Kitagawa M, Ichikawa D, Komatsu S, Okamoto K, Shiozaki A, Fujiwara H, Murayama Y, Kuriu Y, Ikoma H, Nakanishi M, Ochiai T, Kokuba Y, Sonoyama T, Otsuji E. Evaluation of lymph node metastasis in patients with gastric cancer: a comparison of the directionality of lymph node metastasis and the total number of metastatic lymph nodes.
Surg Today 2012;
43:130-5. [PMID:
23232554 DOI:
10.1007/s00595-012-0454-8]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2010] [Accepted: 04/01/2011] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE
The clinical impact of the directionality of lymph node (LN) metastasis was assessed in comparison with the staging by the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma (JCGC), a numerical LN staging system.
METHODS
Two hundred forty-one gastric cancer patients who were diagnosed pathologically to have LN metastasis, and 54 patients who underwent preoperative multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) with an image thickness of 1 mm were classified into three groups (unidirectional [Uni-], bidirectional [Bi-], and tridirectional [Tri-] groups) depending on the directionality of their LN metastasis.
RESULTS
The prognosis of the Uni-group was better than that of the Bi- or the Tri-group when assessed on the basis of the pathological findings of metastatic LN and also the preoperative MDCT findings. The exact preoperative evaluation was 70.2 % for the directionality system and 61.7 % for the JCGC system, respectively. The stages were less frequently underestimated by the directionality system than the JCGC system (P < 0.02, 19.1 vs. 34.0 %), and the staging could be more precisely performed by both systems in combination.
CONCLUSIONS
More precise preoperative evaluation of disease stage could be obtained by the directionality system and the JCGC system in combination.
Collapse