Cancer symptom management in the home: A scoping review

A rapid review of patient-reported outcomes investigated in the context of advanced renal cell cancer or advanced hepatocellular cancer

BACKGROUND

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are key indicators of health status and functioning, coming directly from the patient. Comprehensive monitoring of PROs enables implementation of person-centred care. Currently, the PROs that patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) consider of greatest importance remains unknown.

METHODS

A rapid literature review was carried out to identify PROs commonly reported in clinical studies of patients with advanced RCC/HCC. We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL & PsycInfo for relevant peer-reviewed publications in the period from 2000 to 2021. Pre-specified selection criteria were applied to all retrieved records. Findings were integrated into a narrative synthesis.

RESULTS

Eighty-one studies met our selection criteria and were retained. Most research was on advanced RCC (n = 64, 79%); 46 studies (57%) were drug trials. Only twenty-six studies (32%) employed PROs as their primary endpoint. Most PROs concerned physical symptoms (45% RCC, 54% HCC) and emotional wellbeing (19% RCC, 16% HCC). The most common outcome measured was quality of life (65% of the total), followed by fatigue (62%) and pain (54%). Whether selection of these PROs was patient-driven was not reported.

CONCLUSIONS

A wide range of PROs were assessed. Deficits in PROs often cause patients to seek out help; however, which PROs matter the most to people with advanced RCC/HCC must be further clarified. Targeting, monitoring, and responding to the 'right' PROs can enhance provision of person-centred care in advanced RCC/HCC and augment the clinical efficacy of established and emerging targeted therapies.

The Relationship Between Health Literacy and Illness Self-Care Management in Turkish Patients With Cancer

OBJECTIVES

To determine the relationship between health literacy and illness self-care management in individuals with cancer.

SAMPLE & SETTING

207 individuals with cancer undergoing treatment in the chemotherapy unit of a university hospital in Istanbul, Turkey.

METHODS & VARIABLES

Data were collected using a sociodemographic and illness characteristics questionnaire, the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire-Turkish Version (HLS-EU-Q-TR), and the Self-Care Management Process in Chronic Illness. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, one-way analysis of variance, student t test, Pearson correlation test, and multiple regression analysis.

RESULTS

86% of individuals displayed an inadequate or problematic to limited level of health literacy. Extended family status and HLS-EU-Q-TR score were significant predictors of self-care management.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

Nurses can organize health programs designed to improve the level of health literacy in the population, but they should take into consideration the health literacy levels of their patients.

Unmet home healthcare needs and quality of life in cancer patients: a hospital-based Turkish sample

Home healthcare services in Turkey are provided primarily to patients that are bedridden or seriously disabled. There are no such services integrated with hospital services that are specifically designed for cancer patients. The present study aimed to explore the home healthcare needs of cancer patients and their experiences related to unmet home healthcare needs. The study included 394 adult cancer patients who were followed up at the surgical oncology department of a university hospital. A 37-item, study-specific questionnaire and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for cancer patients (EORTC-QLQ-C30) were administered, and patient clinical records were evaluated. Home healthcare was provided primarily by the patients' immediate family members; the professional home healthcare usage rate was only 2.8%. Patient quality of life (QoL) was negatively affected by cancer, especially those with stage three and four disease. The frequency of the need for home healthcare services due to disease-related health problems during the 30 days prior to administration of the questionnaires was as follows: pain (62.9%), surgical wound care (44.9%), injection of therapeutics (52.3%), gastrointestinal complaints (51.8%), anxiety (87.1%), psychosocial assistance (77.2%) and information about cancer (94.4%). In the absence of home healthcare services, the patients primarily used institutional healthcare services to meet their needs; otherwise, their needs were not met. The physical and psychosocial problems that cancer patients experience could be solved in most cases by professional home healthcare services. Hospital-integrated home healthcare services might not only improve cancer patient QoL but might also increase the effectiveness of hospital-based healthcare services.

Managing Symptoms During Cancer Treatments: Barriers and Facilitators to Home Care Nurses Using Symptom Practice Guides

Nurses are instrumental in helping clients safely manage at home and triage potentially life-threatening symptoms from cancer. The purpose of this study was to assess factors influencing home care nurses’ use of 15 evidence-informed symptom practice guides for providing telephone or in-home nursing services to clients with cancer. A mixed-methods descriptive study was guided by the Knowledge-to-Action Framework. All six nursing agencies within a regional home care authority participated. Data collection included retrospective audit of symptom management in 50 patient records, 14 interviews, and barriers survey from 150 of 243 (61.7%) registered nurses and registered practical nurses providing cancer symptom support in home care. Chart audit revealed more than 80% of clients were on chemotherapy and common symptoms were nausea/vomiting (44%), constipation (32%), fatigue (32%), loss of appetite (32%), and pain (20%). Nurses had positive intentions ( M = 5.4 out of 7; SD = 1.3) and felt capable of using the symptom practice guides ( M = 5.4; SD = 1.0), held strong beliefs about the consequences ( M = 5.8; SD = 1.1) and moral norms of using them ( M = 5.7; SD = 1.1), and identified neutral to low social influence ( M = 3.0; SD = 1.6). Common barriers were inadequate time in practice, learning curve, need to integrate into documentation, and competing system changes. Common facilitators were being comprehensive, an evidence-based resource for use in practice, and having consistent symptom management guides across settings. Overall, the symptom guides were well received by the nurses. Interventions nurses identified to overcome barriers were education, clear organizational mandate for implementation, and integration with documentation.