Clinical Manifestations of Symptomatic Spontaneous Dissection of the Celiac and Superior Mesenteric Arteries

Clinical characteristics and impact of pseudo-lumen blood flow on long-term vessel dilatation in spontaneous isolated dissection of superior mesenteric/celiac artery

This study aimed to identify the clinical characteristics associated with spontaneous isolated dissection of superior mesenteric artery/celiac artery (SIDSMA/SIDCA). This observational study, conducted at Toranomon Hospital, Japan between 2009 and 2020, analyzed consecutive SIDSMA/SIDCA cases based on radiology data. The study compared clinical characteristics between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with SIDSMA/SIDCA and investigated factors related to future vessel dilatation. Among 57 cases (44 SIDSMA, 17 SIDCA, and 4 both), the majority were male (87.7%), nearly half having hypertension (43.9%) and smokers (48.9%). Of those, 17 cases (29.8%) were symptomatic; abdominal pain (94.1%), back pain (23.5%), nausea (17.6%) and fever (5.9%). The symptomatic group was younger (52.6 ± 9.4 versus 67.2 ± 7.9 years, P < 0.001), had higher systolic and mean blood pressure (142.6 ± 20.0 versus 129.5 ± 16.5 mmHg, P = 0.017; 96.1 ± 14.6 versus 88.2 ± 17.7 mmHg, P = 0.038), a higher white blood cell count (9975 ± 5032 versus 6268 ± 1991 /µL, P = 0.012), and a higher LDL cholesterol level at diagnosis (129.7 ± 21.7 versus 87.2 ± 25.6 mg/dL, P = 0.002) than the asymptomatic group. The factors associated with future vessel dilatation included the presence of pseudo-lumen flow in the dissection vessel (73.9% versus 41.4%, p = 0.019) and a larger vessel diameter (13.5 ± 2.4 mm versus 11.5 ± 2.1 mm, p = 0.005) at diagnosis after multiple adjustments, pseudo-lumen flow was a predictor of future vessel dilatation (odds ratio, 4.80; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-20.75; p = 0.036). The study revealed that only 30% of SIDSMA/SIDCA cases were symptomatic. Symptomatic cases were generally younger and exhibited higher blood pressure and elevated white blood cell counts. These findings offer valuable insights for the acute diagnosis of SIDSMA/SIDCA.

Spontaneous Celiac Artery Dissection with Splenic Infarction: A Report of Two Cases

Spontaneous isolated celiac artery dissection (SICAD) is a rare condition that is characterized by sudden onset abdominal pain, typically occurring in middle-aged men. Although its clinical course is mostly benign, it may progress to true lumen occlusion. No established therapeutic guidelines are available for SICAD associated with splenic infarction. This report describes two patients who presented with sudden onset abdominal pain and were diagnosed with SICAD with splenic infarction based on computed tomography (CT) findings. Patients were treated with bowel rest and anticoagulants. After a week of medical therapy, the abdominal pain resolved. Follow-up CT revealed no progression of the dissection flap. The patients received oral anticoagulants for 3 months and did not experience any symptom recurrence. Medical therapy with anticoagulants may be considered for patients with SICAD and splenic infarction. Associated splenic infarction itself is not an indication for endovascular or surgical intervention for SICAD.

General features, management strategies, and outcomes of symptomatic spontaneous isolated celiac artery dissection

Objectives

Spontaneous isolated celiac artery dissection (SICAD) is a rare condition that has not been fully investigated and reported, and very little is known regarding its prognosis and management. Here, we aimed to provide more evidence on the management strategy and outcome for symptomatic SICAD based on the experience of a single center.

Methods

From January 2018 to December 2021, a total of consecutive 51 patients with symptomatic SICAD were retrospectively included in this study. These patients had been selectively treated with conservative treatment (n = 31) or endovascular treatment (n = 20). Baseline data, imaging findings, treatment strategy, outcomes, and follow-up data have been described and analyzed.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 53.2 ± 9.6 years, 44 (86.3%) were male, and 36 (70.6%) had hypertension. The median length of stay was 10.0 days. The complete remission rate was 92.2% on discharge. The median follow-up time was 21.0 months. A secondary intervention was required for two patients during follow-up in the conservative group, wherein one underwent a stent placement three months after discharge because of progression of symptoms and extension of dissection, and the other required intervention one month after discharge because of symptomatic progression. No secondary intervention was required in the endovascular group. Occasional and mild relapse of symptoms occurred in two patients in both the conservative and endovascular groups, with no secondary intervention. The length of dissection (25.5 ± 11.8 mm vs. 19.1 ± 7.4 mm, P = 0.022) and complete remodeling rate (85.7% vs. 15.4%, P < 0.001) in the endovascular group were greater than that in the conservative group.

Conclusion

Patients with symptomatic SICAD who were selectively treated with conservative treatment or endovascular treatment had satisfactory early and medium-term outcomes. Endovascular treatment showed significant advantages in the complete remodeling of the celiac artery and presented with a lower rate of secondary intervention. Moreover, it was found to be a safe and effective remedy for failed conservative treatment.