thrombocytopenia is a common complication of many viral infections, including SARS-CoV-2. In addition, both de novo ITP and exacerbation of ITP after vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 have been reported. Patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 develop a prothrombotic coagulopathy called COVID-19-associated coagulopathy (CAC). In addition, autoimmune hematological disorders secondary to SARS-CoV-2 infection, mainly ITP and autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA), have been described. Furthermore, SARS-CoV-2 infection has been associated with exacerbation of autoimmune processes, including ITP. In fact, there is evidence of a high relapse rate in patients with preexisting ITP and COVID-19. As for vaccination against SARS-CoV-2, hematological adverse events (HAE) are practically anecdotal. The most common HAE is thrombocytopenia-associated thrombosis syndrome (TTS) linked to vectored virus vaccines. Other HAEs are very rare, but should be considered in patients with previous complement activation disease or autoimmunity. In patients with ITP who are vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2, the main complication is exacerbation of ITP and the bleeding that may result. In fact, this complication occurs in 12% of patients, with splenectomized and refractory patients with more than five lines of previous treatment and platelet counts below 50 × 10⁹/L being the most vulnerable. We conclude that, in general, there is no greater risk of severe SARS-CoV-2 infection in ITP patients than in the general population. Furthermore, no changes are advised in patients with stable ITP, the use of immunosuppressants is discouraged unless there is no other therapeutic option, and patients with ITP are not contraindicated for vaccination against COVID-19.

Treatment of immune thrombocytopenia in Australian adults: A multicenter retrospective observational study

Background

In Australia, prescribing restrictions limit access to internationally recommended second-line therapies such as rituximab and thrombopoietin agonists (TPO-A) (eltrombopag and romiplostim). Subsequent lines of therapy include an array of immunosuppressive and immune-modulating agents directed by drug availability and physician and patient preference.

Objectives

The objective of the study was to describe the use of first and subsequent lines of treatment for adult immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in Australia and to assess their effectiveness and tolerability.

Patients/Methods

A retrospective review of medical records was conducted of 322 patients treated for ITP at eight participating centers in Australia between 2013 and 2020. Data were analyzed by descriptive statistics and frequency distribution using pivot tables, and comparisons between centers were assessed using paired t tests.

Results

Mean age at diagnosis of ITP was 48.8 years (standard deviation [SD], 22.6) and 58.3% were women. Primary ITP was observed in 72% and secondary ITP in 28% of the patients; 95% of patients received first-line treatment with prednisolone (76%), dexamethasone (15%), or intravenous immunoglobulin (48%) alone or in combination. Individuals with secondary ITP were less steroid dependent (72% vs. 76%) and required less treatment with a second-line agent (47% vs. 58%) in the study sample. Over half (56%) of the cohort received treatment with one or more second-line agents. The mean number of second-line agents used for each patient was 1.9 (SD, 1.2). The most used second-line therapy was rituximab, followed by etrombopag and splenectomy. These also generated the highest rates of complete response (60.3%, 72.1%, and 71.8% respectively). The most unfavorable side effect profiles were seen in long-term corticosteroids and splenectomy.

Conclusion

A wide range of "second-line" agents were used across centers with variable response rates and side effect profiles. Findings suggest greater effectiveness of rituximab and TPO-A, supporting their use earlier in the treatment course of patients with ITP across Australia.